Re: upgrading R

On 2013-09-03 07:21, Richard Vickery wrote: I used to do this by scrolling up through the commands, but it's no longer there: I don't know if I remember it correctly: sudo yum upgrade updates.testing R Do I have this correct, or am I missing something? I don't want to forge ahead fearing that I

Corrupt repos and broken mockbuild ?

Hello, while trying to build a rawhide package with fedpkg mockbuild I get: [...] Finishing delta rebuilds of 10 package(s) (3.4 M) Some delta RPMs failed to download or rebuild. Retrying.. http://ftp.ps.pl/pub/Linux/fedora-linux/development/rawhide/x86_64/os/Packages/a/acl-2.2.52-3.fc20.x86_64.rp

Re: Corrupt repos and broken mockbuild ?

On 09/03/2013 09:38 AM, Krzysztof Daniel wrote: > Hello, > > while trying to build a rawhide package with fedpkg mockbuild I get: > [...] > Finishing delta rebuilds of 10 package(s) (3.4 M) > Some delta RPMs failed to download or rebuild. Retrying.. > http://ftp.ps.pl/pub/Linux/fedora-linux/develo

Re: COPR

- Original Message - > Hi, > I would like to get your feedback about COPR [1] > > [1] http://miroslav.suchy.cz/blog/archives/2013/08/29/what_is_copr/index.html > > We are the beggining and there are two options of where we can go: > http://miroslav.suchy.cz/blog/archives/2013/08/29/copr_a

Re: COPR

Ultimately, we ended up (again) discussing "should we replace Koji by OBS ?" Unless there is commitment from people to maintain this, we can't even consider this as a solution. H. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Co

Re: [Bug 885474] make bails with *** INTERNAL: readdir: Bad file descriptor

On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 7:10 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > "Deps on dirs" work on local Linux file systems, but doesn't work on linux > nfs and is known to not have worked with local files systems on other > *nices. The obvious question here is way ... what exactly does it try to do which fails? -

Re: [Bug 885474] make bails with *** INTERNAL: readdir: Bad file descriptor

On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 10:37 AM, drago01 wrote: > On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 7:10 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > >> "Deps on dirs" work on local Linux file systems, but doesn't work on linux >> nfs and is known to not have worked with local files systems on other >> *nices. > > The obvious question her

pl license change

Hello, pl-6.4.1 has changed license from: ((GPLv2+ or Artistic 2.0) and LGPLv2+ and LGPLv2 and GPLv2 and GPLv2+ and UCD and Public Domain and GPLv3+) to ((GPLv2+ with exceptions or Artistic 2.0) and (GPLv2+ with exceptions) and LGPLv2+ and LGPLv2 and UCD and Public Domain and GPLv3+ and CC-BY-S

Re: [Bug 885474] make bails with *** INTERNAL: readdir: Bad file descriptor

Ralf Corsepius writes: > However, I recall another case, "deps on dirs" often don't work: > (massively) "parallel make". > > Did you try to build the package single-threaded (make -j1)? No, it used -j2 (as bug 885474 suggests). PM. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://ad

Re: COPR

On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 11:23 AM, 80 wrote: > Ultimately, we ended up (again) discussing "should we replace Koji by OBS > ?" > > Unless there is commitment from people to maintain this, we can't even > consider this as a solution. > > True. I think we reallly need to pick out what we like about OB

Re: COPR

On 09/02/2013 04:29 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > On 08/30/2013 10:01 PM, Jay Greguske wrote: >> I'd like to see some elaboration on why VMs instead of chroots would be >> required. I can draw my own conclusions (security) but I'd like to see >> them listed out first before continuing the discussion.

f20 systemd rpm isn't signed!

FYI, I have just tried to do a `yum --releasever=20 distro-sync` (of an f19 box) and it aborts with the error that the systemd rpm isn't signed. (Yes, I know I can use --nogpgcheck to get around the problem.) -- Kaleb -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedorapr

Re: f20 systemd rpm isn't signed!

On Tue, 03 Sep 2013 10:16:25 -0400 "Kaleb S. KEITHLEY" wrote: > FYI, > > I have just tried to do a `yum --releasever=20 distro-sync` (of an > f19 box) and it aborts with the error that the systemd rpm isn't > signed. > > (Yes, I know I can use --nogpgcheck to get around the problem.) Yes, this

Re: COPR

On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Jay Greguske wrote: > On 09/02/2013 04:29 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > On 08/30/2013 10:01 PM, Jay Greguske wrote: > >> I'd like to see some elaboration on why VMs instead of chroots would be > >> required. I can draw my own conclusions (security) but I'd like to

Re: COPR

On Tue, 03 Sep 2013 10:10:32 -0400 Jay Greguske wrote: > If we had SELinux policy enabled on the builders and used MLS on the > chroots that would mitigate chroot-to-chroot attacks. I'm not sure if > policy could prevent a chroot'ed process from getting access to the > builder's certificate. If i

Re: GNOME 3.9.91 megaupdate

Am 02.09.2013 22:27, schrieb Kalev Lember: > On 09/02/2013 07:37 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: >> Could we have avoided this conflict by scheduling better in advance? > > We might have been able to do slightly better, because GNOME schedules > are published in advance and set pretty much in stone. I

Re: GNOME 3.9.91 megaupdate

- Original Message - > On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 05:44:46PM +0200, Kalev Lember wrote: > > It's that time of the year again -- F20 is going into the Alpha freeze > > tomorrow and new builds will have to go through Bodhi for verification. > > The GNOME 3.9.91 release is coming as well, with a

File Path-Tiny-0.031.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by pghmcfc

A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Path-Tiny: 520141e371439d4467232f87f2f1681b Path-Tiny-0.031.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/

Re: COPR

On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 09:48:52AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Tue, 03 Sep 2013 10:10:32 -0400 > Jay Greguske wrote: > > > If we had SELinux policy enabled on the builders and used MLS on the > > chroots that would mitigate chroot-to-chroot attacks. I'm not sure if > > policy could prevent a c

[perl-Path-Tiny/f20] (2 commits) ...BR: perl(Config) for the test suite (#1003660)

Summary of changes: 8628d0c... Initial import (perl-Path-Tiny-0.031-2) (*) 672725e... BR: perl(Config) for the test suite (#1003660) (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-d

[perl-Unicode-UTF8/el6] Initial import (perl-Unicode-UTF8-0.59-3)

Summary of changes: b77924e... Initial import (perl-Unicode-UTF8-0.59-3) (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://a

Re: COPR

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/03/2013 12:29 PM, Michael scherer wrote: > On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 09:48:52AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> On Tue, 03 Sep 2013 10:10:32 -0400 Jay Greguske >> wrote: >> >>> If we had SELinux policy enabled on the builders and used MLS on the >>

Re: COPR

On 09/03/2013 12:29 PM, Michael scherer wrote: > On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 09:48:52AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> On Tue, 03 Sep 2013 10:10:32 -0400 >> Jay Greguske wrote: >> >>> If we had SELinux policy enabled on the builders and used MLS on the >>> chroots that would mitigate chroot-to-chroot at

Re: COPR

On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 8:43 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 03:33:10PM -0400, Jay Greguske wrote: > > > koji already uses VMs for x86. > > Not for RPM builds. > > I think we're talking about different things here. It happens that some of > the x86 builders are VMs, but they're

nodejs-slide license change MIT to ISC

Next update across all Fedora branches plus EL6 changes the license from MIT (nodejs-slide 1.1.4) to ISC (nodejs-slide 1.1.5). Kind regards, -- Jamie Nguyen -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http:

Re: COPR

On 09/03/2013 01:54 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 09/03/2013 12:29 PM, Michael scherer wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 09:48:52AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >>> On Tue, 03 Sep 2013 10:10:32 -0400 Jay Greguske >>> wrote: >>> If we had SELi

[perl-Crypt-DSA/f19] (3 commits) ...CVE-2011-3599

Summary of changes: 62079c0... Perl 5.18 rebuild (*) dcd1366... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass (*) aadaaac... CVE-2011-3599 (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/E

Re: COPR

On Tue, 3 Sep 2013 15:43:38 -0400 Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 03:33:10PM -0400, Jay Greguske wrote: > > > koji already uses VMs for x86. > > Not for RPM builds. > > I think we're talking about different things here. It happens that > some of the x86 builders are VMs, but they

Re: COPR

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/03/2013 03:37 PM, Jay Greguske wrote: > On 09/03/2013 01:54 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 09/03/2013 12:29 PM, Michael scherer wrote: >>> On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 09:48:52AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi

Re: COPR

Le mardi 03 septembre 2013 à 15:37 -0400, Jay Greguske a écrit : > On 09/03/2013 01:54 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On 09/03/2013 12:29 PM, Michael scherer wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 09:48:52AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >>> On T

Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo meeting (2013-09-04)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2013-09-04 18:00 UTC' Links to all tickets below

Cypret Introduction

Hi all, Just wanted to say hi as I'm a bit new around here and haven't dropped an intro message yet. I'm looking forward to contributing to the Fedora Project and would really like to do my part to get some great packages created to spread the Cloud SIG love. I'm currently working on getting etcd

Re: COPR

On 09/03/2013 11:48 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Jay Greguske > wrote: > > On 09/02/2013 04:29 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > On 08/30/2013 10:01 PM, Jay Greguske wrote: > >> I'd like to see some elaboration on why VMs instead

Re: COPR

On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 03:33:10PM -0400, Jay Greguske wrote: > > koji already uses VMs for x86. > Not for RPM builds. I think we're talking about different things here. It happens that some of the x86 builders are VMs, but they're not taken down and rebuilt cleanly between each package build; the

[Test-Announce] 2013-09-04@ 16:00 UTC - F20 Alpha Blocker Bug Review #3

# F20 Alpha Blocker Review meeting #3 # Date: 2013-09-04 # Time: 16:00 UTC (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT) # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net It's time for the first F20 blocker review meeting post-alpha-freeze! We've been seeing great participation so far in F20 and would love to see t

Fedora 20 Alpha Change freeze

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, as the Fedora 20 schedule[1] states the Alpha change freeze is upon us. As we are now at the change freeze bodhi has been enabled for f20 now. It means all builds will now need an update cretaed and as we are at Alpha freeze only accepted exce

Re: Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo meeting (2013-09-04)

On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 05:29:20PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can reply to > this e-mail, file a new ticket at https://fedorahosted.org/fesco, I would like to request some guidance about what to do with retired packages that are still in

Re: COPR

On 09/03/2013 03:41 PM, Frankie Onuonga wrote: I mean we have a really sharp crew here. Why not? We have sharp crew, but they have a lot of other work to do. So thinking about how to offload some developer work with others make IMO sense. -- Miroslav Suchy, RHCE, RHCDS Red Hat, Software Engi