On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 11:24:01AM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
> I haven't seen any efforts from Claudio or whosoever to rebuild all
> mono packages (it's a MUST as Mono is not a _small_ package, he could
> use koji or his personal computer to do that) and feedback the results
> (most of status
On 08/21/2014 09:17 AM, Dan Horák wrote:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014 17:27:39 -0600
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Just thought I would drop a quick note to the list about the status of
various things, at least as I know them. ;)
First, astute readers will note that we were scheduled to go into
freeze for f21 ye
Christopher,
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 4:24 AM, Christopher Meng wrote:
> I haven't seen any efforts from Claudio or whosoever to rebuild all
> mono packages (it's a MUST as Mono is not a _small_ package, he could
> use koji or his personal computer to do that) and feedback the results
> (most of s
Hi everyone,
I'm mainly working on the OpenStack Ceilometer project, so I'll be trying to
make sure its dependencies are packaged and maintained in Fedora!
For a start, I'm working on getting a Python Zookeeper library, kazoo, packaged
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1125841). I'll
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 8:40 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> We've been using git repos for packages since 2010. We don't use
> tags. Mostly because that would require koji to write back to the
> SCM, which it doesn't do. It does log which sha1sum it built the
> SRPM/RPM from though, and that is immut
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 7:41 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 8:40 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>
>> We've been using git repos for packages since 2010. We don't use
>> tags. Mostly because that would require koji to write back to the
>> SCM, which it doesn't do. It does log whi
Hi,
The xtrace package has been renamed to the x11trace package due to a collision
with the name of a glibc tool. The xtrace package should now be removed from
Fedora.
I can see a "fedpkg retire" option for removing it from Rawhide, but is it
possible to remove it now from F21 and earlier?
Davi
David Howells wrote:
> I can see a "fedpkg retire" option for removing it from Rawhide
Which doesn't work, possibly due to a script error:
ERROR:rpkg:Could not retire package: 'Namespace' object has no
attribute 'msg'
David
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://
David Howells wrote:
> > I can see a "fedpkg retire" option for removing it from Rawhide
>
> Which doesn't work, possibly due to a script error:
>
> ERROR:rpkg:Could not retire package: 'Namespace' object has no
> attribute 'msg'
Fixed in fedpkg-1.18-1 (bz 1107646).
David
--
devel mai
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 02:13:43PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> David Howells wrote:
>
> > > I can see a "fedpkg retire" option for removing it from Rawhide
> >
> > Which doesn't work, possibly due to a script error:
> >
> > ERROR:rpkg:Could not retire package: 'Namespace' object has no
>
As requested on this ticket, I'm opening this up for discussion.
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1332
There's a proposal to retire packages quite quickly (I think) after
they are orphaned. At the moment packages are retired once per
release. A notice is posted on devel list, see for exampl
2014-08-21 16:11 GMT+02:00 Richard W.M. Jones :
> As requested on this ticket, I'm opening this up for discussion.
> https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1332
>
> There's a proposal to retire packages quite quickly (I think) after
> they are orphaned. At the moment packages are retired once per
>
On Thu, 21 Aug 2014 04:09:02 +0200
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 08:33:55PM -0500, Jerry Vonau wrote:
> > Hi All:
> >
> > I'd like to point out that there are images/livecd's that are
> > failing to build for rawhide[1]. With the change
> > in /etc/resolv.conf hand
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 04:19:17PM +0200, Haïkel wrote:
> > (c) An orphaned package is not necessarily a risk ("security" has been
> > mentioned here ...). Just because it might be a risk on rare
> > occasions doesn't mean we have to throw out every orphaned package.
> > Security bugs can sit arou
On Thu, 21 Aug 2014 15:11:53 +0100
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
...snip...
First to be clear, I am not sure I really care one way or the other on
this proposal, but happy to try and add more information... ;)
> (a) The reason for wanting packages to be retired so quickly has not
> been made cle
2014-08-21 16:23 GMT+02:00 Matthew Miller :
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 04:19:17PM +0200, Haïkel wrote:
>> > (c) An orphaned package is not necessarily a risk ("security" has been
>> > mentioned here ...). Just because it might be a risk on rare
>> > occasions doesn't mean we have to throw out every
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2014-08-21 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. rktime):
2014-08-21 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PDT
2014-08-21 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EDT
2014-08-21 1
Hello,
- Original Message -
> As requested on this ticket, I'm opening this up for discussion.
> https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1332
> (a) The reason for wanting packages to be retired so quickly has not
> been made clear by rel-eng.
My reading of the ticket gives two reasons:
* Ma
On 08/21/2014 04:31 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Thu, 21 Aug 2014 15:11:53 +0100
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
...snip...
First to be clear, I am not sure I really care one way or the other on
this proposal, but happy to try and add more information... ;)
(a) The reason for wanting packages to be
On Thu, 21 Aug 2014 16:52:37 +0200
Haïkel wrote:
> 2014-08-21 16:23 GMT+02:00 Matthew Miller :
> > On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 04:19:17PM +0200, Haïkel wrote:
> >> > (c) An orphaned package is not necessarily a risk ("security"
> >> > has been mentioned here ...). Just because it might be a risk
> >
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> The recent mass rebuild for glibc/gcc fixes finished monday. However,
> it was discovered that there was a rpm bug present for the last ~1300 or
> so builds in the mass rebuild. This bug would cause packages that
> override provides/requires to
On Thu, 21 Aug 2014 11:19:52 +0300
Panu Matilainen wrote:
> Was about to post this separately but since there's already a
> relevant thread...
>
> There's another package generation affecting bug, present in
> 4.12.0-0.beta1.3 and 4.12.0-0.beta1.4. Any packages containing
> triggers which have
On Thu, 21 Aug 2014 08:31:36 -0700
quickbooks office wrote:
> Wouldn't it be better / safer to just to do the mass rebuild all over
> again for all the packages?
That would be a lot of waste. Only a small subset of packages are
affected. Why shouldn't we just rebuild the ones that are affected?
On 08/21/2014 06:31 PM, quickbooks office wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
The recent mass rebuild for glibc/gcc fixes finished monday. However,
it was discovered that there was a rpm bug present for the last ~1300 or
so builds in the mass rebuild. This bug would cause
> On August 21, 2014 at 9:21 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 21 Aug 2014 04:09:02 +0200
> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 08:33:55PM -0500, Jerry Vonau wrote:
> > > Hi All:
> > >
> > > I'd like to point out that there are images/livecd's that are
> > > faili
Hi,
I'm working with a fedora 19 vm but that for some reason cant enable
services with systemctl.
[root@node0001 /]# systemctl status httpd.service
httpd.service - The Apache HTTP Server
Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/httpd.service; *disabled*)
Active: inactive (dead)
[root@node00
Hello,
- Original Message -
> As part of that, I've reassigned most of my
> packages to others that can care for them.
This way I got pygpgme in EPEL v5, which I’m afraid I don’t have any time for;
so that branch is orphaned now as well. Comaintainers (for this branch or the
whole pack
On Thu, 21 Aug 2014 09:33:53 -0600
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
...snip...
> Will see about rebuilding all these and will check rawhide once it's
> done.
ok, there's just one more package affected in rawhide:
certmonger-0.75.13-1.fc22.x86_64.rpm
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
deve
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 03:11:53PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> (a) The reason for wanting packages to be retired so quickly has not
> been made clear by rel-eng.
Miloslav explained this nicely.
> (b) The biggest reason for people to use one distro over another is
> based on number of pack
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/25/2014 09:58 PM, Bob Lightfoot wrote:
> Dear Devel-List: Please consider this the initial introduction of
> myself as a potential/future packager / co-maintainer. I have been
> "lurking" / using Fedora for the past 7 years when Fedora 8
> releas
Greetings!
I've been a Fedora user since Fedora Core 3, but now I'm starting the
move to the next level - becoming a Fedora packager.
I'm interested in vintage hardware, especially older ATI/Radeon video,
and PPC (Macs & IBM).
I'm hoping to contribute to Fedora development in a couple of areas:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 01:18:48PM -0300, Alexandre Aguiar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm working with a fedora 19 vm but that for some reason cant enable
> services with systemctl.
Yes, this was fixed in
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-9450/systemd-204-21.fc19,
which is currently wait
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 11:10:54AM -0500, Jerry Vonau wrote:
> > On August 21, 2014 at 9:21 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Thu, 21 Aug 2014 04:09:02 +0200
> > Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 08:33:55PM -0500, Jerry Vonau wrote:
> > > > Hi All:
> > > >
> > > > I'
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7370474
There was a failure building odb during the rebuild. A later rebuild
worked, but is this something I should worry about or file a report against?
Thanks,
Dave
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 21 Aug 2014 20:46:05 -0700
Dave Johansen wrote:
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7370474
> There was a failure building odb during the rebuild. A later rebuild
> worked, but is this something I should worry about or file a
On 08/22/2014 06:57 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 21 Aug 2014 20:46:05 -0700
Dave Johansen wrote:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7370474
There was a failure building odb during the rebuild. A later rebuild
worked, but is th
36 matches
Mail list logo
