> Anyways, there are easy ways in Autotools to archieve this, and I can
> craft a patch, if you guide me to the canonical upstream of audit.
And even if you don't patch it, the need to export [1] a PYTHON
variable in the environment is exactly what should be done.
The tragedy of autotools is that
On 8/3/19 12:01 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 8/1/19 2:44 PM, Steve Grubb wrote:
> [snip]
>
> I don't know if any list admins are following this list, but this email
> was delayed almost two days. From the headers (included below) it looks
> like it might have been stuck in a moderation queue. Is
Am Donnerstag, den 01.08.2019, 17:44 -0400 schrieb Steve Grubb:
> On Thursday, August 1, 2019 4:37:01 AM EDT Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > On 01. 08. 19 4:43, Steve Grubb wrote:
> > > Audit. But is seems that autotools shoul hard code the old
> > > sematics so
> > > that all packages do the right thing.
On 8/1/19 2:44 PM, Steve Grubb wrote:
[snip]
I don't know if any list admins are following this list, but this email
was delayed almost two days. From the headers (included below) it looks
like it might have been stuck in a moderation queue. Is that what
happened? I've noticed a few older e
On Friday, August 2, 2019 8:15:24 AM EDT Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 02. 08. 19 5:21, Steve Grubb wrote:
> > On Thursday, August 1, 2019 6:37:47 PM EDT Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >> On 01. 08. 19 23:44, Steve Grubb wrote:
> >>> On Thursday, August 1, 2019 4:37:01 AM EDT Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 01. 08
On 02. 08. 19 5:21, Steve Grubb wrote:
On Thursday, August 1, 2019 6:37:47 PM EDT Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 01. 08. 19 23:44, Steve Grubb wrote:
On Thursday, August 1, 2019 4:37:01 AM EDT Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 01. 08. 19 4:43, Steve Grubb wrote:
Audit. But is seems that autotools shoul hard cod
On 02. 08. 19 10:57, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 02. 08. 19 5:21, Steve Grubb wrote:
On Thursday, August 1, 2019 6:37:47 PM EDT Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 01. 08. 19 23:44, Steve Grubb wrote:
On Thursday, August 1, 2019 4:37:01 AM EDT Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 01. 08. 19 4:43, Steve Grubb wrote:
Audit.
On 02. 08. 19 5:21, Steve Grubb wrote:
On Thursday, August 1, 2019 6:37:47 PM EDT Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 01. 08. 19 23:44, Steve Grubb wrote:
On Thursday, August 1, 2019 4:37:01 AM EDT Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 01. 08. 19 4:43, Steve Grubb wrote:
Audit. But is seems that autotools shoul hard cod
On Thursday, August 1, 2019 6:37:47 PM EDT Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 01. 08. 19 23:44, Steve Grubb wrote:
> > On Thursday, August 1, 2019 4:37:01 AM EDT Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >> On 01. 08. 19 4:43, Steve Grubb wrote:
> >>> Audit. But is seems that autotools shoul hard code the old sematics so
> >>>
On 01. 08. 19 23:44, Steve Grubb wrote:
On Thursday, August 1, 2019 4:37:01 AM EDT Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 01. 08. 19 4:43, Steve Grubb wrote:
Audit. But is seems that autotools shoul hard code the old sematics so
that all packages do the right thing. It seems that python3 equivalents
have been
On Thursday, August 1, 2019 4:37:01 AM EDT Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 01. 08. 19 4:43, Steve Grubb wrote:
> > Audit. But is seems that autotools shoul hard code the old sematics so
> > that all packages do the right thing. It seems that python3 equivalents
> > have been introduced. They do the right
On 01. 08. 19 4:43, Steve Grubb wrote:
Audit. But is seems that autotools shoul hard code the old sematics so that
all packages do the right thing. It seems that python3 equivalents have been
introduced. They do the right thing with the python migration. But there are
things that are expectd to d
On Wednesday, July 31, 2019 7:08:57 PM EDT Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 01. 08. 19 0:03, Steve Grubb wrote:
> > I have a package that fails to build because libraries aren't where they
> > are suposed to be. I looked at the project page
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python_means_Pytho
> > Subject: Re: python2->python3 mass rebuild and auto tools
> >
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> >
> > > From: "Steve Grubb"
> > > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
> > >
> > >
On 01. 08. 19 1:08, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 01. 08. 19 0:03, Steve Grubb wrote:
I have pyexec_PYTHON. What is supposed to be there? And since this is an
upstream package consumed by all distributions and old versions of Fedora/
RHEL, what is the portable thing to do?
There's other things out th
On 01. 08. 19 0:03, Steve Grubb wrote:
Hello,
Hi Steve.
I have a package that fails to build because libraries aren't where they are
suposed to be. I looked at the project page
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python_means_Python3
and there is no mention of the effect on autotools.
- Original Message -
> From: "Charalampos Stratakis"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Thursday, August 1, 2019 1:03:51 AM
> Subject: Re: python2->python3 mass rebuild and auto tools
>
>
>
> - Orig
- Original Message -
> From: "Steve Grubb"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Thursday, August 1, 2019 12:03:01 AM
> Subject: python2->python3 mass rebuild and auto tools
>
> Hello,
>
> I have a package that
Hello,
I have a package that fails to build because libraries aren't where they are
suposed to be. I looked at the project page
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python_means_Python3
and there is no mention of the effect on autotools.
I have pyexec_PYTHON. What is supposed to be there? An
19 matches
Mail list logo
