Hi
Any particular reason we are using gitweb at
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/. Cgit is used in freedesktop.org
is much more faster and resource efficient.
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> We recognize there may be situations when SELinux causes problems and
> you need to make it permissive or turn it off temporarily, but please
> try and keep it turned on if you possibly can, and if you're in a
> situation where you need to disable it, please let the developers know
> by filing a
On 07/30/2010 12:47 PM, Camilo Mesias wrote:
> The use cases in case anyone's interested: Install Picasa3 (which uses
> its own wine version*) and install Spotify (for Windows) using the
> 'native' Wine.
>
> *Google recommends turning off SELinux
These are proprietary software outside the Fedora
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/30/2010 12:11 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
>
> Any particular reason we are using gitweb at
> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/. Cgit is used in freedesktop.org
> is much more faster and resource efficient.
>
> Rahul
No real reason ot
On 07/30/2010 05:55 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> This evening we opened up dist-git for business. Dist-git is our git
> based replacement for dist-cvs, the source control system we were using
> for our package specs, patches, and source files. Thi
On Friday 30 of July 2010 05:55:09 Jesse Keating wrote:
> ... Wiki
> pages
will get filled out as knowledge of how to interact with dist-git
> starts
to spread ( https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Using_Fedora_GIT is a
> good
start ).
Thanks for your hard work! Could you describe this in more
details:
Jesse Keating writes:
> I want to build a new libfoo for rawhide:
> fedpkg build
where can be done local customization like in ~/.cvsextrasrc?
E.g. I set
| BUILD_CLIENT = ${HOME}/bin/tkoji
| KOJI_FLAGS= --nowait
there.
> fedpkg new-sources [ ]
Where can be defined hooks for these o
Hi there,
I had a short glimpse at the review request for dojo (#609817) today and
saw that it explicitly requires httpd. Well, dojo is a collection of
static JavaScript files so I feel that there is no reason why it should
require httpd explicitly as I don't see what special features of Apache
it
Le 30/07/2010 01:07, Jesse Keating a écrit :
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Using_Fedora_GIT
>
> We just might finish up before the 48 hour window is up!
>
Thanks for that great work !
Just updated my first package. No issue :)
Could be usefull to have a tips (in the wiki page) on how to
On 07/30/2010 08:17 AM, Camilo Mesias wrote:
>> We recognize there may be situations when SELinux causes problems and
>> you need to make it permissive or turn it off temporarily, but please
>> try and keep it turned on if you possibly can, and if you're in a
>> situation where you need to disable
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 4:55 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> This evening we opened up dist-git for business. Dist-git is our git
> based replacement for dist-cvs, the source control system we were using
> for our package specs, patches, and source f
fre 2010-07-30 klockan 12:51 +0530 skrev Rahul Sundaram:
> On 07/30/2010 12:47 PM, Camilo Mesias wrote:
> > The use cases in case anyone's interested: Install Picasa3 (which uses
> > its own wine version*)
It's winelib, not wine, right?
> > *Google recommends turning off SELinux
>
> These are pr
I was asked to bring this up here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595060
(http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/xfce/2010-July/000170.html)
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
Friend of Fedora
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Package-Stash:
d7b3857aca1f22b2da06cfcd3123cbef Package-Stash-0.05.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/m
2010/7/30 Remi Collet :
> Le 30/07/2010 01:07, Jesse Keating a écrit :
>
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Using_Fedora_GIT
>>
>> We just might finish up before the 48 hour window is up!
>>
>
> Thanks for that great work !
>
> Just updated my first package. No issue :)
>
>
>
> Could be usefull to h
On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 20:55 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> Without the help of many others, this project would never have gotten
> done. Folks helped out with Koji modifications, with fedpkg
> contributions, with repeated testing of attempted conversions, with
> logic checking of my plans, of hel
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Chen Lei wrote:
> 2010/7/30 Remi Collet :
>> Le 30/07/2010 01:07, Jesse Keating a écrit :
>>
>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Using_Fedora_GIT
>>>
>>> We just might finish up before the 48 hour window is up!
>>>
>>
>> Thanks for that great work !
>>
>> Just upda
Thank you for all the work.
I am currently in the process of convincing my employer to change from
svn to git and know how much work this is. Running git-svn clone alone
takes a few weeks for us.
I will check out all my packages on the weekend.
Happy Branching!
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists
2010/7/30 Martin Sourada :
> On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 20:55 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
>
>> Without the help of many others, this project would never have gotten
>> done. Folks helped out with Koji modifications, with fedpkg
>> contributions, with repeated testing of attempted conversions, with
>>
On 07/30/2010 02:44 PM, Christof Damian wrote:
> Thank you for all the work.
>
> I am currently in the process of convincing my employer to change from
> svn to git and know how much work this is. Running git-svn clone alone
> takes a few weeks for us.
FYI, git-svn is for users who want to conti
On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 17:17 +0800, Chen Lei wrote:
> 2010/7/30 Martin Sourada :
> > On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 20:55 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> >
> >> Without the help of many others, this project would never have gotten
> >> done. Folks helped out with Koji modifications, with fedpkg
> >> contrib
On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 11:20 +0200, Martin Sourada wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 17:17 +0800, Chen Lei wrote:
> > 2010/7/30 Martin Sourada :
> > > On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 20:55 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > >
> > >> Without the help of many others, this project would never have gotten
> > >> don
On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 09:49 +0100, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
> Excellent news! Thanks for all the work.
>
> One thing I've never got around to working out how to do in git which
> is different from previous is dealing with branches. Where previously
> it was as simple as changing directories to
2010/7/30 Martin Sourada :
> On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 09:49 +0100, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Excellent news! Thanks for all the work.
>>
>> One thing I've never got around to working out how to do in git which
>> is different from previous is dealing with branches. Where previously
>> it was as s
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 23:20 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 07:03 +0200, David Tardon wrote:
>
> > > And while Thunderbird 3 was included due to the slow development pace of
> > > the upstream (we used to have a very old Tb 2), Firefox 4 comes with at
> > > least a killer
Great news!
Few questions still remains unanswered for me:
* Should I use git now?
* May I still use cvs?
* If I'll add some changes right now using git/cvs will they be
available in cvs/git respectively?
* I just noticed that some freshly cloned git repositories are about
one month old (namely,
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> Great news!
>
> Few questions still remains unanswered for me:
>
> * Should I use git now?
> * May I still use cvs?
> * If I'll add some changes right now using git/cvs will they be
> available in cvs/git respectively?
> * I just noticed th
Summary of changes:
6730da5... Update to 0.05 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mail
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 11:18, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 07/30/2010 02:44 PM, Christof Damian wrote:
>> Thank you for all the work.
>>
>> I am currently in the process of convincing my employer to change from
>> svn to git and know how much work this is. Running git-svn clone alone
>> takes a fe
we are using cgit in git.ojuba.org and I like it very much.
BTW: why don't we upgrade cgit in fedora repos, cgit-0.8.3.2 was
released a long time ago, it support custom MIME types (the raw view
of png file will not show a text rubbish)
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://a
Good news everyone,
I found time to "fix" our @INC again. Maybe you have noticed, that they
contained duplicates and were terribly long. Duplicates were fixed by
the patch for reordering INC and few adjustments of Configure in perl.spec.
But there's more changes. I suppose many of you is using no
Hello Guys
My first post here is to present a small utility that maybe will
be useful for people building rpms on your machine locally and want to avoid
all the usual flags and directories needed to use rpmbuild directly.
bm,
buildManager is a small python tool created several years ago in the
Co
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 11:38:59PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> I would take over gdal and grass if nobody else steps forward to do so
>> (I'd rather have someone with more knowledge in the field of gis be
>> the maintainer).
> You can talk to the existing co-maintainers and see what you/they wo
On 07/30/2010 04:09 AM, Helio Chissini de Castro wrote:
> Hello Guys
>
> My first post here is to present a small utility that maybe will
> be useful for people building rpms on your machine locally and want to avoid
> all the usual flags and directories needed to use rpmbuild directly.
>
...
>
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-4.fc13.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1)
On i386:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-4.fc13.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1)
Please resolve this as soon as
perl-Config-Model has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Config-Model-1.205-2.fc14.noarch requires perl(YAML::Any) >=
0:0.303
On i386:
perl-Config-Model-1.205-2.fc14.noarch requires perl(YAML::Any) >=
0:0.303
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fe
perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Data-Alias-1.07-6.fc13.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1)
On i386:
perl-Data-Alias-1.07-6.fc13.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extra
Andrew,
> SELinux is very configurable, and its various protections can be
> turned on and off for each individual case.
That's interesting, I think the last problem I ran into was having to
set a boolean to get Picasa3 to run. This wasn't the whole fix, just
one step. I was under the impression
Because of the Python 2.7 transition, it's not possible at the moment
to install fedora-packager (or for me to fix the problems, because I
can't check in stuff).
It appears there are only 1 package which is causing all the issues:
$ sudo yum --enablerepo=koji --exclude="*.i686" install fedora-pa
Richard W.M. Jones wrote, at 07/30/2010 09:22 PM +9:00:
>
> Because of the Python 2.7 transition, it's not possible at the moment
> to install fedora-packager (or for me to fix the problems, because I
> can't check in stuff).
>
> It appears there are only 1 package which is causing all the issues:
commit 96ee09303372884a6f3c8a845a0221195b782d1f
Author: Paul Howarth
Date: Mon Jun 14 08:10:38 2010 +
- Incorporate package review suggestions (#602597)
- Use %{?perl_default_filter}
- Use DESTDIR instead of PERL_INSTALL_ROOT
perl-Package-Stash.spec | 11 +--
1 files
commit 14916ab1cc95c9907b7104db66fe0b72bd8270c9
Author: Paul Howarth
Date: Mon Jun 14 13:52:53 2010 +
- Update to 0.04 (get_package_symbol now doesn't autovivify stash entries;
a new method get_or_add_package_symbol can now be used for that
behavior)
.gitignore
commit 7b013cf8f75931b78621b0f2d5da2a9e24d55409
Author: Paul Howarth
Date: Fri Jul 30 12:46:56 2010 +0100
Update patch for old Test::More versions
Changes in the test suite between versions 0.03 and 0.04 resulted in
the need to update the patch to get the test suite to work wit
commit c8b7003d7f57572d1864fa20ba29b61753a5252b
Author: Paul Howarth
Date: Fri Jul 30 12:59:01 2010 +0100
Update to 0.05
Update to current upstream release 0.05:
- Bump Test::More requirement for done_testing
- Update packaging stuff
BR: perl(Test::EOL) and perl(Test::N
Mamoru Tasaka wrote, at 07/30/2010 09:30 PM +9:00:
> Richard W.M. Jones wrote, at 07/30/2010 09:22 PM +9:00:
>>
>> Because of the Python 2.7 transition, it's not possible at the moment
>> to install fedora-packager (or for me to fix the problems, because I
>> can't check in stuff).
>>
>> It appears
Em Sexta-feira 30 Julho 2010, às 09:02:34, você escreveu:
> On
07/30/2010
04:09 AM, Helio Chissini de Castro wrote:
> > Hello Guys
> >
> >
My first
post here is to present a small utility that maybe will
> > be
useful for
people building rpms on your machine locally and want to
> >
avoid all the
u
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 8:30 AM, Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
> Richard W.M. Jones wrote, at 07/30/2010 09:22 PM +9:00:
>>
>> Because of the Python 2.7 transition, it's not possible at the moment
>> to install fedora-packager (or for me to fix the problems, because I
>> can't check in stuff).
>>
>> It appe
On 07/30/2010 05:55 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> starts to spread ( https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Using_Fedora_GIT is a
> good start ).
I made:
fedpkg clone python-debian
cd python-debian
fedpkg switch-branch f14
edit spec file
fedpkg commit -m 'edit changelog entry' -p
fedpkg push
And the last
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 09:30:52PM +0900, Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
> Richard W.M. Jones wrote, at 07/30/2010 09:22 PM +9:00:
> >
> > Because of the Python 2.7 transition, it's not possible at the moment
> > to install fedora-packager (or for me to fix the problems, because I
> > can't check in stuff).
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 01:43:54PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> I put an extremely grotty patch into this scratch build:
>
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2358551
erm, which failed ...
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rj
Jesse Keating said the following on 07/29/2010 09:03 PM Pacific Time:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Branch_Freeze_Policy
>
> I know it's been a rough couple of days here, python-2.7 and boost
> rebuilds creating build havoc, systemd creating so
On 07/29/2010 07:38 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 10:39:02 +0200
> Sven Lankes wrote:
>> Can we please orphan his packages?:
>
> I'm ok with it as a FESCo member. There's a 3 day objection time now in
> the policy...
>
>> packages with co-maintainers:
[... snip ...]
>> openlayers
Orcan Ogetbil wrote, at 07/30/2010 09:36 PM +9:00:
> On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 8:30 AM, Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
>> Richard W.M. Jones wrote, at 07/30/2010 09:22 PM +9:00:
>>>
>>> Because of the Python 2.7 transition, it's not possible at the moment
>>> to install fedora-packager (or for me to fix the pr
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 03:01:11PM +0200, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
>
> First, I must say that Christian has usually not been very responsive to
> emails I wrote him, but it seems he just is usually very busy, as when
> he actually responded, he would respond several of my emails in a row.
I have t
2010/7/30 Patrice Dumas :
> On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 03:01:11PM +0200, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
>>
>> First, I must say that Christian has usually not been very responsive to
>> emails I wrote him, but it seems he just is usually very busy, as when
>> he actually responded, he would respond several of
On 07/29/2010 05:46 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jul 2010, Mike McGrath wrote:
>
>>
>> Maybe baby steps? Small incremental changes. Sure some features will be
>> missing that kopers will provide. But perhaps we could just create a
>> Fedora-13-devel tag in koji, push it to it's own repo
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 21:13:21 +0800, Chen wrote:
> It seems a considerable amount of packages in fedora don't update for
> years.
If you find any, open a ticket and mention the new release.
> I think we should add some policy to address those unmaintained
> packages,
There is the non-responsive
On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 12:41 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
>
> Any particular reason we are using gitweb at
> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/. Cgit is used in freedesktop.org
> is much more faster and resource efficient.
With my fd.o hat on: Our experience with cgit hasn't been complet
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 12:41 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Any particular reason we are using gitweb at
> > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/. Cgit is used in freedesktop.org
> > is much more faster and resource efficient.
>
> With my fd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/30/2010 04:51 AM, Alexander Boström wrote:
> fre 2010-07-30 klockan 12:51 +0530 skrev Rahul Sundaram:
>> On 07/30/2010 12:47 PM, Camilo Mesias wrote:
>>> The use cases in case anyone's interested: Install Picasa3 (which uses
>>> its own wine vers
commit eea5f13649de57dbf34f24353ba12255ceadcc7e
Author: steve
Date: Fri Jul 30 17:52:59 2010 +0200
* Tue Jun 22 2010 Petr Pisar - 0.33-9
- Rebuild against libtorque-2.4.8
perl-PBS-0.33-obsolete.patch | 213 ++
perl-PBS.spec|
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Mike McGrath wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Adam Jackson wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 12:41 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > Any particular reason we are using gitweb at
>> > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/. Cgit is used in freedesktop.org
>
On 07/30/2010 02:43 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> On 07/30/2010 05:55 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
>> starts to spread ( https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Using_Fedora_GIT is a
>> good start ).
>
> I made:
>
> fedpkg clone python-debian
> cd python-debian
> fedpkg switch-branch f14
>edit spec file
> fed
commit 562c43842baa1183ef7ca7e00f49b3766d1ef783
Author: steve
Date: Fri Jul 30 17:54:02 2010 +0200
Add clog file.
clog |2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/clog b/clog
new file mode 100644
index 000..d5e79a9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/clog
@@ -0,0 +1,2
commit 9349fb073696032ca1813d87e8c79aa5eaa23486
Author: steve
Date: Fri Jul 30 17:55:14 2010 +0200
nothing
perl-PBS-0.33-obsolete.patch |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-PBS-0.33-obsolete.patch b/perl-PBS-0.33-obsolete.patch
index 43daaae..d1
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Adam Jackson wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 12:41 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> >> > Hi
> >> >
> >> > Any particular reason we are using gitweb at
> >> > http://pkgs.fe
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 09:01:47 -0500 (CDT)
Mike McGrath wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > > On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > >
> > >> On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 12:41 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > >> > Hi
> >
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 10:19:08AM +0200, Felix Kaechele wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I had a short glimpse at the review request for dojo (#609817) today and
> saw that it explicitly requires httpd. Well, dojo is a collection of
> static JavaScript files so I feel that there is no reason why it should
I am trying to update one of my packages with git for the first time.
Works good, but "fedpkg build" fails for me.
It complains that it can't retrieve the sources:
http://koji.stg.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=2239266&name=root.log&offset=-4000
When I open the URL open with firefox/curl t
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 06:00:43AM -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
> Jesse Keating said the following on 07/29/2010 09:03 PM Pacific Time:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Branch_Freeze_Policy
> >
> > I know it's been a rough couple of days he
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 09:51:05 -0400,
Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> I decided to respond to these emails about Google Applications in a blog
> entry
The link to Drepper's stuff should be:
http://people.redhat.com/drepper/selinux-mem.html
Your link has a ~ and a trailing space.
--
devel mailing li
Many thanks!
--
Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org
Departamento de InformaticaFono: +56 32 2654431
Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 2654239
Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile 234 Fax: +56 32 2797513
--
devel
Excerpts from Christof Damian's message of Fri Jul 30 16:10:44 +0200 2010:
> I am trying to update one of my packages with git for the first time.
> Works good, but "fedpkg build" fails for me.
>
> It complains that it can't retrieve the sources:
> http://koji.stg.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?ta
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 09:01:47 -0500 (CDT)
> Mike McGrath wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> On Fri, 2010-07-
Daniel,
I had a quick look at your post... I wanted to point out that I installed
Picasa3 and Chrome not only with rpm but via Google's very convenient yum
repos. I got wine from yum too and installed Spotify by running a Windows
binary...
I suppose that means that if there are fine grained fi
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 03:28:42PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>> I think we should add some policy to address those unmaintained
>> packages,
> There is the non-responsive maintainer policy already.
That policy isn't the easiest one to follow though. I understand that
taking someones packag
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> FYI, git-svn is for users who want to continue to use Subversion on
> the server but interact using Git from clients. It is not a tool
> for conversion. It is a common mistake.
Not so much. Many folks use git-svn to convert from svn to git. Once
you have cloned an svn
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 16:18, Stanislav Ochotnicky
wrote:
> Excerpts from Christof Damian's message of Fri Jul 30 16:10:44 +0200 2010:
>> I am trying to update one of my packages with git for the first time.
>> Works good, but "fedpkg build" fails for me.
>>
>> It complains that it can't retrieve
On 07/30/2010 09:45 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>
>> The use cases in case anyone's interested: Install Picasa3 (which uses
>> its own wine version*) and install Spotify (for Windows) using the
>> 'native' Wine.
>
> I might have a look at Picasa3.
I just installed it from
http://dl.google.com/linu
Hi,
On 07/30/2010 01:12 PM, Camilo Mesias wrote:
>> SELinux is very configurable, and its various protections can be
>> turned on and off for each individual case.
>
> That's interesting, I think the last problem I ran into was having to
> set a boolean to get Picasa3 to run. This wasn't the who
On 07/30/2010 03:16 AM, Mike McGrath wrote:
> So I just created:
>
> http://repos.fedorapeople.org/
>
> Anyone want to help me test the steps and process before we announce and
> deploy it? Anyone already got Firefox 4 built for F13 for example? Let
> me know or stop by #fedora-admin on irc.free
On 07/30/2010 09:03 AM, Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
> Well, workaround added in notify-python-0.1.1-13.fc1{4,5}. For F-14
> I submitted push request.
Thank you. FWIW I tried to fix this yesterday but I couldn't work in CVS
because it was locked and I couldn't switch to the new git system, a
chicken-n-e
Le 30/07/2010 17:10, Rahul Sundaram a écrit :
> On 07/30/2010 03:16 AM, Mike McGrath wrote:
>> So I just created:
>>
>> http://repos.fedorapeople.org/
>>
>> Anyone want to help me test the steps and process before we announce and
>> deploy it? Anyone already got Firefox 4 built for F13 for exampl
On 07/30/2010 11:10 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 07/30/2010 03:16 AM, Mike McGrath wrote:
>> So I just created:
>>
>> http://repos.fedorapeople.org/
>>
>> Anyone want to help me test the steps and process before we announce and
>> deploy it? Anyone already got Firefox 4 built for F13 for exampl
On 07/30/2010 08:55 PM, Remi Collet wrote:
> Of course I could push my "firefox4" build on fedorapeople.org, but my
> backport repository is about 12Gio (mainly mozilla stuff, lamp stack and
> some experimental rpm like mysql-workbench)
>
> Could I just added something to be (a link) on the list ?
On 07/30/2010 08:58 PM, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> I'm also working on a set of Firefox 4 packages (split between firefox4
> and xulrunner) that more closely match the Fedora firefox packages, but
> are able to be installed without conflicts.
>
> At the moment, I'm just targeting F-14.
That's r
On 07/30/2010 11:33 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 07/30/2010 08:58 PM, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
>> I'm also working on a set of Firefox 4 packages (split between firefox4
>> and xulrunner) that more closely match the Fedora firefox packages, but
>> are able to be installed without conflicts.
>>
On 07/30/2010 09:06 PM, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> To be fair, I just moved to the format that Mike McGrath set up for
> repos.fedoraproject.org, so, please don't accuse me of not backing
> standardization. ;)
The point is not to accuse anyone of course. Merely was providing a
suggestion on ho
On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 21:03 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 07/30/2010 08:58 PM, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> > I'm also working on a set of Firefox 4 packages (split between firefox4
> > and xulrunner) that more closely match the Fedora firefox packages, but
> > are able to be installed without
On Friday, July 30, 2010 07:22:45 am Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Because of the Python 2.7 transition, it's not possible at the moment
> to install fedora-packager (or for me to fix the problems, because I
> can't check in stuff).
>
> It appears there are only 1 package which is causing all the is
On 07/30/2010 09:08 PM, seth vidal wrote:
> in yum-utils upstream you can do:
>
> yum-config-manager --add-repo=http://baseurl/some/place
>
> or
> yum-config-manager --add-repo=http://path/to/some/foo.repo
>
>
> either will add the repo you want.
That's almost what I want. Can we add a default s
On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 21:11 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 07/30/2010 09:08 PM, seth vidal wrote:
> > in yum-utils upstream you can do:
> >
> > yum-config-manager --add-repo=http://baseurl/some/place
> >
> > or
> > yum-config-manager --add-repo=http://path/to/some/foo.repo
> >
> >
> > either wil
On 07/30/2010 11:49 AM, seth vidal wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 21:11 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> On 07/30/2010 09:08 PM, seth vidal wrote:
>>> in yum-utils upstream you can do:
>>>
>>> yum-config-manager --add-repo=http://baseurl/some/place
>>>
>>> or
>>> yum-config-manager --add-repo=http:/
On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 11:51 -0400, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> On 07/30/2010 11:49 AM, seth vidal wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 21:11 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> >> On 07/30/2010 09:08 PM, seth vidal wrote:
> >>> in yum-utils upstream you can do:
> >>>
> >>> yum-config-manager --add-repo=htt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
fedpkg build
fedpkg build
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/fedpkg", line 959, in
args.command(args)
File "/usr/bin/fedpkg", line 297, in build
mymodule.init_koji(args.user, kojiconfig)
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-pac
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Tom "spot" Callaway
wrote:
> On 07/30/2010 11:49 AM, seth vidal wrote:
>> On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 21:11 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>>> On 07/30/2010 09:08 PM, seth vidal wrote:
in yum-utils upstream you can do:
yum-config-manager --add-repo=http://ba
On 07/30/2010 11:53 AM, drago01 wrote:
> Not even with a note like
>
> "The fedora project has no control about this repos use at your own
> risk etc. pp" ?
No. Not even with a note like that.
~spot
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/list
Thanks for dist-git -- one step closer to banishing CVS from my life! :)
A git trick I'd like fedpkg to learn is to use separate url/pushurl,
e.g. in .git/config:
[remote "origin"]
fetch = +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/*
url = git://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/foo
pushurl =
On 07/30/2010 09:40 PM, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> On 07/30/2010 11:53 AM, drago01 wrote:
>> Not even with a note like
>>
>> "The fedora project has no control about this repos use at your own
>> risk etc. pp" ?
> No. Not even with a note like that.
Instead of a static list of preincluded repos
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 6:33 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 07/30/2010 09:40 PM, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
>> On 07/30/2010 11:53 AM, drago01 wrote:
>>> Not even with a note like
>>>
>>> "The fedora project has no control about this repos use at your own
>>> risk etc. pp" ?
>> No. Not even with
1 - 100 of 195 matches
Mail list logo
