Re: unretiring llvm7.0

2020-05-31 Thread Jens-Ulrik Petersen
On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 12:44 AM Andy Mender wrote: > If I understand correctly, the sudden disappearance of llvm7.0 means that > now ghc is in danger as a package, because it's missing the toolchain > needed to build & package it? > llvm is only a ghc requirement for arm archs. Currently llvm7.

Re: unretiring llvm7.0

2020-05-31 Thread Gerald Henriksen
On Sat, 30 May 2020 18:43:03 +0200, you wrote: >If I understand correctly, the sudden disappearance of llvm7.0 means that >now ghc is in danger as a package, because it's missing the toolchain >needed to build & package it? Don't know anything about ghc to comment on the difficulties, but ghc 8.1

Re: unretiring llvm7.0

2020-05-30 Thread Andy Mender
If I understand correctly, the sudden disappearance of llvm7.0 means that now ghc is in danger as a package, because it's missing the toolchain needed to build & package it? I did a quick `dnf search llvm` and I see the following on my main Fedora 32 box: llvm5.0.i686 : The Low Level Virtual Machi

unretiring llvm7.0

2020-05-29 Thread Jens-Ulrik Petersen
In March llvm7.0 which had been orphaned for some reason, got retired. Unfortunately I missed the warning mails that Miro sent here. llvm7.0 is needed for aarch64 ghc:8.8, and for ghc-8.8.3 planned for F33. So I would like to unretire llvm7.0. Thanks, Jens ___