On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 13:35 +0200, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > On Monday 29 March 2010 13:09:46 Christoph Wickert wrote: > > I am irritated by the way the KDE SIG and the KDE bugzappers handle > > bugs. For most bugs that are reported they demand the reporter to file > > an upstream bug report at bugs.kde.org and set the bug to NEEDINFO. If > > the reporter doesn't respond, the bug is closed NOTABUG or WONTFIX. But > > if the bug has been reported upstream, the Fedora bug gets closed > > UPSTREAM. Ether way, the bug gets closed, no matter if it was actually > > fixed or not. > > <Citation from Bugzilla help> > UPSTREAM
That page is not the appropriate reference for Fedora, as it actually says at the top. The canonical Fedora reference is https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/BugStatusWorkFlow . -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
