On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Johannes Lips wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I finally came to the conclusion, that I no longer want to invest time and
> effort in keeping all my Java packages in good shape. I don't have the time
> anymore to unbundle all the bundled libraries and keep a dozen downstream
On Thu, 2013-08-29 at 07:54 +0100, Ian Malone wrote:
> On 29 August 2013 01:53, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 6:59 PM, Ian Malone wrote:
>
> >> Just to follow up, thanks, your instructions for building worked fine
> >> (I'd worried it wouldn't be so straightforward). Thought I'd
By mere curiosity, why didn't we follow the usual renaming process (and
avoid losing the previous history in git) ?
It was just an upstream rename due to a trademark issue.
H.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of
Quoting Dave Johansen (2013-08-28 21:58:38)
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Remi Collet wrote:
> >
> > Le 28/08/2013 18:09, Dave Johansen a écrit :
> > > I'm trying to make a spec file that uses the devtoolset in RHEL 5/6 (
> > > rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2013-0175.html ) but I haven't been ab
Dne 28.8.2013 16:27, Miloslav Trmač napsal(a):
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
Thanks for your interest. It is a reoccuring problem that both the rename
request submitter *and* the reviewer get the Obsoletes tags wrong.
Perhaps the guidelines should be more clear, then
Dne 29.8.2013 08:05, Panu Matilainen napsal(a):
For a practical example of the timescale of this "process" as things
have been so far: opt-in install-time macro-expansion of scriptlets
was implemented upstream in March 2010 and has been in Fedora since
F15. Yet this relatively trivial thing *
On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 09:04:23 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> I've highlighted the %{?dist} tag issue. see if this is better now:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Renaming.2FReplacing_Existing_Packages
>
Any change like that could help. :) Thanks for the effort!
--
devel ma
Dne 29.8.2013 10:19, Stanislav Ochotnicky napsal(a):
Quoting Dave Johansen (2013-08-28 21:58:38)
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Remi Collet wrote:
Le 28/08/2013 18:09, Dave Johansen a écrit :
I'm trying to make a spec file that uses the devtoolset in RHEL 5/6 (
rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-20
Le Jeu 29 août 2013 01:11, Toshio Kuratomi a écrit :
>> #topic #336 Please clarify the General Naming Guidelines for packages
>> .fpc 336
>> https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/336
BTW Fedora font packages allow lowercase naming only.
The notion that tarball naming reflects in any accurate way
On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 09:57:18 +0200, 80 wrote:
> By mere curiosity, why didn't we follow the usual renaming process (and
> avoid losing the previous history in git) ?
> It was just an upstream rename due to a trademark issue.
The rename process may have been followed, but the renamed packages have
On 08/29/2013 10:19 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
%{?scl:scl enable %{scl} "}
# this is a shell
command 1
command 2
...
%{?scl:"}
Just one command with this syntax. If you need more command, you have to use
heredoc as Vít said in this thread.
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCE, RHCDS
Red Hat, Software
Quoting Johannes Lips (2013-08-29 09:00:28)
> On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Johannes Lips
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I finally came to the conclusion, that I no longer want to invest time and
> > effort in keeping all my Java packages in good shape. I don't have the time
> > anymore to un
On 08/29/2013 11:47 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 29.8.2013 08:05, Panu Matilainen napsal(a):
For a practical example of the timescale of this "process" as things
have been so far: opt-in install-time macro-expansion of scriptlets
was implemented upstream in March 2010 and has been in Fedora since
On 08/28/2013 08:31 PM, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
> On 08/28/2013 07:23 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
>> Today I've wrote article w/ many notes about bisecting kernel [0], but
>> I've used make bzImage, make install and the same commands bypassing RPM
>> and I have IMHO good idea to write utility, that w
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 10:53:53PM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> Package(co)maintainers
> ===
> directfb orphan, kwizart
>
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 2:17 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> On 08/29/2013 10:19 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
>
>> %{?scl:scl enable %{scl} "}
>> # this is a shell
>> command 1
>> command 2
>> ...
>> %{?scl:"}
>>
>
> Just one command with this syntax. If you need more command, you have to
> use he
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 11:09:12AM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> And retiring packages is too difficult in Fedora. The process is
> complex or not known by all packagers:
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
>
> Some retire only in pkgdb (some create orph
commit a304e69913df90663d87b3c3474d0d346ec8ac45
Author: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Thu Aug 29 12:52:54 2013 +0200
Rebuilt with newer libxml2
perl-XML-LibXML.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-XML-LibXML.spec b/perl-XML-LibXML.spec
index 0
On 08/29/2013 12:04 PM, Dave Johansen wrote:
So does that mean that this is the correct statement to put in the .spec file?
%{?scl:scl enable %{scl} "}
source /opt/rh/devtoolset-1.1/enable
%{?scl:"}
What is the %{?scl} macro doing? And am I using it correctly in the above?
This scriplet:
%{?
Dne 29.8.2013 11:17, Miroslav Suchý napsal(a):
On 08/29/2013 10:19 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
%{?scl:scl enable %{scl} "}
# this is a shell
command 1
command 2
...
%{?scl:"}
Just one command with this syntax. If you need more command, you have
to use heredoc as Vít said in this thread.
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 3:32 AM, Igor Gnatenko
wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-08-29 at 07:54 +0100, Ian Malone wrote:
>> On 29 August 2013 01:53, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 6:59 PM, Ian Malone wrote:
>>
>> >> Just to follow up, thanks, your instructions for building worked fine
>> >>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903609
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-XML-LibXSLT-1.80-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-XML-LibXSLT-1.80-1.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on t
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 8:26 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 3:32 AM, Igor Gnatenko
> wrote:
>> On Thu, 2013-08-29 at 07:54 +0100, Ian Malone wrote:
>>> On 29 August 2013 01:53, Josh Boyer wrote:
>>> > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 6:59 PM, Ian Malone wrote:
>>>
>>> >> Just to follow
I need to used multiple loopback addresses (interfaces) for an server
application that communicates with multiple clients running on the same
machine. Since a loopback interface short circuits the network stack
(looping back in the IP layer) it is a more efficient means of
communication, hence bet
I need to used multiple loopback addresses (interfaces) for an server
application that communicates with multiple clients running on the same
machine. Since a loopback interface short circuits the network stack
(looping back in the IP layer) it is a more efficient means of
communication, hence bet
On 29 August 2013 13:32, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 8:26 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> Strange. The source is definitely still on that machine. I'll look
>> into why it's not showing up on the webpage.
>
> Ok, you can clone it with:
>
> git clone git://fedorapeople.org/~jwboyer/koj
On 08/22/2013 07:35 PM, Björn Persson wrote:
Miroslav Suchy wrote:
On 08/22/2013 06:47 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Well, I noticed the rebuild was running only some times. I assume
when they were there to launch the builds in that batch?
Is there any way all the builds could be listed and just fire
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-qpid_proton:
fb2dc704e4d2727d664966f301bfb017 qpid-proton-0.5.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailma
On 08/22/2013 05:15 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
- Original Message -
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 11:03 PM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
What things we do _now_ could be
improved with the investment of some effort?
Perl rebuild always take a lot of time, and as a result it will affect
the mass re
El Jueves, 29 de agosto de 2013 06:38:00 John Chludzinski escribió:
> I need to used multiple loopback addresses (interfaces) for an server
> application that communicates with multiple clients running on the same
> machine. Since a loopback interface short circuits the network stack
> (looping ba
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 06:34:57AM -0700, John Chludzinski wrote:
> I need to used multiple loopback addresses (interfaces) for an server
> application that communicates with multiple clients running on the same
> machine. Since a loopback interface short circuits the network stack
> (looping back
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 03:55:32PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 29.08.2013 15:53, schrieb Neil Horman:
> > you can use the ip utility to create dummy network devices on top of your
> > loopback device, but the better question is - why? Having multiple clients
> > and
> > servers on a si
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
images for Alpha TC2 have been uploaded to us-east-1
i386: eb82cf82
x86_64: ami-1583ce7c
Happy Testing
Dennis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.21 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAlIfVnoACgkQkSxm47BaWfcaYwCgmIms/nBOFUld5PjzM89hxZLp
On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 12:52:25 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> I guess you won't get responses to packages that are orphaned, because
> then the bug report is assigned to the orphan user.
Only few were orphaned when filing the bugs. I just didn't think about
using the pkgdb API to fetch the list.
> > D
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Juan Orti Alcaine
wrote:
> In IPv4 you can get any IP in the 127.0.0.0/8 subnet for the lo interface.
And in current fedora, they are already assigned to localhost. You can
ping 127.0.0.22 if you want.
AIUI, you can bind to it freely, too.
m
--
martin.langh
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 09:11:01AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> images for Alpha TC2 have been uploaded to us-east-1
> i386: eb82cf82
> x86_64: ami-1583ce7c
Thanks Dennis! Booted one up and it looks good at very first glance.
--
Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora Cloud Architect ☁☁☁
--
devel mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=999370
Petr Šabata changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
On 08/29/2013 07:42 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
You make it sound like Peter has a tool for rebuilding in dependency
order. I need such a thing. Can it be made to work for other things
than Perl?
It can take a list of packages and count dependencies, so it could be
used for different languag
Both 127.0.0.7 and 127.0.0.10 exist in /etc/hosts for the client apps to
use when connecting to the server.The clients use both
gethostbyname() and getservbyname() for connecting. Currently, there
are *no* multiple loopback interfaces defined.
I wrote my own example TCP socket code to test
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 08:32:56AM -0700, John Chludzinski wrote:
> Both 127.0.0.7 and 127.0.0.10 exist in /etc/hosts for the client apps to
> use when connecting to the server.The clients use both
> gethostbyname() and getservbyname() for connecting. Currently, there
> are *no* multiple loopb
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/47/
---
Review request for blockerbugs.
Bugs: 411
https://fedorahosted.org/
Thank you, Kevin.
I will re-subscribe with dan@worldquant.com.
Will do what you suggest.
Thanks,
Dan
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Fenzi [mailto:ke...@scrye.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2013 12:13 PM
To: EPEL Development List
Cc: Guo, Dan (WorldQuant); 'Ralph Angenendt'
Subject
Am 29.08.2013 15:53, schrieb Neil Horman:
> you can use the ip utility to create dummy network devices on top of your
> loopback device, but the better question is - why? Having multiple clients
> and
> servers on a single system doesn't in any way require multiple loopback
> interfaces. just
Am 29.08.2013 15:38, schrieb John Chludzinski:
> I need to used multiple loopback addresses (interfaces) for an server
> application that communicates with multiple clients running on the same
> machine. Since a loopback interface short circuits the network stack
> (looping back in the IP layer)
BTW:
try to ping 127.0.0.1, 127.0.0.2, 127.0.0.3
here they are pingable as default
the instruction below if only needed if the application
checks that a configured IP exists via ifconfig or lookalike
Am 29.08.2013 15:46, schrieb Reindl Harald:
> Am 29.08.2013 15:38, schrieb John Chl
On Thu, 2013-08-29 at 15:46 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 29.08.2013 15:38, schrieb John Chludzinski:
> > I need to used multiple loopback addresses (interfaces) for an server
> > application that communicates with multiple clients running on the same
> > machine. Since a loopback interface
I've had a debate with some co-workers about whether or not a message
that's sent to the loopback interface makes it way into the IP layer and
is fragmented before flowing back up the network stack. Does it?
---John
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraprojec
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 10:02:27AM -0700, John Chludzinski wrote:
> I've had a debate with some co-workers about whether or not a message
> that's sent to the loopback interface makes it way into the IP layer and
> is fragmented before flowing back up the network stack. Does it?
Can you please no
On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 09:05:24 +0300
Panu Matilainen wrote:
...snip...
> Let me say AWESOME one more time :)
:)
I actually didn't know that this was so much of a bottleneck for you
folks. ;(
Anyhow, glad we can move forward and hopefully get things rolling
faster.
> > Of course it does mea
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 04:15:15PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Undead and all builds obsoleted:
>
> drupal6-drush
> obsoleted by: php-drush-drush
> jaxen-bootstrap
> obsoleted by: jaxen
> joystick
> obsoleted by: linuxconsoletools
> kdirstat
>
So, after some quick initial progress, we seemed to have stalled out on the
X2Go package reviews. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks.
--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane
So, after some quick initial progress, we seemed to have stalled out on the
X2Go package reviews. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks.
See:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/X2Go#Scope
for packages to review.
--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
On Thu, 2013-08-29 at 18:04 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 10:02:27AM -0700, John Chludzinski wrote:
> > I've had a debate with some co-workers about whether or not a message
> > that's sent to the loopback interface makes it way into the IP layer and
> > is fragmented b
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 01:06:23PM -0700, Les Howell wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-08-29 at 18:04 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 10:02:27AM -0700, John Chludzinski wrote:
> > > I've had a debate with some co-workers about whether or not a message
> > > that's sent to the loopb
On 29 Aug 2013 18:12, "Kevin Fenzi" wrote:
>
> On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 09:05:24 +0300
> Panu Matilainen wrote:
>
> ...snip...
>
> > Let me say AWESOME one more time :)
>
> :)
>
> I actually didn't know that this was so much of a bottleneck for you
> folks. ;(
>
> Anyhow, glad we can move forward and
On 08/29/2013 01:10 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 09:05:24 +0300
> Panu Matilainen wrote:
>
> ...snip...
>
>> Let me say AWESOME one more time :)
>
> :)
>
> I actually didn't know that this was so much of a bottleneck for you
> folks. ;(
>
> Anyhow, glad we can move forward a
>
>
> I'm not saying this was a bad idea, but the Koji developers now have to
> test on both RHEL 6 and Fedora now. Let this message serve as a warning
> to them if they did not already know. ;)
They already were anyway due to the ARM builders in secondary so they've
been getting reports from us
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 7:38 AM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 09:11:01AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>> images for Alpha TC2 have been uploaded to us-east-1
>> i386: eb82cf82
>> x86_64: ami-1583ce7c
>
> Thanks Dennis! Booted one up and it looks good at very first glance.
>
> --
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 03:21:36PM -0700, Richard Vickery wrote:
> >> i386: eb82cf82
> >> x86_64: ami-1583ce7c
> > Thanks Dennis! Booted one up and it looks good at very first glance.
> How does one bring one down?
You can download the same images in raw.xz or qcow2 format from
http://alt.fedorapr
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 03:21:36PM -0700, Richard Vickery wrote:
>> >> i386: eb82cf82
>> >> x86_64: ami-1583ce7c
>> > Thanks Dennis! Booted one up and it looks good at very first glance.
>> How does one bring one down?
>
> You can download t
Hello friends,
I have been part of the Fedora Project for several years (mainly as an
Ambassador) and now I've decided to join the Packaging team!
I live in Buenos Aires, Argentina, I work for IBM and I only have to
pass 1 exam (RH401) to become a RHCA.
I have been using Linux since the 90's. Star
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
El Thu, 29 Aug 2013 16:59:44 -0400
Jay Greguske escribió:
> On 08/29/2013 01:10 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 09:05:24 +0300
> > Panu Matilainen wrote:
> >
> > ...snip...
> >
> >> Let me say AWESOME one more time :)
> >
> > :)
>
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 4:09 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> On 08/29/2013 12:04 PM, Dave Johansen wrote:
>
>> So does that mean that this is the correct statement to put in the .spec
>> file?
>>
>> %{?scl:scl enable %{scl} "}
>> source /opt/rh/devtoolset-1.1/enable
>> %{?scl:"}
>>
>> What is the %{?
63 matches
Mail list logo
