Ben Rosser wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 2:59 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
>> Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>
>>> This is a bit unfortunate considering this is package
>>> every Fedora packager has to have installed
>>
>> I don't think that's true, can you explain?
> Well, the "join the package collection main
On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 9:15 PM Ben Rosser wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 2:59 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
> > Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >
> >> This is a bit unfortunate considering this is package
> >> every Fedora packager has to have installed
> >
> > I don't think that's true, can you explain?
> >
> >
On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 2:59 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>> This is a bit unfortunate considering this is package
>> every Fedora packager has to have installed
>
> I don't think that's true, can you explain?
>
> -- rex
Well, the "join the package collection maintainers" document
Vít Ondruch wrote:
> This is a bit unfortunate considering this is package
> every Fedora packager has to have installed
I don't think that's true, can you explain?
-- rex
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an e
Hi,
I am wondering what is the purpose of fedora-packager package and what
is its future? It seems to be abandoned upstream as well as in Fedora
[1, 2, 3, 4]. This is a bit unfortunate considering this is package
every Fedora packager has to have installed. Is there a chance to give
that package a
