http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Php55
This feature is now nearly completed.
Sorry for the delay, upstream have just released beta1 (Feature Freeze),
the slip is due to the merge of the new "Zend OPcache" extension, the
old "Zend Optimizer+" which have been open sourced (PHP License). APC
s
Hi,
On 03/23/2013 02:11 AM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
I have just orphaned libid3tag. I picked this up a long-time back because it
was needed by gtkpod. I don't maintain gtkpod anymore and I don't even know if
gtkpod requires libid3tag still.
There isn't any upstream that I am aware of for libi
Hi,
On 03/23/2013 02:11 AM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
I have just orphaned libid3tag. I picked this up a long-time back because it
was needed by gtkpod. I don't maintain gtkpod anymore and I don't even know if
gtkpod requires libid3tag still.
Hmm, there are a lot more users then just gtkpod:
Yesterday a bunch of bugs were opened up regarding aarch64 support in
some packages. I'd like to do my part in fixing these, but is there a
way to actually run test builds? I know that there's ARM support in
the works, but I haven't really kept up with the details.
--
Jeff Ollie
--
devel mailin
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 09:14:52 -0500,
Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
Yesterday a bunch of bugs were opened up regarding aarch64 support in
some packages. I'd like to do my part in fixing these, but is there a
way to actually run test builds? I know that there's ARM support in
the works, but I haven'
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 09:14:52 -0500,
> Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
>>
>> Yesterday a bunch of bugs were opened up regarding aarch64 support in
>> some packages. I'd like to do my part in fixing these, but is there a
>> way to actually run t
Broken upgrade path report for tags f19 -> f20:
bandwidthd:
f19 > f20 (bandwidthd-2.0.1-22.fc19 bandwidthd-2.0.1-21.fc19)
ca-certificates:
f19 > f20 (ca-certificates-2012.87-9.fc19.1 ca-certificates-2012.87-9.fc19)
cgnslib:
f19 > f20 (cgnslib-3.2-1.fc19 cgnslib-3.1-5.r4.fc19)
cmdtest
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 03:12:13PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 09:14:52 -0500,
> > Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
> >>
> >> Yesterday a bunch of bugs were opened up regarding aarch64 support in
> >> some packages. I'd
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 03:12:13PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>> > On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 09:14:52 -0500,
>> > Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Yesterday a bunch of bugs w
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 07:35:08PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > Do you know what processor features ('flags') will be available in the
> > first shipping hardware?
>
> Nope, although I will find out, what particular bits do you need
ARM deprecate endian switching in ARMv7+ application (server) profiles. It is
possible to do big endian but with external hardware assistance. We will be an
LP64 little endian architecture with a relaxed memory model. Ping me with
questions.
Sent from my Android phone using TouchDown (www.nitro
We are doing some enablement work with Linaro (Linaro Enterprise Group) that
includes both KVM and Xen, and libvirt. Let's sync up next week Rich.
Sent from my Android phone using TouchDown (www.nitrodesk.com)
-Original Message-
From: Richard W.M. Jones [rjo...@redhat.com]
Received: Sat
On 03/23/2013 10:14 AM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
> Yesterday a bunch of bugs were opened up regarding aarch64 support in
> some packages. I'd like to do my part in fixing these, but is there a
> way to actually run test builds?
As Peter says, there will be an updated F19-ish filesystem image soon.
Th
On 03/23/2013 06:12 PM, Jonathan Masters wrote:
> ARM deprecate endian switching in ARMv7+ application (server) profiles. It is
> possible to do big endian but with external hardware assistance. We will be
> an LP64 little endian architecture with a relaxed memory model. Ping me with
> questions
Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 18.03.2013 20:55, schrieb James Antill:
>> This means users can't choose between the mysql's if they want to, so
>> if we do this it'd be much easier to just say "we'll only have a single
>> `mysql' in Fedora" and then we'd just have to add one more obsolete to
>> mariadb
Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> BTW determining this accurately should be fairly doable[1]. Just look
> for symlink() and link() calls (and recursively through wrapper APIs /
> language bindings). These syscalls are fairly rare.
That checks for PROGRAMS which run into this. It catches neither admin's
c
Sergio Pascual wrote:
> Oh great. I didn't thought that a link from libcfitsio-3.330.so.0 to
> libcfitsio.so would work.
> I have changed it now. The soname is (finally) libcfitsio-3.330.so.0, the
> library is libcfitsio-3.330.so.0 and is linked to libcfitsio.so
But WHY?
How is that better than l
17 matches
Mail list logo