Re: Orphaning Packages

2010-03-30 Thread Nikola Pajkovsky
On 03/29/2010 09:12 PM, Allisson Azevedo wrote: > tcputils -- Utilities for TCP programming in shell-scripts > I will take this one. -- Nikola -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Thanks & comments

2010-03-30 Thread Bob Smith
To all developers & contributors:  Thanks for Fedora C12 - it's beautiful! Just loaded,  & updated it. My linux/unix is rusty but it will come back.  Support information available is enormous, sometimes overwhelming. Yum update bug fix was simple, update was flawless.  Display behavior is phenom

[Test-Announce] Bugzappers Meeting Agenda for 2010-03-30

2010-03-30 Thread Adam Williamson
Event: Fedora Bug Triage Meeting Date: 2010-03-30 Time: 15:00 UTC Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net Additions or corrections to the agenda? Reply to this email. = Agenda = * follow ups * open floor Not much on the agenda this week, but I'll be there in case anyone has topics to brin

Headsup new soname changing parted coming to rawhide

2010-03-30 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, I'm updating parted to the 2.2 release. This is mostly a bugfix update. But one of the fixes is a change in the soname, the soname now no longer is in the form of parted-2.x.so, but instead has become a regular versioned soname. The positive side of this is that we no longer will need to rebu

Re: Thanks & comments

2010-03-30 Thread Michael Cronenworth
Bob Smith wrote: > Display behavior is phenomenal, *but* lost dual-monitor background > double-span after update (I will read the docs and work on it myself). The latest gnome-desktop package adds that back as the "Span" option in your background wallpaper settings. See the bug[1] for more info.

Re: FC12 update repo broken?

2010-03-30 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 10:18 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 03/30/2010 05:40 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >> >> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Ralf Corsepius >>  wrote: >>> >>> On 03/29/2010 07:44 PM, Jesse Keating wrote: >> >>> My conclusion from this: Either fedora's mirror manager is dysf

Broken dependencies: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIProfile

2010-03-30 Thread buildsys
perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIProfile has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIProfile-0.07-1.fc14.noarch requires perl(HTML::BarGraph) perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIProfile-0.07-1.fc14.noarch requires perl(SVG::TT::Graph::Bar) On

Re: FC12 update repo broken?

2010-03-30 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 03/30/2010 05:15 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 10:18 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > >> On 03/30/2010 05:40 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Ralf Corsepius >>> wrote: >>> On 03/29/2010 07:44 PM, Jesse Keatin

rawhide report: 20100330 changes

2010-03-30 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Tue Mar 30 08:15:05 UTC 2010 Broken deps for i386 -- anaconda-14.2-1.fc14.i686 requires fcoe-utils >= 0:1.0.12-2.20100323git emotion-0.1.0.042-5.fc12.i686 requires libecore_job.so.0 emotion-0.1.0.042

Re: [389-devel] Re-engaging the Samba4 LDAP backend

2010-03-30 Thread masarati
> I'm trying to pick up the ball again on the OpenLDAP and Fedora DS > backends, and hopefully to bring them back up to speed as a working and > respectable solution. > > LDB will always be the Samba Team's primary backend for Samba4. This is > particularly the case as there seems no reasonable pr

[Test-Announce] F-13-Beta Go/No-Go Meeting @ 2010-04-01 00:00 UTC (2010-03-31 @ 8pm EDT)

2010-03-30 Thread James Laska
# F-13-Beta Go/No-Go meeting # Date: 2010-04-01 # Time: 00:00 UTC (20:00 EDT, 17:00 PDT) # Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net Before each public release Development, QA, and Release Engineering meet to determine if the release criteria are met for a particular release. This meeting is

Re: Drop Xorg Nv driver?

2010-03-30 Thread Kevin Kofler
Mihai Limbasan wrote: > They are deprecating it on *new* hardware - the Fermi architecture and > the follow-ups. They explicitely state that they're going to continue > supporting it on existing hardware for the foreseeable future, within > reason. I don't see why it should get dropped yet. Beca

Re: Maximum length of userid on Fedora Linux

2010-03-30 Thread Kevin Kofler
Miloslav Trmač wrote: > Oh. In that case, use LOGIN_NAME_MAX from (256 on my > system). Does that include the terminating '\0' or should the buffer actually be sized LOGIN_NAME_MAX+1? Kevin Kofler -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mai

Re: Maximum length of userid on Fedora Linux

2010-03-30 Thread Miloslav Trmač
Kevin Kofler píše v Út 30. 03. 2010 v 20:51 +0200: > Miloslav Trmač wrote: > > Oh. In that case, use LOGIN_NAME_MAX from (256 on my > > system). > > Does that include the terminating '\0' or should the buffer actually be > sized LOGIN_NAME_MAX+1? It doesn't really matter, the practical limit i

F-13 Branched report: 20100330 changes

2010-03-30 Thread Branched Report
Compose started at Tue Mar 30 09:15:05 UTC 2010 Broken deps for i386 -- gnome-web-photo-0.9-4.fc13.i686 requires gecko-libs = 0:1.9.2.1 hornsey-1.5.2-0.1.fc13.i686 requires libclutter-gst-0.10.so.0 libnodeupdown-backen

Summary / Minutes for the 2010-03-30 FESCo meeting

2010-03-30 Thread Kevin Fenzi
=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2010-03-30) === Meeting started by nirik at 19:00:01 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-03-30/fesco.2010-03-30-19.00.log.html Meeting summary -

License change: swarp

2010-03-30 Thread Sergio Pascual
Hi all: the new version of swarp in rawhide (2.17.6) will have a CeCILL license. Previously, swarp was distributed under GPLv2 Regards -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: License change: swarp

2010-03-30 Thread Seth Vidal
On Tue, 30 Mar 2010, Sergio Pascual wrote: > Hi all: > > the new version of swarp in rawhide (2.17.6) will have a CeCILL > license. Previously, swarp was distributed under GPLv2 Which CeCILL license will it be? -sv -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproje

Re: Drop Xorg Nv driver?

2010-03-30 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2010-03-27 at 11:44 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 05:36:29AM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Nvidia has announced that they are deprecating it > > > > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg/2010-March/049749.html > > > > They are recommending

Re: Update testing policy: how to use Bodhi

2010-03-30 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2010-03-27 at 16:33 +0100, Till Maas wrote: > I have some additions: > > 7. fixes bug X, but does not claim to fix it > > This can often happen with hardware related bugs, e.g. with the kernel > where something starts to work again Oh, yes, I like that. Then the update text could be upd

Re: Drop Xorg Nv driver?

2010-03-30 Thread Sam Varshavchik
Adam Williamson writes: On Sat, 2010-03-27 at 11:44 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: Has to be said that I've always had better luck with nv. Nouveau has "seemed" to be very unstable to me (although it's always been hard to pin down actual reproducible bugs). I never used and don't care abou

Re: Upstream bugs vs. Fedora bugs: KDE people do it wrong

2010-03-30 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 13:35 +0200, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > On Monday 29 March 2010 13:09:46 Christoph Wickert wrote: > > I am irritated by the way the KDE SIG and the KDE bugzappers handle > > bugs. For most bugs that are reported they demand the reporter to file > > an upstream bug report at bugs

Re: Upstream bugs vs. Fedora bugs: KDE people do it wrong

2010-03-30 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 13:59 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 03/29/2010 01:38 PM, Oliver Falk wrote: > > I had similar issues already and I totally agree with Christoph! > Me too. > > Except that I would not want to restrict this complaint to Fedora KDE. > > There are many other maintainers who

Re: Upstream bugs vs. Fedora bugs: KDE people do it wrong

2010-03-30 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 14:11 +0200, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > On Monday 29 March 2010 14:03:51 Yaakov Nemoy wrote: > > 2010/3/29 Michał Piotrowski : > > > 2010/3/29 Oliver Falk : > > >> I had similar issues already and I totally agree with Christoph! > > >> The maintainer should not redirect the bugr

Re: Upstream bugs vs. Fedora bugs: KDE people do it wrong

2010-03-30 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 14:20 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > As a user, having been hit by a bug, "CLOSED UPSTREAM" is nothing but a > cheap bold lie packagers use as weak excuse to for not being able to fix > a bug having hit a user. > > In other words: "FIXED UPSTREAM" does not fix anything for

Re: Upstream bugs vs. Fedora bugs: KDE people do it wrong

2010-03-30 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 09:13 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 15:10 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote: > > > > > But still bugs are fixed by program developers not Fedora developers. > > IMO 'Fedora developers' (really, what you mean here are packagers, I > guess) should strive

Re: FC12 update repo broken?

2010-03-30 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 10:44 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 17:31 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > * Somebody at rel-eng failed to do his job ;) > > That file exists on the master mirror, so your favorite punching bag > doesn't seem to be the blame this time. Aw, c'mon, Jesse.

Re: setuid binary for beep program

2010-03-30 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 20:59 +0200, Jan Klepek wrote: > Hi, > > I'm looking for a way how to correctly have beep program[1] with setuid > binary (I mean, what is correct process for this from maintainer point > of view? Or what should be done except change in spec file). I saw > http://fedoraprojec

Re: Drop Xorg Nv driver?

2010-03-30 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 19:32 -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > Adam Williamson writes: > > > On Sat, 2010-03-27 at 11:44 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > >> > >> Has to be said that I've always had better luck with nv. Nouveau has > >> "seemed" to be very unstable to me (although it's always been

Re: Drop Xorg Nv driver?

2010-03-30 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 20:47 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Mihai Limbasan wrote: > > They are deprecating it on *new* hardware - the Fermi architecture and > > the follow-ups. They explicitely state that they're going to continue > > supporting it on existing hardware for the foreseeable future, wi

Re: Drop Xorg Nv driver?

2010-03-30 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 16:48:06 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > If you're on f13, you can install mesa-dri-drivers-experimental and try > it. If it breaks you get to keep both pieces :) Please update us on when he is ready for bug reports for that version. Several 3d games don't work. -- d

Re: Upstream bugs vs. Fedora bugs: KDE people do it wrong

2010-03-30 Thread Jeff Spaleta
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > I don't think there's ever an absolute answer to this question. > Sometimes it makes more sense for the original reporter to report > upstream - in which case the maintainer should politely ask them to; > sometimes it makes more sense for t

Re: Drop Xorg Nv driver?

2010-03-30 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
> "BW" == Bruno Wolff writes: BW> Please update us on when he is ready for bug reports for that BW> version. Several 3d games don't work. I don't think anything's actually expected to work at this point. - J< -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.

Re: Drop Xorg Nv driver?

2010-03-30 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 18:52 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 16:48:06 -0700, > Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > If you're on f13, you can install mesa-dri-drivers-experimental and try > > it. If it breaks you get to keep both pieces :) > > Please update us on when he is re

Re: Upstream bugs vs. Fedora bugs: KDE people do it wrong

2010-03-30 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 15:56 -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > I don't think there's ever an absolute answer to this question. > > Sometimes it makes more sense for the original reporter to report > > upstream - in which case the maintainer sho

Re: Upstream bugs vs. Fedora bugs: KDE people do it wrong

2010-03-30 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 03/31/2010 01:36 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 14:20 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > >> As a user, having been hit by a bug, "CLOSED UPSTREAM" is nothing but a >> cheap bold lie packagers use as weak excuse to for not being able to fix >> a bug having hit a user. >> >> In oth

Re: Drop Xorg Nv driver?

2010-03-30 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 17:44:48 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 18:52 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 16:48:06 -0700, > > Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > > > If you're on f13, you can install mesa-dri-drivers-experimental and try > > > it. If i

Re: Upstream bugs vs. Fedora bugs: KDE people do it wrong

2010-03-30 Thread Linuxguy123
On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 13:09 +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote: > I am irritated by the way the KDE SIG and the KDE bugzappers handle > bugs. For most bugs that are reported they demand the reporter to file > an upstream bug report at bugs.kde.org and set the bug to NEEDINFO. If > the reporter doesn't

Re: FC12 update repo broken?

2010-03-30 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 03/31/2010 01:39 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 10:44 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: >> On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 17:31 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: >>> * Somebody at rel-eng failed to do his job ;) >> >> That file exists on the master mirror, so your favorite punching bag >> doesn'

Re: Upstream bugs vs. Fedora bugs: KDE people do it wrong

2010-03-30 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 8:04 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 03/31/2010 01:36 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: >> On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 14:20 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: >> >>> As a user, having been hit by a bug, "CLOSED UPSTREAM" is nothing but a >>> cheap bold lie packagers use as weak excuse to for

Re: Drop Xorg Nv driver?

2010-03-30 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 21:11 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 17:44:48 -0700, > Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 18:52 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 16:48:06 -0700, > > > Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > > > > > If you're on f

[Test-Announce] Fedora 13 Beta RC#2 Available for testing Now!

2010-03-30 Thread He Rui
Greetings testers, F13 Beta RC2 has been uploaded for testing. I've summarized main issues on Beta RC1[1] and highlighted related test cases on current matrices of the following links. Please test them as first priority to make sure they meet the beta release criteria[2]: Installation: https

rpms/perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib/devel dead.package,1.1,NONE

2010-03-30 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
Author: mmaslano Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib/devel In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv15670 Removed Files: dead.package Log Message: Resurect this package. --- dead.package DELETED --- -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki

rpms/perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib/F-13 dead.package,1.1,NONE

2010-03-30 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
Author: mmaslano Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib/F-13 In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv17047 Removed Files: dead.package Log Message: * Mon Mar 29 2010 Marcela Mašláňová 2.024-2 - split again from main package for updated version --- dead.package