On 16. 8. 2013 at 15:20:57, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Matthias Clasen (mcla...@redhat.com) said:
> > On Fri, 2013-08-16 at 08:42 +0200, Jan Zelený wrote:
> > > Actually no, the system is all hacked up and works in a super-abusive
> > > way, see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979083
> >
A couple of obsolete packages is still included in Rawhide. Usually
that means a package has not been retired yet or has been retired
incompletely:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
In some cases, the dead package is only missing the koji block request
in Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=992666
--- Comment #3 from Paul Howarth ---
It still doesn't work with the new Regexp::Grammars 1.031 either. Looks like we
might have to wait for Perl 5.18.2.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe f
On Sun, 18 Aug 2013 21:41:52 -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 9:35 PM, Will Benton wrote:
> > (1) As far as I can tell, the package for Scala 2.9.2 on F19 (2.9.2-2) has
> > broken dependencies; I can't install it via yum on my new F19 install. Is
> > this the case for anyone
Hello,
can someone please check this latex2html bug [1]? I've reported it many
times on this list on a different thread but somehow it went unnoticed.
I know user jnovy has left Redhat, but the package is still owned by him
[2] and is blocking my builds since the beginning of August. Shouldn't th
On 08/18/2013 07:03 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Hi,
>
> One of my packages: dcm4che-test fails to build for rawhide currently.
> There's a bug filed here[1]. The build.log seems to fail on the
> "add_to_maven_depmap" macro. I think it doesn't find it at all[2]. Could
> someone please tell me if I'm m
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 09:05:34PM +1000, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> You should be able to click on your profile and then use the "manage
> login methods" to merge your logins etc.
That works just fine in my case, thanks!
--
Later,
Lukas "lzap" Zapletal
irc: lzap #theforeman
--
devel mailing list
Hello,
I would like to ask again for somebody to sponsor me and help me finish
review and packaging of gimp-separate+.
Thank you in advance.
Peter
On 08/05/2013 10:22 PM, Peter Hanecak wrote:
> Hello,
>
> after initial slow progress I'm now looking for a sponsor to finish the
> review process
On Fri, 2013-08-16 at 09:51 -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> by single file I meant a _single_ file, not the original file and a mapping
> file. :)
Oh, sorry, OK.
> I realize that you have a fully-fledged set of tools, and you're not looking
> for new directions, but I was thinking about encoding ma
- Original Message -
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have merged perl info f20 and started the mass rebuild.
Hi!
A friendly reminder - "Branch Fedora 20 from Rawhide" is planned
tomorrow (2013-08-20) and "Alpha Change Deadline" is also pretty soon
as
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have merged perl info f20 and started the mass rebuild.
>
> Hi!
> A friendly reminder - "Branch Fedora 20 from Rawhide" is planned
> tomo
On Sat, 2013-08-17 at 17:09 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 12:34:26PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > But then there's the issue of transporting these sparse files
> > around. We have had the same problem in the past with large e2image
> > metadata image files, which may
Flock is over. How about some action on my ticket?
Or reject the ticket and tell me why!
Original Message
Subject: promoting to package co-maintainers?
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 08:31:13 -0400
From: Kaleb S. KEITHLEY
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
Hi
On 7
On Sun, 2013-08-18 at 16:43 +0100, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> You definitely need the fsync before doing the fiemap.
> We saw this on certain file systems including ext4 when adding
> fiemap support (efficient reading of holes) to cp.
> This is a bug in the fiemap interface IMHO in that it returns
> fa
On 08/19/2013 01:32 PM, drago01 wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
- Original Message -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I have merged perl info f20 and started the mass rebuild.
Hi!
A friendly reminder - "Branch Fedora 20 from Rawhi
在 2013-8-19 PM7:49，"Ralf Corsepius" 写道：
> Please postpone this. IMO, this is much too early.
>
> Also take into account what time of year it is: Summer Holidays (at least
in Europe).
>
> Many people have been on vacation and some still are (Around here, summer
holidays end early/mid September).
+1
- Original Message -
> On 08/19/2013 01:32 PM, drago01 wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Jaroslav Reznik
> > wrote:
> >> - Original Message -
> >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >>> Hash: SHA1
> >>>
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> I have merged perl info f20 and started
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> On 08/19/2013 01:32 PM, drago01 wrote:
>> > On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Jaroslav Reznik
>> > wrote:
>> >> - Original Message -
>> >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> >>> Hash: SHA1
>> >>>
On 08/19/2013 02:21 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
- Original Message -
On 08/19/2013 01:32 PM, drago01 wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Jaroslav Reznik
wrote:
- Original Message -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I have merged perl info f20 and star
perl-MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes-2.002-2.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes-2.002-2.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2
perl-ParseUtil-Domain has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-ParseUtil-Domain-2.22-3.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-ParseUtil-Domain-2.22-3.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
perl-ParseUtil-Do
slic3r has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.3)
On i386:
slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.3)
On armhfp:
slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_
perl-Encode-JP-Mobile has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Encode-JP-Mobile-0.30-2.fc19.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-Encode-JP-Mobile-0.30-2.fc19.i686 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
perl-Encode-JP-Mobi
perl-MIME-Lite-HTML has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-MIME-Lite-HTML-1.24-4.fc18.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0)
On i386:
perl-MIME-Lite-HTML-1.24-4.fc18.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0)
On armhfp:
perl-MIME-Lite-HTML-1.2
On 08/19/2013 02:25 PM, drago01 wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
- Original Message -
On 08/19/2013 01:32 PM, drago01 wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Jaroslav Reznik
wrote:
- Original Message -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: S
Hi,
I am happy to announce that Ruby on Rails 4.0 has landed in Fedora Rawhide[1].
If you have any packages that depends on Rails, it's a good time to test them.
Note: Some dependent RubyGems were updated afterwards to support the newest
version of Rails[2], some not.
Regards
Josef
[1] https:/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=998212
Petr Šabata changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|ppi...@redhat.com |psab...@redhat.com
--
You are receiving
Change in ownership over the last 168 hours
===
5 packages were orphaned
python-xklavier [EL-6] was orphaned by pbrobinson
Python bindings for libxklavier
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/python-xklavier
vbla
On Sat, 17 Aug 2013 20:20:33 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
> becuase it happens *regualary* and not from time to time
> and not depending on package/maintainer and that is
> a wron gbehavior which should be made clear insinde
> the distribution
So, you are proposing a addition to the package mainta
On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 02:28:34PM -0700, Ryan Rix wrote:
>
>> Basically we ship Fedora 20 in a state where one only of our major desktop
>> environments supports bluetooth in a stable fashion? That seems kind of like
>> a
>> disaster wait
Am 19.08.2013 16:37, schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
> On Sat, 17 Aug 2013 20:20:33 +0200
> Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>> because it happens *regulary* and not from time to time
>> and not depending on package/maintainer and that is
>> a wrong behavior which should be made clear insinde
>> the distribution
>
>
On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 07:35:03 -0400
"Kaleb S. KEITHLEY" wrote:
>
> Flock is over. How about some action on my ticket?
>
> Or reject the ticket and tell me why!
Sorry for the delay.
I went and processed all the back packager-sponsor tickets. Looks like
mrunge already added those two folks to p
On 19/08/2013 4:31 PM, "Richard Vickery"
wrote:
>
> On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Matthew Garrett
wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 02:28:34PM -0700, Ryan Rix wrote:
> >
> >> Basically we ship Fedora 20 in a state where one only of our major
desktop
> >> environments supports bluetooth in a s
On Sun, 2013-08-18 at 14:28 -0700, Ryan Rix wrote:
> It sounds like BlueZ5 is not ready for Fedora, betwen the "early alpha" XFCE
> code, and shipping git BlueDevil, mate and cinnamon don't appear to work with
> it ...
We're not even at Alpha TC1 yet, remember. It's not unusual for stuff
roadm
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 08:55:01AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Have you tried Bluetooth on our major desktop environments in F19? :P
>
> (I kid, I kid, it mostly works well. But still, I have to pair my mouse
> every damn time I want to use it, for instance.)
Oh, is https://bugzilla.redhat.
Somewhere along the line, the AHCI driver was changed from a module to
being built-in to the kernel. This is a major PITA for anyone who wants
to use a different/customized version of this driver. (I want to
rebuild it with LED triggers for the disk LEDs on my NAS.)
I haven't been able to find a
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 01:16:03PM -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote:
> Somewhere along the line, the AHCI driver was changed from a module to
> being built-in to the kernel. This is a major PITA for anyone who wants
> to use a different/customized version of this driver. (I want to
> rebuild it with LED
On 08/19/2013 01:19 PM, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> because it's commonly used and found on basically every machine now.
> there are many advantages to having it built in that outweigh the cons.
A couple of questions:
- What are the advantages of having the driver built-in, as compared to
simply ens
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 01:35:16PM -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote:
> On 08/19/2013 01:19 PM, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> > because it's commonly used and found on basically every machine now.
> > there are many advantages to having it built in that outweigh the cons.
>
> A couple of questions:
>
> - What ar
On 19 Aug 2013 19:40, "Ian Pilcher" wrote:
>
> On 08/19/2013 01:19 PM, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> > because it's commonly used and found on basically every machine now.
> > there are many advantages to having it built in that outweigh the cons.
>
> A couple of questions:
>
> - What are the advantages
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:44:02AM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> A couple of obsolete packages is still included in Rawhide. Usually
> that means a package has not been retired yet or has been retired
> incompletely:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_li
On 19 Aug 2013 19:51, "Till Maas" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:44:02AM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > A couple of obsolete packages is still included in Rawhide. Usually
> > that means a package has not been retired yet or has been retired
> > incompletely:
> >
> > https://f
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 07:55:26PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On 19 Aug 2013 19:51, "Till Maas" wrote:
> > How did you create the list? At least this one seems to be a false
> > positive, because it is not retired:
>
> Isn't that what he says in the first sentence... Orphaned but not properl
On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 21:22:49 +0200
Till Maas wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 07:55:26PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > On 19 Aug 2013 19:51, "Till Maas" wrote:
>
> > > How did you create the list? At least this one seems to be a false
> > > positive, because it is not retired:
> >
> > Isn't
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 01:25:36PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 21:22:49 +0200
> Till Maas wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 07:55:26PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > > On 19 Aug 2013 19:51, "Till Maas" wrote:
> >
> > > > How did you create the list? At least this one se
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:44:02AM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> A couple of obsolete packages is still included in Rawhide. Usually
> that means a package has not been retired yet or has been retired
> incompletely:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
>
On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 21:34:52 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> > > > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/latexdiff
> > >
> > > Let me rephrase: It is not orphaned/retired/deprecated in pkgdb and
> > > there is no dead.package in GIT and it is not blocked in koji.
> >
> > Right, and yet it'
The following packages have been retired:
alsa-oss
firmware-extract
firstboot
gkrellm-timestamp
guiloader
justmoon
lybniz
mars-sim
miau
openstack-tempo
osgal
python3-cherrypy
vblade
Because alsa-oss was retired, mumble needs to be rebuild without OSS
support (just removing the BR failed in a scra
On 08/19/2013 01:48 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> Ultimately if there's missing features you should communicate with the
> author of the patch as to why they're not upstream and then you'd not
> have to care about whether its built in or a module.
Heh. I kind of doubt that the AHCI driver maintaine
> If there are no objections, I can just retire all of them.
The src.rpm names:
chktex
classads
detex
drupal6-drush
ff-utils
gpp4
ibus-table-array30
jadetex
jaxen-bootstrap
joystick
kdirstat
latexdiff
lzma
mate-conf
mate-conf-editor
metapost-metauml
nss-myhostname
openswan
pdfbook
pdfjam
ps2eps
p
On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 22:30:03 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > If there are no objections, I can just retire all of them.
Okay, I object!
Some of them are sub-packages. Obsolete, but still being built!
For example, yum-plugin-security from yum-utils, obsoleted by yum.
That's really odd.
--
de
> yum-utils
>
I don't think yum-utils should be on that list given that it appears to be
actively maintained and not obsoleted.
Peter
> zeitgeist-datahub
>
> [...]
>
> chktex-1.6.4-12.fc19.src.rpm
> classads-1.0.8-7.fc20.src.rpm
> detex-2.8-6.fc20.src.rpm
> drupal6-drush-4.1-7.fc20.src.rpm
> f
The following packages did not build for two releases and will be
retired around 2013-08-26 unless someone rebuilds them or announces to
actively working on fixing them.
Note: If you received this mail directly you (co)maintain one of the affected
packages or a package that depends on one.
On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 21:45:09 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > yum-utils
> >
>
> I don't think yum-utils should be on that list given that it appears to be
> actively maintained and not obsoleted.
All these src.rpms build _something_ that is obsoleted by something else.
For yum-utils, it's the y
On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 23:05:32 +0200
Till Maas wrote:
> The following packages did not build for two releases and will be
> retired around 2013-08-26 unless someone rebuilds them or announces to
> actively working on fixing them.
>
> Note: If you received this mail directly you (co)maintain one of
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 9:16 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> The following packages have been retired:
>
> alsa-oss
> firmware-extract
> firstboot
> gkrellm-timestamp
> guiloader
> justmoon
> lybniz
> mars-sim
> miau
> openstack-tempo
> osgal
> python3-cherrypy
> vblade
>
> Because alsa-oss was retired, m
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47403/0001-Ticket-47403-DSGW-authentication-issue.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:21:38PM +0200, Dan Horák wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 23:05:32 +0200
> Till Maas wrote:
>
> > The following packages did not build for two releases and will be
> > retired around 2013-08-26 unless someone rebuilds them or announces to
> > actively working on fixing them
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:21:38PM +0200, Dan Horák wrote:
> > On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 23:05:32 +0200
> > Till Maas wrote:
> >
> > > The following packages did not build for two releases and will be
> > > retired around 2013-08-26 unless someone r
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:51:34PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> No they can't, the sync of blocked/new packages is synced over all
> secondary arches. They could likely be untagged so they don't show up in
> the list.
Tagging is also synced, therefore it is more complicated. There is now a
tick
Comments at the bottom. First the src.rpms in Rawhide, which are
completely obsolete because all built binary rpms are obsoleted.
Those should get retired properly:
All builds obsoleted:
-
chktex
classads
detex
drupal6-drush
ff-utils
gpp4
ibus-table-array30
jadetex
jaxen-boots
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 12:17:50AM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> # repoquery --whatobsoletes openswan
> libreswan-0:3.3-1.fc19.x86_64
>
> That's strange, because openswan is a dead.package. :-/
FYI: openswan is now blocked for Fedora 20.
Regards
Till
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fe
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47486/0002-fix-compiler-warnings.patch
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47486/0002-fix-compiler-warnings.2.patch
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47486/0002-fix-compiler-warnings.3.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de.
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 09:48:46PM -0700, Richard Vickery wrote:
> Instead of shipping it, is there a problem with giving it to those on
> the developer list and letting us iron out the kinks?
Sure, that's what already happens. If you want to help, this thread
contains a multitude of pointers wher
On Tue, 20 Aug 2013, Michael Schwendt wrote:
For openswan, the openswan-doc subpackage is not obsoleted, just the
base package is.
# repoquery --whatobsoletes openswan
libreswan-0:3.3-1.fc19.x86_64
That's strange, because openswan is a dead.package. :-/
I'll fix that.
Paul
--
devel mailin
The whole reason why the bluez5 package was proposed as a separate one was so
that we didn't have to cater for every desktop under the sun that's included in
Fedora.
bluez5 would conflict with bluez. If you had both MATE and GNOME installed, you
wouldn't be able to upgrade to the latest version
Hi,
I just noticed the mass rebuild on Aug 3 botched up my EVR for
libreswan:
Release: %{?prever:0.}1%{?prever:.%{prever}}%{?dist}.1
It should have been:
Release: %{?prever:0.}2%{?prever:.%{prever}}%{?dist}
The previous version was:
Release: %{?prever:0.}1%{?prever:.%{prever}}%{?dist}
How
Don't retire my package, I have no time to fix them in this week, will
check them at least from next Monday.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Hi. These packages were obsoleted in MATE 1.6 along with the migration
to gsettings.
libmate
libmateui
libmatecanvas
libmatecomponent
libatecomponentui
libmatenotify
mate-conf (compiz no longer relies on mate-conf)
mate-conf-editor
mate-doc-utils (to be retired in F21 with MATE 1.8)
mate-keyring (
On Mon, 2013-08-19 at 19:29 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just noticed the mass rebuild on Aug 3 botched up my EVR for
> libreswan:
>
> Release: %{?prever:0.}1%{?prever:.%{prever}}%{?dist}.1
>
> It should have been:
>
> Release: %{?prever:0.}2%{?prever:.%{prever}}%{?dist}
>
> The prev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 19:29:08 -0400 (EDT)
Paul Wouters wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I just noticed the mass rebuild on Aug 3 botched up my EVR for
> libreswan:
>
> Release: %{?prever:0.}1%{?prever:.%{prever}}%{?dist}.1
>
> It should have been:
>
> Release:
Hi guys,
Following the set of guidelines provided at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers#Install_the_client_tools_.28Koji.29_and_set_up_your_certificate
I would like to introduce myself.
My names are Onuonga Frankie.
my page on the fedora system is
:https:
Where is your package?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 11:42 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
> Where is your package?
I do not have one.
I am hoping to assist in packaging if required.
thank you.
>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://
Hi TIll,
The maintainer of package
python-pylons
is a zombie.
I just realized that I'm on CC list but not co.
I'd like to take it.
Thanks.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.o
76 matches
Mail list logo
