On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 12:51 PM Andy Mender wrote:
>
> On Sun, 12 Jul 2020 at 18:09, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 5:39 AM Andy Mender wrote:
>> >
>> >On updates, a single automatic corrupted snapshot can
>> > potentially hose the entire snapshotted volume.
>>
>> How do you
On Sun, 12 Jul 2020 at 18:09, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 5:39 AM Andy Mender
> wrote:
> >
> >On updates, a single automatic corrupted snapshot can
> > potentially hose the entire snapshotted volume.
>
> How do you mean? If this is a sort of superficial corruption like a
> bad/
On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 5:39 AM Andy Mender wrote:
>
>On updates, a single automatic corrupted snapshot can
> potentially hose the entire snapshotted volume.
How do you mean? If this is a sort of superficial corruption like a
bad/failed/partial update, inconsistency between package manager and
wh
On Sat, 11 Jul 2020 at 18:05, Neal Becker wrote:
> I think if we really want to advocate for btrfs, we also should provide
> the
> tools to take full advantage of it. I've been using btrfs since it was
> offered as an option on Fedora. On Ubuntu, there is a tool "snapper" to
> help manage snaps
On Sat, 2020-07-11 at 12:05 -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
> I think if we really want to advocate for btrfs, we also should
> provide the
> tools to take full advantage of it. I've been using btrfs since it
> was
> offered as an option on Fedora. On Ubuntu, there is a tool "snapper"
> to
> help man
I think if we really want to advocate for btrfs, we also should provide the
tools to take full advantage of it. I've been using btrfs since it was
offered as an option on Fedora. On Ubuntu, there is a tool "snapper" to
help manage snapshots. Unfortunately I didn't manage to get this setup on
