Am Donnerstag, den 01.08.2019, 17:44 -0400 schrieb Steve Grubb:
> On Thursday, August 1, 2019 4:37:01 AM EDT Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > On 01. 08. 19 4:43, Steve Grubb wrote:
> > > Audit. But is seems that autotools shoul hard code the old
> > > sematics so
> > > that all packages do the right thing. It seems that python3
> > > equivalents
> > > have been introduced. They do the right thing with the python
> > > migration.
> > > But there are things that are expectd to defaulto python 2.
> > 
> > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/audit/pull-request/4
> > 
> > Autotools usually already does the right thing, aka choosing python2
> > if it
> > cannot find python. Using "python" in Fedora packages is forbidden
> > anyway.
> 
> I applied your patch. Thanks.
> 
> But I am concerned that this is a bandaid because it patches the spec
> file and 
> all distributions will have to do the same thing.


Just until the end of this year, as Python2 will be finally dead on
2020-01-01.

Anyways, there are easy ways in Autotools to archieve this, and I can
craft a patch, if you guide me to the canonical upstream of audit.

Björn

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to