On 06/26/2010 07:33 AM, Adam Miller wrote:
> Sounds like it might need to be. Maybe push stable requests with -2 karma to
> some list that requires investigation and possibly a +3 (or other agreed
> upon number) proventesters karma to go stable?
Would you mind to explain how could have happened:
# yum update
...
---> Package evolution.x86_64 0:2.30.2-1.fc13 set to be updated
--> Processing Dependency: libedataserver-1.2.so.11()(64bit) for
package: gnome-panel-2.30.0-1.fc13.x86_64
--> Processing Dependency: libedataserver-1.2.so.11()(64bit) for
package: glabels-2.2.8-1.fc13.x86_64
---> Package evolution-data-server.x86_64 0:2.30.2-2.fc13 set to be updated
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
Error: Package: glabels-2.2.8-1.fc13.x86_64 (@updates)
Requires: libedataserver-1.2.so.11()(64bit)
Removing: evolution-data-server-2.30.1-2.fc13.x86_64 (@fedora)
Error: Package: gnome-panel-2.30.0-1.fc13.x86_64 (@fedora)
Requires: libedataserver-1.2.so.11()(64bit)
Removing: evolution-data-server-2.30.1-2.fc13.x86_64 (@fedora)
To me this is a clear case of package-push which should not have
happened and is not related to karma votes at all.
Ralf
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
