[Test-Announce] 2013-04-29 @ 15:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

x27;s make sure everything's in place and we're all ready to test. This is a reminder of the upcoming QA meeting. Please add any topic suggestions to the meeting wiki page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20130429 The current proposed agenda is included below. == Proposed Agenda Topi

Re: Review Swap

On 04/29/2013 08:59 AM, Matthias Runge wrote: On 04/28/2013 01:48 PM, Christopher Meng wrote: There are many review requests here. Can someone help do a review(even only one of them)? It'll be way easier for you to find a reviewer, when you'd be reviewing other packages yourself. Matthias Su

Re: Review Swap

On 04/29/2013 09:12 AM, Alec Leamas wrote: On 04/29/2013 08:59 AM, Matthias Runge wrote: On 04/28/2013 01:48 PM, Christopher Meng wrote: There are many review requests here. Can someone help do a review(even only one of them)? It'll be way easier for you to find a reviewer, when you'd be rev

perl-File-Next 1.12 license corrected to 'Artistic 2.0'

Upstream has mis-matched licensing in Makefile.PL and in the source code. I corrected the License in specfile following the source code. robin -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Q: webfonts:

On 04/27/2013 01:49 PM, Alec Leamas wrote: I'm trying to package a web application with bundled fonts. These fonts are used by the web clients (browsers), and just served from the Fedora webapp. The case is similar to javascript .js files. Trying to package the webfonts as dependencies I have r

Re: Q: webfonts:

On 04/29/2013 11:04 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: On 04/27/2013 01:49 PM, Alec Leamas wrote: I'm trying to package a web application with bundled fonts. These fonts are used by the web clients (browsers), and just served from the Fedora webapp. The case is similar to javascript .js files. Trying t

rawhide report: 20130429 changes

Compose started at Mon Apr 29 08:15:03 UTC 2013 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [aeolus-conductor] aeolus-conductor-0.10.6-2.fc19.noarch requires ruby(abi) = 0:1.9.1 [deltacloud-core] deltacloud-core-1.0.5-2.fc19.noarch requires rub

F-19 Branched report: 20130429 changes

Compose started at Mon Apr 29 09:15:02 UTC 2013 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [aeolus-conductor] aeolus-conductor-0.10.6-2.fc19.noarch requires ruby(abi) = 0:1.9.1 [clementine] clementine-1.1.1-1.fc19.x86_64 requires libprotobuf.s

Re: GNOME games stuck on v3.6.1 for Fedora 19?

Hi, On 04/27/2013 11:48 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: It looks like all of the gnome games are still at v3.6.1 in Fedora 19... I guess because they were split into multiple packages upstream. I guess it's too late to get these into F19 since they are basically new packages now, but I wanted to gi

[Bug 957639] perl-CPANPLUS-0.9136 is available

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957639 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version|

Idea: "{Gnome,KDE,Xfce,...} Minimal Desktop" groups

Hi, >From time to time, when setting up virtual machines for testing, I miss a fast way to install the minimal set of packages which allows me to boot into the desktop of a desktop environment. Currently, I do a minimal install, then install some core component, i.e. gnome-shell, and then hunt the

Re: Review swap: zopfli - Zlib compatible better compressor

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/26/2013 03:22 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Hi > > Should be a simple review. Let me know if anyone is interested. Rahul, it would be helpful to put a link to the review ticket in request emails like this. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version:

Re: Idea: "{Gnome,KDE,Xfce,...} Minimal Desktop" groups

Hi, On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 15:07:58 +0200 Sandro Mani wrote: > Hi, > > From time to time, when setting up virtual machines for testing, I miss a > fast way to install the minimal set of packages which allows me to boot > into the desktop of a desktop environment. Currently, I do a minimal > instal

Re: no kernels updates in F17 ?

On Sáb, 2013-04-27 at 15:59 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > this one is no longer relevant and if there would be a karma-option > in koji i would have given as i rolled out 3.8.8-102.fc17.x86_64 > in production But 3.8.8-102.fc17.x86_64 is not pushed to updates-testing . Meanwhile kernel-3.8.8-100.

Re: Review swap: zopfli - Zlib compatible better compressor

Hi On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 9:35 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 04/26/2013 03:22 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > Hi > > > > Should be a simple review. Let me know if anyone is interested. > > Rahul, it would be helpful to put a link to the rev

Re: Idea: "{Gnome,KDE,Xfce,...} Minimal Desktop" groups

On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Sandro Mani wrote: > So, what about creating groups for the various desktop environments which > pull in basesystem + xorg + mesa drivers + displaymanager + bare desktop > shell? Do the groups already provided in comps.xml[1] not work for this task? Currently,

Re: Idea: "{Gnome,KDE,Xfce,...} Minimal Desktop" groups

On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Rich Mattes wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Sandro Mani wrote: > >> So, what about creating groups for the various desktop environments which >> pull in basesystem + xorg + mesa drivers + displaymanager + bare desktop >> shell? > > > Do the groups alr

fedora-review 0.4.1 release

We have a new fedora-review release with quite a lot of bugfixes and update for current Java guidelines. Excerpt from NEWS file: - Updated and improved Java checks for latest packaging guidelines * Automate buildarch check * Do CheckNoArch per subpackage instead of buildarch * Add che

Re: Idea: "{Gnome,KDE,Xfce,...} Minimal Desktop" groups

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/29/2013 10:55 AM, Rich Mattes wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Sandro Mani > wrote: > > So, what about creating groups for the various desktop > environments which pull in basesystem + xorg + mesa driver

Re: Idea: "{Gnome,KDE,Xfce,...} Minimal Desktop" groups

On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Sandro Mani wrote: > > > > On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Rich Mattes wrote: > >> >> On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Sandro Mani wrote: >> >>> So, what about creating groups for the various desktop environments >>> which pull in basesystem + xorg + mesa driver

Re: Idea: "{Gnome,KDE,Xfce,...} Minimal Desktop" groups

On 2013-04-29 15:07 (GMT+0200) Sandro Mani composed: From time to time, when setting up virtual machines for testing, I miss a fast way to install the minimal set of packages which allows me to boot into the desktop of a desktop environment. Currently, I do a minimal install, then install some c

Re: Idea: "{Gnome,KDE,Xfce,...} Minimal Desktop" groups

On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 04/29/2013 10:55 AM, Rich Mattes wrote: > > > > On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Sandro Mani > > wrote: > > > > So, what about creating groups for the va

Re: GNOME games stuck on v3.6.1 for Fedora 19?

On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 14:56 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hmm, there seem to be 2 issues here: > > 1) The original built from the unsplit 3.6.1 sources gnome-games-* packages > need to be blocked, ie: > > > [hans@shalem ~]$ sudo yum list '*mahjong*' > ... > gnome-games-mahjongg.x86_64

Re: Idea: "{Gnome,KDE,Xfce,...} Minimal Desktop" groups

On 04/29/2013 10:01 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > That said, if someone wanted to do the exploration, come up with those > minimal package sets and propose them for inclusion to comps.xml (with > the blessing of the related desktop SIG), I have no problems with it > myself. To a certain extent, t

Re: audacity

audacity is unmaintained in both fedora and RPM Fusion. I'm about to kick it out of the later repository. Nicolas (kwizart) 2013/4/28 Richard Vickery > For F18, it appears that the Audacity mp3 build is broken - it won't > install - and mp3 support is rather important to me; is it possible to

Re: GNOME games stuck on v3.6.1 for Fedora 19?

On 27/04/13 23:48, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > It looks like all of the gnome games are still at v3.6.1 in Fedora 19... > I guess because they were split into multiple packages upstream. I guess > it's too late to get these into F19 since they are basically new > packages now, but I wanted to give a

Re: GNOME games stuck on v3.6.1 for Fedora 19?

On 04/29/2013 10:49 AM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > Yes, except it's more than just glchess (now known as gnome-chess) that > is missing; it seems only about half of the games got updated. If I were you, I would create a bug report against gnome-games with the list of games. Once created, provide a

Re: GNOME games stuck on v3.6.1 for Fedora 19?

On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Michael Catanzaro < mike.catanz...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, except it's more than just glchess (now known as gnome-chess) that > is missing; it seems only about half of the games got updated. > The new gnome-chess package is still waiting for a review[1]. It loo

Re: audacity

On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > audacity is unmaintained in both fedora and RPM Fusion. > That's doesn't appear to be true. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/audacity Now, if the maintainer isn't being responsive, we have other ways to deal with that.

Re: Mission Impossible #1: qt without gtk

Whether it is possible to sane gsteamer and try to remove gtk? And gvfs - removing *gnome*. 29.04.2013 01:07, Farkas Levente: On 04/28/2013 10:58 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: Eugene Pivnev wrote: As I'm trying to create gtk-/gnome-/kde*-free environment (QtDesktop) - I tested - what about Fedora wit

[Test-Announce] MariaDB Test Day tomorrow (2013-04-30)

Dear testers, a new test day awaits! This time it is MariaDB test day, which is scheduled tomorrow (2013-04-30). As some of you might know, Fedora 19 is going to experience an interesting change in default implementation of MySQL RDBMS. MariaDB is a fork of original MySQL and in comparison to M

Re: Idea: "{Gnome,KDE,Xfce,...} Minimal Desktop" groups

Le lundi 29 avril 2013 à 16:58 +0200, Sandro Mani a écrit : > > On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Rich Mattes > wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Sandro Mani > wrote: > So, what about creating groups for the various desktop > env

[Test-Announce] Planned Outage: lists.fedoraproject.org migration - 2013-05-01 21:00UTC

Outage: lists.fedoraproject.org migration - 2013-05-01 21:00UTC There will be an outage starting at 2013-05-01 21:00UTC, which will last approximately 4 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2013-05-0

Re: Mission Impossible #1: qt without gtk

On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 20:59 +0400, Eugene Pivnev wrote: > Whether it is possible to sane gsteamer and try to remove gtk? > And gvfs - removing *gnome*. It appears that out of the entire gvfsd package, only: /usr/libexec/gvfsd-recent requires GTK libraries. Everything else is strictly non-GUI.

Re: Idea: "{Gnome,KDE,Xfce,...} Minimal Desktop" groups

On 29.04.2013 19:21, Michael Scherer wrote: Le lundi 29 avril 2013 à 16:58 +0200, Sandro Mani a écrit : On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Rich Mattes wrote: On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Sandro Mani wrote: So, what about creating groups for the

Re: Review Request 23: Bugzilla Faults During Proposal are not logged, lead to http 500 errors

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/23/#review30 --- Code looks good but I'd like to see some test cases for this as

Re: audacity

On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote: > On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > >> audacity is unmaintained in both fedora and RPM Fusion. >> > > That's doesn't appear to be true. > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/audacity > > Now, if the maintai

Re: Idea: "{Gnome,KDE,Xfce,...} Minimal Desktop" groups

On 2013-04-29 19:49 (GMT+0200) Sandro Mani composed: Michael Scherer wrote: minimal is not well defined. I would define minimal as the absolute minimal set of packages which allows the shell to load. This resulting setup is not meant to be usable without the user installing additional pack

Re: audacity

I still have it on my system and use it, what else is there to use? Thanks, Phillip Lynn On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 17:55 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > audacity is unmaintained in both fedora and RPM Fusion. > > I'm about to kick it out of the later repository. > > > Nicolas (kwizart) > > > >

Re: audacity

I just packaged soxr... Anyone willing to review if I submit a review request? Thanks, Richard -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Idea: "{Gnome,KDE,Xfce,...} Minimal Desktop" groups

On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 07:49:23PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote: > I would define minimal as the absolute minimal set of packages which > allows the shell to load. This resulting setup is not meant to be > usable without the user installing additional packages he or she > wishes. So such groups would n

Re: Idea: "{Gnome,KDE,Xfce,...} Minimal Desktop" groups

On 29.04.2013 20:42, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 07:49:23PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote: I would define minimal as the absolute minimal set of packages which allows the shell to load. This resulting setup is not meant to be usable without the user installing additional packag

Re: audacity

On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 2:23 PM, drago01 wrote: > On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 7:08 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: >> MP3 is patented, and there are *no* licenses available for Linux >> environments. > > This is nonsense. There are enough "licenses for the linux > environment". A lot of vendors have li

Re: F-19 Branched report: 20130425 changes

On 04/26/2013 08:28 AM, Tom Callaway wrote: > On 04/26/2013 07:43 AM, José Matos wrote: > >> As you can see this package is present and available at texlive and since it >> is an updated version while maintained it should be the standard. >> >> I think that last year we had this same discussion a

Re: audacity

On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 17:20:30 -0400 Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > > This is nonsense. There are enough "licenses for the linux > > environment". A lot of vendors have licensed MP3 en/decoders that > > work on the linux. The point is that there is no licensed open > > source mp3 en/decoder. > > Name

Updating SRPM for rawhide

Hi, After my changes today, the latest SRPM should be "open-vm-tools-9.2.3-3.fc20.src.rpm" instead of open-vm-tools-9.2.3-1.fc20.src.rpm . Could someone please tell me how do I get this page http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/source/SRPMS/o/ updated? Thanks in

Re: Idea: "{Gnome,KDE,Xfce,...} Minimal Desktop" groups

My "minimal desktop" is OpenBox with fbpanel and lightdm. I'm guessing there are others; openSUSE has a minimal desktop using a stripped IceWM. I've lived comfortably with WindowMaker and even twm. The key to minimizing a desktop IMHO is getting a lighter browser. It's really hard to use a machine

Re: Idea: "{Gnome,KDE,Xfce,...} Minimal Desktop" groups

On 29.04.2013 20:10, Felix Miata wrote: On 2013-04-29 19:49 (GMT+0200) Sandro Mani composed: Michael Scherer wrote: minimal is not well defined. I would define minimal as the absolute minimal set of packages which allows the shell to load. This resulting setup is not meant to be usable w

Re: audacity

On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Frank Murphy wrote: > On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 17:20:30 -0400 > Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > >> > This is nonsense. There are enough "licenses for the linux >> > environment". A lot of vendors have licensed MP3 en/decoders that >> > work on the linux. The point is that t

[Test-Announce] announcing paste.fedoraproject.org

Greetings. I'm happy to announce that our sticky-notes pastebin service is fully live and in service for any of your Fedora Project related pastebin needs. A pastebin is a web application that allows you to temporarily store small blocks of text or code for sharing to others. You can find it

Re: Updating SRPM for rawhide

On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 16:30:57 -0700 (PDT) Ravindra Kumar wrote: > Hi, > > After my changes today, the latest SRPM should be > "open-vm-tools-9.2.3-3.fc20.src.rpm" instead of > open-vm-tools-9.2.3-1.fc20.src.rpm . Could someone please tell me how > do I get this page > http://dl.fedoraproject.org

Re: Updating SRPM for rawhide

On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 16:30 -0700, Ravindra Kumar wrote: > Hi, Hi Ravindra, > > After my changes today, the latest SRPM should be > "open-vm-tools-9.2.3-3.fc20.src.rpm" instead of > open-vm-tools-9.2.3-1.fc20.src.rpm. > Could someone please tell me how do I get this page > http://dl.fedoraprojec

Re: audacity

On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > Neither of which address the existing MP3 patent issues, only software > copyright issues. Mind you, Most of these patents are finally > expiring, and the existing court cases have been oddm and usually > settled out of court. But the

Re: audacity

On Dom, 2013-04-28 at 07:09 -0700, Richard Vickery wrote: > For F18, it appears that the Audacity mp3 build is broken - it won't > install - and mp3 support is rather important to me; is it possible to > get this particular build working? What do you mean with Audacity mp3 build is broken , rpmf

Re: Idea: "{Gnome,KDE,Xfce,...} Minimal Desktop" groups

Sandro Mani wrote: > I would define minimal as the absolute minimal set of packages which > allows the shell to load For kde, at least, that pretty much matches what 'kde-workspace' is. -- rex -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/

Re: audacity

On 04/30/2013 03:07 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Dom, 2013-04-28 at 07:09 -0700, Richard Vickery wrote: For F18, it appears that the Audacity mp3 build is broken - it won't install - and mp3 support is rather important to me; is it possible to get this particular build working? What do you mean

Re: audacity

On 04/29/2013 08:39 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: I just packaged soxr... Anyone willing to review if I submit a review request? Thanks, Richard Sure. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: audacity

On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Richard Shaw wrote: > I just packaged soxr... Anyone willing to review if I submit a review > request? Since nobody else jumped up, I'll take it. I probably won't have time to review it until Wednesday, so take your time. :-) BTW, it looks like Hans de Goede h

Re: audacity

On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 1:55 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Frank Murphy wrote: >> On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 17:20:30 -0400 >> Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: >> >>> > This is nonsense. There are enough "licenses for the linux >>> > environment". A lot of vendors have license