Re: really stop "really" commits (really!)

2013-12-16 Thread Petr Hracek
On 14/12/13 04:35, Rahul Sundaram wrote: Hi On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 8:42 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote: To prevent this from happening in the future, I wrote a little git pre-commit hook to help out, which I figured I'd share with you all: http://patches.fedorapeople.org/patchcheck

Re: really stop "really" commits (really!)

2013-12-16 Thread Martin Stransky
On 12/15/2013 12:01 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 06:42:11PM -0700, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote: To prevent this from happening in the future, I wrote a little git pre-commit hook to help out, which I figured I'd share with you all: http://patches.fedorapeople.org/patchcheck

Re: really stop "really" commits (really!)

2013-12-16 Thread T.C. Hollingsworth
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 4:01 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > It would be nice also to check that the sources file contains the > Sources listed in the spec file, since I often bump the version number > and forget to upload the new sources. Yeah. I actually have a little shell function that runs

Re: really stop "really" commits (really!)

2013-12-16 Thread T.C. Hollingsworth
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 12:45 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > Does it handle %autosetup use as well? Now it does. :-) -T.C. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduc

Re: really stop "really" commits (really!)

2013-12-16 Thread T.C. Hollingsworth
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 1:11 AM, Martin Stransky wrote: > There are some cases when we need it (sources taken as a snapshot from > git/cvs) Huh? The sources have to be either in git or in the lookaside cache for koji to find them later. I'm not sure how it could get this wrong? > patches appli

Re: really stop "really" commits (really!)

2013-12-16 Thread Mathieu Bridon
On Mon, 2013-12-16 at 01:47 -0700, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote: > On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 1:11 AM, Martin Stransky wrote: > > There are some cases when we need it (sources taken as a snapshot from > > git/cvs) > > Huh? The sources have to be either in git or in the lookaside cache > for koji to fin

Re: really stop "really" commits (really!)

2013-12-16 Thread Martin Stransky
On 12/16/2013 09:47 AM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote: On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 1:11 AM, Martin Stransky wrote: There are some cases when we need it (sources taken as a snapshot from git/cvs) Huh? The sources have to be either in git or in the lookaside cache for koji to find them later. I'm not

Re: [Base] Proposal for buildrequires cleanup janitorial initiative

2013-12-16 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 06:31:56PM -0500, Ben Boeckel wrote: > On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 22:12:09 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > TBH I don't think that's necessarily a bug. As long as B-devel > > Requires C-devel, and if A isn't directly including headers from > > C-devel, it seems fine for A

Re: idea for installation - web

2013-12-16 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 09:29:52PM -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 8:15 AM, Jos Vos wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 10:19:30AM +0200, חץ בן חמו wrote: > > > >> Could someone please add them to the boot menu please? I've been > >> searching for ages for those options an

Re: really stop "really" commits (really!)

2013-12-16 Thread T.C. Hollingsworth
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 1:59 AM, Mathieu Bridon wrote: > The kernel package uses a custom-defined ApplyPatch macro, for example. It still uses %{patches} though, so it would pass. -T.C. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fe

Re: EPEL for RHEL7 Beta

2013-12-16 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 16.12.2013 01:58, schrieb Kevin Kofler: > Reindl Harald wrote: >> i am at bulding up an RHEL7 virtual machine for 2014-project-evaluation >> which looks so far very promising - RHEL6 is not what i would want because >> my main-target is Fedora and there are too much differences (systemd, >> Ap

Re: really stop "really" commits (really!)

2013-12-16 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 16.12.2013 09:47, T.C. Hollingsworth napsal(a): On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 1:11 AM, Martin Stransky wrote: There are some cases when we need it (sources taken as a snapshot from git/cvs) Huh? The sources have to be either in git or in the lookaside cache for koji to find them later. I'm not

Re: really stop "really" commits (really!)

2013-12-16 Thread T.C. Hollingsworth
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 2:02 AM, Martin Stransky wrote: > I mean the upstream source check. It may not work if you use generated > source files [1]. No way am I doing an upstream source check in a git pre-commit hook! I'm not waiting for v8 to be downloaded and hashed every time I commit to it, a

Re: [Base] Proposal for buildrequires cleanup janitorial initiative

2013-12-16 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 15.12.2013 11:55, Richard W.M. Jones napsal(a): On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 10:57:00AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 12:20:50PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: * It might be interesting to have some script, which tries to audit BR, e.g. it removes all BR first and then adds the

Re: really stop "really" commits (really!)

2013-12-16 Thread T.C. Hollingsworth
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 2:29 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > It prevents even local commits if I am not wrong. Yeah, to only do it when commits are pushed would mean to do it as a pre-receive hook on the dist-git server, which makes things significantly more complicated. Plus aborting right when you co

Re: [Base] Proposal for buildrequires cleanup janitorial initiative

2013-12-16 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 10:39:16AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Dne 15.12.2013 11:55, Richard W.M. Jones napsal(a): > >On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 10:57:00AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > >>On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 12:20:50PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > >>>* It might be interesting to have some script,

fedora-review 0.5.1 released

2013-12-16 Thread Stanislav Ochotnicky
This is mostly a bugfix release, solving issues with mock in F20 (bz#1028332) and several other check problems. Thanks goes again to Alec for tirelessly working on improving f-r. Feel free to test the updates[1,2,3,4] News: - Added framework for moving plugins out of the fedora-review source tre

rawhide report: 20131216 changes

2013-12-16 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
Compose started at Mon Dec 16 05:15:06 UTC 2013 Broken deps for i386 -- [LuxRender] LuxRender-1.0-16.fc21.i686 requires libImath-2_0.so.10 LuxRender-1.0-16.fc21.i686 requires libIlmThread-2_0.so.10 LuxRender-1.0-16.fc2

[Owner-change] Fedora packages ownership change

2013-12-16 Thread nobody
Change in ownership over the last 168 hours === 9 packages were orphaned jbosscache-support [devel,f18,f19,f20] was orphaned by madsa JBossCache support package https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/jbosscache-sup

sunpinyin

2013-12-16 Thread Michael Schwendt
Anyone being familiar with "sunpinyin" please help with this "re-review": https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1043504 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Agenda for today's Env-and-Stacks WG meeting (2013-12-17)

2013-12-16 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
WG meeting will be at 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting on Freenode. == Next Steps == - I suggest copying first two paragrahps for our so called PRD from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Cloud_PRD as was discussed two weeks ago. - PRD - based on discussion on env-and-stacks mailing list (some disc

Status of Xclients.d?

2013-12-16 Thread Orion Poplawski
In /etc/X11/xinit/Xsession: # This Xsession.d implementation, is intended to obsolte and replace the # various mechanisms present in the 'case' statement which follows, and to # eventually be able to easily remove all hard coded window manager specific # content from this script. See bug #142260

Re: Agenda for today's Env-and-Stacks WG meeting (2013-12-17)

2013-12-16 Thread Sam Kottler
- Original Message - > From: "Marcela Mašláňová" > To: "Fedora Environment and Stacks Working Group mailing list" > , "Development > discussions related to Fedora" > Sent: Monday, December 16, 2013 11:12:15 AM > Subject: Agenda for today's Env-and-Stacks WG meeting (2013-12-17) > > WG

Re: Status of Xclients.d?

2013-12-16 Thread Tomasz Torcz
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 09:35:03AM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote: > In /etc/X11/xinit/Xsession: > > # This Xsession.d implementation, is intended to obsolte and replace the > # various mechanisms present in the 'case' statement which follows, and to I think this in turn was obsoleted by using sy

Re: Status of Xclients.d?

2013-12-16 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 12/16/2013 10:21 AM, Tomasz Torcz wrote: On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 09:35:03AM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote: In /etc/X11/xinit/Xsession: # This Xsession.d implementation, is intended to obsolte and replace the # various mechanisms present in the 'case' statement which follows, and to I thi

Re: Self Introduction and koan de-orphaning

2013-12-16 Thread Stephen Herr
On 12/13/2013 03:19 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 12/13/2013 12:49 PM, Stephen Herr wrote: Hi everyone, I'm Stephen Herr (sherr). I noticed that the koan package is orphaned in Fedora and that it has one or two fairly important bugs. I'm a developer on the Satellite / Spacewalk projects and I

Re: Self Introduction and koan de-orphaning

2013-12-16 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 12/16/2013 12:22 PM, Stephen Herr wrote: On 12/13/2013 03:19 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 12/13/2013 12:49 PM, Stephen Herr wrote: Hi everyone, I'm Stephen Herr (sherr). I noticed that the koan package is orphaned in Fedora and that it has one or two fairly important bugs. I'm a developer