Just realized I never posted my final update to this thread, so in case anyone
else ever wanders here looking for answers:
Any precompiled glib schema file is not needed -- if the *.gschema.xml file(s)
are moved to %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/glib-2.0/schemas/ at the end of the
%install section
Am Sun, 26 Feb 2017 05:12:38 -
schrieb "Andrew Toskin" :
> > On Feb 25, 2017 16:15, "Michael Catanzaro"
> > >
> > Interesting... guess I'm wrong then!
> >
> > I think that can be deleted?
> >
> >
> > It's possible that the extension searches for the schema source
> > (not sure if I'm gett
> On Feb 25, 2017 16:15, "Michael Catanzaro"
> Interesting... guess I'm wrong then!
>
> I think that can be deleted?
>
>
> It's possible that the extension searches for the schema source (not sure
> if I'm getting the terminology right) in a specific directory. Something
> like some extension
On Feb 25, 2017 16:15, "Michael Catanzaro" wrote:
On Sat, 2017-02-25 at 07:57 +, Andrew Toskin wrote:
> > > * if the package includes *precompiled* gschema... remove it?
> >
> > No, because these don't exist (at least I don't think so). All
> > installed gschemas are compiled at once based on
On Sat, 2017-02-25 at 07:57 +, Andrew Toskin wrote:
> > > * if the package includes *precompiled* gschema... remove it?
> >
> > No, because these don't exist (at least I don't think so). All
> > installed gschemas are compiled at once based on the schemas
> > installed
> > on the system, and
> > * if the package includes *precompiled* gschema... remove it?
> No, because these don't exist (at least I don't think so). All
> installed gschemas are compiled at once based on the schemas installed
> on the system, and there are no precompiled schemas.
A few of packages' sources include a g
On Sat, 2017-02-25 at 01:04 +, Andrew Toskin wrote:
> I'd just like to confirm what actions I need to take for my RPM
> specs, then, if any. Does this sound right?
>
> * if the package source includes a .gschema.xml file, it's okay, and
> needed, so leave it alone.
Yes.
> * if the package so
I'd just like to confirm what actions I need to take for my RPM specs, then, if
any. Does this sound right?
* if the package source includes a .gschema.xml file, it's okay, and needed, so
leave it alone.
* if the package source includes a Makefile, which compiles the gschema file,
then the sche
> It used to be important. The review criteria should be updated. Do you
> want to file a bug with fedora-review?
Looks like there's already an open bug report:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409315
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fed
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 5:09 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-02-24 at 21:15 +, Andrew Toskin wrote:
>> But then why is this such a prominent "Issue" in the output
>> review.txt file?
>
> It used to be important. The review criteria should be updated. Do you
> want to file a bug wit
On Fri, 2017-02-24 at 21:15 +, Andrew Toskin wrote:
> But then why is this such a prominent "Issue" in the output
> review.txt file?
It used to be important. The review criteria should be updated. Do you
want to file a bug with fedora-review?
> And why does it warn me even when nothing in th
> gsettings schema compilation is automatically handled these days with an
> rpm file trigger that glib2 sets up. There's no need to add
> glib-compile-schemas %postun and %postrans scripts any more (but they
> won't hurt either and are required for EPEL7 if you want to keep the
> same spec file).
Am 24.02.2017 um 06:19 schrieb Andrew Toskin:
I'm a new Fedora packager; my very first packages have not yet been accepted.
I'm working on RPM packages for a few GNOME Shell extensions. Things are mostly
going well, except that `fedora-review` complains about gschemas in the
packages, and I'm
On 02/24/2017 06:20 AM, Andrew Toskin wrote:
> I'm a new Fedora packager; my very first packages have not yet been accepted.
> I'm working on RPM packages for a few GNOME Shell extensions. Things are
> mostly going well, except that `fedora-review` complains about gschemas in
> the packages, and
> I could help edit the wiki if only someone
...if only someone would explain to me what this is about **
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
I'm a new Fedora packager; my very first packages have not yet been accepted.
I'm working on RPM packages for a few GNOME Shell extensions. Things are mostly
going well, except that `fedora-review` complains about gschemas in the
packages, and I'm not entirely sure what this is supposed to be te
I'm a new Fedora packager; my very first packages have not yet been accepted.
I'm working on RPM packages for a few GNOME Shell extensions. Things are mostly
going well, except that `fedora-review` complains about gschemas in the
packages, and I'm not entirely sure what this is supposed to be te
17 matches
Mail list logo
