Seems like bitbucket uses unversioned tar ball, not the best approch https://bitbucket.org/yarosla/httpress/get/tip.tar.gz
I would make my own tarball from the git checkout and document in the spec how to make it https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Using_Revision_Control Tim On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 10:16 AM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <n...@redhat.com>wrote: > Hello, > I've submitted a while ago a review-request on a package [0] that is > taken from bitbucket.org. Unfortunately there was no reviewer yet, and I > suspect that is because unlike github [1] we have no rules on how to > handle bitbucket. Have other packagers experienced something similar in > other software? Is there a "good" way to handle repository-distributed > software? As it is now in [0] I've tried to simulate the github rules on > bitbucket. > > regards, > Nikos > > > [0]. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062282 > [1]. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Github > > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
