Package Review Stats for last week ending 8th Aug

2010-08-09 Thread Rakesh Pandit
Top two FAS account holders who have completed reviewing "Package review" components on bugzilla for last week ending 8th August were Stanislav Ochotnicky and Mamoru Tasaka. Stanislav Ochotnicky : 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615869 felix-shell https://bugzil

Re: Some questions about on Fedora

2010-08-09 Thread Chen Lei
2010/8/8 Remi Collet : > Le 08/08/2010 10:28, Chen Lei a écrit : >> I can help to review mysql-connector-c and Silvercity, howerver we may >> need a approve from FESCo for bundling scintilla in silvercity. > > I don't plan to package silvercity, > but rather keep both (scintilla + silvercity) bundl

Re: git branch help?

2010-08-09 Thread Andreas Schwab
"Richard W.M. Jones" writes: > I didn't know git could do this, but it sounds useful for other > (non-fedpkg) things. Can you explain how, or where to start looking? Look for git-new-workdir, it is in the contrib directory of the git sources. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com GPG

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in F-14

2010-08-09 Thread Benny Amorsen
Adam Williamson writes: > PA uses a more correct but more CPU-intensive resampling method than > ALSA by default. On very slow systems it's a good idea to > edit /etc/pulse/daemon.conf and change the 'resample-method' parameter. Back when I had a slow enough machine to care (A Sempron 2600+ I be

rawhide report: 20100809 changes

2010-08-09 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Mon Aug 9 08:15:09 UTC 2010 Broken deps for x86_64 -- Mayavi-3.3.0-1.fc13.x86_64 requires python(abi) = 0:2.6 Mayavi-3.3.0-1.fc13.x86_64 requires libpython2.6.so.1.0()(64bit) PragmARC-20060427-6.fc1

Re: git branch help?

2010-08-09 Thread Karel Zak
On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 04:49:50PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 12:39:02AM -0700, Matt McCutchen wrote: > > On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 09:12 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > > But I guess git > > > will be storing a lot of redundant stuff and forcing extra pulls if you > >

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in F-14

2010-08-09 Thread Radek Vokál
On 08/05/2010 10:13 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote: > Excerpts from Chen Lei's message of Thu Aug 05 09:10:25 +0200 2010: >> It seems a lot of java packages will be orphaned, should we contact >> JAVA-SIG and maven2/eclipse/intellij-idea maintainers? > > Unfortunately there is no JAVA-SIG though I

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: Deji Akingunola

2010-08-09 Thread Deji Akingunola
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Robert Scheck wrote: > Hi, > > as per non-responsive maintainer policy at > >  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers > > I have filed: > >  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600992 > > Does somebody know how to contact

fedpkg local redefines %fedora macro

2010-08-09 Thread Petr Pisar
Hello, while working on `nas' package I found `fedpkg local' redefines `fedora' macro to value `1'. Dist-cvs `make local' does not do that. Original source for %fedora is /etc/rpm/macros.dist. See the strace: $ strace -fqv -eexecve fedpkg local [...] execve("/bin/rpm", ["rpm", "--define", "_sourc

Re: Intel 82Q35 / framebuffer problem

2010-08-09 Thread Adam Jackson
On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 23:12 +0200, Jos Vos wrote: > On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 04:41:33PM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: > > > This is almost certainly the root of the problem. We don't try to set > > up SDVO devices if they're not listed in the VBT, but not having a VBT > > means nothing's gonna be lis

F-14 Branched report: 20100809 changes

2010-08-09 Thread Branched Report
Compose started at Mon Aug 9 13:15:17 UTC 2010 Broken deps for x86_64 -- CGAL-3.6.1-1.fc14.i686 requires libboost_thread-mt.so.1.41.0 CGAL-3.6.1-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libboost_thread-mt.so.1.41.0()(64bit) LuxRender-0

Upcoming Fedora 14 Tasks

2010-08-09 Thread John Poelstra
Start End Name Wed 11-Aug Wed 11-Aug Fedora 14 Alpha Go/No-Go Meeting (17:00 EST) Thu 12-Aug Thu 12-Aug Fedora 14 Alpha Release Readiness Meeting Thu 12-Aug Thu 12-Aug Start Stage & Sync Alpha to Mirrors Thu 12-Aug Tue 17-Aug Stage & Sync Alpha to Mirrors Fri 13-Aug Fri 13-Au

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in F-14

2010-08-09 Thread Bill Nottingham
Petr Pisar (ppi...@redhat.com) said: > > I suggest that these be just built without NAS support. NAS is basically an > > older competitor to PulseAudio with fewer features (it focuses on network > > transparency, which is just one of the things PulseAudio does), it is not > > compatible with Pu

Re: feature freeze?

2010-08-09 Thread Peter Czanik
Hello, On 08/06/2010 01:42 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Peter Czanik wrote: >> While I guess, it's too late now to make a switch now, here is some good >> news: >> http://bazsi.blogs.balabit.com/2010/07/syslog-ng-contributions- > redefined.html >> Dual licensing will be gone with the upcoming syslog-

[389-devel] Please review: [Bug 621928] Unable to enable replica (rdn problem?) on 1.2.6 rc6

2010-08-09 Thread Noriko Hosoi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621928 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=437670&action=diff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=437670&action=edit Description: RUV (nsuniqueid=---,) needs to be allowed to add to the DB before is

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in F-14

2010-08-09 Thread pbrobin...@gmail.com
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Petr Pisar (ppi...@redhat.com) said: >> > I suggest that these be just built without NAS support. NAS is basically an >> > older competitor to PulseAudio with fewer features (it focuses on network >> > transparency, which is just one of the

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in F-14

2010-08-09 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 11:21 +0100, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: > On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 2:04 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 10:46 +, Petr Pisar wrote: > > > >> PulseAudio is interresting project, but it's absolutely unusable on old > >> slow hardware. Last time I checked

fedpkg cannot talk to koji

2010-08-09 Thread Orion Poplawski
I'm getting: $ fedpkg -v build Creating module object from /export/home/orion/fedora/cmake/f13 Initiating a koji session to http://koji.fedoraproject.org/kojihub Could not log into koji: Opening a SSL connection failed fedora-packager-0.5.1.0-1.fc13.noarch I've re-run fedora-packager-setup a cou

Re: Integrity protection of fetches

2010-08-09 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sun, 2010-08-08 at 11:34 -0700, Matt McCutchen wrote: > On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 11:29 -0500, Steve Bonneville wrote: > > i.g...@comcast.net wrote: > > > Ideally (from this perspective), the host would validate the response > > > itself. > > > > Exactly, if sshd is sufficiently paranoid it should

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: Deji Akingunola

2010-08-09 Thread Christoph Wickert
Am Montag, den 09.08.2010, 09:46 -0400 schrieb Deji Akingunola: > While the truth is you never contacted me by email, and you went ahead > threatening me with AWOL policy and orphaning all my packages just 2 > weeks after filing a bug for package upgrade on EPEL 4. The truth is that the bug 60099

Re: fedpkg cannot talk to koji

2010-08-09 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 08/09/2010 01:07 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > I'm getting: > > $ fedpkg -v build > Creating module object from /export/home/orion/fedora/cmake/f13 > Initiating a koji session to http://koji.fedoraproject.org/kojihub > Could not log into koji: Opening a SSL connection failed > > fedora-packager-0

Plan for tomorrow's FESCo meeting (2010-08-10)

2010-08-09 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting tomorrow at 19:30UTC (3:30pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. = Followups = #topic #351 Create a policy for updates - status report on implementation https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/351 #topic #382 Imp

Re: Plan for tomorrow's FESCo meeting (2010-08-10)

2010-08-09 Thread Orcan Ogetbil
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo > meeting tomorrow at 19:30UTC (3:30pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on > irc.freenode.net. > > = Followups = > > #topic #351 Create a policy for updates - status report on implementat

Re: fedpkg local redefines %fedora macro

2010-08-09 Thread Kyle VanderBeek
That would certainly explain all the problems I've been having getting python3 packages built with "fedpkg local". All of my "%if 0%{?fedora} > 12" lines would blow up. On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 6:54 AM, Petr Pisar wrote: > Hello, > > while working on `nas' package I found `fedpkg local' redefines

Re: fedpkg local redefines %fedora macro

2010-08-09 Thread Dennis Gilmore
On Monday, August 09, 2010 04:27:31 pm Kyle VanderBeek wrote: > That would certainly explain all the problems I've been having getting > python3 packages built with "fedpkg local". All of my "%if > 0%{?fedora} > 12" lines would blow up. > > On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 6:54 AM, Petr Pisar wrote: > > H

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in F-14

2010-08-09 Thread Kevin Kofler
pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: > While the XO-1 is a comparitatively relative higher HW spec (433 mhz > from memory, so not massive but still double) it might be a worthwhile > canditdate as there's quite a few of them around the community for > testing, its not overly powerful and sees similar issues

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: Deji Akingunola

2010-08-09 Thread Robert Scheck
Hello Deji, On Mon, 09 Aug 2010, Deji Akingunola wrote: > While the truth is you never contacted me by email, and you went ahead > threatening me with AWOL policy and orphaning all my packages just 2 > weeks after filing a bug for package upgrade on EPEL 4. thank you very much for your reply. In

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in F-14

2010-08-09 Thread pbrobin...@gmail.com
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 10:56 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: >> While the XO-1 is a comparitatively relative higher HW spec (433 mhz >> from memory, so not massive but still double) it might be a worthwhile >> canditdate as there's quite a few of them around the community for

Re: feature freeze?

2010-08-09 Thread Kevin Kofler
Peter Czanik wrote: > OSE is nothing near to being a crippleware. Most features arrive > simultaneously to OSE and PE (like support for the new syslog spec, > etc.) or appear in PE first and then migrated quickly to OSE (like SSL > and database support). Automatic testing of PE also helped to fix m

Re: git branch help?

2010-08-09 Thread Robert Relyea
On 08/02/2010 06:06 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Jesse Keating wrote: > >> Here is where you should have done a fedpkg or git push >> > [snip] > >> There is nothing to commit, since all the changes are already committed. >> > The joys of DVCSes. People are NOT used to commit and push b

F14 update pushes

2010-08-09 Thread Orion Poplawski
Are updates getting pushed for F14? https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lyx-2.0.0-0.6.alpha5.fc14?_csrf_token=3478f09b5daca6a8e92441cd1f8a07e7aed3a668 was submitted on the 5th. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA DivisionF

Re: Integrity protection of fetches

2010-08-09 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 12:11 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Sun, 2010-08-08 at 11:34 -0700, Matt McCutchen wrote: > > On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 11:29 -0500, Steve Bonneville wrote: > > > i.g...@comcast.net wrote: > > > > Ideally (from this perspective), the host would validate the response > > > >

Re: boot.fedoraproject.org

2010-08-09 Thread Jon Stanley
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 12:28 PM, Frank Murphy wrote: > send an email to: ad...@fedoraproject.org > Subject: BFO > > The right people will get back to you. Simply because one of the people that tends BFO is in sysadmin-main (the people who receive ad...@fp.o) does not make it a proper support mec

Re: F14 update pushes

2010-08-09 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 19:35 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: > Are updates getting pushed for F14? > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lyx-2.0.0-0.6.alpha5.fc14?_csrf_token=3478f09b5daca6a8e92441cd1f8a07e7aed3a668 > > was submitted on the 5th. Not while we're trying to spin the Alpha, no. A

Re: Plan for tomorrow's FESCo meeting (2010-08-10)

2010-08-09 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, 9 Aug 2010 17:12:20 -0400 Orcan Ogetbil wrote: > Hello, could you provide a more detailed status of the above 2 topics > after the next meeting? > The following report was from last week and it is not very > informative: ...snip... > There has been a very long debate here in this mailing

Re: Some questions about on Fedora

2010-08-09 Thread Remi Collet
Le 09/08/2010 09:38, Chen Lei a écrit : > It seems silvercity is packaged in many distributions, e.g. gentoo > freebsd mandriva PLD. It fact, RPM I found only provide the python library. From the upstream README file : Contributions are welcome for a build system for the standalone

Re: F14 update pushes

2010-08-09 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > releng have actually not been pushing to -testing either, although for > f13 cycle we let -testing pushes happen unimpeded throughout the cycle > and we should probably do the same for f14 - jesse has been away, and > those who are doi

Re: feature freeze?

2010-08-09 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 3:38 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Peter Czanik wrote: > > OSE is nothing near to being a crippleware. Most features arrive > > simultaneously to OSE and PE (like support for the new syslog spec, > > etc.) or appear in PE first and then migrated quickly to OSE (like SSL > > and

Evolution - bits missing?

2010-08-09 Thread Paul Johnson
Hi, Post the disaster on my hard drive, I've restarted evolution, but have found that the menu bar (File, Edit, etc) at the top has vanished. Is this a known problem and if it isn't, is there a way to get it back there? TTFN Paul -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin

Re: boot.fedoraproject.org

2010-08-09 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Jon Stanley wrote: > . > > The proper place to discuss would be > infrastruct...@lists.fedoraproject.org. BFO is essentially BKO, and > all of the custom stuff is in the infrastructure git repo, which can > be found at git://git.fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastruct