On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 09:59:42AM +0100, Petr Pisar wrote: > On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 06:20:01PM +0100, Iain Arnell wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Petr Pisar <ppi...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > any chance you could generate that list with the reverse > > (build-)dependencies as well? Would help to identify the leaves that can be > > left to die and allow those that really matter to be picked up by people who > > care most about them. > > > I see, reverse dependencies. I will try it. > So here are reverse dependencies. Both build- and run-time. The red ones are orphaned perl packages, the black ones are other packages. The only flaw is I did not expanded orphaned perl source package to binary packages (because I could not find the relation in this direction in yum repository; I could ask koji for build results, but I didn't). This graphs is generarated from the original orphaned perl package list and today rawhide repository.
-- Petr
orphaned_perl_packages-20120116.sorted.rdeps.svg.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
pgpjX1rbaKKbv.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
