On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 09:55:15AM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
>
> BTW since a python mass-rebuild is looming anyway, we might want to
> consider pulling in Aurélien Bompard's python-egg dependency extractors
> while at it: http://rpm.org/ticket/15
>
That sounds good. One note: we might wan
#3780: Grant CVS write access for all perl packages to ppisar
-+--
Reporter: ppisar | Owner: toshio
Type: task| Status: reopened
Milestone: | Component: cvs
Resolution: |
#3780: Grant CVS write access for all perl packages to ppisar
-+--
Reporter: ppisar | Owner: toshio
Type: task| Status: closed
Milestone: | Component: cvs
Resolution: fixed |Ke
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607896
--- Comment #1 from Ralf Corsepius 2010-06-25 04:32:37
EDT ---
Could be I am not patient enough. The koji-build above seems to
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607896
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
On 06/25/2010 01:24 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> On 06/20/2010 05:08 AM, Robin 'cheese' Lee wrote:
>> The spec file for each per-module package I just created is generated
>> through a little and nasty script which converts spec files generated by
>> setuptools to ones complying with Fedora sta
I have two easy reviews to trade:
xnoise, a tracklist-centric media player:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=60
and
xnoise-plugins-core, some plugins that ship with it:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607778
I've been running development versions for a while, so now tha
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607896
Ralf Corsepius changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Uninitialized warnings on $magnitude
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607982
Summary: Uninitialized warnings on $magnitude
Product: Fedora
perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Data-Alias-1.07-6.fc13.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1)
On i386:
perl-Data-Alias-1.07-6.fc13.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extra
perl-DBI-Dumper has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-DBI-Dumper-2.01-8.fc12.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0)
On i386:
perl-DBI-Dumper-2.01-8.fc12.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extra
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-4.fc13.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1)
On i386:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-4.fc13.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1)
Please resolve this as soon as
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 02:56:39AM +0200, jonathan MERCIER wrote:
> hello, i try create 2 package: ldc and tango.
> I have a big question where i put *.d file ?
> for C/C++ it's in /usr/include but D they are nothing
attached my ancient gcc + D(v1.x) rpm specfile.
Have not done this lately and es
Compose started at Fri Jun 25 08:15:20 UTC 2010
Broken deps for i386
--
BackupPC-3.1.0-14.fc14.noarch requires perl-suidperl
1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc14.i686 requires libgladeui-1.so.9
dates-0.4.11-3.fc14.i686 requires li
Author: xavierb
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-IPC-ShareLite/EL-6
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv18185/EL-6
Modified Files:
perl-IPC-ShareLite.spec
Log Message:
Update EL-5 and EL-6 branch to 0.13
Index: perl-IPC-ShareLite.spec
===
Author: xavierb
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-IPC-ShareLite/EL-5
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv18185/EL-5
Modified Files:
perl-IPC-ShareLite.spec sources
Log Message:
Update EL-5 and EL-6 branch to 0.13
Index: perl-IPC-ShareLite.spec
===
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Carp-Assert-More - request for EL-6 branch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608024
Summary: perl-Carp-Assert-More - request for EL-6 branch
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 8:57 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>
> So... AFAIK, libtool does solve this which is why I'm wondering why you're
> seeing this. Is the package that's giving you problems checked into the
> rawhide cvs right now?
What changed is simply that I'm using my script "fedpkg-vcs" t
- "Chuck Anderson" wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 08:38:27PM +0200, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
> > Rob Crittenden wrote:
> > > Richard Hughes wrote:
> > >> On 23 June 2010 09:50, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> > >>> “/sbin/upsdrvctl is used as the near final step in
> /etc/init.d/halt to command
> > >>
Once upon a time, Simo Sorce said:
> Ideally your UPS is smart enough to sense when the load drops to 0,
> and do whatever it needs to do w/o system intervention of any sort. If
> your UPS can't do that, maybe it is time to look for alternatives :)
That's nice if you only have a computer plugged
Sorry, I'm away from the office this week and don't have access
to my email, but I noticed:
> 1:libguestfs-1.3.8-2.fc14.i686 requires [etc]
This is really strange because the latest libguestfs package built in
Rawhide is 1.3.21, see:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=8391
Richard Jones wrote, at 06/25/2010 10:40 PM +9:00:
> Sorry, I'm away from the office this week and don't have access
> to my email, but I noticed:
>
>> 1:libguestfs-1.3.8-2.fc14.i686 requires [etc]
>
> This is really strange because the latest libguestfs package built in
> Rawhide is 1.3.21, see:
>
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 10:52:44PM +0900, Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
> Richard Jones wrote, at 06/25/2010 10:40 PM +9:00:
> > Sorry, I'm away from the office this week and don't have access
> > to my email, but I noticed:
> >
> >> 1:libguestfs-1.3.8-2.fc14.i686 requires [etc]
> >
> > This is really stran
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 02:58:09PM +0100, Richard Jones wrote:
> If a proven packager can just do a bump and rebuild it ought
> to fix the issue.
OK I see that failed with:
guestfsd: error: cannot find required program mke2fs
[...]
mkfs.ext2: No such file or directory
guestfsd: error: ext2: /dev/
i submit to package for review:
- Tango standard library for D language of d1
specificationhttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603904
- LDC a compiler for the D programming language:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608066
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
htt
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 08:43:35AM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 8:57 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> >
> > So... AFAIK, libtool does solve this which is why I'm wondering why you're
> > seeing this. Is the package that's giving you problems checked into the
> > rawhide cvs r
bad link for tango => https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608069
Le vendredi 25 juin 2010 à 17:15 +0200, jonathan MERCIER a écrit :
> i submit to package for review:
> - Tango standard library for D language of d1
> specificationhttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603904
> - LDC a
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>
> None of the above. Why libtool isn't handling this rpath (and the binaries
> created during the build process) correctly when it does in other software.
No, libtool is adding an rpath fine; see below:
> So if you have the package some
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 11:34:34AM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> >
> > None of the above. Why libtool isn't handling this rpath (and the binaries
> > created during the build process) correctly when it does in other software.
>
> No, lib
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>
> The fact that you have to use those sed lines shows that there's something
> wrong somewhere as we normally don't need them to produce rpath-free
> binaries if we're using Fedora or Red Hat libtool. Since you have the
> ability to commi
On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 13:42 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> As far as using that, note the glib2 tarballs are actually typically
> created on an Ubuntu system. So...
>
What makes you think so ?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 11:28:16AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Sorry for the cross-post, but figured it's worth CCing devel in case
> anyone has concerns on these.
>
> I'm currently working on a plan to expand desktop validation testing. As
> part of the discussion around this, Christoph Wicke
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=584929
--- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov 2010-06-25 14:22:18 EDT
---
Hello!
Could you, please, clarify whether this issue exists in t
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589261
--- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov 2010-06-25 14:23:41 EDT
---
Hello!
Could you, please, clarify whether this issue exists in t
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=584929
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry Burstein 2010-06-25
14:51:29 EDT ---
Yep.. unfortunately it still exists in 3.0.2.
--
Configure bu
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589261
--- Comment #2 from lejeczek 2010-06-25 15:28:20 EDT
---
I think it does,
but there is that thing in init script: -log_to_syslo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Can anybody tell me what went wrong with this update? It was submitted
at 15:09 on 06-23, then made it into testing at 16:19 on 06-24 and was
submitted for stable two hours later. Between that submission and the
push to stable (push to stable happene
Sounds like it might need to be. Maybe push stable requests with -2 karma to
some list that requires investigation and possibly a +3 (or other agreed
upon number) proventesters karma to go stable?
Just a thought.
-AdamM (From Android)
On Jun 25, 2010 6:27 PM, "Jesse Keating" wrote:
-BEGIN
Author: corsepiu
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Number-Compare/devel
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv13912
Modified Files:
perl-Number-Compare.spec
Added Files:
Number-Compare-0.01-uninitialized.patch
Log Message:
* Sat Jun 26 2010 Ralf Corsépius - 0.01-15
Author: corsepiu
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Number-Compare/F-12
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv14350/F-12
Modified Files:
perl-Number-Compare.spec
Added Files:
Number-Compare-0.01-uninitialized.patch
Log Message:
* Sat Jun 26 2010 Ralf Corsépius - 0.0
Author: corsepiu
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Number-Compare/F-13
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv14350/F-13
Modified Files:
perl-Number-Compare.spec
Added Files:
Number-Compare-0.01-uninitialized.patch
Log Message:
* Sat Jun 26 2010 Ralf Corsépius - 0.0
On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 16:27 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Can anybody tell me what went wrong with this update? It was submitted
> at 15:09 on 06-23, then made it into testing at 16:19 on 06-24 and was
> submitted for stable two hours later. Be
On 06/26/2010 07:33 AM, Adam Miller wrote:
> Sounds like it might need to be. Maybe push stable requests with -2 karma to
> some list that requires investigation and possibly a +3 (or other agreed
> upon number) proventesters karma to go stable?
Would you mind to explain how could have happened:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607982
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System 2010-06-26
01:56:08 EDT ---
perl-Number-Compare-0.01-15.fc12 has been submitted as an
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607982
Ralf Corsepius changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607982
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System 2010-06-26
01:56:14 EDT ---
perl-Number-Compare-0.01-15.fc13 has been submitted as an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6/25/10 10:50 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Until AutoQA is in place to tackle this, the obvious option is for there
> to be a process improvement whereby whoever's doing stable update pushes
> at least gets notified if a package has received negativ
On 06/26/2010 11:20 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> Clearly the maintainer did not allow sufficient time for testing here;
> there's a grand 4 hour window between the update being 'pushed to
> testing' and 'submitted to stable'. That probably wasn't long enough for
> it even to hit any public mirror
48 matches
Mail list logo
