On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 01:54:12PM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > supertux
>
> An error message I'd never before seen:
>
> /builddir/build/BUILD/supertux-0.3.3/src/supertux/screen_manager.cpp: In
> member function 'void ScreenManager::process_events()':
> /builddir/build/BUILD/supertux-0.3.3/src
We're trying to package "Apache Traffic Server" for fedora, and need a
dedicated uid/gid for user/group "ats" running this services since it
includes clustering and config management over more than one node.
I've found the PackageUserRegistry wiki page at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/P
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 11:22:26 +0200, JFM (Jan-Frode) wrote:
> We're trying to package "Apache Traffic Server" for fedora, and need a
> dedicated uid/gid for user/group "ats" running this services since it
> includes clustering and config management over more than one node.
>
> I've found the Packa
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:55:33AM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
> You are misreading the PackageUserRegistry page. Or more likely, you haven't
> read it carefully enough to follow the link in the first sentence. RHEL
> doesn't use the 'fedora-usermgmt' feature. Not even Fedora uses it everywhe
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 12:53:23PM +0200, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:55:33AM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> >
> > You are misreading the PackageUserRegistry page. Or more likely, you haven't
> > read it carefully enough to follow the link in the first sentence. RHEL
> krusader
I'll take this if it's not already taken.
Radek Novacek
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 12:09:14 +0100, DPB (Daniel) wrote:
> > > You are misreading the PackageUserRegistry page. Or more likely, you
> > > haven't
> > > read it carefully enough to follow the link in the first sentence. RHEL
> > > doesn't use the 'fedora-usermgmt' feature. Not even Fedora uses it
On Monday, June 20, 2011 07:34:10 PM Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> Due to the requirement for contributors to sign the FPCA by Thursday of
> last week, certain package owners who haven't yet signed will be removed
> from the packager group soon. When that happens, the packages that they
> own will be o
Hi,
if no other is interested, I can provide new home for these:
espeak
libax25
demorse
linpsk
LinLog
regards
Jaroslav
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Good day,
> dbh
> libmatheval
> muParser
I'll take those, if they ain't taken.
- fabian
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
> xcowsay
I'll take this too.
-J
--
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
commit c5299c1960ef2b4b6cfe999c64ee9413ddb7416e
Author: Marcela Mašláňová
Date: Wed Jun 22 14:40:15 2011 +0200
Perl mass rebuild
perl-Test-Memory-Cycle.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Test-Memory-Cycle.spec b/perl-Test-Memory-Cycle
I have now retired bittorrent in git, pkgdb and comps, and have filed
ticket https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4783 to have it blocked
in koji since there were no real objections.
Anyone that would like to breathe new life into it is welcome to take it.
Paul.
--
devel mailing list
devel@
On 22/06/2011 02:12, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> tetrinetx
I’ll be interested in taking this one.
--
Florent Le Coz
louizat...@fedoraproject.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
I've been a Fedora user since FC5 but hadn't contributed until I started
working for Red Hat earlier this year as part of Fedora QA, spending
most of my time on AutoQA. Prior to starting at Red Hat, I was working
on an internal test automation framework for storage device firmware.
I was planning
On 06/21/2011 11:46 AM, Deji Akingunola wrote:
> I will like to take the following 3
>
>> bibletime
>> ncview
>> netcdf
>
> The last two are already being effectively maintained by Orion, he can
> have them if he want.
I have to say, I'd forgotten that I wasn't the official "owner". Welcome
aboa
Hi there,
this update has been long due. Hans De Goede pitches some of the
features of Bison 2.5 in the upstream monitoring bug report
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=704819
... and it's also written in more detail here:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-gnu/2011-05/msg9
commit 6d36ba8fa1c93ab545d380e2423d85dda70eefa8
Author: Iain Arnell
Date: Wed Jun 22 17:55:23 2011 +0200
document "useless" provides filtering
perl-Tk.spec |2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Tk.spec b/perl-Tk.spec
index 27c2f10..cac02f4 10064
I might be doing it wrong, but have kernel-debuginfo packages just
disappeared from Rawhide recently? eg. Compare:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=243927
kernel-2.6.39-0.rc7.git6.1.fc16 from May 14, contains debuginfo
and:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?build
On 06/22/2011 08:23 PM, Tim Flink wrote:
> Since I would be new to packaging, I need to find a mentor before taking
> on python-pip. I am very much interested in learning the ropes and would
> appreciate it if someone was willing to help me learn as a mentor.
I am not a sponsor but I can help you
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 12:10:49PM -0400, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 05:09:06PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > but I don't understand what this means. Are kernel symbols included
> > in the main package in Rawhide? It doesn't seem that way, at least,
> > systemtap can't
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 05:13:13PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > Clearly. It's a bug, I don't build debuginfo locally because it's an
> > epic waste of space and time, and that leaked into the spec. Sorry.
>
> Ah no problem! I thought it must have been a mistake, because the
> commit messa
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> python-werkzeug
I'm packaging python-flask, which has python-werkzeug as a dep. I'll take it.
--
Dan Young
Multnomah ESD - Technology Services
503-257-1562
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 07:59:52PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > libcgroup
>
> I'll take this one if it isn't already grabbed.
>
Done. Thanks Josh.
-Toshio
pgpT70h8aEKKc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists
On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 00:36 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
> We are hosting another Fedora 15 hardfp Virtual Fedora Activity Day
> today, at 14:00UTC (10:00 Eastern Daylight Time). The purpose of this
> session is to co-ordinate the bootstrap of F15 hardfp (hardware floating
> point). Going forward, th
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 09:26:11PM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 17:02 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>
> > sound-theme-freedesktop
>
> If nobody else picks this one up, I'll take it.
>
Done.
-Toshio
pgpuWlb4nI3SE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
de
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 08:56:02PM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 6:12 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > stp
> > tex-zfuzz
> > zenon
>
> Since nobody else has spoken for these, I'll take them, but
> comaintainers would be very welcome.
>
Done.
-Toshio
pgpR6dzvOUTTN.pgp
Descr
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Trusted_Boot is a proposed
feature for F16. We've traditionally had a hard objection to the
functionality because it required either the distribution or downloading
of binary code that ran on the host CPU, but it seems that there'll
shortly be systems that
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Trusted_Boot is a proposed
> feature for F16. We've traditionally had a hard objection to the
> functionality because it required either the distribution or downloading
> of binary code that ran on the host CPU, but it seems that there'll
> shortly be syste
On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 20:02 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Trusted_Boot is a proposed
> feature for F16. We've traditionally had a hard objection to the
> functionality because it required either the distribution or downloading
> of binary code that ran on
On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 14:01 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Trusted_Boot is a proposed
> > feature for F16. We've traditionally had a hard objection to the
> > functionality because it required either the distribution or downloading
> > of binary code that ran on
A little OT perhaps, but would installation of numpy1.6 onto fedora15 be
expected to break anything?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> A little OT perhaps, but would installation of numpy1.6 onto fedora15 be
> expected to break anything?
Hard to say. Lots of things depend on it, but most things have an
unversioned requires. You'd probably want to rebuild the SRPM on F15 to
minimize breakage.
-J
> --
> devel mailing list
>
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 12:09:14PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> I have always filed a BZ against the 'setup' RPM asking for a
> static uid/gid pair to be allocated, and the changelogs support
> this approach:
Great, thanks!
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715266
-jf
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 02:32:46PM +0200, Fabian Deutsch wrote:
> Good day,
>
> > dbh
> > libmatheval
> > muParser
>
> I'll take those, if they ain't taken.
>
Done. Note that muParser has EL-4, EL-5, and EL-6 branches that I've now
orphaned. If you want to take them, feel free to log into the
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 07:34:47AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>
> >
> > xcowsay
>
> I'll take this too.
>
Done.
-Toshio
pgpXt4TeSNtpr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 01:41:20PM +0200, Radek Novacek wrote:
> > krusader
>
> I'll take this if it's not already taken.
>
Done.
-Toshio
pgpoeIbR58OVp.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi,
will Fedora 15's version of Firefox (currently 4.0.1) be updated to
Firefox 5?
The following koji builds let me asume it:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=249788
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=249830
These build have a tag called "dist-f15-updates-ca
On 06/22/2011 02:55 PM, Heiko Adams wrote:
> Hi,
> will Fedora 15's version of Firefox (currently 4.0.1) be updated to
> Firefox 5?
>
> The following koji builds let me asume it:
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=249788
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=249
I'm curious to know the use case(s) for this technology.
Does it enable certain types of behaviour that aren't possible currently?
Would it enable a system running Fedora to interact with other systems
with a greater guarantee about its behaviour or function?
Is it just something that system int
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 13:04, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> On 06/20/2011 06:46 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > After doing a rather large update to my rawhide box, it seems that it
> > no longer wants to play fair with Gnome giving a very unfriendly
> > "Something has gone wrong which I can't
On 06/22/2011 10:56 PM, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
> On 06/22/2011 02:55 PM, Heiko Adams wrote:
>> Hi,
>> will Fedora 15's version of Firefox (currently 4.0.1) be updated to
>> Firefox 5?
>>
>> The following koji builds let me asume it:
>> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=249788
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/22/2011 04:57 PM, Camilo Mesias wrote:
> I'm curious to know the use case(s) for this technology.
>
> Does it enable certain types of behaviour that aren't possible currently?
>
> Would it enable a system running Fedora to interact with other s
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > If so, is there a mechanism to disable that functionality, or mark a
> > kernel as trusted, so that I could, for example, run a kernel I built
> > myself or one from another RPM?
>
> I would say that if this feature prevents users from creating their own
Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for x86_64
using rawhide from 2011-06-16
Good hunting!
Full logs at http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/
4 Open Bugs which now build, and can be marked CLOSED RAWHIDE:
gdmap: [u'599984']
mine_detector: [u'631394']
python-beaker: [u'59994
Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for i386
using rawhide from 2011-06-16
Good hunting!
Full logs at http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/
4 Open Bugs which now build, and can be marked CLOSED RAWHIDE:
gdmap: [u'599984']
mine_detector: [u'631394']
python-beaker: [u'599947'
On 06/22/2011 02:09 PM, Martin Stransky wrote:
> On 06/22/2011 10:56 PM, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
>> On 06/22/2011 02:55 PM, Heiko Adams wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> will Fedora 15's version of Firefox (currently 4.0.1) be updated to
>>> Firefox 5?
>>>
>>> The following koji builds let me asume it:
>>> htt
On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 19:17 -0500, Matt Domsch wrote:
> Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for x86_64
> using rawhide from 2011-06-16
>
> Good hunting!
>
> Full logs at http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/
> sgallagh: pysvn
I've opened a bug upstream. The %check unit test
On 06/22/2011 03:02 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Trusted_Boot is a proposed
> feature for F16. We've traditionally had a hard objection to the
> functionality because it required either the distribution or downloading
> of binary code that ran on the host C
On 06/22/2011 03:01 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>
>> Outside that, is there any other impact? Does tboot perform any
>> verification of the kernels, and if so how is that configured? Is the
>> expectation that an install configured with TXT will only boot trusted
>> kernels, and if so what mechanism is
On 06/22/2011 03:20 PM, seth vidal wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 20:02 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Are we going to continue the double grub entries? while I realize that
> tboot SHOULD allow non TXT hw to boot properly I also realize that any
> differences will be pointed to as a point of con
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 07:17:45PM -0500, Matt Domsch wrote:
> Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for x86_64
> using rawhide from 2011-06-16
There are several false failures in this list due to what seems to be
a race condition between my RHEL5 NFS server and F15 clients. If your
mock.log
On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 19:17 -0500, Matt Domsch wrote:
> evolution-data-server-3.1.2-1.fc16 (build/make)
Hi,
not much to be done, except of not using deprecated flags in configure,
because this is failing on a recently deprecated G_CONST_RETURN, but not
in the eds itself, but in pango, whic
53 matches
Mail list logo
