Dne 8.5.2010 03:39, Stephen John Smoogen napsal(a):
> It is a blessing and it is a curse. Why do more developers show up at
> conferences these days running Ubuntu or Debian systems.. many who
> used to run Fedora or RHL? My very non-scientific survey has been that
> it isn't that Ubuntu is cooler,
ons 2010-05-05 klockan 17:30 +0200 skrev Jim Meyering:
> I propose (seriously, now) to add this to /etc/profile,
> or to some always-sourced file like /etc/profile.d/glibc.sh:
>
> # Enable glibc's malloc perturbing feature in Rawhide.
> # http://udrepper.livejournal.com/11429.html
> r
Hi,
the latest version of Wine found in koji is 1.1.38, which was released
in february this year. The latest mainstream Wine is 1.1.44.
Why isn't there a newer version compiled for Fedora?
Thanks in advance,
Zoltán Böszörményi
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.f
Hi Bernie,
Works for me, Since you are already a provenpackager i dont think you need
explicit cvs access on that package, so i would say go ahead
and thanks for doing it.
Regards,
Huzaifa Sidhpurwala.
- Original Message -
From: Bernie Innocenti
To: Huzaifa Sidhpurwala
Cc: Fedora Devel
2010/5/8 Zoltan Boszormenyi :
> Hi,
>
> the latest version of Wine found in koji is 1.1.38, which was released
> in february this year. The latest mainstream Wine is 1.1.44.
>
> Why isn't there a newer version compiled for Fedora?
You'd have to ask the maintainer ... there is a bug open here
http
On Fri, 2010-05-07 at 13:24 -0400, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> (Since this might be a regression in gconf2, you might need to still add the
> %posttrans scriptlet wth the new scriptlets. If Colin knows that this is
> %a bug that won't be fixed in some versions of Fedora I'll add the killall
> %to the
On Sat, 2010-05-08 at 12:20 +0200, drago01 wrote:
> 2010/5/8 Zoltan Boszormenyi :
> > Hi,
> >
> > the latest version of Wine found in koji is 1.1.38, which was released
> > in february this year. The latest mainstream Wine is 1.1.44.
> >
> > Why isn't there a newer version compiled for Fedora?
>
>
Compose started at Sat May 8 08:15:06 UTC 2010
Broken deps for i386
--
almanah-0.7.2-1.fc13.i686 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.11
almanah-0.7.2-1.fc13.i686 requires libedataserverui-1.2.so.8
anjal-0.3.2-2.fc14.i686 r
Hi all,
There is a bug in Fedora package management since FC4 (except Fedora 8)
that potentially affects ALL of the Fedora installation DVD users
(people who are not annoyed by this bug will probably find other
alternatives more suitable (e.g. Live CD install, Network install or the
new BFO if
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
> Hi all,
> There is a bug in Fedora package management since FC4 (except Fedora 8)
> that potentially affects ALL of the Fedora installation DVD users
> (people who are not annoyed by this bug will probably find other
> alternatives more su
Am Samstag, den 08.05.2010, 15:31 +0200 schrieb drago01:
> On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > There is a bug in Fedora package management since FC4 (except Fedora 8)
> > that potentially affects ALL of the Fedora installation DVD users
> > (people who are not
lör 2010-05-08 klockan 00:56 +0200 skrev Guido Grazioli:
> Someone would disagree with me; however i think any decision is taken on
> that topic would be turned in a MUST (depend or not depend) for the sake
> of coherency.
I can only think of rather far-fetched situations where such a
dependency
On 05/08/2010 06:31 AM, drago01 wrote:
> The installation DVD is for installing the system that's it.
That's only part of it. There's around 4GB of data, and more than a few
persons would like to use via PackageKit after the initial install, too.
I frequently install just the "Internet Desktop",
Andreas Bierfert wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-05-08 at 12:20 +0200, drago01 wrote:
>> 2010/5/8 Zoltan Boszormenyi :
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > the latest version of Wine found in koji is 1.1.38, which was released
>> > in february this year. The latest mainstream Wine is 1.1.44.
>> >
>> > Why isn't there a newer
2010/5/8 Matěj Cepl :
> Dne 8.5.2010 03:39, Stephen John Smoogen napsal(a):
>> It is a blessing and it is a curse. Why do more developers show up at
>> conferences these days running Ubuntu or Debian systems.. many who
>> used to run Fedora or RHL? My very non-scientific survey has been that
>> it
On Sat, May 08, 2010 at 12:26:17PM +0200, Pierre-Yves wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-05-07 at 13:24 -0400, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > (Since this might be a regression in gconf2, you might need to still add the
> > %posttrans scriptlet wth the new scriptlets. If Colin knows that this is
> > %a bug that won
On ۱۰/۰۵/۰۸ 06:01, drago01 wrote:
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
Hi all,
There is a bug in Fedora package management since FC4 (except Fedora 8)
that potentially affects ALL of the Fedora installation DVD users
(people who are not annoyed by this bug will probab
Hi again,
/*John Reiser */ wrote on شنبه ۰۸ مه ۱۰، ۱۹:۵۴:۰۳:
On 05/08/2010 06:31 AM, drago01 wrote:
The installation DVD is for installing the system that's it.
That's only part of it. There's around 4GB of data, and more than a few
persons would like to use via PackageKit after
On ۱۰/۰۵/۰۸ 06:01, drago01 wrote:
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
Hi all,
There is a bug in Fedora package management since FC4 (except Fedora 8)
that potentially affects ALL of the Fedora installation DVD users
(people who are not annoyed by this bug will probab
On 08/05/10 19:15, Hedayat Vatnakhah wrote:
>
>>
> Please have a look at the last comments of the bug. Most of the
> implementation is done, the only missing part is how to mount the CD/DVD
> in PackageKit!
>
> Thanks,
> Hedayat
>
>
If you can install "gnome-packagekit-extra" if using Gnome?
Is h
Okay, the patch is being applied with a significant offset but it still
looks like it's going to the right place.
I see that we're calling killall -TERM instead of killall -HUP in the patch.
That seems non-optimal (since it means we'll keep shutting down the gconfd
server instead of letting it use
On Sat, May 08, 2010 at 03:31:04PM +0200, drago01 wrote:
>
> Why?
>
> The installation DVD is for installing the system that's it.
strongly disagree. Many people do not like to spend much time during
installation
to decide which packages to install. It should be easy to do it after
installati
Hi,
I recently was offline for about a week due to health issues and
realized that a number of my packages don't have any co-maintainers or
could use more help and it would be quite nice to have a few more people
taking care of these packages rather than relying solely on me. If
anyone is intere
Compose started at Sat May 8 16:16:06 UTC 2010
Updated Packages:
anaconda-13.41-1.fc13
-
* Fri May 07 2010 David Lehman - 13.41-1
- Remove partitions after unpartitioned non-partition devices. (#588597)
(dlehman)
- Work around device node creation issues when creatin
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 16:21:54 -0500,
> Mike McGrath wrote:
>> Here's a list of f12 -> f13 with unclean update paths based on srpm.
>> I'll work with FES to to go through and get some builds out. Some might
>> make it in to F13 final, some will go out as F13-updates.
Chris Jones wrote:
> Although I am not familiar with what you've mentioned, is there a point
> for the change? I'm curious,
Trademarks.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Christoph Höger wrote:
> Unfortunately g++ also allows one single precompiled header per
> compilation unit. Does anyone know why?
Because a g++ "precompiled header" is more or less a dump of the complete
compiler state, which is loaded and from which compilation continues.
Obviously this can on
On Sun, 2010-05-09 at 02:24 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I recently was offline for about a week due to health issues and
> realized that a number of my packages don't have any co-maintainers or
> could use more help and it would be quite nice to have a few more people
> taking care of t
Hi all,
GTK+ 1.2 has been retired by upstream for 8 years and was deprecated in many
linux disritbutions, e.g. debian arch.
Few applications in our repos now depends on gtk+ 1.2 and there is no
security support for it.
I think it is time to retire it entirely from our repos, though it may break
/*Frank Murphy */ wrote on 05/08/2010 10:51:42 PM
+0450:
On 08/05/10 19:15, Hedayat Vatnakhah wrote:
Please have a look at the last comments of the bug. Most of the
implementation is done, the only missing part is how to mount the CD/DVD
in PackageKit!
Thanks,
Hedayat
30 matches
Mail list logo
