I just want to ask here, why did you retire the pywcs and considered
it as dead upstream whereas pypi pywcs has a new release in the
February?
And now APLpy is broken.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct
Compose started at Mon Jul 21 07:15:02 UTC 2014
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[APLpy]
APLpy-0.9.8-5.fc21.noarch requires pywcs
[PyKDE]
PyKDE-3.16.6-14.fc20.armv7hl requires sip-api(10) >= 0:10.0
[audtty]
audtty-0.1.12-9.fc
Hello
2014-07-21 10:59 GMT+02:00 Christopher Meng :
> I just want to ask here, why did you retire the pywcs and considered
> it as dead upstream whereas pypi pywcs has a new release in the
> February?
>
The functionallity of pywcs is now in astropy, is where active development
is happening. The
On Sat, 2014-07-19 at 12:30 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> The first step of most Koji builds is buildSRPMFromSCM, where a
> .src.rpm file is built from the git repo.
>
> Currently this involves completely building a mock buildroot
> containing all the BuildRequires, and running `rpmbuild -bs'
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121026
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=oYT2PuMScF&a=cc_unsubscribe
user: limb set for ddick acl: commit of package: perl-Role-Tiny from: to:
Approved on branch: epel7
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Role-Tiny
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing li
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121026
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
Change in package status over the last 168 hours
3 packages were orphaned
gdesklets [f21, f19, master, f20] was orphaned by luya
An interactive Imlib2 console for the X Window system
https://admin.fedoraproject.org
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 10:36:47 +,
Fedora Rawhide Report wrote:
This is pretty minor, but for some reason the devel list copy of the
rawhide report arrives significantly after (over an hour later) the
test list copy. This didn't used to happen. The branched reports
both arrive around th
On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 10:03:00 -0500
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 10:36:47 +,
> Fedora Rawhide Report wrote:
>
> This is pretty minor, but for some reason the devel list copy of the
> rawhide report arrives significantly after (over an hour later) the
> test list copy.
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 09:30:07 -0600,
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 10:03:00 -0500
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 10:36:47 +,
Fedora Rawhide Report wrote:
This is pretty minor, but for some reason the devel list copy of the
rawhide report arrives significan
commit dfd44d1f8eb9e18731dd71908d5ceef85c78ea0a
Author: Paul Howarth
Date: Mon Jul 21 16:46:30 2014 +0100
Support building for EPEL-7
- Avoid some optional test dependencies for EPEL builds so that we can get
an EPEL-7 build done
- Use %license where possible
perl-AnyEv
Hi folks! Meant to send this out last night, but forgot :(
I'm not sure there's anything specific to discuss at the meeting today,
so let's cancel it. Obviously F21 testing is a bit behind, but it's not
blocking on anything we can control, I don't think, and we can talk
about the blocker bugs at t
# F21 Blocker Review meeting #3
# Date: 2014-07-23
# Time: 16:00 UTC (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT)
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
We've got another blocker meeting coming up this week. As of today
there are 2 proposed blockers and 1 proposed FE for F21 Alpha (so it
should be a sh
On Sat, 19 Jul 2014 12:30:38 +0100
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
>
> The first step of most Koji builds is buildSRPMFromSCM, where a
> .src.rpm file is built from the git repo.
>
> Currently this involves completely building a mock buildroot
> containing all the BuildRequires, and running `rpmbui
On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 13:58:49 -0500
Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Jul 2014 12:30:38 +0100
> "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
>
> >
> > The first step of most Koji builds is buildSRPMFromSCM, where a
> > .src.rpm file is built from the git repo.
> >
> > Currently this involves completely buildi
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 01:58:49PM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Jul 2014 12:30:38 +0100
> "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
>
> >
> > The first step of most Koji builds is buildSRPMFromSCM, where a
> > .src.rpm file is built from the git repo.
> >
> > Currently this involves completely b
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 09:30:07AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 10:03:00 -0500
> Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 10:36:47 +,
> > Fedora Rawhide Report wrote:
> >
> > This is pretty minor, but for some reason the devel list copy of the
> > rawhide r
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 03:19:42PM +0200, Jan Staněk wrote:
> One of the planned parts of the F21 System Wide Change: BerkeleyDB 6 [1]
> is the introduction of downstream symbol versioning of both versions of
> the libraries (libdb with v6 and libdb5 with v5). This part is planned
> in order to not
19 matches
Mail list logo
