On 18. 10. 2013 at 09:35:36, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 09:19:30AM +0200, Ales Kozumplik wrote:
> > On 10/16/2013 11:13 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > >* Need to clarify if the DNF bindings will exist for both python2 and
> > >
> > > python3 or just python3. This could affe
On 20/10/13 22:01, Pete Travis wrote:
>
> *snip*
>>
>>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group
>> lists, how to get sponsored. Just waiting might be a solution, but
>> probably not the fastest one.
>>
>> Matthias
>>
>> --
>>
> I don't agree with this. The spo
On Mon, 2013-10-21 at 09:12 +0200, Jan Zelený wrote:
> On 18. 10. 2013 at 09:35:36, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > Oh also -- I've been assuming that the DNF python2 bindings will be
> > compatible with the yum API. Is that the case?
>
> Sort of. The problem is that while yum has some sort of API, th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
El Mon, 21 Oct 2013 09:12:40 +0200
Jan Zelený escribió:
> On 18. 10. 2013 at 09:35:36, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 09:19:30AM +0200, Ales Kozumplik wrote:
> > > On 10/16/2013 11:13 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > > >* Need to cla
On 10/17/2013 05:19 AM, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
I understand each one of us is busy with their life but a simple message would
suffice to let know about the status. Is
there a better way to address this concern to avoid repeating it in the future?
Some numbers FYI:
* We have 117 sponsors rig
On 21. 10. 2013 at 15:47:20, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-10-21 at 09:12 +0200, Jan Zelený wrote:
> > On 18. 10. 2013 at 09:35:36, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > > Oh also -- I've been assuming that the DNF python2 bindings will be
> > > compatible with the yum API. Is that the case?
> >
> >
-- snip --
> > Some of them will be rewritten to Py3 but for example createrepo has
> > now a C implementation and we are planning for that one to be the
> > default.
>
> we can not change to createreo_c without making sure it has feature
> parity first. While some releng tools call createreo and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021206
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
Hello All!
Unfortunately "fedora create maillist" doesn't give me a lot of
related links, so I'd like to ask here. I want to create two
additional maillists dedicated to the particular Fedora Language SIGs
- one for Erlang, and another one for Golang. Could please anyone help
me - where should I s
File a ticket in the infrastructure trac and it will get done
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-
On Mon, 21 Oct 2013 15:31:28 +0400
Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> - one for Erlang, and another one for Golang. Could please anyone
> help me - where should I start?
>
Open a ticket with fedora infra,
saying what you need.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/Tickets
--
Regards,
Frank
www.
On Sat, 2013-10-19 at 14:01 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > Hi folks, and welcome to the Fedora 20 Beta blocker bug news...
>
> can't find any criteria currently that covers application icons (though do
> mention it if such a thing exists)...
>
> At issue here are gtk3 a
On Mon, 21 Oct 2013 04:01:15 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Till Maas wrote:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines?rd=Packaging/Guidelines#Compiler_flags
> >
> > mentions only %optflags to be required for packages but I noticed that
> > %configure sets LDFLAGS to a value different
Compose started at Mon Oct 21 09:15:03 UTC 2013
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[blueman]
blueman-1.23-7.fc20.armv7hl requires obex-data-server >= 0:0.4.3
blueman-1.23-7.fc20.armv7hl requires gvfs-obexftp
[bwm-ng]
bwm-ng-0.6
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Test-File-Contents:
ba3abe6143d1055ccb81d741a481a190 Test-File-Contents-0.21.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorapro
Op 10/20/13 8:59 PM schreef Piergiorgio Sartor
:
>Does the tools converts the complete RAID-10, including
>the LVM volumes to bcache?
I will look into the blocks tool for F21, but for now I leave answering
the question to Gabriel.
>
>Some times ago I asked, in my setup, what would be the
>right
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> On 10/17/2013 05:19 AM, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
>
>> I understand each one of us is busy with their life but a simple message
>> would suffice to let know about the status. Is
>> there a better way to address this concern to avoid rep
On 10/21/2013 03:28 PM, Parag N(पराग़) wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Miroslav Suchý mailto:msu...@redhat.com>> wrote:
On 10/17/2013 05:19 AM, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
I understand each one of us is busy with their life but a simple
message would suffice to let know ab
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 7:08 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> On 10/21/2013 03:28 PM, Parag N(पराग़) wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Miroslav Suchý > msu...@redhat.com>> wrote:
>>
>> On 10/17/2013 05:19 AM, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
>>
>> I understand each one
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 01:42:37AM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> A few years ago we've been much better at talking about things and
> coming to a conclusion. Nowadays I have the feeling "the community"
> is fragmented too much. With some people avoiding mailing-lists like
> the plague, some peop
lib389 implements a python library for 389-ds administrative operations.
This review is the push of DSadmin (
https://github.com/richm/dsadmin ) into lib389 with few adaptation fixes.
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47566/0001-Ticket-ticket47566-Initial-import-of-DSadmin-into-38.p
On 2013-10-16, Petr Pisar wrote:
> To finish usr-move, I'm going to change quota package in that way.
> /sbin/quotacheck, /sbin/quotaoff, and /sbin/quotaon files will be moved
> under /usr.
>
Thanks all for the comments.
This change is implemented in quota-4.01-11.fc21.
-- Petr
--
devel maili
On 10/20/2013 01:11 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Oct 20, 2013, at 4:38 AM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
Before 20.25.1, if you had an existing swap on a regular partition or a logical
volume and you specified --noformat, that swap specification was added to
fstab. With 20.25.1, this is no longer th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 09:49:29PM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 11:46 PM, Elio Maldonado wrote:
> > No one in the NSS team was consulted on this. I usually monitor the FESCO
> > meetings announcements but missed this.
> I
Change in ownership over the last 168 hours
===
5 packages were orphaned
obexftp [devel,f20] was orphaned by rathann
Tool to access devices via the OBEX protocol
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/obexftp
obexf
On Oct 21, 2013, at 7:58 AM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
>
> If I specifically specify an existing regular partition or logical volume as
> swap and specify "--noformat" in the kickstart file, then the way it has been
> working is that such swap specifications are added to fstab.
Regression in kic
# F20 Beta Blocker Review meeting #4.5
# Date: 2013-10-21
# Time: 16:00 UTC (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT)
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
Apologies for the extremely late notice, but we'll be doing a quick
blocker review meeting following the QA meeting today, in 20 minutes'
time,
Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-2 for this important
meeting, wherein we shall determine the readiness of the Fedora 20 Beta.
Thursday, October 24, 2013 17:00 UTC (1 PM EDT, 10 AM PDT, 19:00 CEST)
"Before each public release Development, QA and Release Engineering meet
to determine
On 21 October 2013 07:52, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 01:42:37AM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > A few years ago we've been much better at talking about things and
> > coming to a conclusion. Nowadays I have the feeling "the community"
> > is fragmented too much. With some
On Mon, 21 Oct 2013 09:52:32 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > A few years ago we've been much better at talking about things and
> > coming to a conclusion. Nowadays I have the feeling "the community"
> > is fragmented too much. With some people avoiding mailing-lists like
> > the plague, some peo
On 10/21/2013 04:08 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
The intended usage of "test" list has always been a problem. Once in a
while, somebody points that out, but there's nobody (no leadership) to
work on a change actively. Is it only for Test releases or also for
Rawhide? Its description is vague. Is t
On Mon, 21 Oct 2013 18:08:09 +0200
Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Oct 2013 09:52:32 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> > > A few years ago we've been much better at talking about things and
> > > coming to a conclusion. Nowadays I have the feeling "the
> > > community" is fragmented too much
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Good idea. What items could we move to announce that would be more
> useful for folks that don't have as much time/energy to skim the main
> list?
>
I'm assuming you're referring to the devel-announce list, and not the
general announce list,
Hello,
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Elio Maldonado Batiz
wrote:
> On 10/18/2013 06:54 PM, Elio Maldonado Batiz wrote:
>>
>> On 10/18/2013 12:55 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 10:33 PM, Eric H. Christensen
>>> wrote:
Information on this fix is in Bugzilla[1
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 06:08:09PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > I have this same feeling. I think we need to fix it; do you have any
> > thoughts or ideas as to how?
> If people hate email lists in general (or the number of messages posted
> to them), it cannot be fixed.
Hmmm; I don't know i
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 9:27 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Miloslav Trmač wrote:
>> No, the intent was very much to change what the resulting desktop
>> prioritizes. Quite a few FESCo members would be rather disappointed
>> if the new Workstation ended up just an unchanged GNOME[1].
> [snip]
>> [1] A
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 10:00:59AM -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> Don't we have this same conversation every two years? With pretty much the
> same questions and feeling of disconnectedness? We fix a couple of things,
> and then get back to doing stuff and then wake up and go "where did
> eve
On 10/21/2013 06:08 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Mon, 21 Oct 2013 09:52:32 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
A few years ago we've been much better at talking about things and
coming to a conclusion. Nowadays I have the feeling "the community"
is fragmented too much. With some people avoiding mail
On 21 October 2013 11:08, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 10:00:59AM -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > Don't we have this same conversation every two years? With pretty much
> the
> > same questions and feeling of disconnectedness? We fix a couple of
> things,
> > and then ge
On Mon, 21 Oct 2013 16:23:29 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
> > The intended usage of "test" list has always been a problem. Once in a
> > while, somebody points that out, but there's nobody (no leadership) to
> > work on a change actively. Is it only for Test releases or also for
> > Rawhide
On 10/21/2013 05:25 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
So, discussing Test Updates for stable dist releases belongs onto which
list?
According to some in the QA community ( at least in the past ) any GA
release test topic ( like update testing ) belongs on the user list.
JBG
--
devel mailing list
d
"Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
According to some in the QA community ( at least in the past ) any GA release
test topic ( like update testing ) belongs on the user list.
If that's true then the updates-testing mail for N and N-1 need to go to the
user list.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.f
On 10/21/2013 05:44 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
"Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
According to some in the QA community ( at least in the past ) any GA
release
test topic ( like update testing ) belongs on the user list.
If that's true then the updates-testing mail for N and N-1 need to go
t
On Mon, 21 Oct 2013 13:07:25 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > As a first step, I suggest clearing up the intended usage of "devel" list.
> > There's too much traffic on that list. 792 messages so far in October.
>
> This is way down from the peak 5-7 years ago.
What is the reason? More people a
On 21 October 2013 11:48, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Oct 2013 13:07:25 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> > > As a first step, I suggest clearing up the intended usage of "devel"
> list.
> > > There's too much traffic on that list. 792 messages so far in October.
> >
> > This is way down
On Mon, 21 Oct 2013 19:16:53 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 10/21/2013 06:08 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > On Mon, 21 Oct 2013 09:52:32 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> >
> >>> A few years ago we've been much better at talking about things and
> >>> coming to a conclusion. Nowadays I have the f
On Mon, 21 Oct 2013 11:57:06 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> I am not saying shut-up but I am saying that I am confused by what you
> mean. First you seem to advocate more lists,
That could be a misunderstanding. Have I've phrased something very poorly.
Then please tell and give me a chance
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021385
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from Fedo
On Mon, 21 Oct 2013 17:47:12 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
> On 10/21/2013 05:44 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> > "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> >> According to some in the QA community ( at least in the past ) any GA
> >> release
> >> test topic ( like update testing ) belongs on the u
On Mon, 21 Oct 2013 11:02:57 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> On 10/17/2013 05:19 AM, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> > I understand each one of us is busy with their life but a simple message
> > would suffice to let know about the status. Is
> > there a better way to address this concern to avoid repe
On Mon, 21 Oct 2013 21:38:18 +0200
Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
> Is the following page wrong?
> http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEEDSPONSOR.html
I see 59 people on that list.
(many have more than 1 review they have filed)
Not sure where the 191 number comes from?
There's 194 bugs ope
Hello
My name is pierre jourdain from france , i'm a student at Université de
Picardie Jules Verne in Saint Quentin (INSSET) in embedeed electronics
and computing .
My experiences in computing things are relate to space
systems securisation and communications .
I'm using fedora since fedora 7
M
Le 21/10/2013 22:34,
a écrit :
Hello
My name is pierre jourdain from france , i'm a student at Université de
Picardie Jules Verne in Saint Quentin (INSSET) in embedeed electronics
and computing .
My experiences in computing things are relate to space
systems securisation and communications .
Miloslav Trmač (m...@volny.cz) said:
> On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 9:27 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> >> No, the intent was very much to change what the resulting desktop
> >> prioritizes. Quite a few FESCo members would be rather disappointed
> >> if the new Workstation ended
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/434/0001-Ticket-434-admin-serv-logs-filling-with-admserv_host.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
any ideas?
thanks
regards
Messaggio originale
Oggetto:Broken dependencies: tika
Data: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 21:01:15 + (UTC)
Mittente: build...@fedoraproject.org
A: tika-ow...@fedoraproject.org
tika has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
Am 13.10.2013 22:04, schrieb Till Maas:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 12:15:02PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> i get somehow tired to report bugs for several packages,
>> refresh them at each release because maintainers
>> ignore guidelines all the time
>>
>> some of them responded and fixed their pa
Il 21/10/2013 23:32, punto...@libero.it ha scritto:
any ideas?
thanks
regards
Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6085254
Messaggio originale
Oggetto:Broken dependencies: tika
Data: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 21:01:15 + (UTC)
Mittente: bui
On 10/21/2013 07:48 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Mon, 21 Oct 2013 13:07:25 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
As a first step, I suggest clearing up the intended usage of "devel" list.
There's too much traffic on that list. 792 messages so far in October.
This is way down from the peak 5-7 years a
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 10:34 PM,
wrote:
> Hello
> My name is pierre jourdain from france , i'm a student at Université de
> Picardie Jules Verne in Saint Quentin (INSSET) in embedeed electronics
> and computing .
> My experiences in computing things are relate to space
> systems securisation and
60 matches
Mail list logo
