On 03/04/2013 06:14 AM, Dan Mashal wrote:
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Christopher Meng wrote:
在 2013-3-4 AM7:30，"Dan Mashal" 写道：
I understand but is this happening on 18? I know it's happening on
rawhide for sure.
Yes.
F17 & F18 & Rawhide.
I'll recheck today later.
--
devel mailing
Me, too. Thanks.
BTW,uReport still have some problems.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
not a good choice of app with which to 'test your
tablet'. Especially not the night before a meeting. For three hours solid.
This is a reminder of the upcoming QA meeting. Please add any topic
suggestions to the meeting wiki page:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20130304
The c
Hello All!
I've got few review requests which got stuck for a while, and I'd love
to trading reviews with anyone.
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/906473 - erlang-ranch - Socket acceptor
pool for TCP protocols
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/906481 - erlang-cowboy - Small, fast,
modular HTTP server wri
Hi!
There an interesting thing happened in gugzilla recently. Some bug
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809773) is applied for F16. There
are some (five, ten, twenty,...) simmilar bugs which are, ofcouse, are marked
as dublicate. But. Last one is for F18
(https://bugzilla.redhat.co
- Original Message -
> Hi!
>
> There an interesting thing happened in gugzilla recently. Some bug
> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809773) is applied for
> F16. There
> are some (five, ten, twenty,...) simmilar bugs which are, ofcouse,
> are marked
> as dublicate. But. Last o
On 02/28/2013 12:58 PM, Matthias Runge wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> Django 1.5 was released about two days ago. I'd like to push a build to
> rawhide, but I assume, that will break many dependent packages.
>
> The plan is, to delay the push, until other packages are fixed, or to
> push in about 14 day
Is it possible to use abrt as intended and still be able to get core dumps from
non-fedora binaries (e.g., my own code)? Right now, all core dumps are
redirected to abrt.
We need a way to be able to use gdb to debug core dumps.
I know we can turn off abrt entirely
/proc/sys/kernel/core_patter
On 03/04/2013 01:17 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
Is it possible to use abrt as intended and still be able to get core dumps from
non-fedora binaries (e.g., my own code)? Right now, all core dumps are
redirected to abrt.
We need a way to be able to use gdb to debug core dumps.
I know we can turn off
Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
> On 03/04/2013 01:17 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
>> Is it possible to use abrt as intended and still be able to get core dumps
>> from
>> non-fedora binaries (e.g., my own code)? Right now, all core dumps are
>> redirected to abrt.
>>
>> We need a way to be able to use gdb to de
On 03/04/2013 01:28 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
On 03/04/2013 01:17 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
Is it possible to use abrt as intended and still be able to get core dumps
from
non-fedora binaries (e.g., my own code)? Right now, all core dumps are
redirected to abrt.
We need a way
Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
> On 03/04/2013 01:28 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
>> Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
>>
>>> On 03/04/2013 01:17 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
Is it possible to use abrt as intended and still be able to get core dumps
from
non-fedora binaries (e.g., my own code)? Right now, all core
On 03/04/2013 01:37 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
On 03/04/2013 01:28 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
On 03/04/2013 01:17 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
Is it possible to use abrt as intended and still be able to get core dumps
from
non-fedora binaries (e.g., my own code
Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
> On 03/04/2013 01:37 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
>> Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
>>
>>> On 03/04/2013 01:28 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
> On 03/04/2013 01:17 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
>> Is it possible to use abrt as intended and still be able to get core
On 03/04/2013 01:44 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
On 03/04/2013 01:37 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
On 03/04/2013 01:28 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
On 03/04/2013 01:17 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
Is it possible to use abrt as intended and still b
Hi,
I am looking for some valgrind users that want to try out the latest
valgrind package in rawhide.
If you use valgrind please try out the new valgrind-3.8.1-10.fc19
version in rawhide. It is the first version that puts the debuginfo in a
separate valgrind-debuginfo package (this saves ~35MB fr
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Toshio Kuratomi (a.bad...@gmail.com) said:
> > I recalled this set of issues too from my previous time in fesco but I
> > didn't find the meeting logs with the information. I did find this
> meeting
> > log:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 9:21 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Jon Ciesla wrote:
> > I see no reason not to keep dietlibc around for development use, but I'd
> > rather see packages use glibc.
>
> We agree then. But if we want to keep dietlibc, it needs to be fixed to
> comply with the packaging guideline
Compose started at Mon Mar 4 08:15:12 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[HippoDraw]
HippoDraw-python-1.21.3-6.fc19.x86_64 requires
libboost_python.so.1.50.0()(64bit)
[condor]
condor-plumage-7.9.1-0.1.fc19.4.x86_64 requires
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 11:02:55AM -0600, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 10:28:21AM +0100, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > Matt Domsch (matt_dom...@dell.com) said:
> > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 01:57:42PM -0600, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > > > > If we can solve the installtime naming c
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 09:20:51AM -0600, John Reiser wrote:
> On 02/28/2013 06:55 AM, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Andy Gospodarek
> > wrote:
> >
> I'd like to see kernel driver work to be sure every multi-port driver
> with the same PCI b/d/b/f sets dev_id.
Jaroslav,
On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 06:38 -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> Btw. as asked frequently in the previous EOL thread and to make it
> easier for me and upcoming guys responsible for EOL - the script is
> now available in the GIT of Fedora Project Schedule hosted project [1].
thanks for putt
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 08:44:55AM -0600, Domsch, Matt wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 11:02:55AM -0600, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 10:28:21AM +0100, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > > Matt Domsch (matt_dom...@dell.com) said:
> > > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 01:57:42PM -0600, Bil
- Original Message -
> Jaroslav,
>
> On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 06:38 -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > Btw. as asked frequently in the previous EOL thread and to make it
> > easier for me and upcoming guys responsible for EOL - the script is
> > now available in the GIT of Fedora Project Sched
If you're planning on doing a 3.7.91 build manually (i.e. that's not
picked up by mclazy, or one you'd rather do on your own), can you add
them to the spreadsheet please:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AtzJKpbiGX1zdGJzeU9waFJFZmgyQzBuN2VxU0lxbHc
This way we can QA and test the releas
Le Ven 1 mars 2013 17:41, Miloslav Trmač a écrit :
> (In the recent years, the number of upstreams and packagers that can't
> or won't support a smooth upgrade path and want to have several
> versions of the same package installed has noticeably increased, and
> we may need to react to this by de
Twice now we have one Fedora 18 system where systemd seems to get into a
non responsive state. We are not able to get the status of any service
and we're not able to do an init 6 to restart the system.
Did notice today that a full process list showed a message about abrt
and something to the effec
Product: Security Response
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=884354
--- Comment #13 from Petr Pisar ---
Created attachment 705056
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=705056&action=edit
Fix ported to perl-5.8.8
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC l
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 09:01:35AM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 08:44:55AM -0600, Domsch, Matt wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 11:02:55AM -0600, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
> > > On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 10:28:21AM +0100, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > > > Matt Domsch (matt_dom...@d
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 10:03:01AM -0600, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 09:01:35AM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 08:44:55AM -0600, Domsch, Matt wrote:
> > > The challenge here is that because struct netdev is initialized to all
> > > zeros, code that consu
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 07:56:51AM -0800, David Highley wrote:
> Twice now we have one Fedora 18 system where systemd seems to get into a
> non responsive state. We are not able to get the status of any service
> and we're not able to do an init 6 to restart the system.
Did system logs or "dmesg
On Mon, 04.03.13 07:56, David Highley (dhigh...@highley-recommended.com) wrote:
> Twice now we have one Fedora 18 system where systemd seems to get into a
> non responsive state. We are not able to get the status of any service
> and we're not able to do an init 6 to restart the system.
>
> Did n
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 10:19:14AM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 10:03:01AM -0600, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 09:01:35AM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 08:44:55AM -0600, Domsch, Matt wrote:
> > > > The challenge here is that bec
Hi all,
I noticed that Amide is orphaned, even if it is still possible to
install in f18. Is anyone interested in helping to maintain it?
Thanks,
Mario
BTW: I tried to take ownership, but I can only do that for 17. Is
there something wrong with my FAS account?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.
On 4 March 2013 17:33, Mario Ceresa wrote:
> Hi all,
> I noticed that Amide is orphaned, even if it is still possible to
> install in f18. Is anyone interested in helping to maintain it?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mario
>
> BTW: I tried to take ownership, but I can only do that for 17. Is
> there something w
Hello,
iptables has been updated in Fedora rawhide. The version of libxtables
has been bumped to 10. Therefore all packages, that require libxtables
need to be rebuilt for the new lib. iproute has been rebuilt already.
There are also testing packages for F-18:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 7:18 AM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> If you're planning on doing a 3.7.91 build manually (i.e. that's not
> picked up by mclazy, or one you'd rather do on your own), can you add
> them to the spreadsheet please:
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AtzJKpbiGX1zdGJzeU9w
Hi,
For the record, I took over the ownership of the following package from
Sandro (aka red):
R-ROC
R-affydata
R-fibroEset
R-hgu133acdf
R-hgu95av2cdf
R-statmod
R-timeDate
R-xtable
Pierre
___
r-devel mailing list
r-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://
This is a proposal of changes to the way future Fedora cycles should
work and integrate changes.
Some of the things we want to achieve:
* Make rawhide to be reliably installable and usable by developers by
coherently introducing changes.
* Define the interfaces that applications can rely on (and b
Before we branch for Fedora 19, as is custom, we will block currently
orphaned packages and packages that have failed to build since Fedora 17.
The following packages are currently orphaned, or fail to build. If
you have a need for one of these packages, please pick them up.
If no one claims any o
"Lennart Poettering wrote:"
>
> On Mon, 04.03.13 07:56, David Highley (dhigh...@highley-recommended.com)
> wrote:
>
> > Twice now we have one Fedora 18 system where systemd seems to get into a
> > non responsive state. We are not able to get the status of any service
> > and we're not able to do
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> This is a proposal of changes to the way future Fedora cycles should
> work and integrate changes.
>
> Some of the things we want to achieve:
> * Make rawhide to be reliably installable and usable by developers by
> coherently introducing cha
Summary of changes:
2ad89e3... Removing dependency that breaks builds (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admi
On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 15:18 +, Richard Hughes wrote:
> If you're planning on doing a 3.7.91 build manually (i.e. that's not
> picked up by mclazy, or one you'd rather do on your own), can you add
> them to the spreadsheet please:
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AtzJKpbiGX1zdGJzeU
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Package sympy (orphan)
I have taken ownership of sympy.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 06:44:43PM +0100, Thomas Woerner wrote:
> Hello,
>
> iptables has been updated in Fedora rawhide. The version of
> libxtables has been bumped to 10. Therefore all packages, that
> require libxtables need to be rebuilt for the new lib. iproute has
> been rebuilt already.
>
Am 04.03.2013 18:44, schrieb Thomas Woerner:
> Hello,
>
> iptables has been updated in Fedora rawhide. The version of libxtables has
> been bumped to 10. Therefore all
> packages, that require libxtables need to be rebuilt for the new lib. iproute
> has been rebuilt already.
>
> There are also
Hello
I'm looking old kernel from FC17 updates kernel-3.6.10-2.fc17.x86.rpm,
where I can find it?
All 3.7.9-X kernels have broken IPv6 support. They crashes when native
IPv6 is big - for example during amanda backup running via IPv6.
Thank You.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproje
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Lukasz Trabinski wrote:
> Hello
>
> I'm looking old kernel from FC17 updates kernel-3.6.10-2.fc17.x86.rpm,
> where I can find it?
In koji. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=8
> All 3.7.9-X kernels have broken IPv6 support. They crashes when
Am 04.03.2013 20:13, schrieb Lukasz Trabinski:
> Hello
>
> I'm looking old kernel from FC17 updates kernel-3.6.10-2.fc17.x86.rpm,
> where I can find it?
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=8
> All 3.7.9-X kernels have broken IPv6 support. They crashes when native IPv6
> i
On Mon, 4 Mar 2013, Reindl Harald wrote:
I'm looking old kernel from FC17 updates kernel-3.6.10-2.fc17.x86.rpm,
where I can find it?
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=8
Thank You.
All 3.7.9-X kernels have broken IPv6 support. They crashes when native IPv6 is
big -
Summary of changes:
2ad89e3... Removing dependency that breaks builds (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admi
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=917609
Daniel Berrange changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolut
On 4 March 2013 18:20, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Before we branch for Fedora 19, as is custom, we will block currently
> orphaned packages and packages that have failed to build since Fedora 17.
>
> The following packages are currently orphaned, or fail to build. If
> you have a need for one of the
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 7:50 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> 1: Long-term ABI for applications that we don't want to break without
>> significant discussion.
>> For now, this will include the stable kernel and libc ABIs
>
> Please define what you mean by "stable kernel ABI". Do you mean the
> kernel
On Mon, 4 Mar 2013 17:43:32 +
Mat Booth wrote:
> On 4 March 2013 17:33, Mario Ceresa wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I noticed that Amide is orphaned, even if it is still possible to
> > install in f18. Is anyone interested in helping to maintain it?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Mario
> >
> > BTW: I tried
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 6:01 PM, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 10:19:14AM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
>> > > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_netdev.c: dev->dev_id = port - 1;
>> > > drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/siena.c: efx->net_dev->dev_id =
>> > > EFX_OWORD_FIELD(reg,
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 08:35:08PM +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 7:50 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> >> 1: Long-term ABI for applications that we don't want to break without
> >> significant discussion.
> >> For now, this will include the stable kernel and libc ABIs
> >
There is no luakit on fc18 . how to help ?
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/applications/Luakit?_csrf_token=a4b62ea58e444602602d35ee0a3f33e6d8980887
--
Klearchos-Angelos Gkountras
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
"David Highley wrote:"
>
> "Lennart Poettering wrote:"
> >
> > On Mon, 04.03.13 07:56, David Highley (dhigh...@highley-recommended.com)
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Twice now we have one Fedora 18 system where systemd seems to get into a
> > > non responsive state. We are not able to get the status of
On 03/04/2013 11:16 AM, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
Hello All!
I've got few review requests which got stuck for a while, and I'd love
to trading reviews with anyone.
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/906473 - erlang-ranch - Socket acceptor
pool for TCP protocols
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/906481 - erla
It's clear to me that library soname bumps should generally be avoided
in released Fedoras, but can it be allowed for more fringe libraries?
Specifically, I'd like to get Dyninst 8.1 into Fedora 18, which would
bump everything from ".so.8.0" to ".so.8.1". The only in-distro package
that BuildRequ
Hi
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Josh Stone wrote:
>
> If there are any out-of-distro users of our dyninst libraries, I expect
> they are of the more research-oriented type who will appreciate keeping
> up the version. I suppose any such people should speak up, please, if
> you disagree.
>
>
On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 07:06 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 15:30 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> > IMHO use of software collections is a symptom of a badly run organisation
> > not devoting enough cycles to maintain the software it uses, and hoping
> > (as in wishful thinking
Hey,
Just forwarding it here so Python folks don't miss it on the main devel
list.
Thanks,
Mark.
Forwarded Message
> From: Mark McLoughlin
> Reply-to: Mark McLoughlin
> To: Development discussions related to Fedora
>
> Subject: Python libraries and backwards compat [was Re:
On Mon, 04.03.13 10:24, David Highley (dhigh...@highley-recommended.com) wrote:
> "Lennart Poettering wrote:"
> >
> > On Mon, 04.03.13 07:56, David Highley (dhigh...@highley-recommended.com)
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Twice now we have one Fedora 18 system where systemd seems to get into a
> > > non
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 10:06:46AM -0800, Dan Mashal wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 7:18 AM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> > If you're planning on doing a 3.7.91 build manually (i.e. that's not
> > picked up by mclazy, or one you'd rather do on your own), can you add
> > them to the spreadsheet please:
Properly order packages returned by PackageKit so automations executed
on 64bit systems won't sometimes pull 32bit packages due to a lack of
ordering (Jockey).
--
diff -rupN PackageKit-0.6.22.orig/backends/yum/yumFilter.py
PackageKit-0.6.22/backends/yum/yumFilter.py
--- PackageKit-0.6.22.orig
Yes and no. Right, I could press two buttons and reopen ticket. No, I am not a
reporter so there would be no actual result in it. If you digg into
closed/dublicate reports you will see that there were some communication in
them. But it stopped every time that bug been marked as dublicate. Repor
"Lennart Poettering wrote:"
>
> On Mon, 04.03.13 10:24, David Highley (dhigh...@highley-recommended.com)
> wrote:
>
> > "Lennart Poettering wrote:"
> > >
> > > On Mon, 04.03.13 07:56, David Highley (dhigh...@highley-recommended.com)
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Twice now we have one Fedora 18 s
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 10:06:46AM -0800, Dan Mashal wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 7:18 AM, Richard Hughes wrote:
>> > If you're planning on doing a 3.7.91 build manually (i.e. that's not
>> > picked up by mclazy, or one you'd rather do o
On Mon, 4 Mar 2013 20:35:08 +0100
Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 7:50 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
...snip...
> >> Finally, the planning process will recognize the existence of these
> >> tiers by classifying each proposed change:
> >>
> >> * Changes to tiers 1 and 2:
> >> Strong r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/03/13 03:26, Klearchos-Angelos Gkountras wrote:
> There is no luakit on fc18 . how to help ?
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/applications/Luakit?_csrf_token=a4b62ea58e444602602d35ee0a3f33e6d8980887
>
>
It's orphaned, so if you're a pack
Am Dienstag, den 05.03.2013, 03:56 + schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
> commit 0ed4b2cddfa74be4b66b3646aee4c5d0e3fe756f
> Author: Rahul Sundaram
> Date: Mon Mar 4 22:55:58 2013 -0500
>
> remove vendor tag from desktop file.
> https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/247
>
> - drop obsolete
- Original Message -
> On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 07:06 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 15:30 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> > > IMHO use of software collections is a symptom of a badly run
> > > organisation
> > > not devoting enough cycles to maintain the software it u
75 matches
Mail list logo
