Re: new upstream tracker (linuxtesting.org)

2010-06-04 Thread Andrey Ponomarenko
On 06/03/2010 05:16 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On 06/03/2010 09:04 AM, Andrey Ponomarenko wrote: > >> Hello, I'm from ISPRAS and we have created an experimental system for >> monitoring and analyzing of upstream libraries development. It may be >> helpful for analyzing risks of library updat

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-06-01 x86_64

2010-06-04 Thread Mamoru Tasaka
Hedayat Vatankhah wrote, at 06/04/2010 03:07 PM +9:00: > Hi, > My packages (rcsslogplayer and rcssmonitor) are being failed because of the > lack of Qt dependencies (QtNetwork requires ssl and crypto libraries from > openssl-devel package, and gobject-2.0 from glib2-devel). As these packages > a

Re: -upstart subpackage vs tranditional initscripts

2010-06-04 Thread Patrice Dumas
On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 04:43:58AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Chen Lei wrote: > > I found the maintainer violates fedora package/naming guideline many > > times, we need a people to persuade him to obey those guideline. > > IMHO we need to unsponsor him and orphan his packages. There are way too

Re: sources file audit - 2010-05-31

2010-06-04 Thread Guido Grazioli
> On 06/04/2010 05:02 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > guidograzioli:BAD_CVS_SOURCE:cvsclient-20060125.pom:maven-scm > http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/sourcecheck/sourcecheck-20100531/maven-scm-dl.txt repo[12].maven.org drops wget download requests with error 403, this happens for many packages needing

Re: -upstart subpackage vs tranditional initscripts

2010-06-04 Thread Richard Zidlicky
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 09:13:02PM +0800, Chen Lei wrote: > Fedora have upstart as the /sbin/init daemon for a long time, but we > still use the old 'SysVinit' scripts from /etc/rc.d/init.d and fedora > packaging guideline have nothing about upstart. > > Is it right for the maintainer to provide  

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-06-01 x86_64

2010-06-04 Thread Hedayat Vatankhah
/*Mamoru Tasaka */ wrote on 06/04/2010 12:00:50 PM +0450: Hedayat Vatankhah wrote, at 06/04/2010 03:07 PM +9:00: Hi, My packages (rcsslogplayer and rcssmonitor) are being failed because of the lack of Qt dependencies (QtNetwork requires ssl and crypto libraries from openssl-devel package

Re: Inclusion user rpm macros file in spec

2010-06-04 Thread Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)
30.05.2010 21:19, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) ?: 21.05.2010 20:58, Panu Matilainen ?: On Fri, 21 May 2010, Kevin Kofler wrote: Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote: I think because macroses should be included before it processed as shell script. Is there some var

Re: JBoss stalled (was Re: status of some packages ??)

2010-06-04 Thread Tom "spot" Callaway
On 06/03/2010 10:35 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: >> You might feel that way, but the simple fact is that French citizens can >> not abandon copyright (aka put works into the Public Domain). This is >> the only license that we've been given, but since it is not valid, we >> c

rawhide report: 20100604 changes

2010-06-04 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Fri Jun 4 08:15:04 UTC 2010 Broken deps for i386 -- almanah-0.7.3-1.fc14.i686 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.12 1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc14.i686 requires libgladeui-1.so.9 bugzilla-3.6-1.fc14.noarch re

Re: JBoss stalled (was Re: status of some packages ??)

2010-06-04 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 08:24:33PM +0100, Alex Hudson wrote: > So effectively we're arguing that everyone else, Red Hat included, is > either oblivious to the legal risk or they looked at it and came to the > wrong conclusion. All of them. This isn't the only time it's happened. Debian still dist

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-06-01 x86_64

2010-06-04 Thread Matt Domsch
On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 08:57:06AM +0200, Gianluca Sforna wrote: > On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Matt Domsch wrote: > > > > It also doesn't report any failing packages that have subsequently > > been built and published in koji's rawhide since 06-01. ??That should > > cut down on the "but I just

Re: sources file audit - 2010-05-31

2010-06-04 Thread Thomas Moschny
2010/6/3 Kevin Fenzi : > thm:BADSOURCE:httperf-0.9.0.tar.gz:httperf why's that? % cd devel % wget -N http://httperf.googlecode.com/files/httperf-0.9.0.tar.gz % md5sum -c sources httperf-0.9.0.tar.gz: OK - Thomas -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org

Re: sources file audit - 2010-05-31

2010-06-04 Thread Christoph Wickert
Am Freitag, den 04.06.2010, 15:12 +0200 schrieb Thomas Moschny: > 2010/6/3 Kevin Fenzi : > > thm:BADSOURCE:httperf-0.9.0.tar.gz:httperf > > why's that? > > % cd devel > % wget -N http://httperf.googlecode.com/files/httperf-0.9.0.tar.gz Not sure how the source file audit script works, but you wil

Re: sources file audit - 2010-05-31

2010-06-04 Thread Thomas Moschny
2010/6/4 Christoph Wickert : > Am Freitag, den 04.06.2010, 15:12 +0200 schrieb Thomas Moschny: >> 2010/6/3 Kevin Fenzi : >> > thm:BADSOURCE:httperf-0.9.0.tar.gz:httperf >> >> why's that? >> >> % cd devel >> % wget -N http://httperf.googlecode.com/files/httperf-0.9.0.tar.gz > > Not sure how the sour

Re: JBoss stalled (was Re: status of some packages ??)

2010-06-04 Thread Alexander Boström
tor 2010-06-03 klockan 19:31 +0100 skrev Alex Hudson: > On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 12:29 -0400, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > > On 06/03/2010 11:54 AM, Iain Arnell wrote: > > > And slightly weird that it's okay for Red Hat to distribute it > > > themselves, both commercially and as open source from jbos

Re: sources file audit - 2010-05-31

2010-06-04 Thread Jesse Keating
On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 15:02 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > jkeating:BADSOURCE:koji-1.3.2.tar.bz2:koji > jkeating:BADURL:mock-1.1.1.tar.gz:mock > jkeating:BADURL:pungi-2.1.0.tar.bz2:pungi We don't really do tarball drops of these anymore, we just make release from git. What should we put in the spec

Re: sources file audit - 2010-05-31

2010-06-04 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 4 Jun 2010 15:12:18 +0200 Thomas Moschny wrote: > 2010/6/3 Kevin Fenzi : > > thm:BADSOURCE:httperf-0.9.0.tar.gz:httperf > > why's that? > > % cd devel > % wget -N http://httperf.googlecode.com/files/httperf-0.9.0.tar.gz > % md5sum -c sources > httperf-0.9.0.tar.gz: OK It's googlecode.

Re: sources file audit - 2010-05-31

2010-06-04 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 08:36:53 -0700 Jesse Keating wrote: > On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 15:02 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > jkeating:BADSOURCE:koji-1.3.2.tar.bz2:koji > > jkeating:BADURL:mock-1.1.1.tar.gz:mock > > jkeating:BADURL:pungi-2.1.0.tar.bz2:pungi > > We don't really do tarball drops of these a

rpms/perl-Net-GitHub/devel .cvsignore, 1.3, 1.4 perl-Net-GitHub.spec, 1.4, 1.5 sources, 1.3, 1.4

2010-06-04 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
Author: mmaslano Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Net-GitHub/devel In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv32574 Modified Files: .cvsignore perl-Net-GitHub.spec sources Log Message: * Fri Jun 4 2010 Petr Pisar - 0.22-1 - 0.22 bump - Update Source0 URL Index: .cvsignore =

Re: JBoss stalled (was Re: status of some packages ??)

2010-06-04 Thread Matěj Cepl
Dne 3.6.2010 21:09, Tom "spot" Callaway napsal(a): > You might feel that way, but the simple fact is that French citizens can > not abandon copyright (aka put works into the Public Domain). Do we have some better authority on this than Wikipedia? In my understanding (in a dim memory, now long-tim

F13 install refuses to work with old NFS servers?

2010-06-04 Thread Jos Vos
Hi, I just tried to install F13 (PXE boot and the NFS with DVD image and images/install.img) but after a while it says it can't mount the directory. On the NFS server I see a NFS packet coming in and a response being sent, but that's about it and nothing is logged about the mount request. Now I

Re: -upstart subpackage vs tranditional initscripts

2010-06-04 Thread Kevin Kofler
Patrice Dumas wrote: > I think that this would be a huge mistake. Enrico is a very talented > packagers he generally is ahead of his time. I was myself sometimes > annoyed by the peculiarities of his packages, but he always comply to > guidelines. No he doesn't. For example, SVN revision tags in V

Re: new upstream tracker (linuxtesting.org)

2010-06-04 Thread Kevin Kofler
Andrey Ponomarenko wrote: > Taken into account, thanks. Some automatic way to add libraries may be > very useful. At the moment all the libraries can be only manually added > to the system by the administrator. If you want to add some library to > the system than send a request to me or > upstream-

File CGI-Application-Plugin-TT-1.05.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by eseyman

2010-06-04 Thread Emmanuel Seyman
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-TT: 6e795c093a011cb701ab877deb0917a4 CGI-Application-Plugin-TT-1.05.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://a

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-06-01 x86_64

2010-06-04 Thread Kevin Kofler
Mamoru Tasaka wrote: > I tried to add > --- > sed -i.nostatic \ > -e 's|--static||g' m4/qt.m4 > --- > and this seems to make build succeed (I just also tried the same fix for > rcsslogplayer and

rpms/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-TT/devel .cvsignore, 1.2, 1.3 perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-TT.spec, 1.4, 1.5 sources, 1.2, 1.3

2010-06-04 Thread Emmanuel Seyman
Author: eseyman Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-TT/devel In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv5679 Modified Files: .cvsignore perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-TT.spec sources Log Message: Update to 1.05 Index: .cvsignore ===

Re: -upstart subpackage vs tranditional initscripts

2010-06-04 Thread Till Maas
On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 06:52:51PM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Patrice Dumas wrote: > > I think that this would be a huge mistake. Enrico is a very talented > > packagers he generally is ahead of his time. I was myself sometimes > > annoyed by the peculiarities of his packages, but he always compl

Re: JBoss stalled (was Re: status of some packages ??)

2010-06-04 Thread Tom "spot" Callaway
On 06/04/2010 12:26 PM, Matěj Cepl wrote: > Dne 3.6.2010 21:09, Tom "spot" Callaway napsal(a): >> You might feel that way, but the simple fact is that French citizens can >> not abandon copyright (aka put works into the Public Domain). > > Do we have some better authority on this than Wikipedia? I

Re: JBoss stalled (was Re: status of some packages ??)

2010-06-04 Thread R P Herrold
On Fri, 4 Jun 2010, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: Matěj Cepl asked for >> I would really like to see some opinion of the real >> European IP law on the matter. Does anybody have URL? and received a slam at lawyers in the open to the reply. > Matěj, as I'm sure you know, we could find a lawyer who

Re: JBoss stalled (was Re: status of some packages ??)

2010-06-04 Thread Matěj Cepl
Dne 4.6.2010 22:10, Tom "spot" Callaway napsal(a): > Matěj, as I'm sure you know, we could find a lawyer who would tell us I said European IP lawyer, but I will let it be. Matěj -- When you're happy that cut and paste actually works I think it's a sign you've been using X-Windows for too long.

Re: new fesco meeting time vote

2010-06-04 Thread Steven M. Parrish
On Wednesday, June 02, 2010 03:00:06 pm Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Hey, if you get a chance can you hit: > > http://whenisgood.net/ee8prq > > and add when you would be able to make a fesco meeting? > > Thanks, > > kevin Done, sorry it took so long. Didn't get my schedule for next 3 months until th

Re: JBoss stalled (was Re: status of some packages ??)

2010-06-04 Thread Chen Lei
Can anyone contact members in AOP alliance directly, maybe it's helpful? e.g. Cédric Beus http://beust.com/weblog/ (http://twitter.com/cbeust) All members info see http://aopalliance.sourceforge.net/members.html Regards, Chen Lei -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admi