On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 06:28:53AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 9:19 PM Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>
> > El mié, 27-06-2018 a las 11:58 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > escribió:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'd like to pick up the process of converting fedora-release from
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 9:19 PM Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> El mié, 27-06-2018 a las 11:58 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> escribió:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'd like to pick up the process of converting fedora-release from a
> > split "upstream"/"downstream" model into a single repo in src.fp.o.
> >
> >
El mié, 27-06-2018 a las 11:58 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
escribió:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to pick up the process of converting fedora-release from a
> split "upstream"/"downstream" model into a single repo in src.fp.o.
>
> For previous discussions see
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archiv
Hi,
I'd like to pick up the process of converting fedora-release from a
split "upstream"/"downstream" model into a single repo in src.fp.o.
For previous discussions see
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/CIKK4WEF5ACVWZ6EWBKNHSKKKCDTV27C/#CIKK4WEF5AC
El mar, 05-12-2017 a las 07:31 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
escribió:
> On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 12:49:48PM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > El vie, 10-11-2017 a las 09:12 -0500, Neal Gompa escribió:
> > > On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 9:04 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Fr
On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 12:49:48PM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> El vie, 10-11-2017 a las 09:12 -0500, Neal Gompa escribió:
> > On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 9:04 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 02:45:26PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > > > Zbigniew Jędrzejewski
El vie, 10-11-2017 a las 09:12 -0500, Neal Gompa escribió:
> On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 9:04 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 02:45:26PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > > Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > > The fedora-release package contains stuff that is ti
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 07:32:09AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 03:44:49PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > OK, it seems that everybody commented. The part about allowing
> > proven packagers more freedom with the package was controversial,
> > so
On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 03:44:49PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> OK, it seems that everybody commented. The part about allowing
> proven packagers more freedom with the package was controversial,
> so I'm withdrawing that, but otherwise I didn't see disagreement.
>
> Updated proposal
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 09:12:33AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 9:04 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 02:45:26PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> >> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >> > The fedora-release package contains stuff that is tie
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 9:04 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 02:45:26PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>> > The fedora-release package contains stuff that is tied to each Fedora
>> > version and changes slowly, and it also contains
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 02:45:26PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > The fedora-release package contains stuff that is tied to each Fedora
> > version and changes slowly, and it also contains the preset files for
> > systemd units, which change fairly often (a few
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> The fedora-release package contains stuff that is tied to each Fedora
> version and changes slowly, and it also contains the preset files for
> systemd units, which change fairly often (a few requests per month).
Why not have a separate fedora-presets then? Jus
On Wed, 2017-11-08 at 15:23 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > But why? _Any_ package can completely screw up the system with a bad
> > scriplet or a dependency. Let's take one step back and consider why a
> > package would need special protections: only when there's something
> > _tricky_ about the
OK, it seems that everybody commented. The part about allowing
proven packagers more freedom with the package was controversial,
so I'm withdrawing that, but otherwise I didn't see disagreement.
Updated proposal:
1. drop "upstream" at https://pagure.io/fedora-release
(PR to add an obsoletion no
On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 07:51:00PM +, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 2:45 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> > On 11/08/2017 07:13 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 10:03:30AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > >> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 9:56 AM, Zbigniew
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 2:45 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On 11/08/2017 07:13 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 10:03:30AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> >> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 9:56 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> >> wrote:
> >>> We have such special protections for t
On 11/08/2017 07:13 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 10:03:30AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 9:56 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
>> wrote:
>>> We have such special protections for the kernel (signing), firefox
>>> (trademarks),
>>> and for bo
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 7:18 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On 8 November 2017 at 13:50, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 6:47 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 05:58:13PM +, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 10:53 AM Zb
On 8 November 2017 at 13:50, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 6:47 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 05:58:13PM +, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 10:53 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
>>> zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
>>>
>>> >
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 6:47 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 05:58:13PM +, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 10:53 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
>> zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
>>
>> > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 03:23:37PM +, Peter Robinson wro
On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 05:58:13PM +, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 10:53 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
> zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 03:23:37PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> >
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 10:53 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 03:23:37PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > wrote:
> > > But why? _Any_ package can completely screw up the system with
On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 03:23:37PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 02:05:12PM +, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 8:43 AM Peter Robinson wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 a
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 02:05:12PM +, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 8:43 AM Peter Robinson wrote:
>>
>> > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 1:27 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
>> > wrote:
>> > > I propose simplif
On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 10:03:30AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 9:56 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> > We have such special protections for the kernel (signing), firefox
> > (trademarks),
> > and for bootloaders (signing again), and some packages which don't consid
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 9:56 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> We have such special protections for the kernel (signing), firefox
> (trademarks),
> and for bootloaders (signing again), and some packages which don't consider
> the fedora repo the canonical location for sources.
>
Hold the p
On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 02:05:12PM +, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 8:43 AM Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 1:27 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > wrote:
> > > I propose simplifying this and opening fedora-release releases to more
> > > contributors:
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 9:05 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 8:43 AM Peter Robinson wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 1:27 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
>> wrote:
>> > I propose simplifying this and opening fedora-release releases to more
>> > contributors:
>> >
>> >
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 8:43 AM Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 1:27 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> > I propose simplifying this and opening fedora-release releases to more
> > contributors:
> >
> > 1. Let's drop "upstream" at https://pagure.io/fedora-release and
> >
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 1:27 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> Hi fedora-release maintainers and fellow developers,
>
> The fedora-release package contains stuff that is tied to each Fedora
> version and changes slowly, and it also contains the preset files for
> systemd units, which change
Hi fedora-release maintainers and fellow developers,
The fedora-release package contains stuff that is tied to each Fedora
version and changes slowly, and it also contains the preset files for
systemd units, which change fairly often (a few requests per month).
Currently fedora-release has a fair
32 matches
Mail list logo