On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 09:57:56AM +0300, Nicu Buculei wrote:
> On 07/28/2010 01:08 AM, Mike McGrath wrote:
> >> On 07/27/2010 10:53 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Are we skipping Firefox 4 for Fedora 14? Beta 2 has been released
> >>> recently and I am wondering if we can go with it if it
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 21:57 -0700, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 19:33 -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
> > 597858 :: NEW :: firefox :: Gecko Maintainer :: "SELinux is preventing
> > firefox from making its memory writable and executable." crashes rawhide
> > firefox start :: https://b
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 19:33:46 -0700
John Poelstra wrote:
>
> Open Fedora 14 Alpha Blocker Bugs = 6
> Days until Release Candidate Compose = 8
>
> Here's the run down on the current open Fedora 14 Alpha Blocker
> bugs
Just a few cents from me on a few of them...
> 615443 :: NEW :: livecd-t
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 10:39:02 +0200
Sven Lankes wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 02:31:19PM +0200, Sven Lankes wrote:
>
> > Following the process
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
> > Is someone able to get in touch with Christian Balint (rezso)?
> >
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 23:08 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 19:33:46 -0700
> John Poelstra wrote:
>
> >
> > Open Fedora 14 Alpha Blocker Bugs = 6
> > Days until Release Candidate Compose = 8
> >
> > Here's the run down on the current open Fedora 14 Alpha Blocker
> > bugs
>
>
On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 07:03 +0200, David Tardon wrote:
> > And while Thunderbird 3 was included due to the slow development pace of
> > the upstream (we used to have a very old Tb 2), Firefox 4 comes with at
> > least a killer feature, WebM (IIRC, another killer feature is the new js
> > engine
2010/7/29 Michał Piotrowski :
> 2010/7/29 Chris Jones :
>>
>> I'm not going to pretend that I'm not pleased about the delay. I plan
>> to keep using G2 for as long as I possible can, long after the Gnome 3
>> release.
>
> Is it possible to disable gnome-shell in the gnome 3? Or because it is
> not
So will Chromium get into the third-party repos like RPM Fusion? RPM Fusion
has ffmpeg packages.
The problem is that RPM Fusion needs much more time and more resources to
build such a big package.
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 4:58 AM, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> On 07/28/2010 04:47 PM, Conan Kudo (
Le 28/07/2010 19:11, Kai Engert a écrit :
> Remi does:
http://blog.famillecollet.com/post/2010/07/28/Firefox-4.0-Beta-2-en
F12 + F13, i386 + x86_64 build available.
+
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 07/29/2010 12:01 PM, Liang Suilong wrote:
> So will Chromium get into the third-party repos like RPM Fusion? RPM
> Fusion has ffmpeg packages.
>
> The problem is that RPM Fusion needs much more time and more resources
> to build such a big package.
Since ffmpeg can be runtime detected by Ch
Le 28/07/2010 19:11, Kai Engert a écrit :
> Remi does:
http://blog.famillecollet.com/post/2010/07/28/Firefox-4.0-Beta-2-en
F12 + F13, i386 + x86_64 build available.
+
P.S. spec and patches
http://github.com/remicollet/remirepo/tree/master/firefox/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraprojec
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 4:37 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 03:04:46PM +0200, Florent Le Coz wrote:
>> On 28/07/2010 14:52, Mike McGrath wrote:
>> > In my opinion including software that even upstream says is not ready is
>> > for a distribution that's "lost their way". We
101 - 112 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
