Re: REVIEW/RFC: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Kevin/Updates_Policy_Draft

2010-09-22 Thread Tomasz Torcz
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 11:01:04PM -0700, Eric Smith wrote: > Seems generally reasonable to me. > > Is there a definition somewhere of what constitutes a "critical path > update"? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Critical_path_packages#Where_can_I_find_the_critical_path.3F -- Tomasz Torcz

Re: Why is Coin3d version 3 and Pivy not in Fedora

2010-09-22 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 09/22/2010 08:32 AM, Prasad H. L. wrote: > Hi, > > I was trying to find out why is coin3d version 3.1.3 (latest stable > version) and its python binding (pivy) not in fedora. All I managed to > get was a bugzilla thread > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?format=multiple&id=458975 > which

Re: Why is Coin3d version 3 and Pivy not in Fedora

2010-09-22 Thread Prasad H. L.
On 22 September 2010 13:29, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 09/22/2010 08:32 AM, Prasad H. L. wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I was trying to find out why is coin3d version 3.1.3 (latest stable >> version) and its python binding (pivy) not in fedora. All I managed to >> get was a bugzilla thread >> https://bugz

Re: Why is Coin3d version 3 and Pivy not in Fedora

2010-09-22 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 09/22/2010 10:38 AM, Prasad H. L. wrote: > On 22 September 2010 13:29, Ralf Corsepius wrote: >> On 09/22/2010 08:32 AM, Prasad H. L. wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I was trying to find out why is coin3d version 3.1.3 (latest stable >>> version) and its python binding (pivy) not in fedora. All I manag

Re: Why is Coin3d version 3 and Pivy not in Fedora

2010-09-22 Thread Prasad H. L.
On 22 September 2010 14:24, Ralf Corsepius wrote: >  On 09/22/2010 10:38 AM, Prasad H. L. wrote: >> >> On 22 September 2010 13:29, Ralf Corsepius  wrote: >>> >>> On 09/22/2010 08:32 AM, Prasad H. L. wrote: Hi, I was trying to find out why is coin3d version 3.1.3 (latest stable

File Text-Aligner-0.07.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by ppisar

2010-09-22 Thread Petr Pisar
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Text-Aligner: 73088eaeae1e6c627398db1e7cc76717 Text-Aligner-0.07.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mai

[perl-Text-Aligner] 0.07 bump

2010-09-22 Thread Petr Pisar
commit 5320df99122c4701e99c0822619f3bfb377f7a94 Author: Petr Písař Date: Wed Sep 22 11:07:50 2010 +0200 0.07 bump .gitignore |1 + perl-Text-Aligner.spec | 15 +-- sources|2 +- 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- diff --

Re: Why is Coin3d version 3 and Pivy not in Fedora

2010-09-22 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 09/22/2010 11:06 AM, Prasad H. L. wrote: > On 22 September 2010 14:24, Ralf Corsepius wrote: >> On 09/22/2010 10:38 AM, Prasad H. L. wrote: >>> >>> On 22 September 2010 13:29, Ralf Corsepiuswrote: On 09/22/2010 08:32 AM, Prasad H. L. wrote: > > Hi, > > I was tryi

Re: Fedora "backports" repo? (Was Re: PostgreSQL 9 for F14?)

2010-09-22 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 01:51:03AM +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote: > 2010/9/21 Toshio Kuratomi : > > As the concept of using third party repositories (both as packagers and as > > users) grows, this interdependence will grow. > > Ok, so maybe it's time to setup Fedora "backports" repo for these th

Re: Fedora "backports" repo? (Was Re: PostgreSQL 9 for F14?)

2010-09-22 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 09:58:53PM -0400, Arthur Pemberton wrote: > 2010/9/20 Michał Piotrowski : > > 2010/9/21 Toshio Kuratomi : > >> As the concept of using third party repositories (both as packagers and as > >> users) grows, this interdependence will grow. > > > > Ok, so maybe it's time to setu

Re: Fedora "backports" repo? (Was Re: PostgreSQL 9 for F14?)

2010-09-22 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2010/9/22 Richard W.M. Jones : > Maybe we should turn this around and ask why more people don't > use Rawhide. Maybe because when I installed rawhide I lost my desktop icons? :) IMHO rawhide isn't the right answer for most users who wants just one new app. > Rich. Regards, Michal -- devel mail

Re: REVIEW/RFC: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Kevin/Updates_Policy_Draft

2010-09-22 Thread Tomas Mraz
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 15:47 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Greetings. > > I'd like to ask for feedback and helping cleaning up an updates policy > draft page: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Kevin/Updates_Policy_Draft > > How can we clarify the language or the layout of the page to be mo

Re: REVIEW/RFC: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Kevin/Updates_Policy_Draft

2010-09-22 Thread drago01
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Tomas Mraz wrote: > On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 15:47 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> Greetings. >> >> I'd like to ask for feedback and helping cleaning up an updates policy >> draft page: >> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Kevin/Updates_Policy_Draft >> >> How can w

Re: Fedora "backports" repo? (Was Re: PostgreSQL 9 for F14?)

2010-09-22 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 10:24 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > This is reasonably easy to fix: we should do some testing and withhold > packages from Rawhide if they don't pass some basic sanity checks > (eg. does it boot, can an X server be started). That's basically the proven testers process,

Re: Fedora "backports" repo? (Was Re: PostgreSQL 9 for F14?)

2010-09-22 Thread drago01
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 09:58:53PM -0400, Arthur Pemberton wrote: >> 2010/9/20 Michał Piotrowski : >> > 2010/9/21 Toshio Kuratomi : >> >> As the concept of using third party repositories (both as packagers and as >> >> users) grows, thi

Passing arguments into LDFLAGS

2010-09-22 Thread Paul F. Johnson
Hi, I know I can do the likes of export CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -blah" and it will pass whatever CFLAGS is plus the argument "-blah" to the compiler. How do I do this with LDFLAGS. I'm trying to pass --build-id using export LDFLAGS="$LDFLAGS --build-id" It's about the only way I can get mono to build

Re: Fedora "backports" repo? (Was Re: PostgreSQL 9 for F14?)

2010-09-22 Thread Brandon Lozza
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 8:06 AM, drago01 wrote: > On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Richard W.M. Jones > wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 09:58:53PM -0400, Arthur Pemberton wrote: >>> 2010/9/20 Michał Piotrowski : >>> > 2010/9/21 Toshio Kuratomi : >>> >> As the concept of using third party repo

rawhide report: 20100922 changes

2010-09-22 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Wed Sep 22 08:15:25 UTC 2010 Broken deps for x86_64 -- almanah-0.7.3-3.fc14.x86_64 requires libedataserverui-1.2.so.10()(64bit) antlr3-python-3.1.2-7.fc14.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:2.6 claws-ma

Re: Passing arguments into LDFLAGS

2010-09-22 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 09/22/2010 02:08 PM, Paul F. Johnson wrote: > Hi, > > I know I can do the likes of > > export CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -blah" and it will pass whatever CFLAGS is plus > the argument "-blah" to the compiler. > > How do I do this with LDFLAGS. Depends on a build-system's internals. > I'm trying to pass --

Re: Why is Coin3d version 3 and Pivy not in Fedora

2010-09-22 Thread Rich Mattes
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 5:16 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > [snip] > Exactly - That's why I am wondering if the page you cite above is an > "outdated place holder" or if this page current and "brand new". > > It looks like the project updated its version number to 4.0.0a last year: http://hg.sim.no/

Re: Fedora "backports" repo? (Was Re: PostgreSQL 9 for F14?)

2010-09-22 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 08:20 -0400, Brandon Lozza wrote: > That's why I propose an easy way to install additional repos. I can't > see a non tech savvy user installing the chromium browser on fedora, > to be brutally honest. It's annoying having to hold their hand and > walk them through it. I don't

[Bug 633737] perl-Padre-0.70 is available

2010-09-22 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633737 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 633737] perl-Padre-0.70 is available

2010-09-22 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633737 --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar 2010-09-22 09:06:14 EDT --- perl(File::HomeDir) >= 0.91 is needed (upgrade requested in bug #6365

[Bug 636514] File-HomeDir-0.93 bump

2010-09-22 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=636514 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added

Re: Fedora "backports" repo? (Was Re: PostgreSQL 9 for F14?)

2010-09-22 Thread Jesse Keating
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/22/2010 05:06 AM, drago01 wrote: > Well "use rawhide" for anything else than testing and/or developing > the new release just do not fly. > > Some of the reasons I can think of: > > 1) To high rate of changes / breakage Not much one can do on

Re: Fedora "backports" repo? (Was Re: PostgreSQL 9 for F14?)

2010-09-22 Thread Jesse Keating
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/22/2010 04:07 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 10:24 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > >> This is reasonably easy to fix: we should do some testing and withhold >> packages from Rawhide if they don't pass some basic sanity che

[Bug 636518] New: JSON-XS-2.3 bump

2010-09-22 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: JSON-XS-2.3 bump https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=636518 Summary: JSON-XS-2.3 bump Product: Fedora Version: rawhide P

[Bug 636518] JSON-XS-2.3 bump

2010-09-22 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=636518 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 633737] perl-Padre-0.70 is available

2010-09-22 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633737 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 633737] perl-Padre-0.70 is available

2010-09-22 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633737 --- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar 2010-09-22 09:18:58 EDT --- perl(JSON::XS) >= 2.29 is needed (upgrade requested in bug #636518)

Re: Fedora "backports" repo? (Was Re: PostgreSQL 9 for F14?)

2010-09-22 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:07:24PM +0100, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 10:24 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > This is reasonably easy to fix: we should do some testing and withhold > > packages from Rawhide if they don't pass some basic sanity checks > > (eg. does it boot,

Re: Fedora "backports" repo? (Was Re: PostgreSQL 9 for F14?)

2010-09-22 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 02:06:12PM +0200, drago01 wrote: > On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Richard W.M. Jones > wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 09:58:53PM -0400, Arthur Pemberton wrote: > >> 2010/9/20 Michał Piotrowski : > >> > 2010/9/21 Toshio Kuratomi : > >> >> As the concept of using thir

Re: Fedora "backports" repo? (Was Re: PostgreSQL 9 for F14?)

2010-09-22 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
I should add that whether this testing happens in Koji or in AutoQA isn't material. AutoQA is probably better. *Provided* that if the basic sanity tests fail they must prevent the packages from going into the Rawhide compose. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.

Re: REVIEW/RFC: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Kevin/Updates_Policy_Draft

2010-09-22 Thread Tomas Mraz
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 12:48 +0200, drago01 wrote: > On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Tomas Mraz wrote: > > On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 15:47 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >> Greetings. > >> > >> I'd like to ask for feedback and helping cleaning up an updates policy > >> draft page: > >> > >> https://fed

File Wx-Perl-ProcessStream-0.28.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by mmaslano

2010-09-22 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Wx-Perl-ProcessStream: 9a893347401af6e1c40b22c72d92b383 Wx-Perl-ProcessStream-0.28.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fed

[perl-Wx-Perl-ProcessStream] - update, works with Wx > 0.97

2010-09-22 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
commit d88ff6c709b6cfa9304002f8f9ca061da3d05381 Author: Marcela Mašláňová Date: Wed Sep 22 15:34:10 2010 +0200 - update, works with Wx > 0.97 .gitignore |1 + perl-Wx-Perl-ProcessStream.spec |9 ++--- sources |2 +- 3 files chan

[Bug 636518] JSON-XS-2.3 bump

2010-09-22 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=636518 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 636471] perl-Wx-Perl-ProcessStream-0.28 is available

2010-09-22 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=636471 Marcela Mašláňová changed: What|Removed |Added -

Re: Fedora "backports" repo? (Was Re: PostgreSQL 9 for F14?)

2010-09-22 Thread Brandon Lozza
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > I should add that whether this testing happens in Koji or in AutoQA > isn't material.  AutoQA is probably better.  *Provided* that if the > basic sanity tests fail they must prevent the packages from going into > the Rawhide compose. > >

Re: Fedora "backports" repo? (Was Re: PostgreSQL 9 for F14?)

2010-09-22 Thread Brandon Lozza
something like sidux, but fedora based im thinking stable f14 with the goodies stable vision blocks because people want stale software, and i'd rather not use rawhide or opensuse On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Brandon Lozza wrote: > On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >

Re: Passing arguments into LDFLAGS

2010-09-22 Thread Stephen Gallagher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/22/2010 08:08 AM, Paul F. Johnson wrote: > Hi, > > I know I can do the likes of > > export CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -blah" and it will pass whatever CFLAGS is plus > the argument "-blah" to the compiler. > > How do I do this with LDFLAGS. I'm trying t

Java SIG meeting minutes from September 21st

2010-09-22 Thread Stanislav Ochotnicky
Meeting minutes from our second meeting. I reordered our wiki a bit to accomodate future meeting minutes and agendas (thanks to KDE SIG for template :-) ) I would like to know how many people wanted to attend but couldn't because of time. There are about 2x as many people written on our SIG page t

Re: Fedora "backports" repo? (Was Re: PostgreSQL 9 for F14?)

2010-09-22 Thread Al Dunsmuir
On Wednesday, September 22, 2010, 8:06:12 AM, drag01 wrote: > On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Richard W.M. Jones > wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 09:58:53PM -0400, Arthur Pemberton wrote: >>> 2010/9/20 Michał Piotrowski : >>> > 2010/9/21 Toshio Kuratomi : >>> >> As the concept of using third

Re: REVIEW/RFC: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Kevin/Updates_Policy_Draft

2010-09-22 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:35:01 +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote: > > - Avoid changing the user experence if at all possible. - this is too > strong condition. In some cases fixing a bug might inevitable change the > user experience and in some cases for example the user experience might > be just seve

[Bug 633737] perl-Padre-0.70 is available

2010-09-22 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633737 --- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar 2010-09-22 10:08:46 EDT --- perl(threads::shared) >= 1.33 is needed (upgrade requested in bug #63

[Bug 633737] perl-Padre-0.70 is available

2010-09-22 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633737 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added

Re: REVIEW/RFC: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Kevin/Updates_Policy_Draft

2010-09-22 Thread drago01
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Tomas Mraz wrote: >> > This example is IMO wrong: >> > - WebKit requires an update to solve a security problem. This requires >> > updating Midori to a version with some minor menu layout changes. This >> > would be a judgement call based on how intrusive the chan

Re: Fedora "backports" repo? (Was Re: PostgreSQL 9 for F14?)

2010-09-22 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 15:18 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: > > 4) To much of "manual fixing" required > > 5) To many broken deps, which might prevent applying updates and security > > fixes > > 6) Some others that I can't think of right now might be a consequence > > of the above or something else >

Re: Fedora "backports" repo? (Was Re: PostgreSQL 9 for F14?)

2010-09-22 Thread Al Dunsmuir
On Wednesday, September 22, 2010, 6:19:28 PM, Jesse wrote: > On 09/22/2010 04:07 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: >> On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 10:24 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> >>> This is reasonably easy to fix: we should do some testing and withhold >>> packages from Rawhide if they don't pass som

[Bug 633737] perl-Padre-0.70 is available

2010-09-22 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633737 --- Comment #4 from Petr Pisar 2010-09-22 10:16:46 EDT --- Created attachment 448944 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachmen

Re: Fedora "backports" repo? (Was Re: PostgreSQL 9 for F14?)

2010-09-22 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 10:24:38 +0100, "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote: > > I use Rawhide on my laptop and one of my servers, so I'll tell you the > answer to this: because critical components such as the kernel are > often broken. IME this is because there is no testing of these > components befo

Re: Passing arguments into LDFLAGS

2010-09-22 Thread Garrett Holmstrom
Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On 09/22/2010 08:08 AM, Paul F. Johnson wrote: >> I know I can do the likes of >> >> export CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -blah" and it will pass whatever CFLAGS is plus >> the argument "-blah" to the compiler. >> >> How do I do this with LDFLAGS. I'm trying to pass --build-id using >

Re: Fedora "backports" repo? (Was Re: PostgreSQL 9 for F14?)

2010-09-22 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 14:06:12 +0200, drago01 wrote: > Some of the reasons I can think of: > > 2) No signed packages There is a plan to deal with that, but I am not sure what its current status is. > 5) To many broken deps, which might prevent applying updates and security > fixes Hopeful

Re: Fedora "backports" repo? (Was Re: PostgreSQL 9 for F14?)

2010-09-22 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 09:22:21AM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 10:24:38 +0100, > "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote: > > > > I use Rawhide on my laptop and one of my servers, so I'll tell you the > > answer to this: because critical components such as the kernel are > > ofte

Re: Fedora "backports" repo? (Was Re: PostgreSQL 9 for F14?)

2010-09-22 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 09:59:51 -0400, Al Dunsmuir wrote: > > If a second rawhide-specific staging repository (equivalent to > updates-testing, so call it rawhide-testing) was added with some > autoqa automation to prevent gratuitous problems (such as broken > dependencies

Re: Fedora "backports" repo? (Was Re: PostgreSQL 9 for F14?)

2010-09-22 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 15:34:34 +0100, "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote: > > No, I think you are wrong. > > First of all, I can see no benefit in pushing a package that cannot do > its basic function to Rawhide. Even in Rawhide, no one wants a kernel > that doesn't boot, even if in some circumstan

Re: Fedora "backports" repo? (Was Re: PostgreSQL 9 for F14?)

2010-09-22 Thread Jesse Keating
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/22/2010 04:14 PM, Al Dunsmuir wrote: > On Wednesday, September 22, 2010, 6:19:28 PM, Jesse wrote: >> On 09/22/2010 04:07 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: >>> On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 10:24 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >>> This is reasonably easy

Re: REVIEW/RFC: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Kevin/Updates_Policy_Draft

2010-09-22 Thread Tomas Mraz
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 16:09 +0200, drago01 wrote: > On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Tomas Mraz wrote: > > >> > This example is IMO wrong: > >> > - WebKit requires an update to solve a security problem. This requires > >> > updating Midori to a version with some minor menu layout changes. This >

File PPIx-Regexp-0.011.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by ppisar

2010-09-22 Thread Petr Pisar
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-PPIx-Regexp: 2c315aa4603e511cc9f4f69a535bb02f PPIx-Regexp-0.011.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mail

[perl-PPIx-Regexp] 0.011 bump

2010-09-22 Thread Petr Pisar
commit 429bb74e17b0e3b7a2e25331ae43097727dbc1b7 Author: Petr Písař Date: Wed Sep 22 17:01:26 2010 +0200 0.011 bump .gitignore|1 + perl-PPIx-Regexp.spec | 14 ++ sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) --- diff --git

[Bug 636514] File-HomeDir-0.93 bump

2010-09-22 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=636514 --- Comment #1 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2010-09-22 10:57:28 EDT --- Petr, I'd be happy to let you co-maintain here. -- Config

Re: Fedora "backports" repo? (Was Re: PostgreSQL 9 for F14?)

2010-09-22 Thread Jesse Keating
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/22/2010 04:14 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > That would likely be an improvement, but have you thought through the > interaction issues? Builds are rarely standalone, so we need to figure > out which builds go with which other builds so they can be

Re: REVIEW/RFC: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Kevin/Updates_Policy_Draft

2010-09-22 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 17:01:02 +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote: > I say that the example of Webkit should be removed because if it is not > possible to backport the security patch and due to the version update > Midori has to be updated to a new version regardless of the changes of > user experience.

Re: Fedora "backports" repo? (Was Re: PostgreSQL 9 for F14?)

2010-09-22 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 17:05:30 +0200, Jesse Keating wrote: > > It isn't going to be perfect, but it'll definitely be better than what > we have now. The other case to consider is two updates in rawhide-pending that each are OK with rawhide, but which together have dependency issues. -- deve

Re: Fedora "backports" repo? (Was Re: PostgreSQL 9 for F14?)

2010-09-22 Thread Jesse Keating
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/22/2010 05:07 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 17:05:30 +0200, > Jesse Keating wrote: >> >> It isn't going to be perfect, but it'll definitely be better than what >> we have now. > > The other case to consider is two updat

Re: Fedora "backports" repo? (Was Re: PostgreSQL 9 for F14?)

2010-09-22 Thread Michael Cronenworth
Jesse Keating wrote: > It isn't going to be perfect, but it'll definitely be better than what > we have now. I'm still not going to use rawhide. There would have to be a kernel without debugging before I would even think of using it for my home or work systems. I have a need for speed. :P -- de

F-14 Branched report: 20100922 changes

2010-09-22 Thread Branched Report
Compose started at Wed Sep 22 13:15:39 UTC 2010 Broken deps for x86_64 -- RackTables-0.18.3-1.fc14.noarch requires /usr/local/bin/php RackTables-0.18.3-1.fc14.noarch requires perl(File::FnMatch) 1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc1

[Bug 636514] File-HomeDir-0.93 bump

2010-09-22 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=636514 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 634899] perl-PPIx-Regexp-0.011 is available

2010-09-22 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634899 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added

Re: Fedora "backports" repo? (Was Re: PostgreSQL 9 for F14?)

2010-09-22 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 10:13 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > Jesse Keating wrote: > > It isn't going to be perfect, but it'll definitely be better than what > > we have now. > > I'm still not going to use rawhide. There would have to be a kernel > without debugging before I would even think of

Re: Fedora "backports" repo? (Was Re: PostgreSQL 9 for F14?)

2010-09-22 Thread drago01
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Al Dunsmuir wrote: > On Wednesday, September 22, 2010, 8:06:12 AM, drag01 wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Richard W.M. Jones >> wrote: >>> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 09:58:53PM -0400, Arthur Pemberton wrote: 2010/9/20 Michał Piotrowski : > 2010

Re: REVIEW/RFC: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Kevin/Updates_Policy_Draft

2010-09-22 Thread drago01
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 17:01:02 +0200, >  Tomas Mraz wrote: >> I say that the example of Webkit should be removed because if it is not >> possible to backport the security patch and due to the version update >> Midori has to be updated to

Re: REVIEW/RFC: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Kevin/Updates_Policy_Draft

2010-09-22 Thread Tomas Mraz
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 10:04 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 17:01:02 +0200, > Tomas Mraz wrote: > > I say that the example of Webkit should be removed because if it is not > > possible to backport the security patch and due to the version update > > Midori has to be upda

Re: REVIEW/RFC: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Kevin/Updates_Policy_Draft

2010-09-22 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 17:27:43 +0200, drago01 wrote: > On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 17:01:02 +0200, > >  Tomas Mraz wrote: > >> I say that the example of Webkit should be removed because if it is not > >> possible to backport the securit

Re: REVIEW/RFC: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Kevin/Updates_Policy_Draft

2010-09-22 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 17:51:01 +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote: > Of course, the issue might be very minor, but in that case it is not a > "judgement call based on how intrusive thec changes are" but "judgement > call on whether the pros and cons of doing the update are significantly > in favor of pro

[Bug 635235] perl-DBD-CSV-0.31 is available

2010-09-22 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635235 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added

Re: Fedora "backports" repo? (Was Re: PostgreSQL 9 for F14?)

2010-09-22 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 04:22:45PM +0100, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 10:13 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > > Jesse Keating wrote: > > > It isn't going to be perfect, but it'll definitely be better than what > > > we have now. > > > > I'm still not going to use rawhide. Ther

Re: REVIEW/RFC: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Kevin/Updates_Policy_Draft

2010-09-22 Thread drago01
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 17:27:43 +0200, >  drago01 wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: >> > On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 17:01:02 +0200, >> >  Tomas Mraz wrote: >> >> I say that the example of Webkit should be re

Re: Fedora "backports" repo? (Was Re: PostgreSQL 9 for F14?)

2010-09-22 Thread drago01
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 6:55 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 04:22:45PM +0100, Adam Williamson wrote: >> On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 10:13 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: >> > Jesse Keating wrote: >> > > It isn't going to be perfect, but it'll definitely be better than what >>

File DBD-CSV-0.31.tgz uploaded to lookaside cache by ppisar

2010-09-22 Thread Petr Pisar
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-DBD-CSV: 50918cc0ed58dd38df462398a16adc36 DBD-CSV-0.31.tgz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo

[perl-DBD-CSV] 0.31 bump

2010-09-22 Thread Petr Pisar
commit 8cd85a626a4a8f8b8d9c48d2d0ed9b587ee30029 Author: Petr Písař Date: Wed Sep 22 19:12:09 2010 +0200 0.31 bump .gitignore|1 + perl-DBD-CSV.spec | 24 +--- sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/

Re: REVIEW/RFC: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Kevin/Updates_Policy_Draft

2010-09-22 Thread Alex Hudson
Hey Kevin, On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 15:47 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > How can we clarify the language or the layout of the page to be more > clear? Are there places that it could be more like the existing package > update howto page? Could we be more detailed about what bodhi enforces > and whats jus

Re: REVIEW/RFC: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Kevin/Updates_Policy_Draft

2010-09-22 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 18:58:25 +0200, drago01 wrote: > > In case of a security issue a random note somewhere "don't do that" is > not acceptable ... that's all I am saying here. > You are leaving users at risk by assuming that they will read that > notice (note: most wont). I disagree. There

[Bug 635235] perl-DBD-CSV-0.31 is available

2010-09-22 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635235 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added

File STD-32116.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by ppisar

2010-09-22 Thread Petr Pisar
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-STD: fc84fda3b80eef3708d8a51dfcb9a5ba STD-32116.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/per

Re: bodhi v0.7.9 deployed

2010-09-22 Thread Luke Macken
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 02:19:06PM -0400, Luke Macken wrote: > Backend Changes > === > > - Add the new 'dist-fN-updates{-testing,}-pending' tags to builds so AutoQA > can > start testing them before they get pushed > - List security & critpath testing updates in our updates-testing

Re: pushing updates for FTBFS

2010-09-22 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 03:25:25PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 10:06:09 -0700 > Eric Smith wrote: > > > A bug was filed against meshlab because of an FTBFS for Fedora 14. I > > added a patch to resolve it and submitted an update. After seven > > days with no feedback, I was

Re: REVIEW/RFC: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Kevin/Updates_Policy_Draft

2010-09-22 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 18:14:47 +0100 Alex Hudson wrote: > Hey Kevin, > > On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 15:47 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > How can we clarify the language or the layout of the page to be more > > clear? Are there places that it could be more like the existing > > package update howto page?

Re: REVIEW/RFC: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Kevin/Updates_Policy_Draft

2010-09-22 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 09:05:42 -0500 Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:35:01 +0200, > Tomas Mraz wrote: > > > > - Avoid changing the user experence if at all possible. - this is > > too strong condition. In some cases fixing a bug might inevitable > > change the user experienc

Re: REVIEW/RFC: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Kevin/Updates_Policy_Draft

2010-09-22 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 12:12:54 -0500 Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 18:58:25 +0200, > drago01 wrote: > > > > In case of a security issue a random note somewhere "don't do that" > > is not acceptable ... that's all I am saying here. > > You are leaving users at risk by assuming

Re: REVIEW/RFC: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Kevin/Updates_Policy_Draft

2010-09-22 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 21:06:42 -0400 Josh Boyer wrote: > > You've obviously spent a lot of time thinking about the exceptions. I > think that is good. I would, however, suggest you also include > examples of changes/updates that are not applicable for a stable > release. Good idea. Add some t

Re: REVIEW/RFC: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Kevin/Updates_Policy_Draft

2010-09-22 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 17:09:32 -0500 Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 15:47:04 -0600, > Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Greetings. > > > > I'd like to ask for feedback and helping cleaning up an updates > > policy draft page: > > Do you want feedback on the mailing list or the Talk pa

Re: pushing updates for FTBFS

2010-09-22 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 13:37:44 -0400 Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > For (unreleased) F14, I think that the arugment that future work on > the package is better off starting with something that works than to > start off with something that's broken by new gcc, boost, etc is very > valid. Sure. I would su

Re: REVIEW/RFC: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Kevin/Updates_Policy_Draft

2010-09-22 Thread Matthew Miller
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:35:32PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > So, for example, we have these use cases for Fedora which involves > > information working on the desktop, so the guiding principles for the > > stable release ought to be about those users being generally happy and > > having a deskt

Re: REVIEW/RFC: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Kevin/Updates_Policy_Draft

2010-09-22 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:35:38 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > So, that would be, BAD: > > - Changing User interface (moving menu items or buttons around) > - Changing names of commands for command line. > - Changing behavior of command line options (ie, --foo does something > totally differen

Re: REVIEW/RFC: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Kevin/Updates_Policy_Draft

2010-09-22 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:35:55 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 17:09:32 -0500 > Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 15:47:04 -0600, > > Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > Greetings. > > > > > > I'd like to ask for feedback and helping cleaning up an updates > > >

Re: REVIEW/RFC: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Kevin/Updates_Policy_Draft

2010-09-22 Thread drago01
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 8:35 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 12:12:54 -0500 > Bruno Wolff III wrote: > >> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 18:58:25 +0200, >>   drago01 wrote: >> > >> > In case of a security issue a random note somewhere "don't do that" >> > is not acceptable ... that's all I

Re: REVIEW/RFC: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Kevin/Updates_Policy_Draft

2010-09-22 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 13:42:14 -0500 Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:35:38 -0600, > Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > So, that would be, BAD: > > > > - Changing User interface (moving menu items or buttons around) > > - Changing names of commands for command line. > > - Changing behav

Re: REVIEW/RFC: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Kevin/Updates_Policy_Draft

2010-09-22 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 13:45:55 -0500 Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:35:55 -0600, > Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 17:09:32 -0500 > > Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 15:47:04 -0600, > > > Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > Greetings. > > > >

Re: REVIEW/RFC: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Kevin/Updates_Policy_Draft

2010-09-22 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 13:05:23 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > ok. I Changed 'Beta' mentions in the Pre Beta section to "Alpha or Beta > releases". Does that work? That looks fine now. Thanks. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo

  1   2   >