On 03/05/2013 02:31 AM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
As I am currently very busy with my dayjob, I'd like to ask you to
please fix all of my packages you changed to use conditionals, so I
can continue to use one spec at least for all supported Fedora releases.
Toshio's guidelines for those changes c
- Original Message -
> On Mon, 4 Mar 2013 20:35:08 +0100
> Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 7:50 PM, Josh Boyer
> > wrote:
>
> ...snip...
>
> > >> Finally, the planning process will recognize the existence of
> > >> these
> > >> tiers by classifying each proposed change:
afraid-dyndns has recently been orphaned, following a discussion here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830458
Upstream used to maintain the package in Fedora but no longer remembers
how(!)
Apologies if this is a repeat, but I don't recall seeing a mention here.
--
devel mailing li
On Tue, 05 Mar 2013 08:31:15 +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> Hi Rahul,
>
> if you want to help out in the effort to remove the vendor tags, please
> do it *right*.
>
> That means:
> * use conditionals, so maintainers can continue to use one spec
> for F19 and other releases. Toshi
How to be an packager ?
On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 13:19 +0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> On 05/03/13 03:26, Klearchos-Angelos Gkountras wrote:
> > There is no luakit on fc18 . how to help ?
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/applications/Luakit?_csrf_token=a4b62ea58e444602602d35ee0a3f33
Klearchos-Angelos this links can be helpful
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process#Contributor
2013/3/5 Klearchos-Angelos Gkountras
> How to be an packager ?
>
> On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 13:19 +0700, Michel Alexa
On 03/05/2013 04:09 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
Some of the changes have been applied with good intentions. I
understand that. But they are still controversial.
I have made some actual mistakes in some of the previous builds but I
thought in this case my changes were really straight forward. T
On Thu, 14 Feb 2013 16:17:00 +0100, Tom Lane wrote:
"Norvald H. Ryeng" writes:
We want to keep the MySQL package in Fedora and are willing to
co-maintain
or take over maintainership if nobody else will do it. We haven't really
discussed this with the current maintainers yet, but from the
Product: Security Response
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=884354
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #705056|0 |1
is obso
Thanks, I'll ask Susmit and Andreas why they retired it.
Best,
Mario
On 4 March 2013 20:36, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Mar 2013 17:43:32 +
> Mat Booth wrote:
>
>> On 4 March 2013 17:33, Mario Ceresa wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> > I noticed that Amide is orphaned, even if it is still possibl
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 07:18:04PM +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> Some of the things we want to achieve:
> * Make rawhide to be reliably installable and usable by developers by
> coherently introducing changes.
Mageia packages libraries by the .so major version. So you can upgrade a
library and th
On 05/03 11.07, Norvald H. Ryeng wrote:
>
> We now have a set of working 5.6.10 packages. The packages pass mtr
> tests and we've tested some of the packages that depend on MySQL
> (php, perl-DBD-MySQL, etc.). It all seems to be working well, so I
> think we're ready to get it into rawhide. I beli
On Tue, 05 Mar 2013 04:36:11 -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > Some of the changes have been applied with good intentions. I
> > understand that. But they are still controversial.
>
> I have made some actual mistakes in some of the previous builds but I
> thought in this case my changes were re
Hi everybody,
I already started working on Fedora packages, updates and bugs - one of
each :), so I think it's really a good time to present myself to the
community.
Primary, I'm the upstream maintainer of the hid-multitouch kernel
driver. This driver aims at handling any multitouch touchscreen
c
Hi
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 5:54 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
> > dropped INSTALL file (rpmlint warning). defattr and %clean section
> > which are entirely redundant for all current Fedora releases.
>
> I think you could have fixed also the %buildroot and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT mix,
> too. *g*
>
Sure b
- Original Message -
> On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 07:18:04PM +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> > Some of the things we want to achieve:
> > * Make rawhide to be reliably installable and usable by developers
> > by
> > coherently introducing changes.
>
> Another factor is that on Fedora, it seem
There is some way to test new version of gnome on Fedora 18?
Thanks
--
Dario Lesca - sip:da...@solinos.it
(Inviato dal mio Linux Fedora18+Gnome3)
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
No.
Please upgrade to Fedora 19.
Sent from Transformer Prime
On Mar 5, 2013 7:29 PM, "Dario Lesca" wrote:
> There is some way to test new version of gnome on Fedora 18?
> Thanks
> --
> Dario Lesca - sip:da...@solinos.it
> (Inviato dal mio Linux Fedora18+Gnome3)
>
>
> --
> devel mailing list
> d
Il giorno mar, 05/03/2013 alle 19.33 +0800, Liang Suilong ha scritto:
> Please upgrade to Fedora 19.
Thank Liang, someone can tell to me what is the best way to upgrade my
Fedora 18 x86_64 to F19?
Many thanks
--
Dario Lesca - sip:da...@solinos.it
(Inviato dal mio Linux Fedora18+Gnome3)
--
d
I don't suggest you doing that.
Upgrading to Fedora 19 is not good for end users.
*Yours sincerely,*
*Christopher Meng*
Got problems with Windows? - ReBoot
Got problems with Linux? - Be Root
Ambassador/Contributor of Fedora Project and many others.
http://cicku.me
2013/3/5 Dario Lesca
> I
Am Dienstag, den 05.03.2013, 13:23 +0100 schrieb Dario Lesca:
> Il giorno mar, 05/03/2013 alle 19.33 +0800, Liang Suilong ha scritto:
> > Please upgrade to Fedora 19.
>
> Thank Liang, someone can tell to me what is the best way to upgrade my
> Fedora 18 x86_64 to F19?
If you don't know how to do
- Original Message -
> Am Dienstag, den 05.03.2013, 13:23 +0100 schrieb Dario Lesca:
> > Il giorno mar, 05/03/2013 alle 19.33 +0800, Liang Suilong ha
> > scritto:
> > > Please upgrade to Fedora 19.
> >
> > Thank Liang, someone can tell to me what is the best way to upgrade
> > my
> > Fedor
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 12:28:51PM +0100, Dario Lesca wrote:
> There is some way to test new version of gnome on Fedora 18?
> Thanks
The GNOME live image is currently based on Fedora (without the
branding). So you could copy this to some USB stick and test that:
http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/mis
Hi!
As time flows really fast, we are getting closer to another important
milestones for Fedora 19 [1] on 2013-03-12 (as agreed by FESCo):
* Feature Freeze -- Planning & Development Ends
* Branch Freeze -- Branch Fedora 19 from Rawhide
Feature Freeze is in one week from now, please keep in mind t
Il giorno mar, 05/03/2013 alle 07.36 -0500, Jaroslav Reznik ha scritto:
> - Original Message -
> > Am Dienstag, den 05.03.2013, 13:23 +0100 schrieb Dario Lesca:
> > > Il giorno mar, 05/03/2013 alle 19.33 +0800, Liang Suilong ha
> > > scritto:
> > > > Please upgrade to Fedora 19.
> > >
> >
commit 3d785db70a9dfc2720a4398fd732b2cb2f3b3d36
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Tue Mar 5 13:30:37 2013 +0100
Fix CVE-2013-1667
perl-5.14.3-CVE-2013-1667.patch | 172 +++
perl.spec | 10 ++-
2 files changed, 181 insertions(+), 1 deleti
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918008
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version
Il giorno mar, 05/03/2013 alle 13.30 +0100, Christoph Wickert ha
scritto:
> If you don't know how to do this, you probably shouldn't do it.
... or learn to do (I'm a Human, from Earth, Italy).
There is a official way to do this?
Thanks
--
Dario Lesca - sip:da...@solinos.it
(Inviato dal mio Linu
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Encode:
c0ec98b0308e0f9bfc02b73b30ef459e Encode-2.49.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinf
commit f3bb3b9f17a234f7b64186abe0f415dc4dc3387f
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Tue Mar 5 14:23:44 2013 +0100
2.49 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Encode.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 1:15 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> Hi!
> As time flows really fast, we are getting closer to another important
> milestones for Fedora 19 [1] on 2013-03-12 (as agreed by FESCo):
> * Feature Freeze -- Planning & Development Ends
> * Branch Freeze -- Branch Fedora 19 from Rawh
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918008
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.14.3-223.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-5.14.3-223.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908113
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.14.3-223.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-5.14.3-223.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on th
Hi,
I find it sad that people are still arguing for the developer-oriented "I
only care about making application Y as easy to maintain on a wide variety
of platforms as possible", and dismiss sysadmin security concerns as too
inconvenient to follow, at the very same time one of the biggest
propone
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=917982
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
Compose started at Tue Mar 5 08:15:06 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[HippoDraw]
HippoDraw-python-1.21.3-6.fc19.x86_64 requires
libboost_python.so.1.50.0()(64bit)
[condor]
condor-plumage-7.9.1-0.1.fc19.4.x86_64 requires
On Tue 05 Mar 2013 02:21:53 PM CET, Dario Lesca wrote:
> There is a official way to do this?
>
> Thanks
>
At this point you shouldn't ask either if "an official way exists or
not".
That makes no sense, creating "an official method" to do something that
you shouldn't do.
Probably, after an upgra
Il giorno mar, 05/03/2013 alle 15.26 +0100, Antonio ha scritto:
> Upgrading_Fedora_using_yum or use FedUp.
Ok, thanks.
--
Dario Lesca - sip:da...@solinos.it
(Inviato dal mio Linux Fedora18+Gnome3)
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/list
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-PPI-XS:
9f1fc9b4df050395b5ee314f1f77bc05 PPI-XS-0.902.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listin
commit 676d868e2120d3ccd9dc25e083d18783dbd341e8
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Tue Mar 5 16:02:15 2013 +0100
Import
.gitignore |1 +
perl-PPI-XS.spec | 60 ++
sources |1 +
3 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 0 deletion
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC (1:00pm EST, 19:00 CET) in
#fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9
= Fo
On 5 March 2013 01:41, Andrew Wyatt wrote:
> Properly order packages returned by PackageKit so automations executed on
> 64bit systems won't sometimes pull 32bit packages due to a lack of ordering
I've followed up on bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61825
Richard.
--
devel
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Mail-Box-Parser-C:
4203b3df229df135ec3488721f0ce7f8 Mail-Box-Parser-C-3.007.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproj
commit d3d7ce4a153724612bc282c8dded3226bbe85d98
Author: Tom Callaway
Date: Tue Mar 5 11:00:56 2013 -0500
3.007
perl-Mail-Box-Parser-C.spec | 47 ++
sources |2 +-
2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
---
diff
commit 8c661b68e44862b8a402ea3b2a431e21a3129629
Author: Tom Callaway
Date: Tue Mar 5 11:01:11 2013 -0500
3.007
perl-Mail-Box-Parser-C.spec | 41 +++--
sources |2 +-
2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
---
diff -
commit 6d89a76998e670139e9c2e219bf97ba0ed0838cb
Author: Tom Callaway
Date: Tue Mar 5 11:01:31 2013 -0500
3.007
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Mail-Box-Parser-C.spec | 38 --
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 22 insert
On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 14:07 -0800, Josh Stone wrote:
> So given that this library's use is pretty well contained, might it be
> OK to go ahead and update in F18?
Yeah, that's fine.
In the future, consider following the glibc pattern of fixing the soname
for all but truly-world-breaking changes,
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-WWW-OrangeHRM-Client:
7f76f0bdc220280164d5eb0f973d9dfc WWW-OrangeHRM-Client-v0.4.0.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fed
commit 0a84f86549287595f4823f171d7edc60c5aa89ee
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Tue Mar 5 17:00:30 2013 +0100
0.4.0 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-WWW-OrangeHRM-Client.spec |5 -
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-
commit 90434c8f97ff90629cd001b905b06e076597392e
Author: Tom Callaway
Date: Tue Mar 5 11:04:52 2013 -0500
add missing BR
perl-Class-DBI-Loader-Relationship.spec | 15 +--
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Class-DBI-Loader-Relationship.spe
Summary of changes:
0a84f86... 0.4.0 bump (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/
Summary of changes:
0a84f86... 0.4.0 bump (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/
On Tue, 5 Mar 2013 03:48:29 -0500 (EST)
Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> The idea is autoqa (but those test run as part of package build could
> be part of it too). Yes, it means it will take a time to have a good
> set of tests and with autoqa support it's main problem I see but...
So, say I do the fol
On 03/04/2013 04:01 PM, Matt Domsch wrote:
drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/siena.c: efx->net_dev->dev_id =
EFX_OWORD_FIELD(reg, FRF_CZ_CS_PORT_NUM) - 1;
I think sfc does not really *need* to set dev_id.
Yes, these are multi-port cards, but the ports are on distinct PCI
functions.
Michal
--
I'll interject my thoughts here (speaking just for myself):
I think software collections are a great thing for us to provide
tooling for and make easy for our users/consumers to use.
That said, I don't think Fedora as a distribution should ever ship any
of them. The tools/framework/etc, great.
I'm Sarath, a student from India. I have been working with Ruby on Rails
Web Framework for more than a year now. I have done most of my
contributions to www.acenetcampus.com. I am very interested in taking up
Design Hub project mentioned in Fedora Project's Wiki Page for Summer Of
Code Ideas. I am
On 03/05/2013 04:02 AM, David Highley wrote:
Unlike the bug report which indicates you can to a sync && reboot,
nothting but the power switch gets this system out of the issue.
Did you use the "-f" switch?
sync && reboot -f
Michal
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://adm
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914282
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Res
On Tue, 05 Mar 2013 15:56:28 +0100
Dario Lesca wrote:
> Il giorno mar, 05/03/2013 alle 15.26 +0100, Antonio ha scritto:
> > Upgrading_Fedora_using_yum or use FedUp.
>
> Ok, thanks.
>
See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/Rawhide
IMHO, we should drop the scare mongering and provide peop
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/05/2013 11:47 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Mar 2013 03:48:29 -0500 (EST) Jaroslav Reznik
> wrote:
>
>> The idea is autoqa (but those test run as part of package build
>> could be part of it too). Yes, it means it will take a time to
>> ha
On Tue, 05 Mar 2013 12:10:58 -0500
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Our original thoughts on this were that we would tie this to the
> bodhi/repocreate phase of things. Basically, before each automatic
> repocreate run in Rawhide, we would run the set of tier 1 and tier 2
> acceptance tests. If any of
"Michal Schmidt wrote:"
>
> On 03/05/2013 04:02 AM, David Highley wrote:
> > Unlike the bug report which indicates you can to a sync && reboot,
> > nothing but the power switch gets this system out of the issue.
>
> Did you use the "-f" switch?
> sync && reboot -f
Missed the the "-f" switch. Wil
Seems like an interesting concept. Don't know how it might apply to Fedora:
http://0install.net/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue 05 Mar 2013 12:25:04 PM EST, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, 05 Mar 2013 12:10:58 -0500 Stephen Gallagher
> wrote:
>
>> Our original thoughts on this were that we would tie this to the
>> bodhi/repocreate phase of things. Basically, before each
On 03/05/2013 07:59 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 14:07 -0800, Josh Stone wrote:
>
>> So given that this library's use is pretty well contained, might it be
>> OK to go ahead and update in F18?
>
> Yeah, that's fine.
>
> In the future, consider following the glibc pattern of fi
On Tue, 05 Mar 2013 12:44:39 -0500
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Well, in that case I suppose we'd need to add a new tag-set, something
> like rawhide-pending and run the tests over the combination rawhide
> and rawhide-pending tags. If they started failing, don't move the
> rawhide-pending tag to r
Josh Stone píše v Út 05. 03. 2013 v 09:44 -0800:
> On 03/05/2013 07:59 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 14:07 -0800, Josh Stone wrote:
> >
> >> So given that this library's use is pretty well contained, might it be
> >> OK to go ahead and update in F18?
> >
> > Yeah, that's fine
On 5 March 2013 17:28, Neal Becker wrote:
> Seems like an interesting concept. Don't know how it might apply to Fedora:
I guess it slots into
https://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2013/03/05/gnome-software-overall-plan/
Richard.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedor
Dan Horák píše v Út 05. 03. 2013 v 18:57 +0100:
> Josh Stone píše v Út 05. 03. 2013 v 09:44 -0800:
> > On 03/05/2013 07:59 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 14:07 -0800, Josh Stone wrote:
> > >
> > >> So given that this library's use is pretty well contained, might it be
> > >>
On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 12:44 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Well, in that case I suppose we'd need to add a new tag-set, something
> like rawhide-pending
In other words, another layer.
I'll only repeat this maybe every 6 months or yearly, depending on how
annoying people find me. But basical
On 03/05/2013 11:07 AM, Norvald H. Ryeng wrote:
On Thu, 14 Feb 2013 16:17:00 +0100, Tom Lane wrote:
The way this worked in the past (and still does on RHEL and some other
distros) is that MySQL AB provided RPMs named "MySQL", "MySQL-server",
etc, which simply conflicted with the Red Hat-supplie
On Tue, 05 Mar 2013 13:07:59 -0500
Colin Walters wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 12:44 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> > Well, in that case I suppose we'd need to add a new tag-set,
> > something like rawhide-pending
>
> In other words, another layer.
>
> I'll only repeat this maybe every
On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 13:17 -0500, seth vidal wrote:
> If the issue was only 'newer is better' then rpm can easily get around
> it. Hell, so can yum, now.
But koji, createrepo and such can't, right?
> The issue is that we have nothing that even resembles a backward-compat
> process for user DATA
On Tue, 05 Mar 2013 13:28:58 -0500
Colin Walters wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 13:17 -0500, seth vidal wrote:
>
> > If the issue was only 'newer is better' then rpm can easily get
> > around it. Hell, so can yum, now.
>
> But koji, createrepo and such can't, right?
createrepo is version agno
On 03/05/2013 01:28 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 13:17 -0500, seth vidal wrote:
If the issue was only 'newer is better' then rpm can easily get around
it. Hell, so can yum, now.
...
So - I don't see how adding another layer is really a problem - since
the 'infinite versions
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Przemek Klosowski
wrote:
> On 03/05/2013 01:28 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 13:17 -0500, seth vidal wrote:
>>
>>> If the issue was only 'newer is better' then rpm can easily get around
>>> it. Hell, so can yum, now.
>
> ...
>
>>> So - I don't
Le Mar 5 mars 2013 19:28, Colin Walters a écrit :
> True, but the biggest problems are things like new versions of colord
> that trip up a selinux-policy denial which then in turn cause
> gnome-settings-daemon to crash which in turn gives you a failure at GDM.
Given how fast our selinux people r
On Thu, 2013-02-28 at 10:05 -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The mediawiki package has been updated to 1.20.2 for Rawhide and 1.19.3
> for F17/F18.
>
> The mediawiki-math/nopath packages have been merged into just
> "mediawiki" (with Obsoletes). There is one package that depended on th
James Laska wrote:
> I've not had time to spin up a mediawiki instance to test yet. However,
> if anyone is so inclined, I have updated mediawiki-semantic packages
> available for test.
>
> rawhide - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5082817
> f18 - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/k
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> I was not able to use your updated package as the latest version of
> semantics now requires the Validator[1] extension.
>
> [1] http://semantic-mediawiki.org/wiki/Validator
More specifically: Validator >= 0.5. Fedora has 0.4.13.
http://semantic-mediawiki.org/wiki/Hel
Neal Becker wrote:
> http://0install.net/
This project has been ongoing for years. Nobody cared back then and nothing
has really changed since then, because:
> Seems like an interesting concept.
No. This completely throws away all the advantages of GNU/Linux package
repositories, in particular
seth vidal (skvi...@fedoraproject.org) said:
> On Tue, 05 Mar 2013 13:28:58 -0500
> Colin Walters wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 13:17 -0500, seth vidal wrote:
> >
> > > If the issue was only 'newer is better' then rpm can easily get
> > > around it. Hell, so can yum, now.
> >
> > But koji
On Tue, 5 Mar 2013 16:58:49 -0500
Bill Nottingham wrote:
> seth vidal (skvi...@fedoraproject.org) said:
> > On Tue, 05 Mar 2013 13:28:58 -0500
> > Colin Walters wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 13:17 -0500, seth vidal wrote:
> > >
> > > > If the issue was only 'newer is better' then rpm
Olav Vitters wrote:
> Mageia packages libraries by the .so major version. So you can upgrade a
> library and then work on rebuilding all the software.
>
> Example (library name is not too important):
> lib64spice-client-gtk3.0_1-0.9-1.mga2
> lib64spice-client-gtk3.0_4-0.15-3.mga3
This is a re
Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> We also propose to build up automated tests to verify the tier 1 and
> tier 2 functionality, and use those tests on newly-built packages to
> gate inclusion in rawhide.
Please no! Extending the already painful red tape we have in stable releases
to Rawhide will completely
On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 22:51 +, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
(following up with more thoughts from the distutils-sig thread)
> It started here:
>
> http://mail.python.org/pipermail/distutils-sig/2013-February/020030.html
>
> and now we're talking about Software Collections here:
>
> http://ma
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=917669
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
Package perl-Mail-Box-Parser-C-3.007-1.fc18:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror within two days.
Updat
While there was a Fedora 19 blocker bug review meeting scheduled for
tomorrow, there are currently no blockers proposed and only one freeze
exception proposed for F19 alpha.
It seems a bit excessive to call a meeting to review a single bug and
thus, the review meeting tomorrow is canceled.
Tim
On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 16:58 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> We don't ship in a way that easily allows this though, now. Admittedly,
> this is due to the sheer *amount* of stuff involved in just maintaining
> single versions of things, and how much that would jump if we started
> having multiple ve
Greetings.
I'm happy to announce that we have moved our new OpenID identity
provider (fas-openid) into production and it's ready for general use.
OpenID allows you to use an existing identity (like a Fedora Project
account) on sites or applications that support OpenID authentication.
Fedora Pr
We are attempting to create systemd files for an ssh port monitoring
process. When we enable and attempt to start the service we get multiple
executions of the daemon and systemctl does not return until we do a
control-c. The init script and our attempt at replacement:
#!/bin/bash
#
# chkconfig: -
Wrong list, please.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 03/05/2013 06:07 AM, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
Now, I've been hired by Red Hat and I intend to put in application my
experience as a kernel developer and the GPU stuffs I learned during my
studies to contribute upstream and to enhance fedora.
So I'm glad to be on board!
Welcome to Fedora d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/03/13 04:58, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Neal Becker wrote:
>> http://0install.net/
>
> This project has been ongoing for years. Nobody cared back then and
> nothing has really changed since then, because:
>
>> Seems like an interesting concept.
>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/03/13 01:20, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Package emacs-rpm-spec-mode (orphan)
That's a curious package, it lasted a few months, was never branched,
and then is gone. And rpm-spec-mode.el has been provided by
emacs-common for as long as I could reme
can I use my existing openid? kurt.seifried.org.
-Kurt
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> I'm happy to announce that we have moved our new OpenID identity
> provider (fas-openid) into production and it's ready for general use.
>
> OpenID allows you to use an ex
在 2013-3-6 PM2:40，"Kurt Seifried" 写道：
>
> can I use my existing openid? kurt.seifried.org.
Maybe only yourname.id.fp.o?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 23:39 -0700, Kurt Seifried wrote:
> can I use my existing openid? kurt.seifried.org.
If you run your own openid server then of course you can use your openid
to login on website that requires *an* openid (ask.fp.o, stackoverflow,
pypi...).
However, in the futur, a number of t
On Wed, 2013-03-06 at 11:49 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
> Wrong list, please.
How so?
Pierre
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 07:48:04PM -0800, David Highley wrote:
> We are attempting to create systemd files for an ssh port monitoring
> process. When we enable and attempt to start the service we get multiple
> executions of the daemon and systemctl does not return until we do a
> control-c. The in
100 matches
Mail list logo
