Re: Java 7 for Fedora 16

2011-07-26 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:22:08PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Sat, 2011-07-23 at 14:00 -0700, Douglas Myers–Turnbull wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Just something I wanted to bring to attention: > > > > Java 7 is slated for release (after years of hassle and heated debate) > > on 28 July, 2011. >

orphaning / looking for new owner for monkey-bubble

2011-07-26 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, I've been thinking about orphaning monkey-bubble for a while now, mostly because it is dead upstream and it is using various obsolete gnome technologies (esound, libgnomeui, bonobo). Yesterday it came to my attention that monkey-bubble also contains at least 1 sound sample which we should not

Re: Java 7 for Fedora 16

2011-07-26 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote: > * Toshio Kuratomi [2011-07-23 20:03]: > > On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 02:00:24PM -0700, Douglas Myers–Turnbull wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Just something I wanted to bring to attention: > > > > > > Java 7 is slated for release (after years of h

Re: Java 7 for Fedora 16

2011-07-26 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 00:05 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > as I always point out when this comes up, in the hopes that it'll > > eventually irritate someone enough that they go fix the feature process, > > the option is open to simply put Java 7 in without it being a 'Fedora > > feature'. If yo

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages in F-16 (final warning)

2011-07-26 Thread Fabian Deutsch
Hello, It seems as if my first mail (from 12 days ago) got lost: I can take > Orphan link-grammar - fabian -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

User-level instance of /bin in PATH

2011-07-26 Thread Misha Shnurapet
Hi. Since F15 ~/bin has been added to PATH, and commands that are supposed to run user scripts will work without changing into that directory. Meanwhile, ~/.local/bin isn't used. I'd like to propose that it is also added because technically it is ~/bin's brother. Yes, user scripts can be kept

File Perl-Critic-Pulp-62.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by ppisar

2011-07-26 Thread Petr Pisar
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp: 90aff90625ea0659107700302e36843d Perl-Critic-Pulp-62.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.o

[perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp] 0.62 bump

2011-07-26 Thread Petr Pisar
commit dccf4e2a5c7c65ed2c49e340189b3ed2f3f711f9 Author: Petr Pisar Date: Tue Jul 26 11:16:13 2011 +0200 0.62 bump .gitignore |1 + perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp.spec | 10 +++--- sources|2 +- 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) --- d

[perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp] Remove 4.8 filters

2011-07-26 Thread Petr Pisar
commit 6c8b32c6c6921f2d0d07de2c4920f6ac5430988e Author: Petr Pisar Date: Tue Jul 26 11:20:05 2011 +0200 Remove 4.8 filters perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp.spec | 21 +++-- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp.spec b/perl-Perl-Cri

[perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp] Fix typo in changelog

2011-07-26 Thread Petr Pisar
commit 115abdfc5c196c9d6652b95c0822f7d72fc43301 Author: Petr Písař Date: Tue Jul 26 11:30:14 2011 +0200 Fix typo in changelog perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp.spec |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp.spec b/perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp.spec ind

[Bug 720293] perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp-62 is available

2011-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720293 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added

Re: User-level instance of /bin in PATH

2011-07-26 Thread Andrew Haley
On 26/07/11 10:22, Misha Shnurapet wrote: > > Since F15 ~/bin has been added to PATH, and commands that are > supposed to run user scripts will work without changing into that > directory. Meanwhile, ~/.local/bin isn't used. I'd like to propose > that it is also added because technically it is ~/b

File perl-PPIx-Regexp.spec uploaded to lookaside cache by ppisar

2011-07-26 Thread Petr Pisar
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-PPIx-Regexp: 77aacbbd0b54a9d2a57711a222887459 perl-PPIx-Regexp.spec -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman

[perl-PPIx-Regexp] 0.021 bump

2011-07-26 Thread Petr Pisar
commit 199e2e745f412c0005e1b4a34e52b5e0207d6c15 Author: Petr Pisar Date: Tue Jul 26 11:34:08 2011 +0200 0.021 bump .gitignore|1 + perl-PPIx-Regexp.spec |7 +-- sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/.giti

[perl-PPIx-Regexp] Remove RPM 4.8 filter

2011-07-26 Thread Petr Pisar
commit c96e225b016b2fed65f68dc1723de279e2ebc65c Author: Petr Pisar Date: Tue Jul 26 11:36:16 2011 +0200 Remove RPM 4.8 filter perl-PPIx-Regexp.spec |4 +--- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-PPIx-Regexp.spec b/perl-PPIx-Regexp.spec index e3a4fbf..f

Re: Systemd transition prevents updating older release branches??

2011-07-26 Thread Michal Hlavinka
On 07/25/2011 09:07 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > In > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Systemd > I read that conversion of a package using a SysV initscript to systemd > units requires a trigger with a "< NEVR" condition, and that > > # Note: the NEVR in trigger scripts should a

Re: thanks for F15 mdadm systemd unit

2011-07-26 Thread Ric Wheeler
On 07/26/2011 02:15 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Sat, 2011-07-23 at 07:24 -0400, Ric Wheeler wrote: > >> should not be surprised that you see resistance (what new capability does NFS >> get from the systemd changes for example!). > reliable on-demand automounting, for a start. for which you alre

[perl-Padre] RPM 4.9 dependency filtering added

2011-07-26 Thread Petr Pisar
commit 4827e8c86f0a6bf8e9e00f547e5e02b49e6f4989 Author: Petr Pisar Date: Tue Jul 26 13:16:38 2011 +0200 RPM 4.9 dependency filtering added perl-Padre.spec | 44 +++- 1 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Padre.spe

Re: Systemd transition prevents updating older release branches??

2011-07-26 Thread Matthias Saou
Toshio Kuratomi wrote : > Regarding the fragility argument in reply to notting's clarification; do > note that the fragility there only lasts until that Fedora release goes EOL > and therefore can no longer receive updates) less than a year now for Fedora > 15. The fragility of packagers remember

[perl-Perl-Critic-Deprecated] RPM 4.9 dependency filtering added

2011-07-26 Thread Petr Pisar
commit 246320d44ae6b3a7fa975c23005d21e03d924534 Author: Petr Pisar Date: Tue Jul 26 13:27:33 2011 +0200 RPM 4.9 dependency filtering added perl-Perl-Critic-Deprecated.spec |9 - 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Perl-Critic-Deprecated.spec

Re: usb_modeswitch/usb_modeswitch-data outdated

2011-07-26 Thread Xose Vazquez Perez
Huzaifa Sidhpurwala wrote: > taken care of this, sorry for the delay :) -thank you- now waiting for the maintainer of usb_modeswitch: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625004 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

No new repos being built for dist-f16?

2011-07-26 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
newRepo seems to fail, although it's not clear why. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3230556 Maybe something to do with branching? Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines. Supports shel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages in F-16 (final warning)

2011-07-26 Thread Marc Grimme
- "Bill Nottingham" wrote: > Each release, before branching, we block currently orphaned packages. > It's that time again for Fedora 16. > > New this go-round is that we are also blocking packages that have > failed to build since before Fedora 14. > > The following packages are currently o

One easy review swap: 669911 / guestfs-browser

2011-07-26 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=669911#c5 Review Request: guestfs-browser - Guest filesystem browser Spec: http://oirase.annexia.org/reviews/guestfs-browser/guestfs-browser.spec SRPM: http://oirase.annexia.org/reviews/guestfs-browser/guestfs-browser-0.1.6-1.fc15.src.rpm This is a ver

Re: No new repos being built for dist-f16?

2011-07-26 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 12:54:24PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > newRepo seems to fail, although it's not clear why. > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3230556 > > Maybe something to do with branching? For whatever reason, this has fixed itself now. Rich. -- Richar

Re: User-level instance of /bin in PATH

2011-07-26 Thread Misha Shnurapet
26.07.2011, 18:34, "Andrew Haley" : > On 26/07/11 10:22, Misha Shnurapet wrote: > >>  Since F15 ~/bin has been added to PATH, and commands that are >>  supposed to run user scripts will work without changing into that >>  directory. Meanwhile, ~/.local/bin isn't used. I'd like to propose >>  that i

Re: orphaning / looking for new owner for monkey-bubble

2011-07-26 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 09:12:54 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > I've been thinking about orphaning monkey-bubble for a while now, > mostly because it is dead upstream and it is using various obsolete > gnome technologies (esound, libgnomeui, bonobo). > > Yesterday it came to my attentio

Re: merge into dist-f16

2011-07-26 Thread Petr Pisar
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 08:44:44AM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote: > On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 07:38:11PM +0200, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: > > > > b/ filters still not converted/checked > > > perl-Language-Functional > > > perl-libwww-perl > > > perl-LWP-Protocol-https > > > perl-Math-Random-MT-Auto > >

Re: Packages affected by RPM 4.9 filtering [was: News from rebuild]

2011-07-26 Thread Petr Pisar
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 03:19:45PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote: > On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 01:14:09PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 01:03:28PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 03:56:22PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 11:08:40AM +020

Re: orphaning / looking for new owner for monkey-bubble

2011-07-26 Thread Richard Shaw
Just to add my $0.02, I installed both monkey bubble and frozen bubble for the kids and they definitely like frozen bubble more and otherwise they're functionally equivalent. Richard -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[perl-Fedora-Rebuild] Do not create back-up files when patching

2011-07-26 Thread Petr Pisar
commit a1606c356bf5934f59fa2c9a90cbc0f504cc3882 Author: Petr Písař Date: Tue Jul 26 14:55:57 2011 +0200 Do not create back-up files when patching perl-Fedora-Rebuild.spec |7 +-- 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Fedora-Rebuild.spec b/perl-Fedo

NFSv4 / POSIX ACL mapping bug?

2011-07-26 Thread Robert Marcano
Hi, I need some help clarifying this issue in order to know if this is a bug or limits of the NFSv4 / POSIX ACL mapping before reporting it Creating a directory on the server with the following POSIX ACLs, rwx for the group "sharedgroup" and same defaults: #

[perl-Kwiki-UserPreferences] Add RPM 4.9 style filters

2011-07-26 Thread Petr Sabata
commit b40f91e83382c2d05f0d87b67147ff278bf4b7a5 Author: Petr Sabata Date: Tue Jul 26 14:59:28 2011 +0200 Add RPM 4.9 style filters perl-Kwiki-UserPreferences.spec |8 +++- 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Kwiki-UserPreferences.spec b/perl-Kwik

Re: User-level instance of /bin in PATH

2011-07-26 Thread Genes MailLists
On 07/26/2011 08:03 AM, Misha Shnurapet wrote: > 26.07.2011, 18:34, "Andrew Haley" : >> On 26/07/11 10:22, Misha Shnurapet wrote: >> >>> Since F15 ~/bin has been added to PATH, and commands that are >>> supposed to run user scripts will work without changing into that >>> directory. Meanwhile, ~

Re: User-level instance of /bin in PATH

2011-07-26 Thread Robert Marcano
On 07/26/2011 08:36 AM, Genes MailLists wrote: > On 07/26/2011 08:03 AM, Misha Shnurapet wrote: >> 26.07.2011, 18:34, "Andrew Haley": >>> On 26/07/11 10:22, Misha Shnurapet wrote: >>> Since F15 ~/bin has been added to PATH, and commands that are supposed to run user scripts will work

Re: User-level instance of /bin in PATH

2011-07-26 Thread Genes MailLists
On 07/26/2011 09:15 AM, Robert Marcano wrote: > In /etc/skel/.bash_profile they are added to the end and I think that is ok > > PATH=$PATH:$HOME/.local/bin:$HOME/bin > > Never knew about ~/.local/bin my .bash_profile is really old from the > time where the default was only ~/bin Mmm ok ... Ca

Self Introduction

2011-07-26 Thread Simon Thompson
Hi, My name's Simon, I'm a sys admin/developer type in Computer Science at University of Birmingham. We've got a couple of hundred workstations running variants of SL6/CentOS and I'd done various bits and pieces packaging up software to support our teaching here. Along with rebuilding stuff from F

Re: User-level instance of /bin in PATH

2011-07-26 Thread Emmanuel Seyman
* Genes MailLists [26/07/2011 15:14] : > > > >> On 26/07/11 10:22, Misha Shnurapet wrote: > > > Unlike ~/bin, which is in PATH though not even created. It's the other way round on my machine. Both are in my $PATH but ~/bin exists (I may have created it by hand) and ~/.local/bin/ doesn't. > Whe

Re: User-level instance of /bin in PATH

2011-07-26 Thread Emmanuel Seyman
* Genes MailLists [26/07/2011 15:32] : > > Mmm ok ... Can I assume root is excepted from this? You can. That is the case. Emmanuel -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: merge into dist-f16

2011-07-26 Thread Petr Pisar
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 02:43:42PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote: > Currently not-rebuild packages are: > > perl-Fedora-Rebuild perl-Fedora-Rebuild done. > perl-MongoDB > perl-NOCpulse-Debug > perl-NOCpulse-Gritch > perl-NOCpulse-Object > perl-Perlbal-XS-HTTPHeaders > perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule > perl-thr

Re: merge into dist-f16

2011-07-26 Thread Petr Pisar
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 02:43:42PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote: > > Currently not-rebuild packages are: [...] > perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule This package had problems in previous releases (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611015), current problem is tracked at upstream (https://rt.cpan.org/Publ

Re: One easy review swap: 669911 / guestfs-browser

2011-07-26 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 13:02 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=669911#c5 > Review Request: guestfs-browser - Guest filesystem browser > > Spec: > http://oirase.annexia.org/reviews/guestfs-browser/guestfs-browser.spec > SRPM: > http://oirase.annexia.or

Re: No new repos being built for dist-f16?

2011-07-26 Thread James Laska
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 13:03 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 12:54:24PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > newRepo seems to fail, although it's not clear why. > > > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3230556 > > > > Maybe something to do with bra

Re: User-level instance of /bin in PATH

2011-07-26 Thread Genes MailLists
On 07/26/2011 09:34 AM, Emmanuel Seyman wrote: > * Genes MailLists [26/07/2011 15:32] : >> >> Mmm ok ... Can I assume root is excepted from this? > > You can. That is the case. > > Emmanuel > :-) -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/list

Re: User-level instance of /bin in PATH

2011-07-26 Thread Robert Marcano
On 07/26/2011 09:04 AM, Emmanuel Seyman wrote: > * Genes MailLists [26/07/2011 15:32] : >> >> Mmm ok ... Can I assume root is excepted from this? > > You can. That is the case. a clean F15 install has PATH=$PATH:$HOME/bin, not the same /etc/skel/.bash_profile but still has ~/bin > > Emmanuel

Re: One easy review swap: 669911 / guestfs-browser

2011-07-26 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 07:13:18PM +0530, Ankur Sinha wrote: > Can you please review nifticlib[1]? > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714047 No problem, I'll do it right now. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones New in Fedora 11:

Re: Systemd transition prevents updating older release branches??

2011-07-26 Thread Tom Lane
Matthias Saou writes: > Toshio Kuratomi wrote : >> Regarding the fragility argument in reply to notting's clarification; do >> note that the fragility there only lasts until that Fedora release goes EOL >> and therefore can no longer receive updates) less than a year now for Fedora >> 15. The fr

File Mojolicious-1.65.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by yaneti

2011-07-26 Thread Yanko Kaneti
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Mojolicious: b9cff0ff045d1ca5cb55d41ce90c1f5b Mojolicious-1.65.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailm

Re: merge into dist-f16

2011-07-26 Thread Petr Pisar
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 02:43:42PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote: > > Currently not-rebuild packages are: > > perl-Fedora-Rebuild > perl-MongoDB > perl-NOCpulse-Debug > perl-NOCpulse-Gritch > perl-NOCpulse-Object > perl-Perlbal-XS-HTTPHeaders perl-Perlbal-XS-HTTPHeaders is with Perlbal in cycle. I wil

[perl-Mojolicious] Upstream update 1.65

2011-07-26 Thread Yanko Kaneti
commit cb0f6b62d359d1d58937bc20aeadb9ae58b81323 Author: Yanko Kaneti Date: Tue Jul 26 17:40:47 2011 +0300 Upstream update 1.65 .gitignore|1 + perl-Mojolicious.spec |9 ++--- sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) --- diff

Re: Systemd transition prevents updating older release branches??

2011-07-26 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 10:37:43AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Matthias Saou > writes: > > Toshio Kuratomi wrote : > >> Regarding the fragility argument in reply to notting's clarification; do > >> note that the fragility there only lasts until that Fedora release goes EOL > >> and therefore can no

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages in F-16 (final warning)

2011-07-26 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 01:56:36PM +0200, Marc Grimme wrote: > - "Bill Nottingham" wrote: > > > Each release, before branching, we block currently orphaned packages. > > It's that time again for Fedora 16. > > > > New this go-round is that we are also blocking packages that have > > failed t

Re: Systemd transition prevents updating older release branches??

2011-07-26 Thread Tom Lane
Toshio Kuratomi writes: > On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 10:37:43AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> Michal Hlavinka's solution of explicitly testing for the old sysv init >> script seems like a win from here, since I don't intend to continue >> packaging that. Anyone have an objection to that approach? > Yes

Re: Self Introduction

2011-07-26 Thread Rich Mattes
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 9:28 AM, Simon Thompson wrote: > Hi, > > My name's Simon, I'm a sys admin/developer type in Computer Science at > University of Birmingham. We've got a couple of hundred workstations > running variants of SL6/CentOS and I'd done various bits and pieces > packaging up softwa

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages in F-16 (final warning)

2011-07-26 Thread Bill Nottingham
Fabian Deutsch (fabian.deut...@gmx.de) said: > It seems as if my first mail (from 12 days ago) got lost: > I can take > > > Orphan link-grammar It's not a matter of can you; you need to go to pkgdb to claim it. (Sorry if the original mail didn't make this clear.) Bill -- devel mailing list de

TBB (Threading Building Blocks) rebase

2011-07-26 Thread Petr Machata
Hi there, I rebased TBB to 3.0. This should even be ABI-stable release--upstream didn't bump the SONAME, and I verified that no ABI-looking symbols disappeared. Thanks, PM -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages in F-16 (final warning)

2011-07-26 Thread Till Maas
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 03:51:16PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Till Maas (opensou...@till.name) said: > > Just wondering: Did the comaintainers get a copy of this mail? > > Only inasmuch as they're subscribed to devel@. I hereby propose to change this in the future and explicitly CC comaint

Sparc test machine

2011-07-26 Thread Sergio Belkin
I'd like to port UpTools package to sparc architecture. By chance is some test sparc machine there running Fedora? Thanks in advance! -- -- Sergio Belkin  http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.

rawhide openssh-server update kills sshd

2011-07-26 Thread Jim Meyering
FYI, I've just yum-updated my rawhide VM to the latest (but not from the console) and was surprised to lose the connection while it was happening. Again. It happened to me last week, too. I got back in via the console and tried to reinstall it via "yum reinstall openssh-server". That failed (so

Re: rawhide openssh-server update kills sshd

2011-07-26 Thread Clyde E. Kunkel
On 07/26/2011 12:22 PM, Jim Meyering wrote: > > service ssh restart Would that be: service sshd restart ? -- Regards, OldFart -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages in F-16 (final warning)

2011-07-26 Thread Jesse Keating
On 7/26/11 8:48 AM, Till Maas wrote: > I hereby propose to change this in the future and explicitly CC > comaintainers to make them aware that their package is orphaned. This can easily be done by just mailing -ow...@fedoraproject.org It will get to all co-maintainers. -- Jesse Keating Fedora

Re: Systemd transition prevents updating older release branches??

2011-07-26 Thread Bill Nottingham
Tom Lane (t...@redhat.com) said: > Bill Nottingham writes: > > Tom Lane (t...@redhat.com) said: > >> IOW, once I push a mysql update with native systemd support into > >> rawhide, I'll be forbidden from ever rebasing mysql in F15 up to > >> a newer upstream patch release. Considering that upstr

Adding ~/.local/bin to default PATH (was: Re: User-level instance of /bin in PATH)

2011-07-26 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 08:45:11AM -0430, Robert Marcano wrote: > On 07/26/2011 08:36 AM, Genes MailLists wrote: > > On 07/26/2011 08:03 AM, Misha Shnurapet wrote: > >> 26.07.2011, 18:34, "Andrew Haley": > >>> On 26/07/11 10:22, Misha Shnurapet wrote: > >>> > Since F15 ~/bin has been added t

Re: rawhide openssh-server update kills sshd

2011-07-26 Thread Jim Meyering
Clyde E. Kunkel wrote: > On 07/26/2011 12:22 PM, Jim Meyering wrote: >> >> service ssh restart > > Would that be: > > service sshd restart Yes, thanks. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Adding ~/.local/bin to default PATH (was: Re: User-level instance of /bin in PATH)

2011-07-26 Thread Bernd Stramm
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 17:49:43 +0100 "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote: > On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 08:45:11AM -0430, Robert Marcano wrote: > > On 07/26/2011 08:36 AM, Genes MailLists wrote: > > > On 07/26/2011 08:03 AM, Misha Shnurapet wrote: > > >> 26.07.2011, 18:34, "Andrew Haley": > > >>> On 26/07/11 10

Re: Adding ~/.local/bin to default PATH

2011-07-26 Thread Josh Stone
On 07/26/2011 09:49 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 08:45:11AM -0430, Robert Marcano wrote: >> In /etc/skel/.bash_profile they are added to the end and I think that is ok >> >> PATH=$PATH:$HOME/.local/bin:$HOME/bin > > This was added between bash-4.2.10 -2 and -3: > > http

Re: Adding ~/.local/bin to default PATH

2011-07-26 Thread Przemek Klosowski
On 07/26/2011 12:49 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> PATH=$PATH:$HOME/.local/bin:$HOME/bin > > This was added between bash-4.2.10 -2 and -3: > > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=bash.git;a=commitdiff;h=02b20d810111e8b53bb98ad49fedd1d583ce62e1 > > because of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_

Re: Systemd transition prevents updating older release branches??

2011-07-26 Thread Ville Skyttä
On 07/26/2011 12:48 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > Ville recently proposed a different set of scriptlets that would do away > with triggers but no one's committed to testing that the triggers work in > all cases (lots of package upgrades and lots of reboots are needed to test > that the scriptlets u

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages in F-16 (final warning)

2011-07-26 Thread Fabian Deutsch
Am Dienstag, den 26.07.2011, 11:28 -0400 schrieb Bill Nottingham: > Fabian Deutsch (fabian.deut...@gmx.de) said: > > It seems as if my first mail (from 12 days ago) got lost: > > I can take > > > > > Orphan link-grammar > > It's not a matter of can you; you need to go to pkgdb to claim it. (Sor

Re: Adding ~/.local/bin to default PATH

2011-07-26 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Przemek Klosowski said: > On 07/26/2011 12:49 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > >> PATH=$PATH:$HOME/.local/bin:$HOME/bin > > > > This was added between bash-4.2.10 -2 and -3: > > > > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=bash.git;a=commitdiff;h=02b20d810111e8b53bb98ad49fedd1d5

Re: Adding ~/.local/bin to default PATH

2011-07-26 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Tue, 26.07.11 15:05, Przemek Klosowski (przemek.klosow...@nist.gov) wrote: > > On 07/26/2011 12:49 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > >> PATH=$PATH:$HOME/.local/bin:$HOME/bin > > > > This was added between bash-4.2.10 -2 and -3: > > > > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=bash.git;a=commit

Re: Adding ~/.local/bin to default PATH

2011-07-26 Thread Genes MailLists
On 07/26/2011 03:34 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > I don't think it makes a lot of sense to have a visible directory for > binaries. People will see that, and be annoyed. Perhaps, but hiding things annoys many people more ... not a huge deal as .config is not too hidden anyway ... > > Not

RPM version goes backward in Rawhide

2011-07-26 Thread Jerry James
I just did a "package-cleanup --orphans" on my Rawhide machine to see which of the just-blocked packages are installed there. To my surprise, I got this: # package-cleanup --orphans Loaded plugins: auto-update-debuginfo, langpacks, presto, refresh-packagekit [snip stuff that I need to take care o

Re: Systemd transition prevents updating older release branches??

2011-07-26 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 11:20:10AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Toshio Kuratomi writes: > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 10:37:43AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > >> Michal Hlavinka's solution of explicitly testing for the old sysv init > >> script seems like a win from here, since I don't intend to continue > >

Re: Systemd transition prevents updating older release branches??

2011-07-26 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 01:17:33PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Tom Lane (t...@redhat.com) said: > > Bill Nottingham writes: > > > Tom Lane (t...@redhat.com) said: > > >> IOW, once I push a mysql update with native systemd support into > > >> rawhide, I'll be forbidden from ever rebasing mysq

Re: RPM version goes backward in Rawhide

2011-07-26 Thread Tomas Mraz
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 13:59 -0600, Jerry James wrote: > I just did a "package-cleanup --orphans" on my Rawhide machine to see > which of the just-blocked packages are installed there. To my > surprise, I got this: > > # package-cleanup --orphans > Loaded plugins: auto-update-debuginfo, langpacks

Re: rawhide openssh-server update kills sshd

2011-07-26 Thread Dave Jones
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 06:22:50PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote: > FYI, I've just yum-updated my rawhide VM to the latest > (but not from the console) and was surprised to lose the connection > while it was happening. Again. It happened to me last week, too. > > I got back in via the console a

Re: RPM version goes backward in Rawhide

2011-07-26 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 13:59:51 -0600, JJ (Jerry) wrote: > I just did a "package-cleanup --orphans" on my Rawhide machine to see > which of the just-blocked packages are installed there. To my > surprise, I got this: > > # package-cleanup --orphans > Loaded plugins: auto-update-debuginfo, langpacks

Re: RPM version goes backward in Rawhide

2011-07-26 Thread Jerry James
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > Yes, It got untagged. See last week's thread on this list: > Subject: rpm builds failing with "Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found" Thanks for the replies, Tomas and Michael. I somehow missed the part where I needed to downgrade rpm

Re: RPM version goes backward in Rawhide

2011-07-26 Thread Jesse Keating
On 7/26/11 1:14 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > Yes, It got untagged. See last week's thread on this list: > Subject: rpm builds failing with "Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found" I thought there was a hard rule about not having nvrs go backwards, and if a bad build was put out, it should be f

Re: rawhide openssh-server update kills sshd

2011-07-26 Thread Paul Howarth
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 16:13:59 -0400 Dave Jones wrote: > On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 06:22:50PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote: > > FYI, I've just yum-updated my rawhide VM to the latest > > (but not from the console) and was surprised to lose the connection > > while it was happening. Again. It happen

Re: RPM version goes backward in Rawhide

2011-07-26 Thread Tomas Mraz
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 13:24 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: > On 7/26/11 1:14 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > Yes, It got untagged. See last week's thread on this list: > > Subject: rpm builds failing with "Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found" > > I thought there was a hard rule about not having

Re: rawhide openssh-server update kills sshd

2011-07-26 Thread James Antill
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 21:28 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote: > On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 16:13:59 -0400 > Dave Jones wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 06:22:50PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote: > > > FYI, I've just yum-updated my rawhide VM to the latest > > > (but not from the console) and was surprised to

Re: RPM version goes backward in Rawhide

2011-07-26 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 01:24:58PM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: > On 7/26/11 1:14 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > Yes, It got untagged. See last week's thread on this list: > > Subject: rpm builds failing with "Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found" > > I thought there was a hard rule about not

Re: rawhide openssh-server update kills sshd

2011-07-26 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Tue, 26.07.11 17:16, James Antill (ja...@fedoraproject.org) wrote: > > Perhaps it's because in %postun it has "systemctl try-restart > > sshd.service" where it used to have "service sshd condrestart", and > > systemd kills all running sshd processes whereas the old one only > > killed the main

Re: Adding ~/.local/bin to default PATH

2011-07-26 Thread Matej Cepl
Dne 26.7.2011 20:40, Bernd Stramm napsal(a): > Oh it seems every useful for purposes like installing executables that > most users will never find. Actually I would prefer ~/.local/bin to ~/bin ... I actually use ~/ as my workspace (I never got what's the point of ~/Desktop) so I don't want to du

Re: rawhide openssh-server update kills sshd

2011-07-26 Thread Matthew Miller
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 11:46:30PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > If restarting sshd kills the sshs sessions then my guess is that > pam_systemd is not enabled (or somehow failing) and hence user sessions > stay members of the sshd cgroup instead of getting their own. Lennart, is pam_systemd a

Re: Meeting minutes/summary for 2011-07-25 FESCo meeting

2011-07-26 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 07/25/2011 06:37 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > On 07/25/2011 06:22 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: >> * need to get audidt #617321 iscsi #714688 NFS-Utils #699040 >> Tigervnc #717227 dnsmasq #694932 openvpn #714710 speech-dispatcherd >> #697600 smolt #697612 wpa_supplicant #66123

Naming

2011-07-26 Thread Nathan Owens
I am probably going to try and package Peerguardian, and the question is what should I name it, because the tarball is named pgl_noGUI. should I name it pgl, pgl_nogui, pgl-console or possibly just peerguardian? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org

Re: Adding ~/.local/bin to default PATH

2011-07-26 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Matej Cepl said: > Dne 26.7.2011 20:40, Bernd Stramm napsal(a): > > Oh it seems every useful for purposes like installing executables that > > most users will never find. > > Actually I would prefer ~/.local/bin to ~/bin ... I actually use ~/ as > my workspace (I never got what'

Re: Adding ~/.local/bin to default PATH

2011-07-26 Thread Misha Shnurapet
27.07.2011, 10:17, "Chris Adams" : > I've used ~/bin since before Linux was available, so I don't really see > the point in trying to "hide" it (of course, I alias ls to "ls -FCA", so > ~/.bin wouldn't be hidden, just one extra character to type when I need > to access it). Noone has asked to "hid

[Test-Announce] Fedora 16 branch today

2011-07-26 Thread Adam Williamson
Just a heads-up to let everyone know that Fedora 16 is now branched from Rawhide. This means that we're now into the phase where pre-Beta requirements for updates apply (see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy): updates-testing is in effect for F16, so if you're running F16, remember to s

Re: User-level instance of /bin in PATH

2011-07-26 Thread Braden McDaniel
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 08:45 -0430, Robert Marcano wrote: > On 07/26/2011 08:36 AM, Genes MailLists wrote: > > On 07/26/2011 08:03 AM, Misha Shnurapet wrote: > >> 26.07.2011, 18:34, "Andrew Haley": > >>> On 26/07/11 10:22, Misha Shnurapet wrote: > >>> > Since F15 ~/bin has been added to PATH

Re: thanks for F15 mdadm systemd unit

2011-07-26 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 07:07 -0400, Ric Wheeler wrote: > On 07/26/2011 02:15 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Sat, 2011-07-23 at 07:24 -0400, Ric Wheeler wrote: > > > >> should not be surprised that you see resistance (what new capability does > >> NFS > >> get from the systemd changes for example

Starting a SIG for package reviews

2011-07-26 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
For a while now I've wanted to get some sort of package review SIG going. The package review process hasn't really evolved much since it was instituted way back when, and now it (and the portion of the sponsorship process it overlaps) has become a major bottleneck in one of the main ways of gettin