On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 20:24 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Wed, 25.05.11 13:04, Petr Lautrbach (plaut...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> >
> > On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 11:33:50AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > today this update:
> > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/upstar
On 05/26/2011 12:44 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 05/26/2011 03:45 PM, Petr Lautrbach wrote:
>> Ok, I admit that I should have sent announcement to allow wider awareness.
>>
>> upstart-1.0 branch is in fact minor update of upstart-0.6.5, it was just
>> declared stable.
>>
>> .override files [1] i
On 05/26/2011 04:25 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> It's a feature for system administrators, not for Fedora packages. You'll
> have to ask system administrators whether and how they intend to make use of
> this.
My question, why push these features into an update, when you have no
idea whether it is
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 05/26/2011 03:45 PM, Petr Lautrbach wrote:
>> Ok, I admit that I should have sent announcement to allow wider
>> awareness.
>>
>> upstart-1.0 branch is in fact minor update of upstart-0.6.5, it was just
>> declared stable.
>>
>> .override files [1] in upstart allows admi
On 05/26/2011 03:45 PM, Petr Lautrbach wrote:
> Ok, I admit that I should have sent announcement to allow wider awareness.
>
> upstart-1.0 branch is in fact minor update of upstart-0.6.5, it was just
> declared stable.
>
> .override files [1] in upstart allows admin to change behaviour of upstart
On 05/25/2011 09:33 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 05/25/2011 04:34 PM, Petr Lautrbach wrote:
>> upstart-1.2-2 hasn't changed upstart behavior. It fixes upstream bugs and
>> also adds new
>> features like new stanzas (manual,debug) and also .override files
>> feature adapted from Ubuntu.
>
> We do
On 05/25/2011 08:24 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Wed, 25.05.11 13:04, Petr Lautrbach (plaut...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
>>
>> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 11:33:50AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> today this update:
>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/upstart-1.2-2.fc14
>>> got pus
On 05/25/2011 04:34 PM, Petr Lautrbach wrote:
> upstart-1.2-2 hasn't changed upstart behavior. It fixes upstream bugs and
> also adds new
> features like new stanzas (manual,debug) and also .override files
> feature adapted from Ubuntu.
We don't do feature additions like this in a existing releas
On Wed, 25.05.11 13:04, Petr Lautrbach (plaut...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 11:33:50AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > today this update:
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/upstart-1.2-2.fc14
> > got pushed to F14. (FWIW, I don't see how this is consistent
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 11:33:50AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> today this update:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/upstart-1.2-2.fc14
> got pushed to F14. (FWIW, I don't see how this is consistent with the update
> policies, but that's not the matter here.)
Hi,
upstart-1.x bra
Hi,
today this update:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/upstart-1.2-2.fc14
got pushed to F14. (FWIW, I don't see how this is consistent with the update
policies, but that's not the matter here.)
The result is that systemd in F15 no longer Obsoletes the upstart in F14:
https://bugzilla.red
11 matches
Mail list logo