Alexander Kurtakov wrote:
> complaining either for shipping too newer or too old version. And with the
> current manpower we took the side of the newer versions, read as we don't
> take care for compat libs but others are free to do so. Yet this is
> causing a lot of disruption but this is the same
On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 10:55 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> As a former contributor to both projects I will say the common ground is easy
> to find; users want stuff to just work and do not care about politics. The
Unfortunately, whenever this statement is made, the definition of
'politics' turns
On 13:24:10 Tuesday 23 August 2011 Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Le Lun 22 août 2011 13:42, Alexander Kurtakov a écrit :
> > Nicolas, while this was true things have changed dramatically last year
> > and Fedora is now what JPackage was in the past ...
> >
> > Fedora might even be the first to ship JBo
Le Lun 22 août 2011 13:42, Alexander Kurtakov a écrit :
> Nicolas, while this was true things have changed dramatically last year and
> Fedora is now what JPackage was in the past ...
> Fedora might even be the first to ship JBossAS7 - in a true community manner -
> synced with the rest of the d
Excerpts from Denis Arnaud's message of Sun Aug 21 15:05:59 +0200 2011:
> Hello Olivier,
>
> 2011/8/21
>
> > I want to package an application that depends on jets3t. It is packaged in
> > Jpackage. I see in fact that many Java packages are available in JPackage.
> >
> > What is the usual behavior
On 14:19:51 Monday 22 August 2011 Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Le Dim 21 août 2011 13:24, Olivier Sallou a écrit :
> > What is the usual behavior in this case ? Should I check with maintainer
> > if package can be "moved" to Fedora ? (and do it myself if he does not
> > wish to do so)
>
> If done clea
Le Dim 21 août 2011 13:24, Olivier Sallou a écrit :
> What is the usual behavior in this case ? Should I check with maintainer if
> package can be "moved" to Fedora ? (and do it myself if he does not wish to do
> so)
If done cleanly importing packages from JPackage to Fedora is fine and will be
Excerpts from Olivier Sallou's message of Sun Aug 21 13:24:16 +0200
2011:
> Hi,
> I have a question regarding packaging for Fedora.
>
>
> I want to package an application that depends on jets3t. It is packaged in
> Jpackage.
> I see in fact that many Java packages are available in JPackage.
>
>
>
On Sun, 2011-08-21 at 13:24 +0200, Olivier Sallou wrote:
>
> There are Fedora "core", EPEL, JPackage... it is not really clear for
> newcomers to see several repository, and what are their
> relationships...
Since your are french, I would invite do check out the french
documentation on http://ww
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 01:24:16PM +0200, Olivier Sallou wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a question regarding packaging for Fedora.
>
> I want to package an application that depends on jets3t. It is packaged in
> Jpackage.
> I see in fact that many Java packages are available in JPackage.
>
> What is the u
Hello Olivier,
2011/8/21
> I want to package an application that depends on jets3t. It is packaged in
> Jpackage. I see in fact that many Java packages are available in JPackage.
>
> What is the usual behavior in this case ?
As I understand from the following:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ja
Hi,
I have a question regarding packaging for Fedora.
I want to package an application that depends on jets3t. It is packaged in
Jpackage.
I see in fact that many Java packages are available in JPackage.
What is the usual behavior in this case ? Should I check with maintainer if
package c
12 matches
Mail list logo
