Re: retiring basesystem package

2025-02-07 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2025-02-07 at 18:13 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 04:54:36PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > > * Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek: > > > > > Indeed. Apparently I was too hasty with the retirement. The package is > > > being unretired, so this be resolved soo

Re: retiring basesystem package

2025-02-07 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 04:54:36PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek: > > > Indeed. Apparently I was too hasty with the retirement. The package is > > being unretired, so this be resolved soon. > > Do we need to add back the glibc dependency? I don't think so. Unless w

Re: retiring basesystem package

2025-02-07 Thread Florian Weimer
* Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek: > Indeed. Apparently I was too hasty with the retirement. The package is > being unretired, so this be resolved soon. Do we need to add back the glibc dependency? Thanks, Florian -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists

Re: retiring basesystem package

2025-02-07 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 10:04:25AM -0500, Ben Beasley wrote: > You can see the problem in this attempted build: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=128944651 > > The buildSRPMFromSCM task fails with: > > DEBUG util.py:459: Failed to resolve the transaction: > DEBUG util.py:4

Re: retiring basesystem package

2025-02-07 Thread Florian Weimer
* Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek: > On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 03:53:04PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: >> glibc depends on basesystem: >> >> Requires(pre): basesystem >> Requires: basesystem >> >> So the buildroot is currently broken. > > It shouldn't be. filesystem has 'Provides: basesystem'. > Do yo

Re: retiring basesystem package

2025-02-07 Thread Ben Beasley
You can see the problem in this attempted build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=128944651 The buildSRPMFromSCM task fails with: DEBUG util.py:459: Failed to resolve the transaction: DEBUG util.py:459: Problem 1: package dnf5-plugins-5.2.10.0-1.fc43.aarch64 from build req

Re: retiring basesystem package

2025-02-07 Thread Florian Weimer
* Florian Weimer: > * Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek: > >> On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 01:49:57PM +0100, Ondrej Vasik wrote: >>> Hi Zbigniew, >>> yes, basesystem is there just to ensure installation order and it could >>> probably be achieved by that PR. >>> There is one more benefit from the retirement

Re: retiring basesystem package

2025-02-07 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 03:53:04PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > glibc depends on basesystem: > > Requires(pre): basesystem > Requires: basesystem > > So the buildroot is currently broken. It shouldn't be. filesystem has 'Provides: basesystem'. Do you have more details about the issue? Zbyszek

Re: retiring basesystem package

2025-02-07 Thread Florian Weimer
* Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek: > On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 01:49:57PM +0100, Ondrej Vasik wrote: >> Hi Zbigniew, >> yes, basesystem is there just to ensure installation order and it could >> probably be achieved by that PR. >> There is one more benefit from the retirement - as there are >> occasiona

Re: retiring basesystem package

2025-02-07 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 01:49:57PM +0100, Ondrej Vasik wrote: > Hi Zbigniew, > yes, basesystem is there just to ensure installation order and it could > probably be achieved by that PR. > There is one more benefit from the retirement - as there are > occasionally bug reports (that should be filed a

Re: retiring basesystem package

2025-02-06 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 01:49:57PM +0100, Ondrej Vasik wrote: > Hi Zbigniew, > yes, basesystem is there just to ensure installation order and it could > probably be achieved by that PR. > There is one more benefit from the retirement - as there are > occasionally bug reports (that should be filed a

Re: retiring basesystem package

2025-02-06 Thread Panu Matilainen
On 2/6/25 2:50 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 7:18 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: Hi, I was looking at early system installation, and we have filesystem, basesystem, and setup, all competing for the title of the early filesystem setup… It seems that basesystem is the easi

Re: retiring basesystem package

2025-02-06 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 07:50:24AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 7:18 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I was looking at early system installation, and we have filesystem, > > basesystem, and setup, all competing for the title of the early > > filesyst

Re: retiring basesystem package

2025-02-06 Thread Neal Gompa
On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 7:18 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > Hi, > > I was looking at early system installation, and we have filesystem, > basesystem, and setup, all competing for the title of the early > filesystem setup… It seems that basesystem is the easiest to > eliminate: it has no

Re: retiring basesystem package

2025-02-06 Thread Ondrej Vasik
Hi Zbigniew, yes, basesystem is there just to ensure installation order and it could probably be achieved by that PR. There is one more benefit from the retirement - as there are occasionally bug reports (that should be filed against distribution) reported as basesystem issues (similarly to setup p

retiring basesystem package

2025-02-06 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
Hi, I was looking at early system installation, and we have filesystem, basesystem, and setup, all competing for the title of the early filesystem setup… It seems that basesystem is the easiest to eliminate: it has no files and no scriptlets. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/filesystem/pull-req