On Sat, 30 May 2020 18:43:03 +0200, you wrote:

>If I understand correctly, the sudden disappearance of llvm7.0 means that
>now ghc is in danger as a package, because it's missing the toolchain
>needed to build & package it?

Don't know anything about ghc to comment on the difficulties, but ghc
8.10.1 was released 2 months ago and uses llvm 9

>However, https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages lists only llvm9.0 and
>llvm10.0 builds.
>
>I think it's an interesting problem in general. Perhaps it would be good to
>have at least 1 extra version of GCC and LLVM other than the current
>mainline?

Isn't that already happening though with both llvm (10) and llvm9.0
being available in Fedora 32?
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to