Stephen Gallagher, Mon, 11 Oct 2010 08:34:18 -0400:
> Sorry, I think I was confusing daapd with another (system-critical)
> component. You probably need to contact the maintainer of the original
> mt-daapd and make sure they're on-board with switching to this new
> forked version, as well as trying
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/11/2010 08:30 AM, Matej Cepl wrote:
> Stephen Gallagher, Mon, 11 Oct 2010 08:20:08 -0400:
>> Being that it's a different upstream project now, you need to create a
>> new package in Fedora. Once that's reviewed and included in the
>> packageset,
Stephen Gallagher, Mon, 11 Oct 2010 08:20:08 -0400:
> Being that it's a different upstream project now, you need to create a
> new package in Fedora. Once that's reviewed and included in the
> packageset, you should raise the question of default inclusion with
> FESCo.
Sure, no problem. Just I don
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/11/2010 08:12 AM, Matej Cepl wrote:
> mt-daapd in Fedora (and EPEL) is nothing than life of pain (crashes,
> sudden unexaplained stops, etc.) and its upstream is dead.
>
> There is now fork of it (http://blog.technologeek.org/category/hacks/
>
mt-daapd in Fedora (and EPEL) is nothing than life of pain (crashes,
sudden unexaplained stops, etc.) and its upstream is dead.
There is now fork of it (http://blog.technologeek.org/category/hacks/
forked-daapd) which shows some life and hope it could be acutally
maintained by somebody who at le
