Hi everyone and a happy new year to you !
I've tried today to start a gnome session on rawhide via VNC: although
the gnome shell is now able to use software rendering, gnome uses the
fallback mode.
Is it normal? If yes, will it be fixed in F17? Else what did I missed?
The parameters I use to st
Hi,
On 01/17/2012 11:54 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 11:05:36PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
Once that is done, then just adding the vala bindings to the
devel-package likely takes less disk space for those who
do install them, then the meta data needed for a separate su
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:48:58PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> spice-gtk3-devel.rpm size with vala bindings included:
> 10865
>
> spice-gtk3-devel.rpm size without vala bindings:
> 9921
>
> Compressed size of bindings files:
> 10865 - 9921 = 944 bytes
>
> spice-gtk3-vala.rpm (separate vala bin
El Tue, 17 Jan 2012 16:03:21 -0700
Orion Poplawski escribió:
> It appears that when tagging in the f17 rebuild packages, packages
> built after the rebuild package but before they got tagged in to f17
> are not in current rawhide. This in particular hit a bunch of
> packages rebuilt for octave 3.
commit c3edd032540c647beb4f34172f3fc0886f8491e3
Author: Yanko Kaneti
Date: Wed Jan 18 15:44:30 2012 +0200
new sources
.gitignore |1 +
sources|2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 22499ac..37360fb 100644
--- a/.g
- Original Message -
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Bohuslav Kabrda
> wrote:
> >
> > So you want to actually get this into F17? I'm not sure that this
> > is a good idea, the time is short and only two of us have stated
> > their opinions, so let's wait for more people and then make th
Following up with notes from FUDCon.
Bill Nottingham (nott...@redhat.com) said:
> == Distribution construction ==
>
> For this, we will continue to use groups in comps.
>
> PRO:
> - Don't have to change any distribution tools
> - Don't have to change kickstarts
>
> CON that can be fixed:
> - D
On 01/18/2012 09:30 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Later it was brought up that it may just be simpler to create a second file
> of metadata, similar to the comps file, that just contains lists of
> categorized packages. (i.e., #3 above.)
>
> Opinions?
One of the ideas that we've been seriously con
Just a heads up:
the cogl and clutter 1.9.4 releases that have inadvertently been pushed
into rawhide yesterday contain api changes that break gnome-shell -
until we get a gnome-shell release that fixes that, it would be
advisable to steer clear of those updates.
Matthias
--
devel mailing list
Tom Callaway (tcall...@redhat.com) said:
> On 01/18/2012 09:30 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > Later it was brought up that it may just be simpler to create a second file
> > of metadata, similar to the comps file, that just contains lists of
> > categorized packages. (i.e., #3 above.)
> >
> > Opi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hallo,
because I have got issues with the gcc-4.7 compiler suite i have
contacted the
upstream of the gnustep project to get a solution for my issues.
He has adviced me to migrate the gnustep stuff to clang/llvm. Espeicially
some gnustep stuff like
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-LWP-Protocol-http10:
112c39e0bf0c58a6c092f24643f8e37c LWP-Protocol-http10-6.02.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorap
commit 225cfcae0303be2e0110898849dbcfda8cf4fc81
Author: Ralf Corsépius
Date: Wed Jan 18 17:18:57 2012 +0100
Import.
.gitignore|1 +
perl-LWP-Protocol-http10.spec | 62 +
sources |1 +
3 files chang
Summary of changes:
225cfca... Import. (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/lis
Summary of changes:
225cfca... Import. (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/lis
On 01/18/2012 04:11 PM, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
> because I have got issues with the gcc-4.7 compiler suite i have
> contacted the
> upstream of the gnustep project to get a solution for my issues.
>
> He has adviced me to migrate the gnustep stuff to clang/llvm. Espeicially
> some gnustep stuff lik
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Petr Machata wrote:
> I didn't look into your problem, but what you say would mean that cmake
> is not generating all necessary dependencies for make. Having a rule
> like "X: Y Z" is not enough. If Z depends on Y, you need additionally
> "Z: Y", otherwise make w
Hi,
Although the latest version of CUPS is 1.5.0, development is continuing
apace on 1.6. There are some important changes coming in 1.6 which
deserve to be pointed out.
Some time ago CUPS became an Apple project, and now some of the features
that are not relevant to Mac OS are being orphaned.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 18.01.2012 17:25, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 01/18/2012 04:11 PM, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
> It might be more helpful to tell us what these issues are. While
> LLVM might well be OK on x86, I'm less convinced about support for
> other arches.
The issue
On 01/18/2012 04:53 PM, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
> On 18.01.2012 17:25, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> > On 01/18/2012 04:11 PM, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
>> > It might be more helpful to tell us what these issues are. While
>> > LLVM might well be OK on x86, I'm less convinced about support for
>> > other arches
Peter Robinson wrote:
> python in an explicit dependency in Fedora due to yum.
That's exactly why we need zif to become the default instead.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Peter Robinson wrote:
> Spins are required to have yum so by definition they will have python as
> well.
Official spins maybe, but remixes can now be zif-based instead. (Yes, this
is already realistic for a remix, though zif is still a bit rough.)
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
dev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 18.01.2012 17:57, Andrew Haley wrote:
>
>> The issue was, that during thu build of gnustep-base I have got a
>> error messag which told me, that the file objc/objc-api.h was not
>> found.
>>
>> So I have ask upstream for support to solve this issue
Pavel Alexeev wrote:
> We have forbidden bundle libs.
> But what status if from one project copied some source files into
> another and it is not lib to link it?
IMHO, that's not a library, ergo not a bundled library.
Sure, it would be nice to have that code made into an actual library, but I
do
On 01/18/2012 05:03 PM, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
> On 18.01.2012 17:57, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> >
>>> >> The issue was, that during thu build of gnustep-base I have got a
>>> >> error messag which told me, that the file objc/objc-api.h was not
>>> >> found.
>>> >>
>>> >> So I have ask upstream for supp
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 06:03:05PM +0100, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 18.01.2012 17:57, Andrew Haley wrote:
> >
> >> The issue was, that during thu build of gnustep-base I have got a
> >> error messag which told me, that the file objc/objc-api.
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 16:43:33 GMT, Tim Waugh wrote:
> This means that once CUPS drops support for CUPS Browsing, automatic
> CUPS queue discovery *will require Avahi* to be running on both the
> server (i.e. the system hosting the CUPS queue) and the clients (i.e.
> the systems wanting to print
Tim Waugh wrote:
> Till Kamppeter's email about the CUPS 1.6 changes on the
> printing-architecture list:
> http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/printing-architecture/2012/002412.html
What's the story about the PPD stuff Till is talking about there? That
scares me the most when I read that m
Kevin Kofler wrote:
That's exactly why we need zif to become the default instead.
Sounds like a Fedora 18 feature just waiting to be made.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 01/18/2012 05:10 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> so it is surprising that gnustep maintainers didn't bother to do anything
> to move toward objc/runtime.h. And it surprises me that clang actually
> didn't remove that header too, I'd have thought that Nicola Pero
> removed it because it was gone in c
commit d0623441f28d655a8eb76a00eb2b255cd6a1ed10
Author: Ralf Corsépius
Date: Wed Jan 18 18:28:10 2012 +0100
Activate optional BR: perl(Devel::StackTrace::WithLexicals).
Activate optional BR: perl(LWP::Protocol::http10).
perl-Plack.spec | 10 +++---
1 files changed, 7 insertions(
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> That's exactly why we need zif to become the default instead.
>
> Sounds like a Fedora 18 feature just waiting to be made.
Sadly, so far this got blocked on:
* the zif developers targeting only the GUI primarily and feeling the
command line is
On 01/18/2012 04:43 PM, Tim Waugh wrote:
Has it been considered to ditch cups altogether ( or keep what's worth
keeping from it ) and coming up with a native printer client/server for
GNU/Linux?
JBG
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/m
On 01/18/2012 11:04 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> The concern that was raised from infrastructure is that scouring package git
> for DOAP (or any other metadata files) might be prohibitive in cost to do
> regularly. PackageDB would be simpler, of course (maybe have git hooks that
> populate PackageD
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 18.01.2012 18:10, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 01/18/2012 05:03 PM, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
> Ah, right. The old Objective-C runtime API has been removed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-06/msg00571.html And, I guess the
gnustep maintainers don't
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 09:59:42AM +0100, Petr Pisar wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 06:20:01PM +0100, Iain Arnell wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Petr Pisar wrote:
> >
> > any chance you could generate that list with the reverse
> > (build-)dependencies as well? Would help to identi
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/12
patch to fix the problem
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/12/0001-Ticket-12-389-DS-DNA-Plugin-Replication-failing-on-G.patch
patch to allow disabling of the SASL canonical hostname lookup for
running on localhost
https://fedorahosted.org/389
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> I'll try adding only the dependent library and see if I run into any
> other issues.
Nope! It worked. Took the build time from about 65-70 minutes to just
under 20 minutes.
Thanks all!
Richard
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraprojec
Each release, before branching, we block currently orphaned packages.
It's that time again for Fedora 17.
New this go-round is that we are also blocking packages that have
failed to build since before Fedora 15.
The following packages are currently orphaned, or fail to build. If
you have a need f
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/15
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/15/diffs-without-autoconf.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
I took over xpp3. If someone else is willing to take it I am glad to
orphan it again.
Johannes
Orphan xpp3
comaintained by: dbhole
Removing: xpp3
dom4j requires xpp3 = 1.1.3.8-5.fc15
freemind requires xpp3 = 1.1.3.8-5.fc15
gooddata-cl requires xpp3-minimal = 1.1.3.8-5.f
Sorry, I didn't mean to start a heated thread on SysV vs. Systemd or anything.
Unfortunately my question wasn't really answered. I *am* removing SysV support
from gearmand … and have already implemented Systemd scripts. My question is…
for existing users still on SysV in Fedora < 17 …. are th
Hi,
On 18/01/12 22:42, BJ Dierkes wrote:
Sorry, I didn't mean to start a heated thread on SysV vs. Systemd or anything.
Unfortunately my question wasn't really answered. I *am* removing SysV support
from gearmand … and have already implemented Systemd scripts. My question is… for
existing
On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 16:42 -0600, BJ Dierkes wrote:
> My question is… for existing users still on SysV in Fedora < 17 …. are
> there any safeguards I need to put in place as to not break them… or
> should I just rip out all the SysV stuff and hope for the best?
I read that shouldn't or not allow
I took over preload.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 05:11:27PM +0100, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hallo,
>
> because I have got issues with the gcc-4.7 compiler suite i have
> contacted the
> upstream of the gnustep project to get a solution for my issues.
>
> He has advic
18.01.2012 21:02, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Pavel Alexeev wrote:
We have forbidden bundle libs.
But what status if from one project copied some source files into
another and it is not lib to link it?
IMHO, that's not a library, ergo not a bundled library.
Sure, it would be nice to have that code mad
47 matches
Mail list logo
