On 29 Aug 2013 18:12, "Kevin Fenzi" <ke...@scrye.com> wrote: > > On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 09:05:24 +0300 > Panu Matilainen <pmati...@laiskiainen.org> wrote: > > ...snip... > > > Let me say AWESOME one more time :) > > :) > > I actually didn't know that this was so much of a bottleneck for you > folks. ;( > > Anyhow, glad we can move forward and hopefully get things rolling > faster. > > > > Of course it does mean we could run into breakage if there's > > > breakage in Fedora land, but thats good to know and fix too. > > > > Yes, dogfooding on the builders can IMO only be a good thing for > > overall stability of Fedora, even if it might initially cause some > > extra hickups. Breaking the builders a couple of times and getting > > scolded for that ought to make people think a bit more about pushing > > potentially destabilizing updates :) > > Exactly.
I know we discovered a few issues in the last couple of years doing this with arm because of using the stable fedora arm release so I'm glad we're able to help :-) Pete > kevin > > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
