Hello 2014-07-21 10:59 GMT+02:00 Christopher Meng <cicku...@gmail.com>:
> I just want to ask here, why did you retire the pywcs and considered > it as dead upstream whereas pypi pywcs has a new release in the > February? > The functionallity of pywcs is now in astropy, is where active development is happening. The API is the same. Sometimes the developers backport the code to pywcs, but is a dead end. > And now APLpy is broken. > I contacted the maintainer before the change and he agreed to update to APLpy 0.9.11 that uses astropy instead of pywcs. He hasn't updated yet. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116895 In this report there is a new specfile for APLpy 0.9.11. I would have updated myself but I'm not a proven packager. Regards > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct >
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
