> On August 21, 2014 at 9:21 AM Kevin Fenzi <ke...@scrye.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 21 Aug 2014 04:09:02 +0200
> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 08:33:55PM -0500, Jerry Vonau wrote:
> > > Hi All:
> > >
> > > I'd like to point out that there are images/livecd's that are
> > > failing to build for rawhide[1]. With the change
> > > in /etc/resolv.conf handling the builds are now failing with
> > > "IOError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory:
> > > '/var/tmp/imgcreate-ChCMoB/install_root/etc/resolv.conf'" Looking
> > > the code in python-ingcreate[3] it appears that /etc/resolv.conf is
> > > opened, permissions changed, then closed. Think the sequence should
> > > be open, close, change permissions, or can that block of code go
> > > away? At any rate patch to reverse the order.
> > >
> > > diff --git a/imgcreate/kickstart.py b/imgcreate/kickstart.py
> > > index aef3ef2..b87fd59 100644
> > > --- a/imgcreate/kickstart.py
> > > +++ b/imgcreate/kickstart.py
> > > @@ -441,8 +441,8 @@ class SelinuxConfig(KickstartConfig):
> > >          for fn in ("/etc/resolv.conf",):
> > >              path = self.path(fn)
> > >              f = file(path, "w+")
> > > -            os.chmod(path, 0644)
> > >              f.close()
> > > +            os.chmod(path, 0644)
> > The order does not matter here.
>
> These failures sound like perhaps
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116651
> again?
>
> Did the revert for f21 get re-enabled in rawhide?
>

If /etc/resolv.conf is now a symlink, should the above block of code go
away altogether?
That is what seems to be holding up the builds..

Jerry
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Reply via email to