Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-12-01 Thread Matthew Miller
On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 12:22:26PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > [I posted to the Fedora Council list, but reposting here for wider > distribution.] Looks like Thursday at 4pm US/Eastern works best for most people (Everyone who responded but @pingou and @davdunc — sorry.) We’ll meet at https://m

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-30 Thread Matthew Miller
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 03:43:34PM +0100, Kamil Paral wrote: > - Create an account with some Matrix server, and join my favorite Fedora > channels from there? > - Or wait until some formal decision is reached and possibly the Fedora > Matrix server is available? I don't think it'll matter. > - Wi

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-30 Thread Matthew Miller
On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 02:49:54AM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > As I understand it, the Matrix-IRC bridge is "bidirectional" in the sense > that it relays messages both ways, but not in the sense that an IRC user > would be able to connect to an arbitrary Matrix channel with an IRC clie

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-30 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2020-11-30 at 10:45 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 8:17 am, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > >  - Will there be any advantage in using the Fedora server over > > > others? > > > > Not really I wouldn't think. Other I suppose than identifying you as a > > Fedora community

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-30 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 8:17 am, Kevin Fenzi wrote: - Will there be any advantage in using the Fedora server over others? Not really I wouldn't think. Other I suppose than identifying you as a Fedora community member. No, there is a big advantage to using a Fedora server. matrix.org is rep

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-30 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 03:43:34PM +0100, Kamil Paral wrote: > As someone who hates IRC with passion (including the necessity of > maintaining a znc instance and dealing with IRC authentication and network > issues from time to time) and would love to jump to a more modern solution > ASAP, what is

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-30 Thread Kamil Paral
As someone who hates IRC with passion (including the necessity of maintaining a znc instance and dealing with IRC authentication and network issues from time to time) and would love to jump to a more modern solution ASAP, what is the best course of action for me now? - Create an account with some

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-27 Thread Kevin Kofler via devel
Adam Williamson wrote: > The problem is that bridging to existing IRC channels severely dilutes > one of the main appeals of Matrix - being more welcoming to new users > familiar with modern chat system norms. Maybe the way to make everyone happy would be to bridge the other way round, i.e., an I

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-27 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
On 11/27/20 5:49 PM, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: As I understand it, the Matrix-IRC bridge is "bidirectional" in the sense that it relays messages both ways, but not in the sense that an IRC user would be able to connect to an arbitrary Matrix channel with an IRC client the way it allows a Matr

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-27 Thread Kevin Kofler via devel
Erich Eickmeyer wrote: > False. The bridges are bidirectional. As I understand it, the Matrix-IRC bridge is "bidirectional" in the sense that it relays messages both ways, but not in the sense that an IRC user would be able to connect to an arbitrary Matrix channel with an IRC client the way it

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-27 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2020-11-27 at 13:53 +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > > Considering that Matrix can bridge to IRC channels and not the opposite, I > also think that moving to native Matrix mainly just degrades > interoperatibility. The problem is that bridging to existing IRC channels severely dil

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-27 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
On 11/27/20 4:53 AM, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: Considering that Matrix can bridge to IRC channels and not the opposite, I also think that moving to native Matrix mainly just degrades interoperatibility. False. The bridges are bidirectional. -- Erich Eickmeyer Maintainer Fedora Jam _

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-27 Thread Kevin Kofler via devel
Matthew Miller wrote: > As mentioned, we're looking at moving the Fedora Council's main chat to > Matrix. And as part of that, we're considering a hosted Element server -- > which obviously could go quite beyond just #fedora-council. Neal suggested > a video meeting to talk with interested people a

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-22 Thread Eduard Lucena
Can we all stop talking about Discord? The Council is trying to update their communications platforms and the options were clearly stated: - Discourse (not Discord, please notice the difference in their names) replacing ML - Matrix replacing IRC. In both cases the Council is looking to keep all

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-21 Thread Radka Gustavsson
On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 6:59 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > On Sat, 2020-11-21 at 12:01 +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 20.11.2020 19:52, Radka Gustavsson wrote: > > > Discord is in fact an amazing chat platform for the end user that > > > doesn't have a peer out there. > > > > 1. Prop

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-21 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2020-11-21 at 12:01 +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > On 20.11.2020 19:52, Radka Gustavsson wrote: > > Discord is in fact an amazing chat platform for the end user that > > doesn't have a peer out there. > > 1. Proprietary software. The open source community should not use > propr

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-21 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
On 20.11.2020 20:17, Jared K. Smith wrote: As I recall, it puts a small "(edited)" notice at the end of the line to let you know that it was edited. Yes. And if you click on it, you will see the complete difference. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) ___

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-21 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
On 20.11.2020 19:52, Kevin Fenzi wrote: IMHO editing is fine, as long as it notes it was edited and provides you a way to see what was changed. I have no idea how the matrix editing works however. In the Matrix, you can see the complete differences for each edited message. -- Sincerely, Vita

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-21 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
On 20.11.2020 19:52, Radka Gustavsson wrote: Discord is in fact an amazing chat platform for the end user that doesn't have a peer out there. 1. Proprietary software. The open source community should not use proprietary software as the official chat source. 2. Discord has the worst ToS[1] I'v

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-20 Thread Daniel Pocock
On 19/11/2020 19:17, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 1:09 PM Daniel Pocock wrote: >> >> >> >> On 19/11/2020 18:55, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >>> On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 06:50:21PM +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: On 19.11.2020 18:34, Radka Gustavsson wrote: > Rich, IRC

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-20 Thread John M. Harris Jr
On Friday, November 20, 2020 11:52:46 AM MST Radka Gustavsson wrote: > On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 6:03 PM John M. Harris Jr > > wrote: > > On Thursday, November 19, 2020 11:17:15 AM MST Neal Gompa wrote: > > > The move to having our own Matrix server is being driven by Fedora > > > subcommunities al

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-20 Thread Jared K. Smith
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 2:00 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > IMHO editing is fine, as long as it notes it was edited and provides you > a way to see what was changed. I have no idea how the matrix editing > works however. > As I recall, it puts a small "(edited)" notice at the end of the line to let you

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-20 Thread Radka Gustavsson
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 7:56 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 11:27:08AM +0100, Marius Schwarz wrote: > > Am 19.11.20 um 21:13 schrieb José Abílio Matos: > > > > > > On Thursday, November 19, 2020 5:54:52 PM WET Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > > > > I'm not sure that message edit

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-20 Thread Radka Gustavsson
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 6:03 PM John M. Harris Jr wrote: > On Thursday, November 19, 2020 11:17:15 AM MST Neal Gompa wrote: > > The move to having our own Matrix server is being driven by Fedora > > subcommunities already wanting to move primacy from IRC to Matrix. > > Many of our adjunct upstrea

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-20 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 11:27:08AM +0100, Marius Schwarz wrote: > Am 19.11.20 um 21:13 schrieb José Abílio Matos: > > > > On Thursday, November 19, 2020 5:54:52 PM WET Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > > I'm not sure that message editing is a feature. > > > > > > In fairness as long as the grac

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-20 Thread Simo Sorce
On Fri, 2020-11-20 at 09:14 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2020-11-20 at 08:32 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote: > > On Thu, 2020-11-19 at 23:14 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 02:06:46AM +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski > > > wrote: > > > > > > No, you don't. I've

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-20 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2020-11-20 at 08:32 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Thu, 2020-11-19 at 23:14 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 02:06:46AM +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski > > wrote: > > > > > No, you don't. I've just joined a random room without any kind of > > > > > registration

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-20 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
On 20.11.2020 17:59, John M. Harris Jr wrote: Given that the use of proprietary software, where a superior Free alternative exists, is against the Four Foundations, it's questionable that they'd be Discord users. Discord also has the worst terms of service I've ever seen. -- Sincerely, Vital

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-20 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2020-11-20 at 11:19 +0100, Marius Schwarz wrote: > Am 19.11.20 um 23:42 schrieb Adam Williamson: > > The chat history persistence - and seamless use across devices - is a > > huge advantage. The other advantage is that you can sign up for and use > > this system simply and entirely in a web

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-20 Thread John M. Harris Jr
On Thursday, November 19, 2020 11:17:15 AM MST Neal Gompa wrote: > The move to having our own Matrix server is being driven by Fedora > subcommunities already wanting to move primacy from IRC to Matrix. > Many of our adjunct upstreams have done so (Mozilla, KDE, etc.) or are > in the process of doi

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-20 Thread John M. Harris Jr
On Thursday, November 19, 2020 10:34:28 AM MST Radka Gustavsson wrote: > On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 6:11 PM Richard W.M. Jones > > wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 12:22:26PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > > > [I posted to the Fedora Council list, but reposting here for wider > > > distribution.]

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-20 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
On 20.11.2020 17:18, Matthew Miller wrote: Yes, I don't see why not. As I understand it, if your server becomes a source of spam or whatever, we can block it. But I trust that it won't. Public registration is disabled on it. Only me and my friends can use it. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vi

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-20 Thread Matthew Miller
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 08:44:32AM +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > >In this case for our server, we would use FAS single-sign-on for > >accounts. > But this server should support Matrix federation feature. We > shouldn't force users to use only this server in order to be able to > particip

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-20 Thread Simo Sorce
On Thu, 2020-11-19 at 23:14 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 02:06:46AM +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski > wrote: > > > > No, you don't. I've just joined a random room without any kind of > > > > registration. Try it yourself if you don't believe me: > > > > https://app.

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-20 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
On 20.11.2020 10:46, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: How does a server become federated? You need to open port 8448/tcp and add an SRV DNS record: _matrix._tcp.example.org. 3600 IN SRV 10 0 8448 example.org. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-20 Thread Marius Schwarz
Am 19.11.20 um 21:13 schrieb José Abílio Matos: On Thursday, November 19, 2020 5:54:52 PM WET Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > I'm not sure that message editing is a feature. In fairness as long as the grace period is fixed and small that is not a bad thing. E.g it allows you to fix lots of cas

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-20 Thread Marius Schwarz
Am 19.11.20 um 23:42 schrieb Adam Williamson: The chat history persistence - and seamless use across devices - is a huge advantage. The other advantage is that you can sign up for and use this system simply and entirely in a web browser, a process people are comfortable with. It is similar to sys

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-20 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Friday, 20 November 2020 at 08:41, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > On 20.11.2020 02:06, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > I know the difference and yes, you're able to participate without > > registration in that room. > > There are free levels of privacy settings: > 1. join via invit

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-19 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
On 19.11.2020 23:11, Michael Catanzaro wrote: Enjoy: https://github.com/matrix-org/purple-matrix/ I suggest not using purple-matrix as it doesn't support most of the protocol features such as quotes, replies, message editing, etc. due to libpurple's internal limitations (immutable history).

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-19 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
On 19.11.2020 23:55, Matthew Miller wrote: In this case for our server, we would use FAS single-sign-on for accounts. But this server should support Matrix federation feature. We shouldn't force users to use only this server in order to be able to participate in discussions. I already have my

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-19 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
On 20.11.2020 02:06, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: I know the difference and yes, you're able to participate without registration in that room. There are free levels of privacy settings: 1. join via invitation; 2. public group with guests; 3. public room without guests. Most of rooms k

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-19 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
On 20.11.2020 05:14, Matthew Miller wrote: When I view this room in a private browser window, I can see the conversation, but at the bottom, it says "Join the conversation with an account" and presents "Sign In" / "Sign Up" buttons. In the room settings, admins can enable or disable guests (use

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-19 Thread Benson Muite
I'm not going to give a firm recommendation for or against any platform but I'd like to make two suggestions: a) why not slow the process down and allow more ideas to come forward? There is no urgent need to change things in a month or whatever. This is a reasonable suggestion. Since one can br

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-19 Thread Matthew Miller
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 02:06:46AM +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > > No, you don't. I've just joined a random room without any kind of > > > registration. Try it yourself if you don't believe me: > > > https://app.element.io/#/room/#lounge:privacytools.io > > You are able to view i

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-19 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Friday, 20 November 2020 at 02:01, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 7:56 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > > > No, you don't. I've just joined a random room without any kind of > > registration. Try it yourself if you don't believe me: > > https://app.element.io/#/room

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-19 Thread Rahul Sundaram
Hi On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 7:56 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > No, you don't. I've just joined a random room without any kind of > registration. Try it yourself if you don't believe me: > https://app.element.io/#/room/#lounge:privacytools.io > You are able to view it but are you a

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-19 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Thursday, 19 November 2020 at 23:52, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 11:37 pm, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski > wrote: > > Instead of channels, you have rooms and users can be either > > unregistered or registered, just like on IRC. > > No, you have to register. No, you do

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-19 Thread Dan Čermák
Elliott Sales de Andrade writes: >> > I honestly can see exactly zero downsides to using a Matrix setup as >> > compared to using IRC, and a giant pile of upsides, starting with "I no >> > longer need to dedicate a small portion of my brain to remembering how >> > my IRC bouncer setup works and m

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-19 Thread Elliott Sales de Andrade
On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 at 14:44, Tom Hughes via devel wrote: > > On 19/11/2020 19:25, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > I mean, I'm an old fogey too, but at *some* point we do have to accept > > that new things can be actively better. > > True. > > > I honestly can see exactly zero downsides to using a Ma

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-19 Thread Neal Gompa
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 5:55 PM Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 04:52:56PM -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > wrote: > > > Instead of channels, you have rooms and users can be either > > >unregistered or registered, just like on IRC. > > No, you have to register. > > In this ca

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-19 Thread Matthew Miller
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 04:52:56PM -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > wrote: > > Instead of channels, you have rooms and users can be either > >unregistered or registered, just like on IRC. > No, you have to register. In this case for our server, we would use FAS single-sign-on for accounts. --

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-19 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 11:37 pm, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: Instead of channels, you have rooms and users can be either unregistered or registered, just like on IRC. No, you have to register. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedora

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-19 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2020-11-19 at 23:37 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > On Thursday, 19 November 2020 at 21:46, Erich Eickmeyer wrote: > > On 11/19/20 12:32 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > > I don't know how Matrix works exactly... > > Then I suggest educating yourself. Go to eleme

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-19 Thread Matthew Miller
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 11:37:05PM +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > Oh and it's extremely slow compared to IRC. The federation you mean, or in general? It is true that the free matrix.org can get overwhelmed; this is one of the reasons for having our own server. -- Matthew Miller

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-19 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Thursday, 19 November 2020 at 21:46, Erich Eickmeyer wrote: > On 11/19/20 12:32 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > I don't know how Matrix works exactly... > Then I suggest educating yourself. Go to element.io and check it out. So I did and it's not that different from IRC from an en

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-19 Thread Matthew Miller
On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 12:22:26PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: >http://whenisgood.net/k5brwbd FWIW so far tomorrow and next week are (not surprisingly given the US holidays) much less popular than the week of November 30, so let's continue the discussion here and on the Discourse thread. htt

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-19 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 7:43 pm, Tom Hughes via devel wrote: There's also the fact that unless I can get it to talk to all the same chat systems I have pidgin talking to I would need to be running two clients instead of one. Enjoy: https://github.com/matrix-org/purple-matrix/ __

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-19 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
On 11/19/20 12:32 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: I don't know how Matrix works exactly... Then I suggest educating yourself. Go to element.io and check it out. If you don't know what it is or how it works, then why chime-in? That adds nothing to the conversation if you don't know wh

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-19 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Thursday, 19 November 2020 at 19:47, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > On 19.11.2020 19:31, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > Just like IRC. > > No. If the FreeNode network goes down, all Fedora IRC chats will > disappear. Network consists of multiple servers. They'd all have to go dow

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-19 Thread José Abílio Matos
On Thursday, November 19, 2020 5:54:52 PM WET Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > I'm not sure that message editing is a feature. In fairness as long as the grace period is fixed and small that is not a bad thing. E.g it allows you to fix lots of cases where you found that the message was incomplete aft

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-19 Thread Tomasz Torcz
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 08:00:24PM +, Tom Hughes via devel wrote: > On 19/11/2020 19:49, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > The GNOME-based one is Fractal, which is not available in Fedora as of > > right now. That said, the Qt based ones are in way better shape than > > the GNOME one. And QGnomePlatform

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-19 Thread Tom Hughes via devel
On 19/11/2020 19:49, Neal Gompa wrote: The GNOME-based one is Fractal, which is not available in Fedora as of right now. That said, the Qt based ones are in way better shape than the GNOME one. And QGnomePlatform should make them work reasonably well... My problem, at least on this hidpi lapto

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-19 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2020-11-19 at 19:43 +, Tom Hughes via devel wrote: > > No doubt there are others I can try... https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Fractal -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net ___

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-19 Thread Neal Gompa
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 2:44 PM Tom Hughes via devel wrote: > > On 19/11/2020 19:25, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > I mean, I'm an old fogey too, but at *some* point we do have to accept > > that new things can be actively better. > > True. > > > I honestly can see exactly zero downsides to using a

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-19 Thread Tom Hughes via devel
On 19/11/2020 19:25, Adam Williamson wrote: I mean, I'm an old fogey too, but at *some* point we do have to accept that new things can be actively better. True. I honestly can see exactly zero downsides to using a Matrix setup as compared to using IRC, and a giant pile of upsides, starting w

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-19 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 at 14:25, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2020-11-19 at 14:15 -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > > My apologies for that misinformation. While a federated chat system is a > > network of servers for people being social, I should not tie them in the > > same crappile as

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-19 Thread Matthew Miller
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 05:55:49PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 06:50:21PM +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > No, please. IRC bridges need to be closed to force users to switch > > to Matrix. > "force"? You may have said the quiet bit aloud ... To be clear, V

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-19 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2020-11-19 at 14:15 -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > My apologies for that misinformation. While a federated chat system is a > network of servers for people being social, I should not tie them in the > same crappile as Social Networks where my logins and engagement are > measured a

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-19 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 at 13:29, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2020-11-19 at 13:23 -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 at 12:57, Richard W.M. Jones > wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 06:50:21PM +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel > wrote: > > > > On 19.11.2020 18:34, R

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-19 Thread Matthew Miller
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 05:53:29PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > I too love dinosaurs... but I also work on 4 different computers and two > > mobile > > devices every day. Having to literally switch hardware to participate in IRC > > meetings is pain in the ass for some of our contributors

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-19 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2020-11-19 at 19:28 +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > On 19.11.2020 19:16, Adam Williamson wrote: > > If we use a central server, only one server needs maintaining, and the > > problem is solved for everyone. The benefit seems pretty clear. > > Matrix don't need a central server. Th

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-19 Thread Matthew Miller
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 05:08:08PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > There's quite a lot wrong here - a video meeting(!) to discuss > dropping a commonly used and well established channel of > communication. Well, I guess at least you didn't decide to use the > proprietary awfulness of Slack. >

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-19 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
On 19.11.2020 19:31, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: Just like IRC. No. If the FreeNode network goes down, all Fedora IRC chats will disappear. In Matrix if one server will stop working, users can easily switch to another and continue chatting. All messages will be saved. Also users f

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-19 Thread Neal Gompa
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 1:32 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > On Thursday, 19 November 2020 at 19:28, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 19.11.2020 19:16, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > If we use a central server, only one server needs maintaining, and the > > > problem is solved for

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-19 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Thursday, 19 November 2020 at 19:28, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > On 19.11.2020 19:16, Adam Williamson wrote: > > If we use a central server, only one server needs maintaining, and the > > problem is solved for everyone. The benefit seems pretty clear. > > Matrix don't need a central serve

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-19 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
On 19.11.2020 19:16, Adam Williamson wrote: If we use a central server, only one server needs maintaining, and the problem is solved for everyone. The benefit seems pretty clear. Matrix don't need a central server. This is a federated network. All rooms are hosted on multiple servers. -- Sin

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-19 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2020-11-19 at 13:23 -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 at 12:57, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 06:50:21PM +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > > On 19.11.2020 18:34, Radka Gustavsson wrote: > > > > Rich, IRC is not being dropped, it is

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-19 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 at 12:57, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 06:50:21PM +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 19.11.2020 18:34, Radka Gustavsson wrote: > > >Rich, IRC is not being dropped, it is being bridged to modern, > > >"IRC-native" (for lack of better word in m

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-19 Thread Neal Gompa
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 1:09 PM Daniel Pocock wrote: > > > > On 19/11/2020 18:55, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 06:50:21PM +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > >> On 19.11.2020 18:34, Radka Gustavsson wrote: > >>> Rich, IRC is not being dropped, it is being bridged to m

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-19 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2020-11-19 at 17:53 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 06:34:28PM +0100, Radka Gustavsson wrote: > > Let me start off: > > > > What's the reason why hosting your own server for a fairly uncommon > > chat protocol is better than continuing to use IRC? > >

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-19 Thread Daniel Pocock
On 19/11/2020 18:55, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 06:50:21PM +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: >> On 19.11.2020 18:34, Radka Gustavsson wrote: >>> Rich, IRC is not being dropped, it is being bridged to modern, >>> "IRC-native" (for lack of better word in my vocabulary

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-19 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 06:50:21PM +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > On 19.11.2020 18:34, Radka Gustavsson wrote: > >Rich, IRC is not being dropped, it is being bridged to modern, > >"IRC-native" (for lack of better word in my vocabulary) platform. > >Contributors who prefer to stay on IRC

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-19 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 06:46:31PM +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > On 19.11.2020 18:08, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > >What's the reason why hosting your own server for a fairly uncommon > >chat protocol is better than continuing to use IRC? > > IRC is a legacy protocol with no support for

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-19 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
On 19.11.2020 18:49, Sérgio Basto wrote: How I install matrix/element in my desktop ? I suggest you install nheko instead of Element: sudo dnf install nheko P.S. Fedora 33 is required for nheko due to an ancient version of Boost in Fedora 32. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycodin

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-19 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 06:34:28PM +0100, Radka Gustavsson wrote: > Let me start off: > > What's the reason why hosting your own server for a fairly uncommon > chat protocol is better than continuing to use IRC? > > > I too love dinosaurs... but I also work on 4 different computers a

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-19 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
On 19.11.2020 18:34, Radka Gustavsson wrote: Rich, IRC is not being dropped, it is being bridged to modern, "IRC-native" (for lack of better word in my vocabulary) platform. Contributors who prefer to stay on IRC are welcome to do so and won't really notice any difference. No, please. IRC bri

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-19 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Thu, 2020-11-19 at 18:34 +0100, Radka Gustavsson wrote: > On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 6:11 PM Richard W.M. Jones > wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 12:22:26PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > > > > > [I posted to the Fedora Council list, but reposting here for > > wider > > > > > distribution.] >

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-19 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
On 19.11.2020 18:08, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: What's the reason why hosting your own server for a fairly uncommon chat protocol is better than continuing to use IRC? IRC is a legacy protocol with no support for modern features like message editing, history, etc. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaits

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-19 Thread Radka Gustavsson
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 6:11 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 12:22:26PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > > [I posted to the Fedora Council list, but reposting here for wider > > distribution.] > > > > As mentioned, we're looking at moving the Fedora Council's main chat to > >

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-19 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 12:22:26PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > [I posted to the Fedora Council list, but reposting here for wider > distribution.] > > As mentioned, we're looking at moving the Fedora Council's main chat to > Matrix. And as part of that, we're considering a hosted Element server

video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

2020-11-18 Thread Matthew Miller
[I posted to the Fedora Council list, but reposting here for wider distribution.] As mentioned, we're looking at moving the Fedora Council's main chat to Matrix. And as part of that, we're considering a hosted Element server -- which obviously could go quite beyond just #fedora-council. Neal sugge