On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 9:04 PM, Dridi Boukelmoune
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Maybe we should add guidelines for bitbucket. That could be very
> similar to github's template:
>
> ===
> %global owner $OWNER
> %global tag $TAG
> %global commit $COMMIT
> %global shortcommit %(c=%{commit}; ech
Hi,
Maybe we should add guidelines for bitbucket. That could be very
similar to github's template:
===
%global owner $OWNER
%global tag $TAG
%global commit $COMMIT
%global shortcommit %(c=%{commit}; echo ${c:0:12})
...
Source0:https://bitbucket.org/%{owner}/%{name}/ge
On Feb 26, 2014 7:00 PM, "Tim Lauridsen" wrote:
> The problem with this project is that there is no release tags, so you
cant get a specific version, just download the current master
> this is not very usefull for a fedora package.
You can ask them to tag it from now on. I always do that.
--
dev
На 26.02.2014 13:00, Tim Lauridsen написа:
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Christopher Meng wrote:
Bitbucket has downloads support.
Also you can get the tarball from the tags.
What's the problem?
The problem with this project is that there is no release tags, so you cant
get a specific
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Christopher Meng wrote:
> Bitbucket has downloads support.
>
> Also you can get the tarball from the tags.
>
> What's the problem?
>
>
>
The problem with this project is that there is no release tags, so you cant
get a specific version, just download the current m
На 26.02.2014 12:11, Tim Lauridsen написа:
Seems like bitbucket uses unversioned tar ball, not the best approch
https://bitbucket.org/yarosla/httpress/get/tip.tar.gz
I would make my own tarball from the git checkout and document in the
spec how to make it
For example:
https://bitbucket.org/
Bitbucket has downloads support.
Also you can get the tarball from the tags.
What's the problem?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On 26.02.2014 10:16, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
Hello,
I've submitted a while ago a review-request on a package [0] that is
taken from bitbucket.org. Unfortunately there was no reviewer yet, and I
suspect that is because unlike github [1] we have no rules on how to
handle bitbucket. Have o
Seems like bitbucket uses unversioned tar ball, not the best approch
https://bitbucket.org/yarosla/httpress/get/tip.tar.gz
I would make my own tarball from the git checkout and document in the
spec how to make it
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Using_Revision_Control
Tim
Hello,
I've submitted a while ago a review-request on a package [0] that is
taken from bitbucket.org. Unfortunately there was no reviewer yet, and I
suspect that is because unlike github [1] we have no rules on how to
handle bitbucket. Have other packagers experienced something similar in
other so
10 matches
Mail list logo
