UPDATE: As Kamil pointed out, I screwed up the time thing entirely in
the initial announcement for this meeting. So here's a corrected
version. We will adjust the meeting time for DST changes just as we did
last year, starting this week. So the meeting is at 16:00 UTC, which
means that if your cloc
On Sun, 06 Nov 2011 17:56:40 +0200, VS (Ville) wrote:
> > Puzzles me. The F-16 build doesn't depend on libpng* directly:
> >
> > $ rpm -qR geeqie|grep png
> > $ rpm -q geeqie
> > geeqie-1.0-13.fc16.x86_64
>
> I noticed a similar thing with gkrellm-volume -- the F-15 build did have
> a dependency
Compose started at Mon Nov 7 08:16:07 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
4ti2-1.3.2-7.fc17.1.x86_64 requires libgmp.so.3()(64bit)
1:anerley-0.3.0-5.fc17.i686 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.15
1:anerley-0.3.0-5.fc17.i6
On Sat, 2011-11-05 at 13:40 +, Bojan Smojver wrote:
> w googlemail.com>
> writes:
>
> > Yet look at all the happy users of
> default Gnome 3!
> > I am one of them and I went directly
> from the tilling-WM Xmonad to gnome
> > 3! So you can't say it's only for
> absolute noobs :). I install
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> As of tomorrow's rawhide [1], gnome-session will no longer treat
> llvmpipe as an unsupported driver. This means gnome-shell will run even
> on hardware without a native 3D driver, including virt guests.
>
> There are probably bugs! I've done
On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 09:37 -0500, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> What's the plan for rather old, limited hardware? Have you personally
> got XO-1, XO-1.5 units to test? We'll be testing it (with some
> trepidation) at OLPC, but it's always better if you can see it in all
> its glory on your own.
I hav
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 09:37 -0500, Martin Langhoff wrote:
>
>> What's the plan for rather old, limited hardware? Have you personally
>> got XO-1, XO-1.5 units to test? We'll be testing it (with some
>> trepidation) at OLPC, but it's always bett
On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 01:02:15PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> rjones gtkglarea2
> rjones guestfs-browser
> rjones nekovm
> rjones ocaml-lablgtk
I've rebuilt all of these packages. They all built without any
source changes.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.r
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> Details of rawhide builds for them here[1], the XO-1 build isn't
> tested but the XO 1.5 one works fine, I'll be testing further and
> likely the next build I do I'll add all the components to test the
> llvmpipe feature on them.
>
> [1] http
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-DateTime-TimeZone-SystemV:
1739214f1c665110ba163fb7a873bcbf DateTime-TimeZone-SystemV-0.005.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://
commit da9be0a132ad123d964043f7264cd911f36ad754
Author: Iain Arnell
Date: Mon Nov 7 16:33:46 2011 +0100
initial import (rhbz#751522)
.gitignore |1 +
perl-DateTime-TimeZone-SystemV.spec | 57 +++
sources
Summary of changes:
da9be0a... initial import (rhbz#751522) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorapr
Summary of changes:
da9be0a... initial import (rhbz#751522) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorapr
On 11/07/2011 01:57 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> * The %configure macro (at least since F-16) does
> LDFLAGS="${LDFLAGS:--Wl,-z,relro }"; export LDFLAGS;
>so one cannot simply export a customized $LDFLAGS in the spec file
>without disturbing the macro.
That's what I meant by "(in
On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 09:46:41PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> enaut wrote:
> > I am one of them and I went directly from the tilling-WM Xmonad to gnome
> > 3! So you can't say it's only for absolute noobs :).
>
> The fact that you were using a tiling WM first shows that you are much more
> will
On 11/07/2011 10:35 AM, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> On 11/07/2011 01:57 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
>> * The %configure macro (at least since F-16) does
>> LDFLAGS="${LDFLAGS:--Wl,-z,relro }"; export LDFLAGS;
>>so one cannot simply export a customized $LDFLAGS in the spec file
>>without
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Env-Path:
3be7b2f3521eb604d621f6fdf36b86da Env-Path-0.18.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/lis
commit 7d9cfd0af547318af00299c05c21ffd6f12b6a71
Author: Iain Arnell
Date: Mon Nov 7 17:07:04 2011 +0100
initial import (rhbz#751531)
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Env-Path.spec | 50 ++
sources|1 +
3 files changed, 52
Summary of changes:
7d9cfd0... initial import (rhbz#751531) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorapr
Summary of changes:
7d9cfd0... initial import (rhbz#751531) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorapr
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-MooseX-Has-Sugar:
4208e85e65b568707e91b45552347b44 MooseX-Has-Sugar-0.05070419.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorap
commit 7e6b3b5295d1ffef5c6ac693062bb83dbb22068d
Author: Iain Arnell
Date: Mon Nov 7 17:11:27 2011 +0100
initial import (rhbz#751533)
.gitignore |1 +
perl-MooseX-Has-Sugar.spec | 69
sources|1 +
3
Summary of changes:
7e6b3b5... initial import (rhbz#751533) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorapr
On Sun, 2011-11-06 at 22:42 +, Bojan Smojver wrote:
> drago01 gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Not true ... I recommend reading
> > https://live.gnome.org/GnomeShell/Design/#Activities_Overview
>
> I read that a long, long time ago, of course. In fact, I have written a
> constructive critique of Gno
On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 10:11 -0500, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> >> For now let's say yes, but that's more like implementation detail than
> >> fundamental property. Clutter'd be perfectly happy atop a GLES
> >> renderer, we just don't have that wired up.
>
> Ok -- that doesn't sound so terrible. Are
On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 10:50 -0500, Tom Callaway wrote:
> On 11/07/2011 10:35 AM, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> > On 11/07/2011 01:57 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> >
> >> * The %configure macro (at least since F-16) does
> >> LDFLAGS="${LDFLAGS:--Wl,-z,relro }"; export LDFLAGS;
> >>so one cannot
On Sat, 2011-11-05 at 13:02 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> twaugh ghostscript
> twaugh gutenprint
I've rebuilt these two.
Tim.
*/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo
On 11/07/2011 12:16 PM, Tim Waugh wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-11-05 at 13:02 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> twaugh ghostscript
>> twaugh gutenprint
> I've rebuilt these two.
>
> Tim.
> */
>
(Apologies for replying to your reply, Tim, but I wasn't subscribed at
the start of this thread.)
I'm a graphviz upst
Hi,
Just managed to upgrade tonight, but there seems to be a hitch with
evolution - none of my folders appear!
When I run from the command line, I'm getting the following
[paul@PB3 ~]$ evolution
evolution-shell-CRITICAL **: shell_settings_pspec_for_key: assertion
`schema_name != NULL' failed
G
On the today's FESCo meeting we discussed the request to move forward
the conversion of the sysvinit scripts to systemd units in Fedora 17.
The packages which ship sysvinit script but do not ship systemd unit
according to the Fedora packaging guidelines violate this rule:
https://fedoraproject.or
I forgot on agenda, so I'm sending it now :-/
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting today at 17:00UTC (1:00pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9
= Followups =
#top
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> Eventual blocking of the packages that violate this Fedora packaging
> rule was not yet definitively decided upon, but we agreed that the
> Fedora package maintainers should be warned that such blocking might
> happen before the Fedora 17 Alpha
On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 20:28 +0100, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> On the today's FESCo meeting we discussed the request to move forward
> the conversion of the sysvinit scripts to systemd units in Fedora 17.
>
> The packages which ship sysvinit script but do not ship systemd unit
> according to the Fedora p
On Mon, 7 Nov 2011 10:35:18 -0900
Jef Spaleta wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> > Eventual blocking of the packages that violate this Fedora packaging
> > rule was not yet definitively decided upon, but we agreed that the
> > Fedora package maintainers should be warne
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2011-11-07)
===
Meeting started by mmaslano at 17:06:29 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-11-07/fesco.2011-11-07-17.06.log.html
.
Meeting summary
On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 10:35 -0900, Jef Spaleta wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> > Eventual blocking of the packages that violate this Fedora packaging
> > rule was not yet definitively decided upon, but we agreed that the
> > Fedora package maintainers should be warne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
It seems to be a weekly occurrence of a new CVE for some app that uses
/tmp insecurely.
I have been on a crusade for years to stop privileged services from
using /tmp and /var/tmp. These services can be potentially be
interfered by unprivileged users
Dne 7.11.2011 20:50, Daniel J Walsh napsal(a):
> systemd as of Fedora 16 has the ability to run system services with
> private /tmp and /var/tmp. I would like to propose that we make this
> the default in Fedora 17, or at least open a bugzilla on all system
> services that we know of that use /tmp
Sounds good to me.
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> It seems to be a weekly occurrence of a new CVE for some app that uses
> /tmp insecurely.
>
> I have been on a crusade for years to stop privileged services from
> using
On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 19:10 +, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> Just managed to upgrade tonight, but there seems to be a hitch with
> evolution - none of my folders appear!
>
None of your "local" folders appear, such as with pop, or imap folders
or something else?
I don't run it but thoug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/07/2011 03:38 PM, Matej Cepl wrote:
> Dne 7.11.2011 20:50, Daniel J Walsh napsal(a):
>> systemd as of Fedora 16 has the ability to run system services
>> with private /tmp and /var/tmp. I would like to propose that we
>> make this the default in
Hi,
On 7 November 2011 20:38, Mike Chambers wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 19:10 +, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > Just managed to upgrade tonight, but there seems to be a hitch with
> > evolution - none of my folders appear!
> >
>
> None of your "local" folders appear, such as with
Once upon a time, Daniel J Walsh said:
> I know I just opened a couple of other features on Fedora 17. I just
> wanted to open discussion on this about what would be the best way to
> do this.
>
> * Maybe a bad idea. Since admins might get confused by different /tmp(s).
Hmm, one question: is i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/07/2011 03:44 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Daniel J Walsh said:
>> I know I just opened a couple of other features on Fedora 17. I
>> just wanted to open discussion on this about what would be the
>> best way to do this.
>>
>> *
On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 14:55 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> Details of rawhide builds for them here[1], the XO-1 build isn't
> tested but the XO 1.5 one works fine, I'll be testing further and
> likely the next build I do I'll add all the components to test the
> llvmpipe feature on them.
Don't fr
On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 15:42 -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 11/07/2011 03:38 PM, Matej Cepl wrote:
> > Dne 7.11.2011 20:50, Daniel J Walsh napsal(a):
> >> systemd as of Fedora 16 has the ability to run system services
> >> with private /tmp and
On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 09:38:09PM +0100, Matej Cepl wrote:
> Dne 7.11.2011 20:50, Daniel J Walsh napsal(a):
> > systemd as of Fedora 16 has the ability to run system services with
> > private /tmp and /var/tmp. I would like to propose that we make this
> > the default in Fedora 17, or at least op
On 11/07/2011 07:41 PM, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 10:35 -0900, Jef Spaleta wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Tomas Mraz wrote:
>>> Eventual blocking of the packages that violate this Fedora packaging
>>> rule was not yet definitively decided upon, but we agreed that the
>>
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 9:05 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 14:55 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
>
>> Details of rawhide builds for them here[1], the XO-1 build isn't
>> tested but the XO 1.5 one works fine, I'll be testing further and
>> likely the next build I do I'll add all the c
Daniel J Walsh (dwa...@redhat.com) said:
> I know I just opened a couple of other features on Fedora 17. I just
> wanted to open discussion on this about what would be the best way to
> do this.
>
> * Make it default in systemd
I think that would be problematic if it's applied to all units; it'
Once upon a time, Daniel J Walsh said:
> I think this is a question for lennart, I am not sure how he sets them
> up. If I was setting them up, I would probably set them up by default
> under /run/SERVICE/tmp and bind mount over /tmp or something like
> that. And I would figure the root user cou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/07/2011 04:08 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 15:42 -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 11/07/2011 03:38 PM, Matej Cepl wrote:
>>> Dne 7.11.2011 20:50, Daniel J Walsh napsal(a):
>>
On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 14:33 +0100, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> You won't be able to convince Gnome3 zealots.
That's a bit harsh, I think. They are just very impressionable folk. :-)
> Believe me, a lot of people tried.
I would like to believe that a rational argument eventually prevails.
> Vote wit
Hi,
Out of curiosity I wanted to ask, why do I need colord on my system?
My system is ordinary web developer box with php, python, postgresql,
mysql, memcached, cherokee, httpd etc. Colord was installed because of
dependencies. But I would like to know why I need this package? My
system worked wi
Mike Chambers miketc.net> writes:
> Reading all sorts of stuff or trying to but havcen't found yours yet
> (don't like it neither, so wanted to see your thoughts on it too)
If you google '"on gnome 3" bojan', it should come up in top 10.
--
Bojan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedorapro
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 11:35 PM, Bojan Smojver wrote:
> Mike Chambers miketc.net> writes:
>
>> Reading all sorts of stuff or trying to but havcen't found yours yet
>> (don't like it neither, so wanted to see your thoughts on it too)
>
> If you google '"on gnome 3" bojan', it should come up in top
Now that Nils, Gimp maintainer, created Gimp Unstable repository[1],
there is no more reason to duplicate that effort. Without fanfare, I
decide to retire my own version[2] thus delete the repo. Thank you all
for using my package. That was a good experience as package maintainer.
[1] http://re
Mathieu Bridon fedoraproject.org> writes:
> And if you really loved Gnome 2 so much
If this is what think, then you really completely missed what I'm trying to say.
The main reason I'm using the fallback mode is the insanity of overview in
gnome-shell.
Don't worry - I'm sure someone will write
drago01 gmail.com> writes:
> Just point people to the link directly if you want them to read it
> (should be easier for both sides).
Spamming the list with links to my own site is not something I want to do. If
someone really wants to read that, they'll find it.
--
Bojan
--
devel mailing list
Bojan Smojver rexursive.com> writes:
> Don't worry - I'm sure someone will write an extension that will nuke the
> stupid Activities button sooner or later.
I'm behind times:
http://intgat.tigress.co.uk/rmy/extensions/index.html
Open source - it's a wonderful thing.
--
Bojan
--
devel mailin
On Mon, 07 Nov 2011 17:35:53 +0200, VS (Ville) wrote:
> > * The %configure macro (at least since F-16) does
> > LDFLAGS="${LDFLAGS:--Wl,-z,relro }"; export LDFLAGS;
> >so one cannot simply export a customized $LDFLAGS in the spec file
> >without disturbing the macro.
>
> That's wha
On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 16:05 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 14:55 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> > Details of rawhide builds for them here[1], the XO-1 build isn't
> > tested but the XO 1.5 one works fine, I'll be testing further and
> > likely the next build I do I'll add all
On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 09:31 +1100, Bojan Smojver wrote:
> I think what will most likely happen is that someone out there will come
> up with an extension to nuke the Activities button and replace it with
> Applications button. And that will be the end of that discussion.
There's been one for mont
2011/11/7 Michał Piotrowski :
> Hi,
>
> Out of curiosity I wanted to ask, why do I need colord on my system?
>
> My system is ordinary web developer box with php, python, postgresql,
> mysql, memcached, cherokee, httpd etc. Colord was installed because of
> dependencies. But I would like to know wh
Adam Williamson redhat.com> writes:
> There's been one for months, and yet 'the end of that discussion' does
> not appear to have come, and not all Shell users use it.
>
> http://intgat.tigress.co.uk/rmy/extensions/index.html
Yeah, guilty as charged on the discussion bit.
--
Bojan
--
devel m
On Mon, 07.11.11 14:50, Daniel J Walsh (dwa...@redhat.com) wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> It seems to be a weekly occurrence of a new CVE for some app that uses
> /tmp insecurely.
>
> I have been on a crusade for years to stop privileged services from
> using /tmp a
On Mon, 07.11.11 14:44, Chris Adams (cmad...@hiwaay.net) wrote:
> Once upon a time, Daniel J Walsh said:
> > I know I just opened a couple of other features on Fedora 17. I just
> > wanted to open discussion on this about what would be the best way to
> > do this.
> >
> > * Maybe a bad idea. S
On Mon, 07.11.11 15:25, Chris Adams (cmad...@hiwaay.net) wrote:
> Once upon a time, Daniel J Walsh said:
> > I think this is a question for lennart, I am not sure how he sets them
> > up. If I was setting them up, I would probably set them up by default
> > under /run/SERVICE/tmp and bind mount
Once upon a time, Lennart Poettering said:
> Yes, since they are created as subdirectories of the real / with mkdtemp()
> and thus can be found there like any other directory if you are running
> in the main namespaces.
>
> No, since there's currently no sane way to figure out the private /tmp
>
On Nov 1, 2011, at 5:04 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> For f15 through rawhide and epel 6 there is a new update coming for fedpkg
> (part of fedora-packager).
>
> This build is a pretty major rewrite to make use of a shared pyrpkg backend.
> Coming along for the ride is a new build of GitPython whi
On 11/08/2011 12:45 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 09:31 +1100, Bojan Smojver wrote:
>
>> I think what will most likely happen is that someone out there will come
>> up with an extension to nuke the Activities button and replace it with
>> Applications button. And that will be
On Mon, 07.11.11 16:08, Simo Sorce (s...@redhat.com) wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 15:42 -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On 11/07/2011 03:38 PM, Matej Cepl wrote:
> > > Dne 7.11.2011 20:50, Daniel J Walsh napsal(a):
> > >> systemd as of
On Mon, 07.11.11 19:15, Chris Adams (cmad...@hiwaay.net) wrote:
> Once upon a time, Lennart Poettering said:
> > Yes, since they are created as subdirectories of the real / with mkdtemp()
> > and thus can be found there like any other directory if you are running
> > in the main namespaces.
> >
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 8:48 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> If run on the main namespace all they see is that the files are in some
> randomized subdir of /tmp, instead of /tmp itself.
Is the randomization required? If they were named after the
user/service that created
them (perhaps with some ra
Once upon a time, Gregory Maxwell said:
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 8:48 PM, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
> > If run on the main namespace all they see is that the files are in some
> > randomized subdir of /tmp, instead of /tmp itself.
>
> Is the randomization required? If they were named after th
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 10:00 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
> Well, if they're subdirectories of /tmp, you'd have to deal with all the
> usual /tmp attacks of known targets.
Hmph? They wouldn't be accessible to anything except root I assume.
Because they're long lived the random names shouldn't provide
On Sat, 2011-11-05 at 13:02 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> pgordon glabels
> pgordon lucidlife
Thanks for the FYI email. I rebuilt both of these yesterday with no
problems and no source changes necessary.
Regards.
--
Peter Gordon (codergeek42)
Who am I? :: http://thecodergeek.com/about-me
signa
Once upon a time, Gregory Maxwell said:
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 10:00 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
> > Well, if they're subdirectories of /tmp, you'd have to deal with all the
> > usual /tmp attacks of known targets.
>
> Hmph? They wouldn't be accessible to anything except root I assume.
>
> Because
Adam Williamson wrote:
> It seems like a similar bug has come up before in clamav:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573191
This issue affects many JITs. The WebKit JIT is affected too. Actually, the
execmem boolean has been enabled by default for a while, did it get disabled
agai
Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> Out of curiosity I wanted to ask, why do I need colord on my system?
Try "yum remove colord" and see what it wants to remove (and probably say
"no" if it's anything important to you), then you'll know what drags it in
(whether for good reasons or not).
Kevin K
On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 04:48 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
> > It seems like a similar bug has come up before in clamav:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573191
>
> This issue affects many JITs. The WebKit JIT is affected too. Actually, the
> execmem boole
On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 09:31 +1100, Bojan Smojver wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 14:33 +0100, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> > You won't be able to convince Gnome3 zealots.
>
> That's a bit harsh, I think. They are just very impressionable folk. :-)
That's also a bit harsh I think, and I'd appreciate it
On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 19:10 +, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Just managed to upgrade tonight, but there seems to be a hitch with
> evolution - none of my folders appear!
> ...
>
> GLib-GObject-WARNING **: g_object_get_property: object class
> `EShellSettings' has no property named `mail-enable-local-f
Dne 7.11.2011 22:44, Daniel J Walsh napsal(a):
> I often do this, (Probably did it with winbind.) but in some cases the
> maintainer might not know how to make the change or upstream would not
> want the change.
Well, if this project should ever succeeded than those bugs should have
probably patc
Dne 7.11.2011 22:12, Matthew Garrett napsal(a):
> Having some public discussion of a potentially contentious feature is a
> great way to help fesco make decisions. I'm personally in favour of that
> happening on a mailing list rather than in the discussion page on a wiki
> - it's a lot easier to fo
2011/11/8 Stephen John Smoogen :
> 2011/11/7 Michał Piotrowski :
>> Hi,
>>
>> Out of curiosity I wanted to ask, why do I need colord on my system?
>>
>> My system is ordinary web developer box with php, python, postgresql,
>> mysql, memcached, cherokee, httpd etc. Colord was installed because of
>>
Mathieu Bridon fedoraproject.org> writes:
> You probably want to switch to Linux Mint 12 when it comes out with
> their GSME enabled.
Now you're being funny. :-)
--
Bojan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
2011/11/8 Kevin Kofler :
> Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>> Out of curiosity I wanted to ask, why do I need colord on my system?
>
> Try "yum remove colord" and see what it wants to remove (and probably say
> "no" if it's anything important to you), then you'll know what drags it in
> (whether for good
88 matches
Mail list logo
