Am Sun, 26 Feb 2017 05:12:38 -0000 schrieb "Andrew Toskin" <and...@tosk.in>:
> > On Feb 25, 2017 16:15, "Michael Catanzaro" > > <mcatanzaro(a)gnome.org> wrote: > > > > Interesting... guess I'm wrong then! > > > > I think that can be deleted? > > > > > > It's possible that the extension searches for the schema source > > (not sure if I'm getting the terminology right) in a specific > > directory. Something like some extension did it until we patched it > > to try the default directory too - > > https://github.com/endlessm/coding-shell-extensions/commit/45e5c2b3bfaf86... > > > > I tried adding a line to my RPM spec to delete the gschemas.compiled > file, rebuilt and reinstalled the package. Trying to enable the > extension failed, with the message "could not open > file /.../gschemas.compiled" > > So I guess that answers that. The compiled and XML version of the > schema files are necessary where they are in the extension source. > > If this is somehow wrong, then several shell extensions, including > most of the ones I'm packaging right now, will need a bug report, > and/or patches... I did not find anything in the guidelines, whether it's allowed or not, but it's definitely not needed. I have only two extension in Fedora, but both do not have precompiled glib-schema-files. The problem might be, that many extensions are made for local-install only and do not have a real build-system, that works for local and system-wide install. Jens (jenslody)
pgpq0797vhDWH.pgp
Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
