On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 06:15:54PM +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > On Tue, 07 Jul 2020 21:11:31 +0200, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > I am not sure what to tell you here. Perhaps you could describe the > > reason you are working on the chromium debuginfo? Is it broken? Missing? > > Less useful that normal? > > Missing. Completely. > > And it is not just about enabling it (=remove its disable) because with > default Fedora building options (no -fdebug-types-section and using DWZ) the > build will fail. That is because debuginfo will exceed 4GB which is the limit > of DWARF32 format and GNU tools do not much support DWARF64. > Enable debuginfo for x86_64 and aarch64. > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/chromium/pull-request/27 > > > > All I see in this thread is that you were working on it and it increased > > disk space usage, I must have missed the background/goal here? > > The goal is to have debuginfo for Chromium. Or why other Fedora packages have > debuginfo but Chromium does not?
Well, if you can't convince the maintainer, you're welcome to escalate it to FESCo I suppose. I don't think there's a guideline that requires them to exist, but they are definitely handy sometimes. Perhaps a compromise could be to generate them for rawhide builds, but not stable releases and if someone needs to debug things ask them to use the rawhide one/debuginfo? kevin PS: I'm subscribed to the list, there's no need to specifically cc me on posts.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
