Hi
On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 12:48 PM, drago01 wrote: > > Well the FPCA seem to talk about this if someone that didn't sign it > sent you a patch all he/she has to do is to provide it under an > "acceptable license". > Yes but we artificially make it seem like FPCA is a requirement even when it isn't https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/board-discuss/2011-June/010792.html Rahul
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
