On Fri, 10 Jul 2020 20:05:07 +0200, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Perhaps a compromise could be to generate them for rawhide builds, but
> not stable releases and if someone needs to debug things ask them to use
> the rawhide one/debuginfo?
That is not useful, system debuginfos are there to catch bugs easi
On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 06:15:54PM +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Tue, 07 Jul 2020 21:11:31 +0200, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > I am not sure what to tell you here. Perhaps you could describe the
> > reason you are working on the chromium debuginfo? Is it broken? Missing?
> > Less useful that normal?
On Tue, 07 Jul 2020 21:11:31 +0200, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> I am not sure what to tell you here. Perhaps you could describe the
> reason you are working on the chromium debuginfo? Is it broken? Missing?
> Less useful that normal?
Missing. Completely.
And it is not just about enabling it (=remove it
On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 07:55:09AM +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Fri, 03 Jul 2020 14:52:00 +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> > On Thu, 02 Jul 2020 02:04:48 +0200, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 11:22:26PM +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> > > > I will file a ticket after Spot says h
On Fri, 03 Jul 2020 14:52:00 +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Thu, 02 Jul 2020 02:04:48 +0200, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 11:22:26PM +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> > > I will file a ticket after Spot says his opinion (or not).
> >
> > Sure.
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/
On Thu, 02 Jul 2020 02:04:48 +0200, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 11:22:26PM +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> > I will file a ticket after Spot says his opinion (or not).
>
> Sure.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/chromium/pull-request/27
__
On Thu, 02 Jul 2020 02:04:48 +0200, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> I have fixed the buildhw-x86 boxes, they all now have ~365GB now.
Yes, it has built fine:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=46455864
> Sorry, I misunderstood you... I thought you were wanting to test a
> scratch
On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 11:22:26PM +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Jul 2020 17:46:23 +0200, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > * Is this only on x86_64 that you need this? Or all arches?
>
> Sure we should have this on all arches but I haven't tested non-x86_64 yet.
> There possibly may be also some
On Wed, 01 Jul 2020 17:46:23 +0200, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> * Is this only on x86_64 that you need this? Or all arches?
Sure we should have this on all arches but I haven't tested non-x86_64 yet.
There possibly may be also some memory problems even on x86_64 (it builds on
my machine w/64GB but Koji h
On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 03:38:26PM +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Jul 2020 15:14:09 +0200, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > At the moment we have about 10% of the hardware
> > we shipped back in operation and there are at least 2 to 3 weeks to
> > get the rest up. Getting up larger builde
On Wed, 1 Jul 2020 at 09:38, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
>
> On Wed, 01 Jul 2020 15:14:09 +0200, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > At the moment we have about 10% of the hardware
> > we shipped back in operation and there are at least 2 to 3 weeks to
> > get the rest up. Getting up larger builders is goin
On Wed, 01 Jul 2020 15:14:09 +0200, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> At the moment we have about 10% of the hardware
> we shipped back in operation and there are at least 2 to 3 weeks to
> get the rest up. Getting up larger builders is going to have to wait.
Sure there is no hurry with larger builder
On Wed, 1 Jul 2020 at 08:09, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
>
> On Wed, 01 Jul 2020 13:43:57 +0200, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > In the end we have limited resources and you are running into those
> > limits. We can either have fewer builders with more disk space and a
> > long queue of builds or we can
On Wednesday, July 1, 2020 2:00:09 PM CEST Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Jul 2020 13:43:57 +0200, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
> > In the end we have limited resources and you are running into those
> > limits. We can either have fewer builders with more disk space and a
> > long queue of bu
On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 02:00:09PM +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Jul 2020 13:43:57 +0200, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > In the end we have limited resources and you are running into those
> > limits. We can either have fewer builders with more disk space and a
> > long queue of builds
On Wed, 01 Jul 2020 13:43:57 +0200, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> In the end we have limited resources and you are running into those
> limits. We can either have fewer builders with more disk space and a
> long queue of builds or we can have more builders with smaller disk
> space.
Good to know d
On Wed, 1 Jul 2020 at 02:09, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have tried to enable debuginfo for Chromium but it cannot fit the disk.
> During local build it has 160GB (on x86_64) and Koji shows (moreover AFAIK
> shared for multiple builders):
>
> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//wo
Hi,
I have tried to enable debuginfo for Chromium but it cannot fit the disk.
During local build it has 160GB (on x86_64) and Koji shows (moreover AFAIK
shared for multiple builders):
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/7099/46377099/hw_info.log
Filesystem Size Use
18 matches
Mail list logo
