Re: Package with no upstream (ftp)

On 19 July 2012 06:15, Jan Synacek wrote: > On 07/18/2012 04:15 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > > > Did the netkit upstream finally give up the ghost entirely? If so, it > likely > > affects more packages than just ftp. > > > > Bill > > > > [1] seems to be dead. And I haven't found any other place

Re: Package with no upstream (ftp)

On 07/19/2012 09:42 AM, Paul Black wrote: > On 19 July 2012 06:15, Jan Synacek wrote: > > On 07/18/2012 04:15 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > > > Did the netkit upstream finally give up the ghost entirely? If so, it > likely > > affects more packages tha

Re: python-SocksiPy (was: Re: non-responsive)

On Wed, 18 Jul 2012 22:09:27 +0400, Fl@sh wrote: > > The bug report is almost completely incomprehensible. I'm not > > surprised the maintainer is ignoring it. > > > > Rich. > > > Not too difficult for maintainer to see these lines and see > the difference in exactly four brackets ;) > This ma

Re: python-SocksiPy (was: Re: non-responsive)

> That's still no excuse for not submitting a more comprehensible bug report > and a more readable unified diff (man diff --> diff -u …). > OK, I will correct it. -- Fl@sh -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: python-SocksiPy

On 07/18/2012 05:29 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 09:12:42PM +0400, Fl@sh wrote: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831743 Maybe anyone knows how to contact the maintainer? (His mail is not answer.) To save everyone the trouble of opening this bug, the summary

Heads up: nc replaced by nmap ncat

Dear list, The old Fedora, heavily patched OpenBSD nc package was just obsoleted by the nmap ncat implementation, available as the nmap-ncat subpackage. Those are mostly compatible and this change shouldn't cause much headache but please check your netcat dependant scripts or apps. Related bug:

Re: prelink should not mess with running executables

On 07/18/2012 11:37 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > Andrew Haley writes: > >> On 07/18/2012 12:06 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: But that's not a use case. There's no way to know why you want to do this: why you care that another process is running the exact same executable. >>> >>>

Re: Heads up: nc replaced by nmap ncat

On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 12:12:16PM +0200, Petr Šabata wrote: > Dear list, > > The old Fedora, heavily patched OpenBSD nc package was just > obsoleted by the nmap ncat implementation, available as the > nmap-ncat subpackage. Those are mostly compatible and this > change shouldn't cause much headac

Re: prelink should not mess with running executables

Andrew Haley writes: On 07/18/2012 11:37 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > > How do you know that the server that gave you a seemingly verified SSL > certificate, that checks out, isn't an impostor that managed to crack the > right prime. Because we know that to do that is at the present, time compu

Re: prelink should not mess with running executables

On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 07:10:18AM -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > >What's a special-case band-aid about it? It looks perfectly > >reasonable to me. Why wouldn't you restart init? > > Why would you?If there's nothing wrong with with overwriting an > executable, and, after all, that's how UNIX wo

Re: prelink should not mess with running executables

On Thu, 2012-07-19 at 07:10 -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > Andrew Haley writes: > > > On 07/18/2012 11:37 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > > > > > > How do you know that the server that gave you a seemingly verified SSL > > > certificate, that checks out, isn't an impostor that managed to crack the

Ubuntu Unity has been ported to Fedora 17

Hello, This morning, I woke up to the news that a group of developers have managed to successfully make Ubuntu's Unity Desktop work on Fedora 17[1]. What kind of work would be needed to get these people to be able to bring their work into the Fedora repository so that everyone can easily choose to

Re: Heads up: nc replaced by nmap ncat

2012/7/19 Daniel P. Berrange : > Libvirt needs to be able to run the following command > > # nc -U /var/run/libvirt/libvirt-sock It could use socat: # socat stdio /var/run/libvirt/libvirt-sock - Thomas -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman

Re: prelink should not mess with running executables

On 07/19/2012 12:10 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > Andrew Haley writes: > >> On 07/18/2012 11:37 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: >>> >>> How do you know that the server that gave you a seemingly verified SSL >>> certificate, that checks out, isn't an impostor that managed to crack the >>> right prime. >>

Re: Heads up: nc replaced by nmap ncat

On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 01:27:14PM +0200, Thomas Moschny wrote: > 2012/7/19 Daniel P. Berrange : > > Libvirt needs to be able to run the following command > > > > # nc -U /var/run/libvirt/libvirt-sock > > It could use socat: This isn't something that can simply be fixed in libvirt in rawhide be

Re: Ubuntu Unity has been ported to Fedora 17

2012/7/19 Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) > Hello, > > This morning, I woke up to the news that a group of developers have > managed to successfully make Ubuntu's Unity Desktop work on Fedora 17[1]. > What kind of work would be needed to get these people to be able to bring > their work into the Fedora repo

[perl-DBD-Pg/f16] Update to 2.19.2, Fixed #841133

commit 082f2016f5f33dfaed58ba1cc103093b7151d780 Author: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Thu Jul 19 13:19:42 2012 +0200 Update to 2.19.2, Fixed #841133 .gitignore |1 + perl-DBD-Pg.spec | 12 sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) ---

Re: prelink should not mess with running executables

On 07/19/2012 12:29 PM, Andrew Haley wrote: > On 07/19/2012 12:10 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: >> Andrew Haley writes: >> >>> On 07/18/2012 11:37 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: How do you know that the server that gave you a seemingly verified SSL certificate, that checks out, isn't an imp

Re: Heads up: nc replaced by nmap ncat

On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 12:30:35PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 01:27:14PM +0200, Thomas Moschny wrote: > > 2012/7/19 Daniel P. Berrange : > > > Libvirt needs to be able to run the following command > > > > > > # nc -U /var/run/libvirt/libvirt-sock > > > > It could

Re: prelink should not mess with running executables

Andrew Haley writes: On 07/19/2012 12:10 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > Andrew Haley writes: > >> On 07/18/2012 11:37 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: >>> >>> How do you know that the server that gave you a seemingly verified SSL >>> certificate, that checks out, isn't an impostor that managed to crack

Re: prelink should not mess with running executables

Tomas Mraz writes: Actually if you normally open the /proc/pid/exe and read it, it will give you the exact executable that was used to start the process with the pid. That readlink will not give you path to the executable, but the old path with '(deleted)' is very reasonable too. So what's the p

Re: Ubuntu Unity has been ported to Fedora 17

Dangerous road you follow. Best of luck. On Jul 19, 2012 11:23 AM, "Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ)" wrote: > Hello, > > This morning, I woke up to the news that a group of developers have > managed to successfully make Ubuntu's Unity Desktop work on Fedora 17[1]. > What kind of work would be needed to get

Review swap needed for rtirq

Hi all, this package is required for the forthcoming Fedora audio spin. Would be great to get this reviewed before the Spin review. rtirq - realtime IRQ threading https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839527 regards, Brendan bsjones -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: prelink should not mess with running executables

On 07/19/2012 01:17 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: These days I think init reexecs itself during shutdown sequence anyway, Yes, there's a reexec or two during shutdown. After stopping the units the usual way, systemd re-execs into a helper program (/usr/lib/systemd/systemd-shutdown), which does the

Broken dependencies: perl-Unix-Statgrab

perl-Unix-Statgrab has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Unix-Statgrab-0.04-13.fc17.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2) On i386: perl-Unix-Statgrab-0.04-13.fc17.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2) Please resolve this as soon as possible. --

Broken dependencies: perl-PDL

perl-PDL has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-PDL-2.4.10-1.fc17.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2) On i386: perl-PDL-2.4.10-1.fc17.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http:/

Broken dependencies: perl-Class-InsideOut

perl-Class-InsideOut has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Class-InsideOut-1.10-6.fc17.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2) On i386: perl-Class-InsideOut-1.10-6.fc17.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2) Please resolve this as soon as possible

Broken dependencies: perl-eperl

perl-eperl has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-eperl-2.2.14-19.fc17.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2) On i386: perl-eperl-2.2.14-19.fc17.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SI

Re: Review swap needed for rtirq

Hey, I will take this. Could you take devtodo2 or prey? Greetings, Patrick Op 19 jul. 2012 14:42 schreef "Brendan Jones" het volgende: > Hi all, > > this package is required for the forthcoming Fedora audio spin. Would be > great to get this reviewed before the Spin review. > > rtirq - realtime

Re: Review swap needed for rtirq

Hello! 2012/7/19 Patrick Uiterwijk : > Hey, > > I will take this. I'm faster than you! :) > Could you take devtodo2 or prey? I'll take a look. -- With best regards, Peter Lemenkov. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Review swap needed for rtirq

On 07/19/2012 02:50 PM, Peter Lemenkov wrote: Hello! 2012/7/19 Patrick Uiterwijk : Hey, I will take this. I'm faster than you! :) Could you take devtodo2 or prey? I'll take a look. Thanks Peter! -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailma

Re: prelink should not mess with running executables

On Thu, 2012-07-19 at 08:14 -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > I'm already handling updates. Updates are a no-brainer. It's a controlled, > orderly process, and I can handle my housekeeping using the hook scripts. > > There is nothing comparable that can be used with prelink. The API for that woul

Re: Ubuntu Unity has been ported to Fedora 17

On 07/19/2012 11:23 AM, Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) wrote: What kind of work would be needed to get these people to be able to bring their work into the Fedora repository so that everyone can easily choose to use it without breaking stuff? From the looks of it I'm pretty sure they will need to patch

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v2] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 06:56 +0200, Brendan Jones wrote: > On 07/17/2012 10:19 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > >gtick -- A graphical metronome software > > I have added myself to this package. ditto (as co-maint) Nils -- Nils Philippsen "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purcha

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v2] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

On Tue, 2012-07-17 at 13:51 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Package gpsdrive (orphan) Taken. Nils -- Nils Philippsen "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase Red Hat a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty n...@redhat.com nor Safety." -- Benja

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v2] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Michael J Gruber wrote: > >> Package qtparted (fails to build) > > That one is at 0.4.5 in the repo and at 0.6.0 upstream. Maybe getting > the 0.6.0 to build is more promising? I'm taking a shot at it. It looks like 0.5.0 is the current stable version, we'll see

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v2] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Michael J Gruber > wrote: >> >>> Package qtparted (fails to build) >> >> That one is at 0.4.5 in the repo and at 0.6.0 upstream. Maybe getting >> the 0.6.0 to build is more promising? > > I'm taking a shot at

Re: prelink should not mess with running executables

Once upon a time, Sam Varshavchik said: > If what prelink is doing is perfectly fine, then there's no reason to have > the /sbin/telinit hack in /etc/cron.daily, is it? That statement, of > course, would be either true or false irrespective of what I'm doing, > which is completely irrelevant

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v2] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Michael J Gruber wrote: > >> Package qtparted (fails to build) > > That one is at 0.4.5 in the repo and at 0.6.0 upstream. Maybe getting > the 0.6.0 to build is more promising? Even a svn checkout failed to build. It looks like it hasn't been updated for parted 3

Pungi doesn't create installable media with F17 + updates

Hi, When running pungi on a F17 system with all updates applied, it seems to work fine when I only use the F17 release repo in the config file, but it creates uninstallable media when I also include the F17 updates repo. Then, when booting the DVD, it times out after a long time when spawning the

cmucl Was: [ACTION REQUIRED v2] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

I see no reason to keep cmucl in the distro given where sbcl is these days. Any objections to dropping it completely? AG - Original Message - From: "Bill Nottingham" To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Cc: tr...@df.lth.se, "radoslaw lisowski" , michel+...@sylvestre.me, gr...@redhat.com

Re: Ubuntu Unity has been ported to Fedora 17

On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 13:49:15 +0200 Antonio Trande wrote: > 2012/7/19 Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) > > This morning, I woke up to the news that a group of developers have > > managed to successfully make Ubuntu's Unity Desktop work on Fedora > > 17[1]. What kind of work would be needed to get these people

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v2] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

The following three have been orphaned in pkgdb today, which makes it possible to grab ownership: archmage -- Extensible reader/decompiler of files in CHM format gtick -- A graphical metronome software python-chm -- Python package for CHM files handling -- devel mailing list devel@lists.

Re: Ubuntu Unity has been ported to Fedora 17

On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Jussi Lehtola wrote: > On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 13:49:15 +0200 > Antonio Trande wrote: >> 2012/7/19 Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) >> > This morning, I woke up to the news that a group of developers have >> > managed to successfully make Ubuntu's Unity Desktop work on Fedora >>

Re: Ubuntu Unity has been ported to Fedora 17

On 07/19/2012 07:01 PM, Jussi Lehtola wrote: Lol, as if that isn't enough, looks like they ship their own version of GCC 4.6 as well in the repo... I don't know what Ubuntu has been doing so far, but to be fair, probably all major Linux distros and, on a more general scope probably all OSes s

Re: Ubuntu Unity has been ported to Fedora 17

2012/7/19 Jef Spaleta > On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Jussi Lehtola > wrote: > > On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 13:49:15 +0200 > > Antonio Trande wrote: > >> 2012/7/19 Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) > >> > This morning, I woke up to the news that a group of developers have > >> > managed to successfully make Ub

Re: Ubuntu Unity has been ported to Fedora 17

On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 20:29:13 +0200 Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 07/19/2012 07:01 PM, Jussi Lehtola wrote: > > Lol, as if that isn't enough, looks like they ship their own > > version of GCC 4.6 as well in the repo... > > I don't know what Ubuntu has been doing so far, but to be fair, > probably all

Re: Ubuntu Unity has been ported to Fedora 17

> It would be better to think of this as a starting point for porting > and to work out the packaging issue instead of an enduser consumable. > Porting Unity outside of Ubuntu is not going to be easy for anyone. > There's a reason why its not in Debian yet at all. Jeff, The GNOME:Ayatana repo was

Package review...

Hello, No rush on this I *just* posted it and sadly I don't have a lot of time to swap reviews. I thought I would point out that I had posted a review for php-pecl-cairo if anyone is interested in having it in fedora so they could review it. -- Nathanael d. Noblet t 403.875.4613 -- devel

Re: Fedora-Review 0.2.0

Hello, I tried to use fedora-review and it seems to attempt building the package using Fedora 14? from root.log rootdir = /var/lib/mock/fedora-14-x86_64/root/ Is that intentional? A mis-configuration on my part? On 07/11/2012 11:23 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: Dear all, A new fedora-re

Re: Fedora-Review 0.2.0

On Thu, 2012-07-19 at 13:14 -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote: > Hello, > >I tried to use fedora-review and it seems to attempt building the > package using Fedora 14? > > from root.log > > rootdir = /var/lib/mock/fedora-14-x86_64/root/ > > Is that intentional? A mis-configuration on my par

Re: Fedora-Review 0.2.0

Thanks Pierre, Unfortunately there is no such file .config/fedora-review there is however a .config/fedora-create-review. On 07/19/2012 01:12 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: On Thu, 2012-07-19 at 13:14 -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote: Hello, I tried to use fedora-review and it seems to

Re: Fedora-Review 0.2.0

On Thu, 2012-07-19 at 13:20 -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote: > Thanks Pierre, > > Unfortunately there is no such file .config/fedora-review there is > however a .config/fedora-create-review. I went a little bit too fast, the file is ~/.config/fedora-review/settings Pierre > On 07/19/2012 01

Re: Pungi doesn't create installable media with F17 + updates

On 07/19/2012 09:56 AM, Jos Vos wrote: > When running pungi on a F17 system with all updates applied, it seems > to work fine when I only use the F17 release repo in the config file, but > it creates uninstallable media when I also include the F17 updates repo. > > Then, when booting the DVD, it t

Re: gitweb-caching to cgit move

On Wednesday, July 18 2012, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Please try again now. > > I did some tweaking on things and I think it should be much faster > now. Indeed, it is faster now. As fast as gitweb, apparently. Thanks, -- Sergio -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.

Re: Ubuntu Unity has been ported to Fedora 17

On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Nelson Marques wrote: > Are you ready to accept patches on GTK+ and potentially on Xorg that > were declined from upstream? This should be your initial thoughts! Can you point me to the relevant discussion for any critical functionality patches which were actuall

Re: Fedora-Review 0.2.0

On 07/19/2012 09:22 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: On Thu, 2012-07-19 at 13:20 -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote: Thanks Pierre, Unfortunately there is no such file .config/fedora-review there is however a .config/fedora-create-review. I went a little bit too fast, the file is ~/.config/fedora-r

Re: Ubuntu Unity has been ported to Fedora 17

2012/7/19 Jef Spaleta : > On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Nelson Marques > wrote: >> Are you ready to accept patches on GTK+ and potentially on Xorg that >> were declined from upstream? This should be your initial thoughts! > > Can you point me to the relevant discussion for any critical > func

Re: Ubuntu Unity has been ported to Fedora 17

On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Nelson Marques wrote: > I've asked Ken to provide me some additional info on this; I will mail > tomorrow or during the weekend the links to this list. Let's get an accurate picture of what is actually left for vendor patches before we decide the current situatio

Re: Ubuntu Unity has been ported to Fedora 17

2012/7/19 Jef Spaleta : > On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Nelson Marques > wrote: >> I've asked Ken to provide me some additional info on this; I will mail >> tomorrow or during the weekend the links to this list. > > Let's get an accurate picture of what is actually left for vendor > patches b

Re: Ubuntu Unity has been ported to Fedora 17

On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Nelson Marques wrote: > I'm not involved in this project anyway; If you can put me into direct contact with someone who is actively involved I'd be more than happy to discuss a potential roadmap towards a submittable set of packages, either in public or in priva

Re: Heads up: nc replaced by nmap ncat

On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 12:30:35PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 01:27:14PM +0200, Thomas Moschny wrote: > > 2012/7/19 Daniel P. Berrange : > > > Libvirt needs to be able to run the following command > > > > > > # nc -U /var/run/libvirt/libvirt-sock > > > > It could

Re: Ubuntu Unity has been ported to Fedora 17

On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 09:20:59PM +0100, Nelson Marques wrote: >+ 043_ubuntu_menu_proxy.patch ( to export menus through DBus, this > one is still used, and if I understood correctly, this is currently > the only remnant of non-upstreamed patches and I believe it was > declined by GTK+ upstrea

Re: prelink should not mess with running executables

Chris Adams writes: Once upon a time, Sam Varshavchik said: > If what prelink is doing is perfectly fine, then there's no reason to have > the /sbin/telinit hack in /etc/cron.daily, is it? That statement, of > course, would be either true or false irrespective of what I'm doing, > which is co

Re: prelink should not mess with running executables

On 07/20/2012 12:57 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: Chris Adams writes: Once upon a time, Sam Varshavchik said: > If what prelink is doing is perfectly fine, then there's no reason to have > the /sbin/telinit hack in /etc/cron.daily, is it? That statement, of > course, would be either true or fals

Re: prelink should not mess with running executables

Once upon a time, Sam Varshavchik said: > No, it's not because init is "not a standard daemon". prelink did not > single out init for special treatment just because of its special status. > prelink does this to every binary, not just init. It's just that the > results of prelink's frak-up ar

Re: Ubuntu Unity has been ported to Fedora 17

On Thu, 2012-07-19 at 21:58 +0100, Nelson Marques wrote: > 2012/7/19 Jef Spaleta : > > On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Nelson Marques > > wrote: > >> I've asked Ken to provide me some additional info on this; I will mail > >> tomorrow or during the weekend the links to this list. > > > > Let's

Re: Ubuntu Unity has been ported to Fedora 17

On Thu, 2012-07-19 at 20:29 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 07/19/2012 07:01 PM, Jussi Lehtola wrote: > > Lol, as if that isn't enough, looks like they ship their own version of > > GCC 4.6 as well in the repo... > > I don't know what Ubuntu has been doing so far, but to be fair, probably > all

Re: Ubuntu Unity has been ported to Fedora 17

On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 7:55 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > Note for the record - I'm perfectly willing to give up my maintainership > of the few packages I own from my old abortive effort to package Unity. > I have bamf, libindicator and probably one or two others I forgot about. > If anyone wants

Re: prelink should not mess with running executables

On 2012-07-19 15:57, Sam Varshavchik wrote: The fact that the same consequences can occur from upgrades, or some other unspecified events, is irrelevant, because appropriate measures /can/ be easily put in place, to take the appropriate action when upgrading, and most likely for whatever those ot

Re: prelink should not mess with running executables

On Fri, 2012-07-20 at 01:04 +0200, Brendan Jones wrote: > Can someone please kill this thread. It's easy enough to filter it out. Reading -devel without filtering out at least one thread per month can cause serious damage to your mental wellbeing. Just sayin'. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Commu