On Tuesday 18 January 2011 16:42:36 Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> = Agenda =
> topics to discuss:
> * keep kdepim-4.6 or revert to kdepim-4.4. Testing so far as been mixed:
> ** rdieter did quick test against gmail imap: ok
> ** dgilmore testing against ~100gb imap mail: (mostly) fail, initial sync
> of
The lightweight tag 'perl-IO-Socket-SSL-1.38-1.fc15' was created pointing to:
e665b64... Update to 1.38
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-dev
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 14:20 +, Adam Williamson wrote:
> So all the gconf schemas are now in -gconf subpackages which you don't
> have to install unless you really, really want to use the gconf
> configuration storage system for some reason. If you do, you'll have
> to
> make sure whatever metho
Hi,
I have had a new package in EPEL5 testing for 11 days,
but when I try to push it to stable I get a message
saying that the minimum time on testing has not been reached.
Isn't it the same amount of time as Fedora, that is, one week?
Thanks.
--
Paulo Roma Cavalcanti
LCG - UFRJ
--
devel mail
Paulo Cavalcanti píše v St 19. 01. 2011 v 09:22 -0200:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have had a new package in EPEL5 testing for 11 days,
> but when I try to push it to stable I get a message
> saying that the minimum time on testing has not been reached.
>
> Isn't it the same amount of time as Fedora, that is
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 11:03 +, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 14:20 +, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > So all the gconf schemas are now in -gconf subpackages which you don't
> > have to install unless you really, really want to use the gconf
> > configuration storage system for so
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 12:03 +, Adam Williamson wrote:
> configure compiz!' was one of the most popular bug reports (see
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532229 ). I can't really
> think of a really good way to set this up, especially given that the
> compiz user base seems split f
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 12:03 +, Adam Williamson wrote:
> for now I'm going to at least see if I can get a 'pure-gconf' setup to
> work with ccsm.
well, I think I have this going now. the question now is whether to
force gconf on all compiz users...I think I'll update the bug report
with the is
Compiz works, but emerald refuses to decorate my windows
ccsm-0.9.2.1-1.fc15.noarch.rpm
compiz-0.9.2.2-0.8.git619abc05b1.fc15.x86_64.rpm
compizconfig-python-0.9.2.1-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm
compiz-plugins-main-0.9.2.1-4.fc15.x86_64.rpm
fusion-icon-0.1.0-0.9.5e2dc9git.fc15.noarch.rpm
fusion-icon-gtk-0.1.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/19/2011 06:22 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have had a new package in EPEL5 testing for 11 days,
> but when I try to push it to stable I get a message
> saying that the minimum time on testing has not been reached.
>
> Isn't it the
I am using the compile directive
-I%{buildroot}%{_includedir}
during the test phase of a projects rpm build. This tests the installed
copy of the include files instead of the copy in the distribution (and
hence is a better test of the install).
The problem is that rpmlint complains with the
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 4:53 AM, Haïkel Guémar wrote:
> hi,
>
> after a good night of sleep, i just noticed that *just* removing the
> -fexceptions flag won't change anything.
> -fexceptions is for C code linking to C++ code, but it's already default
> when compiling C++, then you have to use the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: When installed per
/usr/share/dspam/sql-scripts/mysql/mysql_objects-space.sql dspam is missing
tables
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670878
Summa
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670878
Matej Cepl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Hmm ... so what should I do with mysql? Since approximately forever,
upstream has recommended using -fno-exceptions (and also
-felide-constructors -fno-rtti) in CXXFLAGS. I now realize that it's
a bit silly to do that when the plain-C files (of which there are
plenty) are being built with -fexcep
Dan Horák danny.cz> writes:
> there is some clash in min/max macros/functions, but I've not done any
> detailed investigation yet, Tom has been notified.
I asked Stan Cox, who said he was using the following workaround:
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 10:48 -0500, Stan Cox wrote:
> mysql defines min and m
Tom Lane writes:
> Hmm ... so what should I do with mysql? Since approximately forever,
> upstream has recommended using -fno-exceptions (and also
> -felide-constructors -fno-rtti) in CXXFLAGS. [...]
-fexceptions / -frtti are essentially harmless, so I am curious why
they were ever thought to
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 03:52:24PM +, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Dan Horák danny.cz> writes:
> > there is some clash in min/max macros/functions, but I've not done any
> > detailed investigation yet, Tom has been notified.
>
> I asked Stan Cox, who said he was using the following workaround:
I g
Mark Wielaard writes:
> On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 10:48 -0500, Stan Cox wrote:
>> mysql defines min and max to be macros in my_global.h which conflicts
>> with the definition of max and min in numeric_limits in .
>> This use of max and min is described in the WG14 c++ standard under
>> 18.3.1 Numeric
Hello,
We are conducting a Fedora Rawhide Test Day on "Network Device Naming" on
Thursday, January 27th 2011.
The objective is to test the new naming scheme for onboard and PCI add-in
network interfaces as suggested by 'biosdevname' utility. It would be great if
you could participate and provi
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 22:30 +0530, narendr...@dell.com wrote:
> The objective is to test the new naming scheme for onboard and PCI
> add-in network interfaces as suggested by 'biosdevname' utility.
> It would be great if you could participate and provide your feedback
> which would help us flush b
I have pushed new util-linux into rawhide. The project has been
renamed from util-linux-ng back to util-linux.
The util-linux v2.19-rc1 contains support for systems without
/etc/mtab (the file is replaced with symlink to /proc/mounts).
This feature is enabled by default on Fedora (due to sy
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 06:35:52PM +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
>
> I have pushed new util-linux into rawhide. The project has been
> renamed from util-linux-ng back to util-linux.
>
> The util-linux v2.19-rc1 contains support for systems without
> /etc/mtab (the file is replaced with symlink to /
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 06:57:09AM -0800, Brad Bell wrote:
> Is there another rpm macro I should use to specify the path
> %{buildroot}%{_includedir} ?
did you try $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ?
Richard
---
Name and OpenPGP keys available from pgp key servers
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproje
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=616850
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=474335&action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=474335&action=edit
Description: Attempting to modify an unknown attribute in the
config entry fails with LDAP_UNWILLING_TO_PERFORM, whi
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 11:26 AM, drago01 wrote:
> Well /tmp should be mounted tmpfs anyway (I have been doing this for
> years and it is working just fine).
> tmp isn't a persistent storage so it makes a lot of sense, and it is
> *not* a dumping ground for giant files (apps that try to do that ar
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 04:47 -0800, Steven I Usdansky wrote:
> Compiz works, but emerald refuses to decorate my windows
> emerald-0.8.4-7.fc15.x86_64.rpm
That's the old, un-fixed emerald build - it must not have made it into
the last compose. The fixed build is
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/b
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 01:11:08PM -0600, Callum Lerwick wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 11:26 AM, drago01 wrote:
> > Well /tmp should be mounted tmpfs anyway (I have been doing this for
> > years and it is working just fine).
> > tmp isn't a persistent storage so it makes a lot of sense, and it
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2011-01-19)
===
Meeting started by nirik at 17:35:34 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-01-19/fesco.2011-01-19-17.35.log.html
Meeting summary
-
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 07:02:21PM +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
> Note, it's possible that NFS umount/remount will not work in some
> cases, because not all necessary mount options are in /proc/mounts.
> I hope this issue will be fixed before F15 release.
Is the uhelper option in /proc/mounts?
Reg
ons 2011-01-19 klockan 18:35 +0100 skrev Karel Zak:
> The util-linux v2.19-rc1 contains support for systems without
> /etc/mtab (the file is replaced with symlink to /proc/mounts).
Wasn't that supposed to be /proc/self/mounts?
/Alexander
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
h
ons 2011-01-19 klockan 21:12 +0100 skrev Alexander Boström:
> Wasn't that supposed to be /proc/self/mounts?
Nevermind, /proc/mounts is a symlink so it doesn't matter.
/Alexander
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 08:29:16PM +0100, Till Maas wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 07:02:21PM +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
>
> > Note, it's possible that NFS umount/remount will not work in some
> > cases, because not all necessary mount options are in /proc/mounts.
> > I hope this issue will be f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/19/2011 03:25 PM, Alexander Boström wrote:
> ons 2011-01-19 klockan 21:12 +0100 skrev Alexander Boström:
>
>> Wasn't that supposed to be /proc/self/mounts?
>
> Nevermind, /proc/mounts is a symlink so it doesn't matter.
>
> /Alexander
>
>
/b
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 19:43 +0100, Richard wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 06:57:09AM -0800, Brad Bell wrote:
>
> > Is there another rpm macro I should use to specify the path
> > %{buildroot}%{_includedir} ?
>
> did you try $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ?
that's not the problem. rpmlint just thinks you usu
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 09:31:27PM +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 08:29:16PM +0100, Till Maas wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 07:02:21PM +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
> >
> > > Note, it's possible that NFS umount/remount will not work in some
> > > cases, because not all necessar
> "AW" == Adam Williamson writes:
AW> that's not the problem. rpmlint just thinks you usually shouldn't do
AW> anything with the build root in certain sections of spec files and
AW> so complains if it sees usage of any buildroot definition
AW> ($RPM_BUILD_ROOT or %buildroot) in those sections
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:16:03PM +0100, Till Maas wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 09:31:27PM +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 08:29:16PM +0100, Till Maas wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 07:02:21PM +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
> > >
> > > > Note, it's possible that NFS umount
tgl wrote:
> [...] I think the only near-term fix is to turn off dtrace support
> in mysql. [...]
We'll do one better; we'll add a hack to sys/sdt.h to make mysql build
and respin systemtap today or tomorrow.
> But the real issue here is that systemtap has got to be more chary of
> what they
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 07:02:21PM +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 06:35:52PM +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
> >
> > I have pushed new util-linux into rawhide. The project has been
> > renamed from util-linux-ng back to util-linux.
> >
> > The util-linux v2.19-rc1 contains support f
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 04:49:04PM -0500, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
>
> tgl wrote:
>
> > [...] I think the only near-term fix is to turn off dtrace support
> > in mysql. [...]
>
> We'll do one better; we'll add a hack to sys/sdt.h to make mysql build
> and respin systemtap today or tomorrow.
>
f...@redhat.com (Frank Ch. Eigler) writes:
> tgl wrote:
>> [...] I think the only near-term fix is to turn off dtrace support
>> in mysql. [...]
> We'll do one better; we'll add a hack to sys/sdt.h to make mysql build
> and respin systemtap today or tomorrow.
Actually, I had just decided that S
On 01/19/2011 02:20 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> f...@redhat.com (Frank Ch. Eigler) writes:
>> I agree. It's not a great situation, but local GCC/C++ experts have
>> found no better way to type-analyze the parameters, to ensure their
>> safe passage to the tool. (Our testing shows is not
>> offensive t
> What I was more worried about was what happens when sdt.h is included in
> plain C code. Whatever you think of C++ apps that don't play nice with
> , such a complaint is unlikely to impress authors of plain C
> apps.
The only header used by in C is .
(Frankly I can't tell any more why we even
Just upgraded to the latest and greatest. Most of compiz seems to work
properly. However, ccsm-0.9.2.1-1 now crashes when I try to
set command key bindings. Reverting to ccsm-0.8.4-5 did not solve the
problem.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproje
In gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel Adam Williamson wrote:
> * desktop-effects is deprecated and broken, do not use it: install
> 'compiz-gnome' and there'll be a 'Classic GNOME with Compiz' choice at
> the login manager you can use to get a GNOME 2 + Compiz-style desktop
> (with panel, not Shell)
On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 00:13 +, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> In gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel Adam Williamson
> wrote:
> > * desktop-effects is deprecated and broken, do not use it: install
> > 'compiz-gnome' and there'll be a 'Classic GNOME with Compiz' choice at
> > the login manager you can use t
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 16:02 -0800, Steven I Usdansky wrote:
> Just upgraded to the latest and greatest. Most of compiz seems to work
> properly. However, ccsm-0.9.2.1-1 now crashes when I try to
> set command key bindings. Reverting to ccsm-0.8.4-5 did not solve the
> problem.
hum, interesting -
f...@redhat.com (Frank Ch. Eigler) writes:
> Tom Lane writes:
>> Hmm ... so what should I do with mysql? Since approximately forever,
>> upstream has recommended using -fno-exceptions (and also
>> -felide-constructors -fno-rtti) in CXXFLAGS. [...]
>> ...
>> Seems like I should either drop the no
For Mozilla, see
https://developer.mozilla.org/en/C___Portability_Guide#Don%27t_use_exceptions
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=593768
Takanori
Matej Cepl wrote:
> Dne 19.1.2011 07:53, Haïkel Guémar napsal(a):
> > Morale: that's just *PLAIN USELESS* to only remove the -fexceptions f
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 18:35 +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
> I have pushed new util-linux into rawhide. The project has been
> renamed from util-linux-ng back to util-linux.
>
> The util-linux v2.19-rc1 contains support for systems without
> /etc/mtab (the file is replaced with symlink to /proc/mounts
On 01/19/2011 12:11 PM, Callum Lerwick wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 11:26 AM, drago01 wrote:
>> Well /tmp should be mounted tmpfs anyway (I have been doing this for
>> years and it is working just fine).
>> tmp isn't a persistent storage so it makes a lot of sense, and it is
>> *not* a dumping
Nathanael D. Noblet píše v Čt 20. 01. 2011 v 00:33 -0700:
> On 01/19/2011 12:11 PM, Callum Lerwick wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 11:26 AM, drago01 wrote:
> >> Well /tmp should be mounted tmpfs anyway (I have been doing this for
> >> years and it is working just fine).
> >> tmp isn't a persis
53 matches
Mail list logo
